SAFE Reviews & Product Details

What stands out about SAFE is the knowledgeable and responsive support team. The team truly understands both the platform and the broader field of cyber risk quantification. They are consistently reliable and actively seek feedback to improve. SAFE is consistently releasing updates and enhancements, which shows a strong commitment to evolving alongside the needs of its users

The platform is intuitive and easy to use, with a range of features. The cyber risk quantification capabilities are especially insightful when it comes to helping security teams prioritize efforts based on meaningful data. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There is nothing I truly dislike about SAFE. The team is very receptive to feedback and always looking to improve. One minor challenge has been getting answers for the Financial Impact Questionnaire (FIQ). However, SAFE has been consistently working to make this more consumable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

SAFE is able to provide real time feeds on threat actor actions and TEF data for each threat actor per initial attack method. This makes the risks stay up to date in real time as it constantly affects current risk.

Additonally I love how you can make small adjustments to risks or do what if analyses to see how a particular finding and/or control affect overall risk. The automated methodology of FAIR is what I have been looking for a long time.

Its also very easy to integrate security tools into the platform to better inform risk by giving real time reliability scores to my FAIR CAM controls which update risk scenarios in real time.

Finally, I have found it incredibly easy to work with SAFE customer support and customer enablement teams who are able to help me customize SAFE platform for my clients and for our own business. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While this is a typical flaw of all web based platforms, certain views/pages could be better scaled to monitor sizes or provide additional functionality like toggles to round or not round CRQ outputs. Additionally there are some deeper views in the loss drivers that I wish had description boxes directly in the UI/tool vs having to refer to seperate whitepapers/user guides/ or SAFE support. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The thing I like most about SAFE is the clear risk quantification and prioritization with actionable insights for remediation. This platform supports informed decision-making across our application teams. They also work extremely hard to ensure all of our integrations and third-party information are implemented successfully. Their support team is very responsive and knowledgeable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The only challenge we've encountered with SAFE is identifying the right internal stakeholders to complete the financial questionnaire. While the platform itself is intuitive, this part of the process can require additional coordination. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Its the only solution of its sorts that provide quantified risk impact in terms of financial value that the enterprises can leverage to make the right investments and predict ROI on their cyber security investments. It is easy to use and the professional service support is stellar. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

A few things where I would like SAFE to improve upon is:

Show calculations or help understand how FAIR arrives at a value to maintain transparency within the tool.

Ability to quantify governance related risks such as improper user access control and review as well as compliance violations.

Provide reference ranges from industry of risk to help organizations build an apetite. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

SAFE Security stands out by offering a unified, AI-powered platform that quantifies cyber risk in financial terms, enabling organizations to make informed, strategic decisions with confidence.

What makes SAFE particularly compelling is its ability to integrate data from across the enterprise - spanning people, processes, technology, and third parties - and translate it into actionable insights. By aligning cyber exposures with business impact, SAFE empowers stakeholders to prioritize risk mitigation efforts based on materiality and return on investment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I would also love to see guided learning modules or certifications tailored to different roles - e.g., CISOs, risk analysts, or compliance officers - to accelerate adoption and maximize value. This could be useful having gone through the transition from RiskLens to SAFE. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

SAFE has a host of features I use daily to deliver value for my company. The what if feature allows my team to perform quantified risk analyses on potential solutions to aid decision makers with risk insights. Additionally, SAFE's data integrations with internal security tools work to automatically influence FAIR-CAM control maturity ratings, which speed up the risk analysis process. Implementing SSO within the product was easy and enabled reporting with key stakeholders. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are some limitations with the internal authorization model that results in overprovisioned access. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Standardised quantification method (FAIR) adds confidence in the outcomes of risk scenarios analysis.

Lot’s of integrations with widespread IT and Cyber tools (assets management, vulnerability management, EDR, people etc) helping ingest data into the SafeOne platform. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

So far, Integrations are not deep and pull only limited data from the source (mostly assets and findings identified by source tool). No way to customise, to check configurations and/or policies applied.

Also I haven’t seen AI capabilities to read evidences (policy, procedures, reports etc) and automate some controls testing (would be useful in today’s AI-driven environment). Cybersecurity Maturity Assessment + Financial Impact Questionnaire are vital for further quantitative analysis of the risks Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The SAFE Security platform integrates multiple sources of risk data that allows our organization to better evaluate our third and fourth parties risk information, thus making it easier for our stakeholders to make business decisions. The platform itself is simple, functional and easy to use and the onboarding of vendors was straightforward and seamless. The SAFE Security team was great to work with as they ensured they were able to provide all that we needed to make the implementation much easier. Mark McKinney is very knowledgeable of their product and was very open to questions and ideas about how to improve their product or add new features to it. It was a great collaborative experience all throughout. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Overall as a product, there's nothing I do not like about the current SAFE Security platform. I however have some Ideas I would like to suggest to improve the features of the product. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Before SAFE, managing third-party risk was a fragmented and labor-intensive process. Our tools didn't talk to each other, and tracking potential threats was a constant uphill battle. SAFE solved this almost overnight. The integration was surprisingly straightforward, and it immediately centralized our security data. Now, with continuous monitoring and an interface our entire team can actually use, we're spending less time chasing down information and more time strategically mitigating risk. It has fundamentally streamlined our security operations Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Beneficial to have guided learning modules Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Using Safe security has been a pretty good experience for us, it gives a clear picture of our internal security and i appreciate the continuous monitoring and risk assessment features... they definitely help us stay on top of things, it's been really useful like how it helps to track and manage risks from external vendors, alerting us to potential issues before they turn into bigger problems that's a big plus for us but the only downside is that the platform can be a bit complicated to navigate with all the data it provides, but overall it is a great tool for managing security very efficiently. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Complexity: It can be challenging for smaller teams without cybersecurity expertise 2. False positives: Sometimes legitimate activities are flagged as threats 3. Integration issues: integrating with other tools or older systems can be tricky at times. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.