Top Tools at a Glance
Best for Fast, template-driven proposals | User Review "Effortless Workflow Management" ![]() CN Carl N. Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) | ||
Best for | User Review "Simplified Sales Process with Seamless Integration" ![]() ZG Zisan G.
| ||
You may also like | |||
![]() Sponsored You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings. BoldSign | Product Description This description is provided by the seller. BoldSign is an easy-to-use and secure electronic signature solution. With BoldSign you can quickly sign documents or send them out for signature, complete contracts, fill out forms, approve... | Try for Free | |
Best for Interactive, web-style proposals | User Review "Very helpful staff when encountering bugs" ![]() LC Lachlan C. Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) | ||
Best for High-volume RFP and questionnaire responses | User Review "Transforms RFP Responses with an Impressive Content Library" A Verified User Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) | ||
Best for Team-scaled proposal consistency | User Review "Excellent Data Security and Compliance Focus" PK Pramod K. Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) | ||
Best for Centralized RFP content management | User Review "very useful" A Verified User Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) | ||
Best for Services proposals with recurring pricing | User Review "Effortless Proposals and Agreements with Smart Pricing Features" A Verified User Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) | ||
Best for Proposal delivery with sales engagement | User Review "Excellent Tool for Music Admissions Teams" A Verified User Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) | ||
Best for Complex configuration and pricing proposals | User Review "Streamlined Quoting with Powerful Automation - OCPQ" HT Harish T. Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) | ||
Best for Proposal-to-billing automation for service firms | User Review "Transforms Client Engagements with Ease" ![]() DV Danielle V.
| ||
You may also like

You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
This description is provided by the seller.
BoldSign is an easy-to-use and secure electronic signature solution. With BoldSign you can quickly sign documents or send them out for signature, complete contracts, fill out forms, approve...
High-volume RFP and questionnaire responses
Complex configuration and pricing proposals
Buyer's Guide: Proposal
All Proposal Tools
Written by G2’s researcher using verified user reviews and product data, with no personal bias.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users love the ease of use of PandaDoc, finding it user-friendly and efficient for managing signatures and documents.
Users love the easy document management of PandaDoc, benefiting from its user-friendly interface and seamless CRM integration.
Users love the easy mailing options of PandaDoc, making template management and document sending effortless and efficient.
Users find signature issues with PandaDoc, particularly regarding personal signature usage and mobile interface difficulties.
Users find the expensive pricing of PandaDoc limits access to useful features and functionality.
Users mention a need for missing features like advanced calculation tables to enhance usability and efficiency.
Written by G2’s researcher using verified user reviews and product data, with no personal bias.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users appreciate the ease of use of Qwilr, finding it fast and intuitive for creating professional proposals.
Users find Qwilr's simplicity in creating proposals extremely helpful, enhancing both efficiency and presentation quality.
Users commend the exceptional customer support of Qwilr, noting quick responses and helpful solutions whenever needed.
Users find Qwilr's limited customization options restrictive, hindering branding flexibility and causing layout issues during exports.
Users face missing features like limited functionalities and challenges with document sign-offs and email customization.
Users note limited functionalities and seek more formatting options to enhance their experience with Qwilr.
Written by G2’s researcher using verified user reviews and product data, with no personal bias.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users appreciate the ease of use of Responsive, finding it intuitive and effective for daily tasks and collaboration.
Users appreciate the powerful project creation and answer library, benefiting from innovative features and excellent support.
Users highlight the efficiency of Responsive, revolutionizing RFI management and significantly reducing response times.
Users find the learning curve steep, often feeling overwhelmed by the platform's many features and options.
Users find the interface unintuitive, making it challenging to navigate and locate content effectively.
Users express disappointment about missing features like personalized settings and comprehensive Q&A views, impacting their overall experience.
Written by G2’s researcher using verified user reviews and product data, with no personal bias.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users love the ease of use with Proposify, streamlining proposal creation and enhancing client engagement effortlessly.
Users love the sleek, customizable templates of Proposify, streamlining proposal creation and elevating professionalism effortlessly.
Users appreciate the easy creation of proposals with Proposify, thanks to its numerous customizable templates.
Users find the difficult editing process in Proposify frustrating, as it lacks intuitiveness and user-friendliness.
Users find the limited customization options in Proposify restrict their ability to create tailored proposals effectively.
Users often face editing difficulties with Proposify, notably in text formatting and table management, which can be frustrating.
Written by G2’s researcher using verified user reviews and product data, with no personal bias.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users enjoy the great ease of use of GetAccept, with no complaints about functionality from their team.
Users value the exceptional customer support from GetAccept, appreciating quick and accurate responses to their queries.
Users value the exceptional customer support of GetAccept, consistently impressed by its responsiveness and helpfulness.
Users note the missing features like PDF conversion and branding options, which are important for their needs.
Users find limited customization frustrating, as it forces duplication of contracts and complicates document management.
Users find difficult editing in GetAccept's quote templates challenging, but customer service provides speedy assistance.
Written by G2’s researcher using verified user reviews and product data, with no personal bias.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users appreciate the ease of use of Oracle CPQ, enabling seamless processing of daily tasks with user-friendly features.
Users value the sales efficiency of Oracle CPQ, streamlining quoting processes and enhancing deal closure speed.
Users value the time-saving features of Oracle CPQ, which streamline quoting processes and enhance deal closures.
Users find the complexity of configuration and customization challenging, especially for those new to CPQ systems.
Users find the setup process complex, needing significant time and expertise for configuration and customization.
Users struggle with the steep learning curve of Oracle CPQ, making it difficult to navigate and utilize effectively.
Written by G2’s researcher using verified user reviews and product data, with no personal bias.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users find Ignition's interface incredibly easy to use, significantly enhancing client-friendly tech experiences and proposal creation.
Users appreciate the top-notch customer support of Ignition, enhancing their experience through prompt assistance and guided resources.
Users love the easy setup of Ignition, streamlining client onboarding and enhancing overall efficiency in proposals and payments.
Users find Ignition to be expensive, noting the cost compared to previous free services and competitors.
Users experience a notable learning curve initially, particularly with setups, though improvements are gradually being made.
Users feel restricted by the limited customization options in Ignition, affecting the design of their proposals.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users find DocSend to be easy to use, enhancing their document sharing with secure and efficient tools.
Users appreciate the secure document sharing capabilities of DocSend, ensuring accountability and professionalism in every transaction.
Users value DocSend's secure document tracking and comprehensive features, enhancing collaboration and efficiency in their workflows.
Users find the pricing to be expensive, especially for small teams and those not in startup programs.
Users find the lack of features challenging, especially regarding configuration and the limitations of lower-tier plans.
Users find limited features in DocSend packages relative to cost, making it less ideal for smaller teams.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users appreciate the easy-to-use interface and seamless data generation of Conga Composer, enhancing daily productivity.
Users praise Conga Composer for its easy-to-use interface, making document management and customization effortless.
Users value the time-saving capabilities of Conga Composer, significantly reducing lengthy contract signing sessions.
Users note a steep learning curve with Conga Composer, especially for complex tasks and mastering merge syntax.
Users face a steep learning curve with Conga Composer, especially when implementing complex features and logic.
Users find the limited template flexibility of Conga Composer problematic, especially with large documents and UI challenges.
Written by G2’s researcher using verified user reviews and product data, with no personal bias.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users find Conga CLM to be extremely easy to use, facilitating efficient contract management and negotiations.
Users value the efficiency of Conga CLM, benefiting from streamlined contract management and improved processing speed.
Users appreciate the comprehensive and adaptable features of Conga CLM, enhancing contract management processes effectively.
Users often face a steep learning curve with Conga CLM, finding its extensive features initially overwhelming and complex.
Users face a steep learning curve with Conga CLM, often finding the setup and features overwhelming.
Users find the time-consuming processes in Conga CLM frustrating, especially during document generation and configuration.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users praise the flexibility and customizability of ConnectWise CPQ, enhancing their quoting efficiency and automation.
Users appreciate the responsive customer support of ConnectWise CPQ, enhancing their overall experience and reliability.
Users love the flexibility and customizability of ConnectWise CPQ, enhancing their quoting process with ease.
Users find the difficult editing in ConnectWise CPQ frustrating, hindering efficient document formatting and modifications.
Users experience numerous bug issues with ConnectWise CPQ, leading to frustration and inefficiencies in their workflow.
Users find the setup process complex and overwhelming, often recommending consulting expertise for better navigation.
This description is provided by the seller.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users find QuoteWerks to be extremely easy to use, significantly speeding up the quoting process and enhancing efficiency.
Users love the professional templates of QuoteWerks, which streamline the quoting process and save significant time.
Users value the time-saving capabilities of QuoteWerks, drastically reducing quote preparation from hours to mere minutes.
Users often face a complex setup process that can be time-consuming and challenging to navigate initially.
Users find the interface design poor, noting it feels outdated and hampers navigation and setup efficiency.
Users feel the interface is dated, impacting navigation and overall user experience despite some appreciating its familiarity.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users appreciate the customization options of Epicor CPQ, enabling tailored configurations and compatibility for diverse products.
Users appreciate the ease of use of Epicor CPQ, facilitating quick updates and seamless order processing.
Users highlight the intuitive interface of Epicor CPQ, making it easy to sell products and services effectively.
Users note that the slow performance of Epicor CPQ can lead to glitches and screen freezes during heavy use.
Users often face bug issues with Epicor CPQ, including glitches and screen freezes during heavy use.
Users find the complex implementation of Epicor CPQ requires specialists, complicating configuration changes significantly.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users value the enhanced efficiency of Zilliant CPQ, significantly reducing quote cycle and order lead times.
Users value the customization and integration capabilities of Zilliant CPQ, enhancing efficiency and competitive advantage.
Users value the customizability of Zilliant CPQ, enhancing processes with tailored solutions and secure data handling.
Users find the slow loading times frustrating, especially during complex operations that require efficiency.
Users experience slow performance during complex operations, which can hinder their overall productivity.


















