
Miro is a go-to tool for me when it comes to visual collaboration and mapping out ideas with the team. What stands out most is how easy it is to sketch out process flows, user journeys, or wireframes—basically, anything that needs to be visualized. The interface is intuitive, so I can quickly get ideas down and iterate as needed, which is a huge plus when working through complex workflows or trying to get everyone on the same page.
I also really value how Miro supports rapid prototyping. I can build out wireframes or mockups, share them instantly, and get feedback right on the board. This makes it easy to update designs and keep everyone aligned without slowing down the process.
The template library is another big win. There’s almost always a template that fits what I need, whether it’s for brainstorming, workshops, or mapping out user stories. It saves a ton of time and lets me focus on the actual content instead of building frameworks from scratch.
Integration is key for me, and Miro does a good job here. It connects with tools like OneDrive and project management platforms, so I can keep everything linked and organized. This helps maintain a single source of truth for the team.
Finally, the real-time collaboration features—comments, mentions, voting, timers—make meetings and workshops more interactive and productive, especially when working with remote or hybrid teams.
Miro isn’t built for coding or heavy analytics, but for visual mapping, collaboration, and prototyping, it’s hard to beat. It’s become an essential part of how I plan projects, iterate on ideas, and keep stakeholders engaged. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
If I had to call out what I don’t love about Miro, a few things come to mind—mostly around its limitations and a few workflow hiccups.
First off, Miro isn’t built for coding or deep analytics, so if I need to do anything beyond visual mapping or prototyping, I have to switch tools. That can break the flow, especially if I’m trying to keep everything in one place.
Sometimes, the boards can get a bit unwieldy, especially on bigger projects. When there’s a lot going on, it can be tough to keep things organized or find what I need quickly. The search and navigation features are decent, but not perfect—so I end up spending extra time hunting for specific notes or diagrams.
Performance can also take a hit with really large boards or when a lot of people are collaborating at once. Things can lag, which slows down meetings or workshops and makes it harder to keep everyone engaged.
While the integrations are solid for the basics, there are times when I wish Miro played even nicer with some of the more specialized tools in my stack. There’s room for improvement in how it syncs data or updates across platforms.
Finally, the pricing can add up if I want to unlock all the features or bring in a bigger team. For smaller projects or occasional use, it’s fine, but for heavy, ongoing collaboration, the cost is something to consider.
Overall, Miro is great for what it does, but it’s not a one-stop shop for every part of the workflow. There are a few rough edges, especially when it comes to scale, performance, and deeper integrations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
At G2, we prefer fresh reviews and we like to follow up with reviewers. They may not have updated their review text, but have updated their review.
The reviewer uploaded a screenshot or submitted the review in-app verifying them as current user.
Validated through Google One Tap using a business email account
This reviewer was offered a nominal incentive as thanks for completing this review.
Invitation from a seller or affiliate. This reviewer was offered a nominal incentive as thanks for completing this review.






