Best Resource Management Software

Reviewers frequently mention the user-friendly interface, the ability to see everyone's schedule at a glance, and the ease of adding, removing, and changing task times as key benefits of using Float. Reviewers noted issues with the software's limited customization options, occasional slow loading times, and difficulties with certain features such as logging time and moving items within the schedule.

Reviewers frequently mention the user-friendly interface, seamless integration of HR functions, and the time-saving automation features that simplify daily HR tasks. Reviewers noted occasional system lags, limited customization options, and the need for initial guidance to fully explore all modules and functionalities.

Users like the comprehensive project oversight it provides, including real-time insights, detailed reports, and the ability to manage tasks, resources, and timelines efficiently. Users reported that the platform can be complex for new users, with a steep learning curve and a mobile experience that lacks the detail of the desktop version.

Users like Workfront's detailed reporting feature, API integration, automation, and customization options, which enhance productivity, flexibility, and team coordination. Reviewers noted that Workfront can be complex for new users, with a steep learning curve, and the system may lag with large data sets.

Reviewers appreciate Kantata's ability to streamline project management processes, automate common pain points, and provide real-time dashboards and reporting for improved visibility into project health, resource utilization, and financials. Users reported issues with Kantata's user interface being complex for new users, lack of flexibility in creating custom fields, difficulties in tracking timesheets effectively, and slow performance with large datasets.

Users frequently mention the platform's ability to centralize various business functions, its intuitive and detailed calendar for resource management, and its robust reporting capabilities as key benefits. Reviewers experienced challenges with the initial adaptation due to the platform's complexity, limitations in customization, and occasional performance issues with large data imports.

Users like that Certinia PS Cloud centralizes project management, resource planning, and financials, provides real-time visibility into project health, optimizes resource allocation, and offers accurate forecasting. Users mentioned that Certinia PS Cloud is complex with a steep learning curve, certain workflows require too many steps, the interface can be less intuitive for new users, and the deployment process tends to be very lengthy.

Reviewers like the platform's ability to handle complex projects, its user-friendly task management, organizational tools, and its seamless integration with other apps, which enhances team productivity and workflow. Reviewers mentioned that Teamwork.com can be overwhelming for new users due to its many features and settings, it tends to crash or slow down during heavy usage, and its interface can be tricky to navigate.

Reviewers frequently mention the user-friendly interface, ease of implementation, and the system's ability to accommodate policy changes for time tracking and leave management. Users experienced limitations in reporting and integration options, occasional challenges with leave management, and delays in data loading that can impact workflow efficiency.

Users frequently mention the tool's visibility over business operations, ease of use, and the ability to create custom reports as key benefits. Reviewers experienced issues with deleting tasks, difficulties in configuring reports, limitations in customization of reporting tools, and high pricing.

Reviewers like the intuitive interface, visual timelines, and the ability to easily spot delays, as well as the seamless integration with other tools such as Salesforce and Xero, which simplifies data management and enhances productivity. Reviewers noted that the initial setup and configuration can be time-consuming and complex, and the interface can feel crowded when managing many simultaneous projects, also, some users found the reporting features to be limited and not as customizable as they would like.

Reviewers appreciate BigTime's intuitive interface, automatic ID carryover, quick total hours update, and the ability to easily enter and manage time for multiple projects. Reviewers experienced issues with column alignment, lack of task copying options, inability to edit submitted hours, and occasional system lags.

Reviewers appreciate the user-friendly interface, the ability to copy previous timesheets, and the platform's flexibility, which saves time and effort, and the responsive customer support. Users reported that the platform can be confusing for beginners, requires prior training, and can be complex during the initial setup, and some users experienced lags when handling large datasets or running complex reports.