Adobe Experience Manager Reviews & Product Details

I really like the drag-and-drop functionality in the Touch UI. Once our developers set up the components, it’s actually very easy for me to build out landing pages without any need to touch any code. And The Digital Asset Management (DAM) part is also a lifesaver because being able to search for an image and edit its metadata right there saves me a lot of time. And the Versioning system is also very great because if I mess up a page, all I have to do is, roll it back to a previous version in just one click. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The learning curve is serious. It took me a good few weeks to really feel comfortable with the authoring workflow. Also, it can be frustratingly dependent on IT. If I want to change something slightly outside of the pre-set templates, I’m stuck until a developer can build it for me. The authoring interface can also get pretty laggy during peak hours. And those are actually some cons of it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Adobe Experience Manager is a robust and highly scalable content management system that excels in enterprise environments. Its ability to manage large volumes of content across multiple sites, brands, and channels is a major strength. The integration with other Adobe products, such as Analytics and Target, allows for a more data driven and personalized digital experience. Once implemented correctly, it provides strong governance, security, and consistency across digital properties, which is especially valuable for organizations with complex needs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The biggest drawback is its complexity. AEM has a steep learning curve and often requires significant technical expertise to use effectively. Simple content updates or structural changes can feel overly complicated without developer support. Implementation and maintenance can also be costly, and troubleshooting issues is not always intuitive, which can slow down day to day workflows for non technical users. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There’s a lot to appreciate, but what really stands out is the impressive combination of power and structure it offers. The DAM + Sites workflow is a huge time-saver, as it keeps assets, pages, and components linked together rather than scattered in separate silos. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

This is something I have experienced frequently—the gap between the platform’s potential and the effort required to realize it. Nothing is truly plug-and-play. Even making straightforward changes often demands the involvement of developers, extensive configuration, or working through layers of Adobe 'best practices' that seem more like hurdles than helpful advice. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

For me, one of the biggest benefits is the flexibility to build and update pages without relying so heavily on the technical team. Being able to drag and drop components, edit content directly in the view, and publish with a couple of clicks makes the workflow much smoother. Reusable components and templates keep everything organized and consistent, no matter how many people are involved in content creation. Furthermore, integration with other Adobe tools like Analytics and Targe makes closing the content lifecycle much easier. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The platform can feel somewhat cumbersome, and if you don't have a robust infrastructure or an experienced technical team, certain processes can become slow or complex. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

AEM allows you to create, manage, and publish content such as websites and documents all from a single platform. It enables users to build web pages using intuitive drag-and-drop tools, and makes it easy to publish content to websites, mobile apps, and emails from one centralized location. The built-in DAM system is especially convenient, as it lets you store, organize, and share images, videos, and documents with ease. Since AEM is a cloud service, it offers automatic updates and consistently high performance. I rely on AEM daily to complete my project deliverables and has been using it for past 1 year almost. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

At this point, there isn't anything in particular that I dislike about AEM. I find it very convenient and user-friendly, and it does a good job of securely storing both company and customer information. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I really appreciate is the flexibility to use nearly any platform as a content backend. Whether it's Google Drive, SharePoint, or a variety of CDNs such as Cloudflare—using a Cloudflare Worker—Akamai, Fastly, or even a custom CDN setup, the options are extensive. I find it especially useful that I can use documents and spreadsheets stored in Google Drive or content from SharePoint as sources, which adds a lot of convenience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I am not particularly fond of how expensive Adobe Experience Manager seems to be when it comes to annual site licensing costs, especially compared to its competitors. Additionally, I am not a big fan of Java stacks in general. On the positive side, being able to handle styling using only npm and Node.js is a decent consolation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find Adobe Experience Manager amazing for B2C and B2B sales and marketing. What stands out most about Adobe Experience Manager is its ability to centralize content and support consistent brand delivery across multiple channels. I appreciate how it combines content management, digital assets, and personalization within a single platform. It's an impressive and user-friendly all-in-one tool that's quite easy to set up. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Adobe Experience Manager appears powerful but complex. The learning curve seems steep, especially for smaller teams without dedicated technical resources. Implementation and maintenance look resource-intensive compared to lighter CMS solutions, and the overall cost may be a barrier for organizations that don't need enterprise-level scale. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

AEM is excellent for business. It is powerful as it works in large enterprises where non technical users can manage web pages without developer help. The author , publish mode is enterprise grade and from a developer’s perspective using vanillaJS and CSS for frontend is easy and beginner friendly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As for me, I am someone who was used to working with SPA frameworks. Compared to these, AEM feels over engineered. Also you would mostly see only large enterprises using it and not small teams or startups as the license cost and maintenance cost is enormous. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It’s got a lot of features. Features are templates. Premade ready to use static pages and templates. It’s got a lot to chose from so it makes the process of creating easy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It wasn’t as creative as I thought. It was pretty standard to matching the quality and selection of most basic applications. It was not that uncommon. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really appreciate Adobe Experience Manager for its flexibility and ease of managing large-scale content. The reusable components and templates make page creation fast and consistent, and the integrated Digital Asset Management keeps everything organized. I also like how it integrates with other tools, like Analytics and Target, bringing marketing together in one place. It's valuable for its component-based design that allows quick updates while maintaining consistent branding. The ability to enable personalized, data-driven experiences makes it a powerful platform for managing complex digital ecosystems. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The biggest drawback is its steep learning curve and the high technical effort required for customization. Some workflows feel rigid, and the interface can be slow or complex at times for asset volumes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.