edoclink
The edoclink is an integrated document management, enabling the dematerialisation of processes and administrative decision
Average Rating: 4.4/5.0
Total Reviews: 14
How Do G2 Users Rate edoclink?
- Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 8.3/10 (Category avg: 8.8/10)
- Performance and Reliability: 7.5/10 (Category avg: 8.7/10)
- File following: 9.0/10 (Category avg: 8.8/10)
- Device Syncing: 8.8/10 (Category avg: 8.8/10)
Who Is the Company Behind edoclink?
- Seller: Link Consulting
- Year Founded: 1998
- HQ Location: Lisboa, PT
-
Twitter: @LinkConsulting
172 Twitter followers -
LinkedIn® Page: www.linkedin.com
735 employees on LinkedIn®
Who Uses This Product?
- Company Size: 86% Medium, 29% Small
What Do G2 Reviewers Say About edoclink?
AI-generated summary from verified user reviews
Pros
- Users highlight the ease of use of edoclink, making file management and sharing effortless and efficient.
- Users highlight the collaboration focus of edoclink, making teamwork seamless through efficient online document management.
- Users value edoclink for its fast and supportive customer service, enhancing their responsiveness and overall experience.
- Users value the efficient data management capabilities of edoclink, enhancing document organization and secure sharing.
- Users love the easy access of edoclink, making document management and sharing seamless from anywhere.
Cons
- Users find the offline document access cumbersome and time-consuming, hindering their workflow and convenience.
- Users find the offline access limitations of edoclink cumbersome, hindering quick retrieval of important documents.
- Users find the cost issues of edoclink to be a significant drawback due to its high pricing and maintenance fees.
- Users find the delays in offline access of edoclink cumbersome, impacting workflow efficiency significantly.
- Users find the expensive pricing and high maintenance costs of edoclink to be a significant drawback.
What Are Recent G2 Reviews of edoclink?
"Allow for quick and easy document retrieval"
Rating: 4.5/5.0 stars
— Ambrogio O.
Rating: 5.0/5.0 stars
— Abdul H.

