Business Collaboration Software

The downside is that work management requires a minimum of three paid users, and if you want the security features you have to be on the Enterprise plan with five users. This is unfortunate for small teams, since they don’t need five seats. It would be great if monday offered a small business plan. I do freelance work on the side and would love to utilize monday, but as a team of one, paying for three seats per product just isn’t reasonable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Monday work management makes project management more organized and easier to track, and it also helps me find the current version of documents quickly. Using a OneDrive or folder-based system can get very messy and can lead to several hours of wasted time over the course of a year. Since switching to Monday, I no longer have to search through folders and dates just to find the most accurate resource. Monday’s version history helps me stay organized and makes it easier to locate the resources I need efficiently. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

ClickUp can feel overwhelming at times. There are many features and configuration options, which is helpful, but it also means the system can become cluttered if it is not set up carefully. New users often need guidance to understand how our team uses it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

ClickUp helps us keep our work organized in one central place. Tasks are clearly assigned, deadlines are visible, and priorities are easier to manage. This reduces confusion about who is responsible for what and helps projects move forward without constant check ins.

It also allows conversations to happen directly within each task. That keeps context, decisions, and updates tied to the work itself instead of scattered across email or chat. As a result, information is easier to find, new team members can get up to speed more quickly, and we spend less time searching for background details. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

large operational spreadsheets can slow down when handling heavy data, advanced workflow automation sometimes requires third party integration also , offline capabilities are not as strong as traditional desktop based tools. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

it solves communication silos and scattered documentation issues, it centralizes infrastructure runbooks, deployment SOPs, audit records and incident reports in a secure environment, this improves collaboration between Dev, QA , security and operations teams. we have reduces incident responses time, improves documentation quality and enhances compliance readiness, it allows me to focus more on automation and infrastructure optimization instead of coordination gaps. it improves security and access control. with strong admin policies , 2FA enforcement and user management we maintain compliance standards easily. it helps me to focus more on automation, CI/CD optimization and infrastructure reliability . Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Since tasks are the only type of true database item, it can become difficult to implement when you need to store information like contacts or checklists. Customer support is also a bit slow and convoluted compared to other tools I have used. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Asana solves my need to be in multiple places at once. I can drill into the details of work as well as see work globally. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

sometimes Jira feels heavy for small experiments ,. creating multiple subtasks for iterative ML experiments can be slightly cumbersome, advance automation features require setup and occasionally third party plugins. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

it solves coordination and tracking problems across ML workflows, instead of tracking experiments and tasks manually, i can see the status of each dataset, model and evaluation in one centralized system, it improves team collaboration , reduces miscommunication between ML engineers, data engineers and product teams, and ensures timely completion of milestones, tasks and blockers are visible, making sprint planning and progress monitoring much more structured. it is indispensable for managing ML projects with multiple moving parts, it enhances accountability, keep documentation and datasets organized and streamlines collaboration between data ,ML and product teams, while it can be slightly heavy for small experiments, the benefits far outweigh the minor setup complexities. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I can not think of anything I dislike about Notion. The only complaint I would have is that using that slash command to quickly pick an option for the note does not work on my mobile device. It's such a quick, convenient thing to use. I wish it worked on my phone. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

A problem notion solves for me is my desire for complex organized note-taking. I have a lot of ideas, a lot of equipment, a lot of projects, a lot of things that I just want to jot down and have very meticulously organized through various lists and toggle headings. Notion allows me to do pretty much anything I wanted, whether it's a database, a log or even a simple note. It's really changed the way I store my information, personal or farm related. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One thing I dislike about Microsoft Teams is that it can sometimes feel overwhelming, especially with too many channels, notifications, and overlapping conversations. Important messages can easily get buried if notifications aren’t managed carefully.

It can also be resource-intensive and occasionally slow, particularly on older devices. Additionally, the file organization structure—since it’s tied to SharePoint and OneDrive—can be confusing for users who aren’t familiar with how Microsoft’s ecosystem works. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Microsoft Teams is solving the problem of fragmented workplace communication by bringing messaging, video meetings, file sharing, and collaboration into a single platform. Instead of switching between separate tools for email, chat, video calls, and document editing, everything is centralized in one workspace.

This benefits me by saving time, reducing miscommunication, and making collaboration more efficient. I can quickly move from a chat to a video call, co-edit documents in real time, and keep project-related conversations organized in dedicated channels. It also improves transparency within teams, since conversations and shared files are accessible in one place rather than scattered across different apps. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One issue is feature overload. There’s meetings, chat, whiteboard, docs, clips, AI tools, phone, scheduler and more. While that’s impressive, it can make the interface feel crowded. For new users especially, it’s not immediately clear where to go for what.

Another drawback is that chat still doesn’t feel as fluid as dedicated tools like Slack. Threads can get messy, and long-term knowledge management inside chat isn’t great. It works, but it’s not the strongest part of the platform.

There’s also the pricing structure. Some of the more useful features, especially advanced AI capabilities, are locked behind higher-tier plans. For smaller teams, that can feel limiting.

And finally, performance can dip when running larger meetings alongside multiple integrations. It’s generally stable, but it does demand decent system resources.

So overall, it’s not about major flaws. It’s more about complexity and positioning. Zoom started as the best video tool in the room. As it expands into an all-in-one workplace platform, it’s still figuring out how to make everything feel equally polished. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

At its core, it cuts down fragmentation. Before, teams juggle a video app, a chat tool, a docs/collaboration tool, calendars, and task trackers. That’s context switching—mental friction, lost time, missed details. Zoom Workplace brings those into one ecosystem. That alone smooths communication and coordination.

It also tackles meeting inefficiency. With things like AI summaries, action item extraction, and searchable transcripts, you don’t have to capture every detail yourself or chase people afterward for what was decided. That means less time rehashing and more time acting.

Real-time collaboration is another area. Whiteboards, shared docs, and chat live together around the same session or workspace, so brainstorming feels continuous instead of disjointed across tools.

For teams spread across different locations or time zones, the persistent history in chats and meetings helps too. You don’t have to repeat context—newcomers can catch up quickly.

The benefit of all this is simpler workflows. Fewer apps to switch between, clearer handoffs between conversation and action, and less “where did we put that?” when you need past context. You save time, reduce friction, and keep everyone aligned without relying on seven different tools. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One thing I notice is that Smartsheet works best on a bigger screen. On smaller screens, I prefer to note things down and update later from my laptop. Also, when I add many tasks in a day, I sometimes forget to set the right status and have to correct it later. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Earlier, I used to handle clinic tasks and content work in a very loose way. Some days I focused only on patients and forgot content deadlines, and some days it was the opposite. There was no clear picture of what was pending and what I had already finished.

With Smartsheet, I now keep a simple running list of my work. When I complete something, I mark it and move on to the next task. This helps me stay consistent instead of working in bursts and then catching up later. Over time, this has made my work feel more controlled and less rushed, especially on busy clinic days. I also don’t miss small things like printing diet charts or follow-up calls because they are already listed there. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One downside of Webex Suite is that it can feel complex and overwhelming, especially for new users. The interface isn’t always as intuitive as some competitors. It can also be more expensive for smaller teams. Sometimes performance depends heavily on network quality, which may affect meeting experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Webex Suite addresses the challenge of relying on multiple disconnected communication tools by bringing messaging, meetings, calling, and collaboration together in one platform. This reduces confusion and saves time, since everything is integrated within a single workspace. It also supports remote and hybrid work through features such as video conferencing, screen sharing, and AI-powered summaries that help keep everyone aligned. The strong security and compliance controls add reassurance by helping protect business data. Overall, it boosts productivity and makes team collaboration smoother and more efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I can't think of any flaws related to Fellow's AI features and tools, my opinion is very positive and favorable due to the performance and digital capabilities of all its virtual communication resources. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Fellow is the platform I currently use to make my virtual work possible, facilitating the collection of information and the transcription of all my work meetings in an automated and efficient way, improving my business productivity and protecting my professional data. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Claap’s AI transcription performs well overall, but it may occasionally miss words—especially with strong accents, technical terms, or when multiple people speak at the same time. As a result, minor edits are needed after meetings. Processing time can also vary depending on the length of the recording and server traffic. During peak usage, transcriptions and summaries may take a bit longer than expected. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Claap solves the main problem of losing important information from meetings, since key discussions, decisions, and action items are often not properly documented or end up scattered across emails and chat tools. It automatically records meetings, generates transcripts and summaries, and organizes everything in one searchable workplace. This lets the team focus on the discussion instead of taking notes, quickly search past meetings for insights, and keep everyone aligned even if someone couldn’t attend live. With strong security controls and compliance features, it also gives me confidence when handling sensitive conversations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

If there is a formal update to our main housing system and I forget to duplicate this update within Airtable, inconsistencies show up and information may be out of date. I'm aware I am only using the software at approximately 70% capacity, I could further automate functionality and develop more structured relationships between tables, but this would take hours of focused work. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Generally there are numerous minor issues that did not justify an immediate formal ticket creation within the institutional system such as, minor complaints, pending furniture requests, etc.; all of these types of items have a designated place within Airtable. The primary benefit of implementing Airtable was clarity, I login, select program and status and it's there. In our team meetings, we spend less time attempting to recall what occurred and more time discussing what to do. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It would be helpful to have more integration options with product management tools so that time entries could be connected directly to feature tickets or backlog items. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

actiTIME gives us a reliable way to track effort across the product development lifecycle. It helps identify where bottlenecks occur, whether estimates are realistic, and how workload is distributed across the team. This leads to better planning, more predictable delivery, and clearer communication with leadership about timelines and capacity. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I just wish more marketers knew about this tool, since it’s still not as widely recognized as it deserves to be. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Before using Morningmate, our marketing projects often suffered from scattered communication and missed deadlines across different tools. Morningmate centralized all project management tasks, which cut down planning time and reduced confusion between teams. Real-time KPI tracking helped us identify underperforming campaigns quickly and optimize budgets more effectively. Collaboration with external partners also became smoother, since everyone could work in the same workspace without constant email back-and-forth. Overall, it solved the problem of inefficiency and gave us clearer visibility into campaign performance. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There's nothing I dislike, but it would be nice if they had a full general ledger accounting system to handle accounts payable, etc. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Ravetree helps us map out projects, set project budgets, allocate people to those projects, log time and expenses, and create invoices. Pretty much all of the day to day stuff at our firm. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

In reality, the problem for me is the mobile functionality when the signal strength is low. The offline functionality also lacks strength in that I continue to have a notebook to record the updates when I am offline. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I've reduced missed appointments & last-minute curveballs by utilizing Bordio as the Field Operations Manager. This allows the crew to see the priorities more clearly, me to recognize overloading sooner, & our daily route to look less reactive. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

No regrets or faults to report for the time I have used Conceptboard. It has been an awesome experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

For all project management needs and visual collaboration, Conceptboard has amazing features and we have used it successfully. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I’d say the onboarding experience can feel a bit overwhelming at first. The platform is extremely powerful, but that also means there’s a learning curve especially when you start working with complex automations, custom fields, and advanced workflows. It takes time (and sometimes trial and error) to fully understand how everything connects.

Another area for improvement is the mobile app. It works well for basic task management and quick updates, but it doesn’t yet offer the full depth of features available on the desktop version. For teams that rely heavily on mobile access, having more parity between desktop and mobile would make a big difference.

That said, once you get past the initial setup phase, Wrike becomes a very robust and flexible project management tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Wrike has helped our team centralize project planning, timelines, and communication. Before Wrike, tracking tasks and deadlines across departments was chaotic. Now, we can assign clear responsibilities, monitor progress, and deliver projects on time with fewer miscommunications. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The least helpful aspects of Backlog i have experienced are its limited advanced features and customization compared to more powerful tools like Jira. It may feel restrictive for large or complex projects that require detailed workflows, automation, or advanced reporting. Backlog’s integrations with third-party apps are also relatively limited, which can be a drawback for teams using many external tools. Its user interface, while simple, can feel basic and less flexible for power users. Additionally, Backlog is less suited for organizations needing highly scalable enterprise-level project management or deep analytics. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

A backlog solves the problem of unclear priorities and forgotten work for me by organizing tasks in one visible, ranked list. It reduces chaos, prevents overcommitment, and makes trade-offs explicit. This benefits me by improving focus, decision-making, and efficiency, while building trust with stakeholders and creating a clear sense of progress and direction in daily work Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.