Top Tools at a Glance
Best for Fast, template-driven proposals | User Review "Effortless Workflow Management" ![]() CN Carl N. Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) | ||
Best for | User Review "Simplified Sales Process with Seamless Integration" ![]() ZG Zisan G.
| ||
You may also like | |||
![]() Sponsored You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings. Tresorit | Product Description This description is provided by the seller. Tresorit is an end-to-end encrypted, zero-knowledge content collaboration platform that enables security-conscious companies to manage, sync, sign, and share their files safely. Unlike other public... | Visit company website | |
Best for Interactive, web-style proposals | User Review "Very helpful staff when encountering bugs" ![]() LC Lachlan C. Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) | ||
Best for High-volume RFP and questionnaire responses | User Review "Transforms RFP Responses with an Impressive Content Library" A Verified User Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) | ||
Best for Team-scaled proposal consistency | User Review "Excellent Data Security and Compliance Focus" PK Pramod K. Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) | ||
Best for Centralized RFP content management | User Review "Efficient Proposal Creation with Reliable AI Features" BR Brittney R.
| ||
Best for Services proposals with recurring pricing | User Review "Effortless Proposals and Agreements with Smart Pricing Features" A Verified User Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) | ||
Best for Proposal delivery with sales engagement | User Review "Excellent Tool for Music Admissions Teams" A Verified User Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) | ||
Best for Complex configuration and pricing proposals | User Review "Streamlined Quoting with Powerful Automation - OCPQ" HT Harish T. Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) | ||
Best for Proposal-to-billing automation for service firms | User Review "Transforms Client Engagements with Ease" ![]() DV Danielle V.
| ||
You may also like

You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
This description is provided by the seller.
Tresorit is an end-to-end encrypted, zero-knowledge content collaboration platform that enables security-conscious companies to manage, sync, sign, and share their files safely. Unlike other public...
High-volume RFP and questionnaire responses
Complex configuration and pricing proposals
Buyer's Guide: Proposal
All Proposal Tools
Written by G2’s researcher using verified user reviews and product data, with no personal bias.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users find PandaDoc easy to use, streamlining signatures and document updates with minimal issues reported.
Users find document management easy and efficient with PandaDoc, appreciating its user-friendly interface and seamless integration.
Users value the ease of use and efficiency of PandaDoc for managing and sending documents effortlessly.
Users find signature issues due to unclear personal signature usage and difficulties with the mobile interface.
Users find PandaDoc expensive, particularly for features like catalog integration and online form submissions.
Users express a desire for missing features like calculation tables and more flexibility in the free version.
Written by G2’s researcher using verified user reviews and product data, with no personal bias.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users praise the ease of use of Qwilr, highlighting its intuitive interface and professional appearance for proposals.
Users appreciate the effortless proposal creation with Qwilr, finding it sleek, simple, and highly effective.
Users value the exceptional customer support from Qwilr, receiving quick and helpful solutions whenever needed.
Users feel Qwilr lacks customization options, restricting design flexibility and leading to potential formatting issues.
Users face missing features like limited functionalities and challenges with document customization in Qwilr.
Users note the limited functionalities in Qwilr, seeking more formatting options for better usability.
Written by G2’s researcher using verified user reviews and product data, with no personal bias.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users appreciate the ease of use of Responsive, praising its intuitive interface and streamlined collaboration features.
Users appreciate the powerful project creation and intuitive answer library, enhancing their efficiency and collaboration experience.
Users praise the efficiency of Responsive, transforming RFP management from days into hours with powerful automation.
Users find the learning curve steep, particularly for new users navigating the platform's extensive features and options.
Users find the interface not intuitive, struggling with navigation and search functionality during their initial experience.
Users note missing features like limited visibility of Q&A and customization options, impacting their overall experience.
Written by G2’s researcher using verified user reviews and product data, with no personal bias.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users love the ease of use in Proposify, making proposal creation and client interactions enjoyable and efficient.
Users love Proposify's easy-to-customize templates, making proposal creation enjoyable and professional in less time.
Users value the easy creation of proposals with numerous templates, ensuring quick and professional results.
Users find the difficult editing process frustrating, citing issues with formatting and non-intuitive dashboard navigation.
Users find limited customization options in Proposify, making the proposal-building process less flexible and more challenging.
Users face editing difficulties with Proposify, particularly with formatting, tables, and content creation challenges.
Written by G2’s researcher using verified user reviews and product data, with no personal bias.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users highlight the ease of use with GetAccept, resulting in a seamless experience and no complaints from users.
Users rave about the amazing customer support from GetAccept, consistently providing quick and accurate assistance.
Users appreciate the exceptional customer support from GetAccept, valuing quick responses and genuine commitment to success.
Users find the missing features of GetAccept, like the PDF converter, hinder their overall experience.
Users find the limited customization in GetAccept frustrating, leading to unnecessary complexities in document management.
Users find the difficult editing process challenging, though customer support provides timely assistance to ease navigation.
Written by G2’s researcher using verified user reviews and product data, with no personal bias.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users appreciate the ease of use of Oracle CPQ, facilitating daily tasks and generating accurate custom quotes effortlessly.
Users highlight the sales efficiency of Oracle CPQ, enabling faster deal closures and improved customer experience.
Users value the time-saving capabilities of Oracle CPQ, streamlining processes and enhancing overall efficiency.
Users find Oracle CPQ's configuration complexity challenging, particularly for newcomers lacking CPQ experience or technical skills.
Users find the setup process complex, especially when integrating with other systems or lacking prior experience.
Users express frustration with the steep learning curve of Oracle CPQ, requiring significant time to master its complexities.
Written by G2’s researcher using verified user reviews and product data, with no personal bias.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users find Ignition's ease of use exceptional, making proposal management seamless and client-friendly.
Users praise the top-notch customer support of Ignition, appreciating prompt assistance and guided instructional resources.
Users appreciate the easy setup of Ignition, allowing for seamless onboarding and efficient payment collection processes.
Users find Ignition to be expensive compared to competitors, but acknowledge its value in saving time.
Users note a steep learning curve with Ignition, particularly in setup and proposal creation, but it improves over time.
Users find the limited customization options in Ignition restrictive, impacting their ability to create appealing proposals.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users praise the ease of use of DocSend, highlighting its user-friendly features and excellent customer support.
Users value the secure document sharing and tracking features of DocSend, enhancing professionalism and accountability in their work.
Users value DocSend's secure document management and tracking features, enhancing collaboration and efficiency in their work.
Users find the pricing of DocSend to be expensive, especially for small teams or those not on startup programs.
Users find the lack of advanced features in lower tiers limiting, complicating routine tasks and configurations.
Users find DocSend has limited features for its cost, especially for smaller teams and non-startup users.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users appreciate the easy-to-use interface of Conga Composer, enhancing their document creation and data management experience.
Users appreciate the easy-to-use interface of Conga Composer, enabling effortless document creation and management.
Users appreciate the time-saving efficiency of Conga Composer, significantly reducing contract signing sessions.
Users find the learning curve challenging, especially with complex merges and old-fashioned UI requiring trial and error.
Users find the steep learning curve challenging, especially for advanced features and complex functionalities.
Users find limited template flexibility in Conga Composer, noting challenges with large documents and UI issues.
Written by G2’s researcher using verified user reviews and product data, with no personal bias.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users find Conga CLM to be very easy to use, streamlining contract management and document negotiations effectively.
Users benefit from enhanced efficiency with Conga CLM, streamlining contract management and improving overall agility.
Users appreciate the rich features of Conga CLM, facilitating efficient contract management and seamless integrations.
Users find the steep learning curve of Conga CLM challenging, as mastering its features can be overwhelming.
Users experience a steep learning curve with Conga CLM, finding the setup and feature depth overwhelming initially.
Users find time-consuming processes in Conga CLM frustrating, especially with document generation and configuration tasks.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users love the flexible customization options of ConnectWise CPQ, enhancing efficiency and streamlining their quoting processes.
Users value the responsive customer support of ConnectWise CPQ, appreciating its quick replies and reliability.
Users value the flexibility and customizability of ConnectWise CPQ, enhancing their quoting processes and efficiency.
Users find difficult editing in ConnectWise CPQ hampers productivity, as modifications often require technical skills and are not intuitive.
Users often face bug issues with ConnectWise CPQ, causing frustration and hindering the overall usability of the system.
Users find the setup process too complex, often recommending hiring a knowledgeable consultant for assistance.
This description is provided by the seller.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users highlight the ease of use of QuoteWerks, significantly speeding up the quoting process with professional templates.
Users love the professional templates of QuoteWerks, streamlining the quoting process and saving valuable time.
Users value the time-saving capabilities of QuoteWerks, dramatically reducing quote preparation from an hour to just minutes.
Users find the complex setup of QuoteWerks time-consuming, especially with extensive product and service integrations.
Users find the poor interface design of QuoteWerks outdated, impacting navigation and overall user experience.
Users find the dated interface of QuoteWerks impacts navigation and setup, hindering overall user experience.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users value the customization options of Epicor CPQ, enabling tailored configurations and enhanced compatibility for diverse products.
Users appreciate the ease of use of Epicor CPQ, facilitating quick updates and efficient order processing.
Users praise the intuitive design of Epicor CPQ, finding it easy to sell products and services effectively.
Users find the slow performance of Epicor CPQ frustrating, especially during high usage, leading to glitches and freezes.
Many users report bug issues with Epicor CPQ, including glitches and freezing screens during heavy use.
Users find Epicor CPQ's complex implementation requires a specialist for effective configurator adjustments and operations.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users benefit from the efficient configuration of customer solutions, leading to faster quote and order lead times.
Users value the customization and integration capabilities of Zilliant CPQ, enhancing efficiency and competitive advantage.
Users value the customizability of Zilliant CPQ, enhancing workflows with tailored features and security options.
Users find the slow loading times for complex operations frustrating and wish for improvements in performance.
Users find the slow performance frustrating during complex operations, leading to delays in productivity.


















