--- title: Responsive, formerly RFPIO Reviews meta_title: 'Responsive, formerly RFPIO Reviews 2026: Details, Pricing, & Features | G2' meta_description: Filter 1314 reviews by the users' company size, role or industry to find out how Responsive, formerly RFPIO works for a business like yours. aggregate_rating: rating_value: 4.5 review_count: 1314 scale: '5' date_modified: '2026-11-06' parent_category: name: Procurement url: https://www.g2.com/categories/procurement ---

Responsive, formerly RFPIO Reviews & Product Details

Value at a Glance

Averages based on real user reviews.

Time to Implement

2 months

Responsive, formerly RFPIO Reviews FAQs

Generated using AI

Last updated: Nov 04, 2026

What is Responsive, formerly RFPIO, and what problem is it built to solve?

Responsive, formerly RFPIO, is strategic response management software for handling complex information requests such as RFPs, RFIs, and questionnaires. It helps organizations automate responses, collaborate with stakeholders, use data insights to improve processes, and find approved content across business applications.

What languages does Responsive, formerly RFPIO support?

Responsive, formerly RFPIO supports 11 languages, including English, French, German, Japanese, Spanish, and others.

What company sizes and industries is Responsive, formerly RFPIO the best fit for?

Responsive, formerly RFPIO is most represented among enterprise and mid-market users, with particularly strong presence in technology-related and financial services organizations.
  • Company size: Enterprise and mid-market teams are the most prominent groups.
  • Industries: Computer software and information technology and services are prominent, alongside financial services, computer and network security, and telecommunications.

How long does it take to implement Responsive, formerly RFPIO across a team?

Implementation most often takes 1–3 months, though teams also report getting started in under a month or taking several months. The timeline depends on the implementation experience and reported scope.
Time to go live Relative frequency
1–3 months Most frequently reported
Under 1 month Also reported
3–6 months Also reported
6–12 months or longer Reported less often

What customer support options does Responsive, formerly RFPIO provide, and how do users find the overall support experience?

Responsive, formerly RFPIO, provides support through phone, email/help desk, and chat, including 24/7 live-rep support. Users often describe the team as helpful, knowledgeable, and quick to respond, while some find troubleshooting or issue resolution slower or less consistent than they would like.

What is the experience like for teams switching to Responsive, formerly RFPIO from another tool?

Teams move to Responsive, formerly RFPIO, from other RFP and proposal platforms—including tools such as Loopio and Qvidian—or from spreadsheet-based processes when they need more robust workflows, content management, collaboration, or AI-assisted responses. The change can bring a more searchable content library and clearer project coordination, though getting teams comfortable with the platform and setting up content may take effort.

What tools and platforms does Responsive, formerly RFPIO integrate with, and how do these integrations help users get more value from the product?

Responsive, formerly RFPIO, offers 7 integrations. Users describe connections across CRM, productivity, collaboration, and file-storage tools:
  • CRM: Salesforce
  • Productivity and document tools: Microsoft Word and SharePoint
  • Team communication: Slack
These connections can keep proposal work closer to existing sales and collaboration workflows, reduce duplicate data entry, and make relevant content easier to access while teams prepare responses.

What features or capabilities could make Responsive, formerly RFPIO even more useful?

Responsive, formerly RFPIO, could be more useful with improvements to finding the right content, refining AI-generated responses, and preparing finished documents. Recurring improvement areas include:
  • Make search and filtering more flexible so teams can find current, relevant answers more easily.
  • Improve AI response relevance, context handling, and accuracy, with clearer ways to guide it toward the right source material.
  • Simplify navigation and common workflows, especially for occasional users.
  • Expand document formatting and import/export controls to reduce manual cleanup before submission.

How useful do Responsive, formerly RFPIO users find its AI features in everyday use?

Responsive, formerly RFPIO’s AI features are useful for speeding up response work, especially when they can draw on a well-maintained content library. Users value the faster starting point and easier answer discovery, but generated content still needs human review because relevance, context, and accuracy can vary.

Responsive, formerly RFPIO Reviews (1,314)

View 2 Video Reviews
Reviews

Responsive, formerly RFPIO Reviews (1,314)

View 2 Video Reviews
4.5
1,314 reviews

What do users say?

Generated using AI from real user reviews

Pros & Cons

Generated from real user reviews
View All Pros and Cons
Search reviews
Filter Reviews
Clear Results
G2 reviews are authentic and verified.
Verified User in Computer Software
AC
Verified User in Computer Software
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Originally submitted 10/9/2026
"Responsive AI and Support That Streamline the Proposal Process"
5/5
What do you like best about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

What I like best about Responsive is the combination of strong features, AI capabilities, and the people behind the platform. The Content Library, project workflows, and ASK AI help us work more efficiently, collaborate with subject matter experts, and spend less time searching for or recreating content. Just as important, the onboarding process helped us get off to a strong start, and having a dedicated support team gives us a reliable resource as our needs evolve. Together, these capabilities and services provide meaningful ROI by improving productivity and allowing our team to spend more time developing high-quality, tailored proposals. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

One challenge with Responsive is that the platform can feel complex at times, particularly when learning how different features, settings, and administrative options work together. There can be a learning curve when trying to take full advantage of the platform. I would also like to see tighter integration with Microsoft Copilot, which would better connect Responsive with the tools we use in our day-to-day workflow. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

RD
Rui D.
Bid Specialist
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Originally submitted 10/30/2025
"Powerful AI and Document Management for better responses"
4/5
What do you like best about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

I love the fact that is constantly being updated with a strong focus on AI tools and new improved features such as file import compatibility. I also love the fact that Responsive offers a learning section that is very good in terms on content. Also I have taken advantage of the June free certification. Also it has a very powerful interface with many options to filter data and find the best responses according to your criteria. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

The difficulty of importing excel spreadsheets when they are very complex as it is difficult to set up the fields and it is done with some order. That order is not very easy to understand so some guidance and more step by step would be a great help

Also sometimes the system is slow, for example in the content library when copy and paste contents into the search box, the system needs to load first and when reloaded you loose what you inserted first and you need to repeat your action. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Jack P.
JP
Jack P.
Manager, Proposals
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
Originally submitted 7/17/2020
"Effortless RFP Management, Clean and Simple Interface"
5/5
What do you like best about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

I use Responsive, formerly RFPIO, for managing RFPs and find it incredibly useful for handling multiple and complex RFPs seamlessly. I like that it's clean, clear, and simple to use, which makes the process more efficient. I also appreciate how very easy the initial setup was, and I like that it links to Salesforce, making integration seamless. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

I never explored the AI piece, specifically the autofilling answers from the library into the responses. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Eddy Brotemarkle of Responsive, formerly RFPIO

Thanks for your review, Jack!

It's so great that your team is able to manage the entire process all in one place—that IS huge!

As you mentioned, anyone can use Responsive with just 15 minutes of training—but you're right, there is so much more you can do with Responsive, beyond what you'll learn in basic training.

Alaina S.
AS
Alaina S.
Proposal Manager
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Powerful, Customizable Proposal Library — Ideal for Bid Managers; Challenging to Scale Company-wide"
3.5/5
What do you like best about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

Responsive is a helpful way to organize and archive past proposal responses. It solves the headache of having hundreds of past proposals scattered in various inboxes, shared drives, and hard drives. The content library is also useful in the detailed, comprehensive metadata tagging it supports. I appreciate how endlessly customizable the library's settings are--you can really do anything you want with it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

The hardest part of using the tool consistently, across all projects, is getting buy-in from my colleagues and other stakeholders. Responsive tends to be "the bid managers' thing" at our company, and I encounter friction when I try to get new users onboarded and regularly using it. In my opinion, Responsive is best suited for use by the proposal management team only. Trying to get a wide variety of stakeholders trained on it is a never-ending process that almost always causes delays and frustrations during the project. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Andrew K.
AK
Andrew K.
Head of Business Solutions
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Responsive AI Speeds Proposal Responses and Boosts Collaboration"
5/5
What do you like best about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

Responsive, through its AI agent, has significantly reduced the time it takes us to complete responses to proposal requests. It has also improved visibility into our progress, strengthened team collaboration, and enabled performance analysis, helping us do our work better. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

The AI features are excellent, but they’re built on a question-and-answer pairing library rather than operating on a general semantic model. This means there’s an administrative component to maintaining and managing that library that you don’t have with other AI agents based on LLMs, such as Co-Pilot or Claude. That said, we’ve found the extra administrative effort pays off with a strong return when building proposal responses. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Tiffany R.
TR
Tiffany R.
Strategic Proposal Manager
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Originally submitted 4/23/2021
"Empowers Teams with Seamless AI and Content Management"
5/5
What do you like best about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

I absolutely love Responsive! It's like having the company's "golden record" of knowledge right at everyone's fingertips, super easy for the whole team to access! The built-in AI is a total game-changer: just ask a question and boom, you get the perfect answer every time. We use it daily for our content library and all our projects. What do I love most? I don't need to bug any tech wizards to manage the structure of the library. I can customize everything myself with my own tags and smart access controls. Running the AI directly on our content makes Responsive an absolute must-have for this one-person powerhouse operation! It's seriously essential to how I get things done. And the customer Support? They actually listen and turn our feedback into real features, talk about feeling valued! Setup was a piece of cake, and it plays perfectly alongside Teams and SharePoint. Responsive isn't just a tool, it's my secret weapon! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

Nothing Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Rhea Nair of Responsive, formerly RFPIO

Hi Tiffany, we love detailed reviews especially with 5 stars. Thank you so much for your kind words. I'll be sure to share the review with Nicole. We are glad RFPIO has helped you remain consistent and save time. We'd love to hear more from you as you continue on your RFPIO journey. Do reach out to us in case of questions or concerns in the future. Thanks again :)

Jace E.
JE
Jace E.
Senior Account Executive
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Responsive’s AI Responses and SSO Make RFPs Effortless"
5/5
What do you like best about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

My favorite feature of Responsive is the AI response tool and I use it even when I'm not engaged in an RFP. The AI tool is somehow incredibly well versed on our internal systems and almost always gives me a legal-approved message to even the hardest questions. The SSO makes it really easy to log into and use quickly when I'm on phone calls or demos. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

I haven't found anything that I dislike about Responsive. It has saved me hundreds of hours of manual entry and finding answers during several large RFPs over the years. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sofía A.
SA
Sofía A.
Proposal Writer
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Major Time-Saver for Multilingual RFPs with a Smarter AI Assistant"
5/5
What do you like best about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

I really appreciate how time saving it is while managing different projects at the same time. I also value how it generates answers using our curated Content Library, its AI Assistant has gotten increasingly better with time.

I work with RFPs in English and Spanish, and the automatic translation and reuse of past answers in multiple languages is a game changer for me.

Lastly, having the Ask Responsive Chrome app available in my desktop is a cool feature I use whenever I want to draft or rephrase an answer. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

Sometimes projects include repetitive questions. To maintain consistency throughout our response, I wish it could have an Ctrl + F like feature inside the platform to find content easier.

I also don't like the layout formats it offers me, I always have to manually refine them outside the platform. I understand it's a tool for answering RFPs and not formatting them, but it could be a nice implementation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Marketing and Advertising
AM
Verified User in Marketing and Advertising
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
Originally submitted 6/24/2026
"Feature-Rich Platform That Streamlines Work and Keeps Deliverables on Time"
4/5
What do you like best about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

I like that the platform offers many useful features that streamline processes, helping ensure that tasks are completed with minimal friction and delivered on time. The UI/UX are easy and engaging with lots of time saved due to Responsive's helpful AI features. The platform's performance is top tier. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

The only thing I dislike about Responsive is that troubleshooting can sometimes take longer than I expect it to. But, the troubleshooting process is usually started within a 48 hour window. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Horia Z.
HZ
Horia Z.
Senior SaaS Cloud Technologist
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
Originally submitted 7/31/2024
"Modern, versatile, obsolete"
5/5
What do you like best about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

This is a great tool that enables me to quickly complete my projects and to easily identify the right answers for my RFP questions

It is versatile, has a really nice touch and feel, always a pleasure to work wit it. I start my working day with Responsive. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

I am looking forward to see how the Library Information is curated and well kept.

Being a replacement for Qvidian, the previously tool used, I would like to have more autonomous and AI embedded features that would make my work faster and flawless. When are you going to incorporate some really nice fine-tuned AI features? Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Questions about Responsive, formerly RFPIO? Ask real users or explore answers from the community

Get practical answers, real workflows, and honest pros and cons from the G2 community or share your insights.

Aditya M.
AM
Aditya Mahajan
•
Last activity about 4 years ago

Are any plans of including AI/machine learning capabilities?

JS
Jaime Smith
•
Last activity over 5 years ago

Can I update the entire proposal as "Complete" without having to assign "complete" to each question?

Pricing Insights

Averages based on real user reviews.

Time to Implement

2 months

Return on Investment

11 months

Average Discount

11%

Perceived Cost

$$$$$
Responsive, formerly RFPIO Comparisons
Responsive, formerly RFPIO Features
User, Role, and Access Management
Alerts and Notifications
Customizable Templates
RFX
Versioning
Due Date Tracking
Analysis
Selection
Collaboration
Knowledge Base
Review