System Management Software

I think the main downsides of Ninja are around Remote Desktop and reporting. With the Remote Desktop feature, you can’t save credentials per user; it’s only per organisation, which is terrible. We should not have shared credentials for obvious Cyber Essentials reasoning.

Reporting also isn’t ideal. I wanted to report on groups of devices with a software count, but you can’t do this, for example, in a report I’d like to see that 5 devices have Software_X. It seems like you can only view this from the dashboard page for all devices at once or an organisation, and even there the filtering isn’t very useful.

Lastly, our previous RMM solution had some helpful features that I miss: a preview/screenshot function so you can see the state of a device before connecting; a chat function to initiate contact before you connect (not only once you’ve already connected); and a network node feature where you can select a device as a network node and VPN tunnel to it remotely. That way, from your local machine you can access other devices and services on their network without needing to physically remote onto the customer’s device just to reach something on their network. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Ninja allows us to remotely support thousands of devices whenever remote support is needed. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It can feel heavy and somewhat slow sometimes, particularly when I’m handling complex workflows.

There are also tasks that take more clicks than they should, which turns otherwise simple actions into something that feels unnecessarily complicated. On top of that, customization isn’t always intuitive, so even minor tweaks can end up taking more time and effort than I anticipate. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

ServiceNow ITSM solves the problem of scattered, manual incident and request handling by centralizing everything in one platform. It reduces repetitive work through automation, which speeds up response times and cuts down on human error. The benefit is a smoother, more predictable operation where teams have clearer visibility and can focus on higher‑value tasks instead of firefighting. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Dashboard felt overwhelming at first, mainly because there are so many tools and analytics sections to navigate. Some of the more advanced features tool time for our team to learn, but once we got comfortable using them, they eneded up benefiting our engineering team a lot. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

LogRocket helps me reproduce frontend bugs fastest bugs fastest and improve the workflow and have fixed multiple UI issues by watching user sessions and seeing exactly where people get confused or get stuck. Being able to open a session replay and review it right. It right away makes it much easier to understand what happend, pinpoint the root cause and resolve issues faster. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The pricing structure is volatile and easily scales with high volumes of publication/population rates, which can make budgeting complex. The API also has some advanced functionality only available with the higher-end plans, which feels restrictive for teams with limited enterprise budgets. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

New Relic has addressed the issue of monitoring silos by bringing together our application, infrastructure and user experience monitoring in one place. This has allowed our team to diagnose incidents quicker, which in turn means that we can fix problems quicker, providing our users with a better product. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I dislike most about Atera is that some of its more advanced features still feel less mature than those in larger, enterprise-focused RMM platforms. Reporting and analytics have improved over time, but they can still feel limiting when you need highly customized dashboards or deeper business insights.

The PSA module is convenient because everything is integrated, but certain workflows and automations aren’t as flexible as they are in dedicated PSA solutions. Ticketing can also become cumbersome in more structured service desk environments.

Patch management is another area that could use improvement, particularly around visibility and consistency in larger or more complex environments. At times, troubleshooting automation failures or agent-related issues requires more manual intervention than I would expect.

Mac management also lags well behind the Windows experience. Feature parity isn’t there yet: monitoring, scripting, patching, and device management for macOS feel more limited and less reliable than on Windows endpoints. For MSPs supporting mixed environments, this creates operational inconsistencies and often means relying on additional tools to properly manage Apple devices.

Finally, while the platform evolves quickly, some UI changes and new features can feel like they’re released before being fully refined. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Atera helps centralize and simplify day-to-day MSP operations by bringing RMM, PSA, remote access, patch management, monitoring, and billing together in a single platform. Rather than juggling multiple disconnected tools, technicians can work from one interface, which boosts efficiency and helps reduce operational overhead.

The biggest benefit for me is the time saved through automation. Automated monitoring, patching, alerting, and scripting cut down on repetitive manual tasks and let the team focus more on higher-value work and customer support. Having centralized visibility across all client environments also makes it easier to spot issues proactively before they become critical.

The per-technician pricing model is another major advantage, since it supports growth without worrying about endpoint-based cost increases. That makes scaling more predictable and financially sustainable for an MSP.

Atera also helps improve response times and the overall customer experience by streamlining ticket management and remote support, enabling faster troubleshooting and quicker resolution for end users. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like least about Better Stack is that some configurations can be a bit confusing at first, especially when you want to adjust alerts or delve into the logs. I also feel that in certain cases it could offer more customization options or integrations. It's not critical, but these are details that could improve the experience, especially for more technical teams. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Better Stack helps me primarily solve the visibility problem in my services. When you have multiple APIs and processes running, it's easy to lose sight of what's failing or where the bottleneck is. With Better Stack, I can centralize logs, monitoring, and alerts, which allows me to detect problems much faster and take action without wasting time investigating in different tools. This ultimately translates into less downtime and better stability in my applications. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes the website will just not load, and I have to wait quite a few times. Also, Metric Explorer sometimes crashes if it has a tad bit more data to share. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Coralogix for monitoring logs, alerting, and tracing, enhancing developer work and on-call team efficiency. It also optimizes costs with the TCO optimizer and integrates seamlessly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While Datadog is powerful and feature-rich, it can take some time to fully learn and configure for new users. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Datadog helps us monitor all our systems, applications, and logs in one place. It helps reduce downtime and keeps our services running smoothly. This saves time, improves team collaboration, and gives us better visibility into our infrastructure. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is one of the most expensive tools on the market. It takes a lot of training to get your team up to speed. Getting the advanced features like custom business dashboards to work exactly how you want them requires a ton of manual effort. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Dynatrace has been instrumental in helping us to know when our app is slow or broken before customers notice them. It has helped to save a lot of time so that we can focus on critical issues. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

GPU monitoring. We run inference workloads on GPU machines and I can't see GPU utilization inside CubeAPM, so I still have to check that elsewhere. Hoping they add this at some point. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Less time jumping between tools when something goes wrong. That's the main thing. When our image processing API starts throwing errors or latency spikes, the on-call team can trace back to the cause a lot faster now.

Cost is also much lower than what we were paying with New Relic. Flat pricing works well for us, so as we keep adding services, the bill stays predictable. I think that alone made the switch worth it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love most parts of this platform but I wish that the price was a little bit more moderate than it is offering now. To be very efficient in using this platform, the user will need to do a lot of learning as well as good exposure to this platform. Sometimes depending too much on AI analytics may seem to be a bad choice for decision making though its presence is of significant help. I have to admit that this platform is meant for powerlifting and may be a mismatch for smaller organization in terms of budget and work capacity. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

This Platform assist a lot in decision making of the organization and assist a lot with its automation capabilities. It makes work more efficient with its faster issue identification and resolution capability. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Notion sync isn’t real time. New pages take a while to be searchable by the agent. If we ship a fresh runbook in the morning the AI doesn’t know about it until later that day. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

it helped me to deploy AI for my entire company and reduce the volume of request my team used to receive Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

what I don’t like much is the UI widgets, they feel a bit confusing and not very consistent, sometimes hard to quickly understand what I’m looking at. also auto refresh doesn’t work properly many times, I still have to manually refresh to see latest errors which is annoying. and sometimes issue grouping is not accurate, same type of errors show up as separate issues which makes things a bit messy to track. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sentry is basically solving the problem of not knowing what broke and where, especially in RPA flows where things fail silently or are hard to reproduce. earlier it was a lot of manual log checking and guessing, now I get exact error, stack trace and context which makes debugging way faster. it also helps in catching issues in real time instead of waiting for someone to report, so downtime is less. overall it’s saving time, reducing effort in tracking issues, and making the bots more reliable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some reports in the inventory area, especially those related to software, can still evolve. Expanding these analyses would provide a more complete set of information, facilitating the centralization of tools and improving IT asset control. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Milvus has been fundamental for the continuous evolution of my support. Through dashboards, reports, and detailed monitoring of the services, I can identify patterns, map recurring failures, and act more strategically on the root cause of problems. This allows us to move from a merely reactive stance and work on neutralizing recurring incidents, increasing team efficiency, improving SLAs, and enhancing the quality of service provided to users. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One thing I don’t like about Jira Service Management is that sometimes it is hard to find which ticket is assigned to me. The tool does not clearly show it, so I have to search a lot or ask others for help. This can waste time and cause confusion. Also, sometimes Jira does not guide me properly or give me a clear direction on what to do next. It feels like I am stuck or unsure about the next steps. If these issues are improved, Jira will become even more user-friendly and efficient for daily work. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Jira Service Management helps me manage my work more easily and in an organised way. In my role, I mainly review tickets that are created by the content team or management team. Whenever a new Jira ticket comes in, I get an automatic email. I open the ticket and check many things carefully. I make sure that the content written is correct and suitable, the mailer team has used the proper code, the CTA (Call to Action) has the correct title tag, and the overall design of the email looks good and is properly formatted. I do a full audit to ensure there are no mistakes. If everything is correct, I approve the ticket and close it in Jira. This process helps avoid errors and ensures smooth communication. Jira makes tracking all these tasks simple, and it improves the workflow between teams, which helps me do my job more efficiently. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It’s a little hard to get used to when you first install it, so there’s definitely a learning curve. That said, the support is fantastic, so I don’t have any worries. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We needed a system to manage incoming finance requests, such as AP and AR, so they could be automatically assigned and tracked by each individual agent. This system does exactly that, and it also integrates smoothly with our existing O365 environment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Upto now there is no dislike points in the motadata evening is good Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The advanced features are whenever the customer is raising any support ticket it will automatically forwarded to the ticketing tools and assing the ticket to the availability engineer

It's reduces the cost of time and works seamlessly Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The hierarchical grouping for OT devices is still pretty manual. Every time maintenance swaps a sensor or adds a new actuator I have to go rebuild the tree structure by hand, and if you forget one sub-group the maps look like a jigsaw with missing pieces. It’s not a deal-breaker, but after a busy shutdown week it feels like busywork that should be smarter by now. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We used to fly blind on predictive maintenance—machines would just fail and we’d scramble. Now PRTG gives us trending curves I can actually show the maintenance guys in plain English. We cut unplanned downtime by roughly 40 % on the critical lines and shaved about 18 % off our quarterly energy bill because we finally saw which machines were idling at full power overnight. The ROI showed up in the first six months. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

1. UI / UX

Limitations: The UI feels less intuitive and somewhat unpolished. There’s a learning curve, and in some situations you may need scripting knowledge to really get the most out of it.

2. Integrations

Limitations: API-based integrations with external enterprise tools can be somewhat limited.

3. Performance

Limitations: Performance can dip on slower networks, especially during large-scale patch deployments.

4. Pricing / ROI

Limitations: Pricing feels a bit higher.

5. Support / Onboarding

Limitations: The initial setup and configuration can take time.

6. AI / Intelligence

Limitations: It’s not as advanced as more AI-first platforms. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

IT teams often end up using different tools for patching, security, asset tracking, and remote support. That fragmentation creates unnecessary complexity, drives up costs, and leaves poor visibility across the environment.

Endpoint Central addresses this with unified endpoint management (UEM) from a single console, letting teams manage Windows, Mac, Linux, and mobile devices together. From a UI/UX perspective, having everything in one place makes day-to-day administration more consistent and easier to follow.

A common challenge is simply not knowing what devices exist or what they’re running, which leads to unmanaged endpoints and, ultimately, security risks. The solution here is real-time asset inventory and monitoring, with full visibility into hardware, software, and usage mapping. The AI/intelligence angle is the real-time insights and analytics that help turn inventory data into something actionable.

Unpatched systems are the #1 cause of breaches & ransomware, and manual patching is both slow and error-prone. Endpoint Central’s approach is automated patch management for both the OS and applications, supported by AI-driven threat detection plus vulnerability scanning and remediation. With AI/intelligence focused on predictive threat detection, the practical outcome is faster patch cycles and less downtime.

When devices are spread across locations, networks, and users, remote management and support becomes difficult. The platform’s remote monitoring and control works across LAN, WAN, cloud, and remote setups, and includes secure remote troubleshooting tools. A central dashboard improves remote management from a UI/UX standpoint, while support and onboarding benefit from faster remote issue resolution. Performance-wise, this translates into less downtime for employees.

Many routine tasks—patching, software deployment, and reporting—are repetitive and time-consuming. An automation-first platform helps by automating patch deployment, software installation, and reporting workflows, which improves performance through faster execution and fewer manual errors.

There’s also the ongoing difficulty of meeting standards such as GDPR and ISO. Built-in compliance reports, policy enforcement, continuous monitoring, and audit-ready data help reduce the manual effort needed to stay aligned.

Finally, multiple tools plus manual work typically means higher cost, and low efficiency leads to poor ROI. Consolidating tools and leaning on automation improves asset utilization and helps bring costs under control. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There’s nothing major to dislike about ManageEngine OP Manager Plus. That said, it would be even better if it included asset management features. We can manage network devices with this tool, but monitors, laptops, and other workstations can’t be managed. Aside from that limitation, I don’t have anything else to complain about. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We have a lot of network devices such as switches, firewalls and routers, so we needed a tool to monitor them, generate monthly reports and identify if anything gets disconnected. For that purpose, we purchased OP Manager. Now, I do not have any issues and everything is clear. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.