Top 10 Miro Alternatives & Competitors

(13,777)4.6 out of 5

Thousands of users compare Miro with other Visual Collaboration Platforms tools to find the best fit for their team or business. Visual Collaboration Platforms is used by teams seeking easily administered, innovative platforms with features like notifications, file sharing, and document collaboration, according to G2 reviews. When comparing Miro with other tools, reviewers most often evaluate user journeys and project management as key differentiators.
The best overall alternative to Miro is Mural, rated ~4.6 stars on G2 from 1452+ reviewers. It is frequently praised for team collaboration and real-time collaboration. Other well-known alternatives to Miro are:

• Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite – known for easy creation and diagramming (G2 star rating ~4.5)
• Creately – highly rated for templates and diagramming (G2 star rating ~4.4)
• Visio – offers templates and shapes variety (G2 star rating ~4.2)
• ClickUp – best suited for teams that need tailored workflows and unified work hub (G2 star rating ~4.6)

Browse top options below. Based on G2 review data, Miro is most commonly used in industries like Visual Collaboration Platforms, Diagramming Software, Collaborative Whiteboard Software. Compare user ratings by vertical to find the best fit.

G2 offers free advice on alternatives to Miro.

Chat with an expert

How would you like to receive Software Advice?

FormAnswer questions at your own pace, no call required.

AI AgentChat live and get a recommendation in minutes.

Phone CallTalk it through live with a software advisor.

Top 10 Alternatives to Miro Recently Reviewed By G2 Community

Mural
By Mural
4.6/5(1,513)
Product Description
Mural is on a mission to help every go-to-market team achieve alignment. With the right tools to collaborate, ideate, and execute customer-centered strategies, organizations can break down the silos that slow success down and get results, faster. Mural offers an intuitive and interactive collaboration space with purpose-built templates, enterprise-grade security, and industry-leading methodologies for the customer-obsessed. GTM teams can come together on an infinite canvas that is flexible and visual to brainstorm ideas, plan project timelines, and execute together quickly. Mural’s Facilitation Superpowers lead to increased engagement from teams, customers, and GTM partners, which transforms every meeting into a co-creation session. Mapping and storyboarding features speed up buy-in and decision making by demonstrating an understanding of customers’ needs and how to meet them. Mural AI can summarize key takeaways from interactions, or suggest new ideas to strategize how to get to ‘yes.’ Out-of-the-box and custom templates make it easy to share best practices to level up every teammate to be customer-obsessed.
Reviewers say compared to Miro, Mural is:
Slower to reach roi
Better at support
Easier to do business with
Categories in common with Miro:
Visual Collaboration Platforms
Customer Journey Mapping
Mind Mapping
Collaborative Whiteboard
Strategy And Innovation Roadmapping Tools
What G2 Reviewers Say About Miro vs Mural
G2 reviewers describe Miro as a flexible infinite-canvas workspace for brainstorming, technical diagrams, process mapping, and collaborative planning. Reviewers value its templates, real-time participation, and ability to keep varied content together, while noting that large, information-heavy boards can become cluttered or slower to navigate and that some advanced capabilities require a paid plan.
G2 reviewers characterize Mural as an intuitive, structured workshop environment, highlighting its extensive framework and template catalog, anonymous voting, automatic connectors, and tools for turning remote meetings into interactive sessions. Reviewers also note occasional lag on dense, high-concurrency boards, along with limitations around importing diagrams and specialized vector or formatting work.
• Miro reviewers emphasize a flexible canvas for technical architecture diagrams, workflows, and mixed media, while Mural reviewers emphasize prebuilt frameworks, anonymous voting, and structured workshop activities.
• Mural reviewers value automatic arrow adjustment and smart alignment for decision trees, while Miro reviewers describe more hands-on flowchart creation.
• Mural reviewers cite limitations importing diagrams, while Miro reviewers value its diagramming elements but note fewer templates for software engineering work.

1. AI can help you find the answers. G2 helps you trust them.

   Connect G2 to Claude or ChatGPT for answers grounded in G2's trusted reviews, comparisons, and pricing from real user insights.

   How it works

   Connect G2 to ChatGPTConnect G2 to Claude

Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
By Lucid Software Inc.
4.5/5(9,092)
Product Description
Lucidchart is an intelligent diagramming application for understanding the people, processes and systems that drive business forward.
Reviewers say compared to Miro, Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite is:
Slower to reach roi
Easier to admin
Better at support
Categories in common with Miro:
Visual Collaboration Platforms
Customer Journey Mapping
Mind Mapping
Collaborative Whiteboard
Org Chart
What G2 Reviewers Say About Miro vs Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
G2 reviewers describe Miro as a flexible, infinite-canvas workspace suited to brainstorming, workshops, process mapping, and keeping varied content together. Compared with Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite’s structured diagramming emphasis, reviewers value Miro’s freedom and real-time participation, while noting that large boards can become cluttered, slower to navigate, and harder to organize.
G2 reviewers highlight Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite for detailed, professional diagrams, broad shape and template libraries, and drag-and-drop process mapping with real-time collaboration. In contrast to Miro’s open-ended canvas, reviewers describe Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite as more structured for workflows, architecture diagrams, and organizational charts, while noting connector complexity, occasional lag on dense diagrams, and limited offline use.
• Miro reviewers value an infinite canvas for mixed content and exploratory workshops, whereas Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite reviewers emphasize shape libraries, templates, and connector-based diagram construction.
• Reviewers associate Miro’s large-board experience with clutter and navigation slowdowns, while Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite reviewers cite lag and manual connector cleanup on complex diagrams.
• Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite reviewers note that functionality is split across distinct products for diagramming and whiteboarding, while Miro reviewers describe brainstorming and diagramming within one shared board.

Creately
By Creately
4.4/5(1,394)
Product Description
Creately has more than 50 types of diagrams, real-time collaboration and projects and thousands of examples and libraries.
Reviewers say compared to Miro, Creately is:
Slower to reach roi
Easier to admin
Easier to do business with
Categories in common with Miro:
Visual Collaboration Platforms
Mind Mapping
Collaborative Whiteboard
Org Chart
Diagramming
What G2 Reviewers Say About Miro vs Creately
G2 reviewers describe Miro as a flexible choice for real-time workshops, brainstorming, and complex technical mapping, with an infinite canvas, templates, and collaborative editing that help teams keep context together. They also note that large boards can become cluttered or slower to navigate, and advanced features can take time to learn, making organization important as work expands.
G2 reviewers highlight Creately for quickly producing professional diagrams through templates, shapes, connectors, and drag-and-drop editing, with real-time collaboration supporting shared planning and documentation. Reviewers also describe it as easy for beginners, while noting that detailed diagrams can become harder to organize and that free-plan restrictions affect imports, exports, and access to more elaborate templates.
• Miro reviewers emphasize an infinite canvas for broad, evolving collaboration and technical mapping, while Creately reviewers emphasize template-led creation of structured diagrams and flowcharts.
• Miro reviewers associate larger boards with clutter and slower navigation, while Creately feedback notes that highly detailed diagrams require extra organization.
• Creately reviewers specifically flag free-plan limits on imports, exports, and elaborate templates, while Miro reviewers note that some advanced features and integrations require paid plans.

Visio
By Microsoft
4.2/5(693)
Product Description
Whether you want to quickly capture a flowchart that you brainstormed on a whiteboard, or map an IT network or build an organizational chart, Visio makes it simple to do so.
Reviewers say compared to Miro, Visio is:
Slower to reach roi
More expensive
Categories in common with Miro:
Visual Collaboration Platforms
Mind Mapping
Collaborative Whiteboard
Org Chart
Diagramming
What G2 Reviewers Say About Miro vs Visio
G2 reviewers describe Miro as a flexible, infinite-canvas workspace for real-time brainstorming, workshops, and mapping complex workflows, with contributions from multiple participants. In contrast with Visio’s structured diagram focus, Miro users value keeping notes, diagrams, images, and process discussions together, though they note that large collaborative boards can become cluttered or slower to navigate.
G2 reviewers characterize Visio as a straightforward tool for professional flowcharts, process maps, organizational charts, and technical diagrams. They highlight its broad templates, shapes, exports, and Microsoft 365 integration, while noting that complex diagrams can take longer to manage and that collaboration, version control, and maintaining consistency across files are less developed than the shared workspace experience they describe with Miro.
• Miro reviewers emphasize real-time co-creation on an infinite canvas for workshops and brainstorming, while Visio reviewers emphasize structured diagram production through templates and shape libraries.
• Miro reviewers value keeping notes, images, workflows, and diagrams together; Visio reviewers note limited version control, central repository support, and consistency across files on larger projects.
• Reviewers flag paid-plan limits for advanced Miro features, while Visio reviewers more often identify overall pricing and perpetual-license cost as concerns.

ClickUp
By ClickUp
4.6/5(15,349)
Product Description
ClickUp is one app to replace them all. It's the future of work. More than just task management - ClickUp offers docs, reminders, goals, calendars, and even an inbox. Fully customizable, ClickUp works for every type of team, so all teams can use the same app to plan, organize, and collaborate.
Reviewers say compared to Miro, ClickUp is:
Slower to reach roi
Better at support
Categories in common with Miro:
Visual Collaboration Platforms
Mind Mapping
Collaborative Whiteboard
Product Management
What G2 Reviewers Say About Miro vs ClickUp
G2 reviewers describe Miro as especially useful for visual brainstorming, workshops, process mapping, and explaining complex workflows on an infinite shared canvas. Reviewers also value its intuitive interface and real-time participation, while noting that large boards can become cluttered, slow, or harder to navigate as content grows.
G2 reviewers describe ClickUp as a centralized workspace for tasks, projects, documents, dashboards, and team workflows. They value customizable views, statuses, automations, and AI features for tracking work and reducing manual effort. Reviewers also note that its breadth can make setup, navigation, and onboarding feel complex or cluttered.
• Miro reviewers frame the workspace around open-ended visual collaboration, using an infinite canvas for workshops, brainstorming, architecture diagrams, and process maps.
• ClickUp reviewers frame the workspace around structured execution, citing task statuses, deadlines, custom fields, dashboards, and automations for managing projects and workflows.

FigJam
By Figma
4.6/5(464)
Product Description
Design features It’s time to design on your terms Figma is the only platform that brings together powerful design features you already love and a more efficient workflow to boot.
Reviewers say compared to Miro, FigJam is:
More expensive
Easier to set up
Easier to admin
Categories in common with Miro:
Visual Collaboration Platforms
Mind Mapping
Collaborative Whiteboard
Diagramming
What G2 Reviewers Say About Miro vs FigJam
G2 reviewers describe Miro as a flexible, expansive workspace for complex diagrams, technical workflows, workshops, and visual documentation. They value its infinite canvas, broad templates, integrations, and ability to keep varied materials together, while noting that large boards can become cluttered or slower and advanced features take time to learn.
G2 reviewers characterize FigJam as a lightweight, intuitive choice for brainstorming, user-flow mapping, workshops, and early product collaboration. They appreciate its fast setup, real-time editing, templates, and tight Figma connection, while noting that complex diagrams, dense boards, organization, and advanced customization can become limiting as collaborative work expands.
• Miro reviewers emphasize a broader, more flexible canvas for complex technical diagrams and documentation, whereas FigJam reviewers describe the product as better suited to early-stage thinking and simpler flows.
• Reviewers say Miro offers a wider, more polished template catalog, while FigJam’s template selection and visual variety are more limited.

Sketch
By Sketch B.V.
4.5/5(1,227)
Product Description
Sketch gives you the power, flexibility and speed you always wanted in a lightweight and easy-to-use package. Finally you can focus on what you do best: Design.
Reviewers say compared to Miro, Sketch is:
Easier to admin
Easier to set up
Categories in common with Miro:
Diagramming
Prototyping
Wireframing
What G2 Reviewers Say About Miro vs Sketch
G2 reviewers describe Miro as particularly useful for remote workshops, brainstorming, and technical workflow mapping because its infinite canvas supports real-time contributions, diagrams, notes, and process context in one shared space. Reviewers also value browser-based access and integrations, while noting that large boards can become cluttered or slow.
G2 reviewers describe Sketch as a focused, clean design workspace that helps users create polished interfaces and maintain consistent systems through symbols, shared styles, and libraries. Reviewers praise its lightweight offline performance, but note macOS-only availability and less natural simultaneous collaboration, which can constrain mixed-platform teams.
• Miro reviewers value a shared, browser-accessible workspace for real-time workshops, diagrams, notes, and workflow mapping, while Sketch reviewers emphasize focused interface and vector design.
• Miro offers a free plan, while Sketch has no free plan.
• Sketch reviewers note that macOS-only availability and less natural simultaneous collaboration can constrain mixed-platform teams.

Padlet
By Padlet
4.9/5(352)
Product Description
Beautiful boards and canvases for visual thinkers and learners.
Reviewers say compared to Miro, Padlet is:
Slower to reach roi
Easier to admin
More expensive
Categories in common with Miro:
Visual Collaboration Platforms
Mind Mapping
Collaborative Whiteboard
What G2 Reviewers Say About Miro vs Padlet
G2 reviewers describe Miro as a flexible, infinite visual workspace for real-time brainstorming, process mapping, technical diagrams, and complex project documentation. In contrast with Padlet’s post-and-resource organization, Miro users emphasize arranging interconnected ideas and workflows on a shared canvas, while noting that dense boards can become cluttered, slower to navigate, and harder for new users to learn.
G2 users like Padlet for its simple, accessible way to collect materials, links, media, and participant contributions in one organized board. Reviewers, especially in education-focused use, describe it as easy for classes, training, and large groups, with real-time collaboration and quick sharing. They also note that free-plan limits, required connectivity, and occasional overcrowding can constrain use.
• Miro reviewers focus on infinite-canvas mapping for technical diagrams, workflows, and architecture; Padlet reviewers focus on organizing classroom or training resources, media, and contributions in a single board.
• Reviewers flag different free-tier constraints: Miro users cite advanced features and AI access as limited, while Padlet users cite limits on the number of boards or walls.

SmartDraw
By SmartDraw
4.5/5(408)
Product Description
SmartDraw helps you create over 70 different types of diagrams.
Reviewers say compared to Miro, SmartDraw is:
More expensive
Easier to admin
Easier to do business with
Categories in common with Miro:
Visual Collaboration Platforms
Org Chart
Diagramming
What G2 Reviewers Say About Miro vs SmartDraw
G2 reviewers describe Miro as useful for real-time brainstorming, workshops, and mapping complex workflows on an infinite canvas. Compared with SmartDraw, reviewers also note that large Miro boards can become cluttered, harder to navigate, or slower as content and collaborators accumulate.
G2 reviewers highlight SmartDraw for template-driven diagramming, drag-and-drop editing, labeled shapes, and automated connectors that help teams produce workflows, layouts, and professional visuals quickly. Compared with Miro, SmartDraw reviewers emphasize structured diagram creation and precise measurements, while noting occasional friction with layers, customization, printing, or locating saved versions.
• Miro has a free plan, while SmartDraw does not.
• Miro reviewers center real-time ideation on an infinite canvas, while SmartDraw reviewers center template-led diagramming with labeled shapes and automated connectors.
• SmartDraw reviewers cite editable measurements for layouts, while Miro reviewers describe large, content-heavy boards becoming cluttered or less responsive.

Klaxoon
By Wrike, Inc.
4.6/5(312)
Product Description
Since 2015, we've put all our energy on imagining and designing the tools allowing teams to work more efficiently, beyond our free whiteboard app.
Reviewers say compared to Miro, Klaxoon is:
Slower to reach roi
Better at support
Easier to do business with
Categories in common with Miro:
Visual Collaboration Platforms
Mind Mapping
Collaborative Whiteboard
What G2 Reviewers Say About Miro vs Klaxoon
G2 reviewers describe Miro as a flexible workspace for complex visual planning, with an infinite canvas, real-time collaboration, templates, and support for mapping technical architectures and workflows. That breadth helps teams keep ideas and documentation together, though reviewers note that dense boards can become cluttered or slower to navigate and advanced capabilities take time to learn.
G2 reviewers describe Klaxoon as a workshop-focused collaboration platform whose polls, quizzes, interactive boards, and session activities keep participants involved and give quieter contributors ways to respond. Reviewers also value its templates and visual process mapping, while noting that the interface and advanced features can take time to learn, crowded boards may slow down, and mobile use is less comfortable.
• Reviewers use Miro to keep architecture diagrams, process maps, and supporting notes on one expandable canvas, while Klaxoon reviewers describe guided workshop flows that combine presentation content with polls and quizzes.
• Miro reviewers value flexible board customization for varied visual work, whereas Klaxoon reviewers emphasize ready-made templates and facilitation activities that reduce workshop preparation.