Cost Estimating Software

Subskribe has a strong engine but is still early on some UI quality of life automations and nice to haves. Things like being able to multi-select and alter records or being able to upload external singed paper in place of docusign just aren't there yet. We are able to work around this because they have strong API access. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Subskribe solves the complexity of managing subscriptions and billing across our multiple business units, each with its own CRM. It has replaced a patchwork of manual processes with an automated, API-driven quote-to-cash flow that integrates directly with our GTM & financial systems. Subskribe's open API design has allowed us signifigant flexibility in desigining an enterprise solution with a wide set of needs. This has improved accuracy, scalability, and visibility across our organization’s recurring revenue operations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One downside is that some advanced features can feel slightly overwhelming at first. The pricing can also be a bit high for small teams, especially if you want access to premium features. Occasionally formatting complex documents requires extra adjustments. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Pandadoc solves the problem of slow and manual document management. Before using it we spent too much time creating proposals from scratch and tracking signatures manually. Now everything is automated, organised and trackable in one place. This has saved us significant time, reduced errors and helped us close deals faster. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There really isn't anything not to like. It's a really powerful platform. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It allows a truly single pane of glass view to all revenue operations and allows utilizing one system without swivel chairing to complet the end-to-end Revenue Management process. Combined with Agentforce Automations, it substantially reduces the person hours needed to manage the business. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The Sales team promised that the large cart limitations would be resolved in the near future, but those limitations are still present and stopping us to close large deals on time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Because of the help we got from Conga CPQ sales team we were able to choose a perfect product with necessary customizations on top of it for our end user. Sales team also trained our internal users with their CPQ knowledge making our team better at Conga CPQ. We utilize it for Quoting large carts for our important clients. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The forecast accuracy has not been so good, so that is something that can be improved. The initial setup was a little challenging, particularly with the data that PROS needs to be inputted into the system. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use PROS for pricing optimization, which helps enhance our revenue. Its capabilities surpass Excel for pricing calculations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Users mainly dislike Procore because of its high, non-transparent pricing, steep learning curve, and heavy administrative overhead. Although it’s a dominant tool for large enterprises, these same factors can make it frustrating to adopt and use for smaller firms or specialized trades. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Procore is designed to bring the “chaos” of construction projects into a single source of truth, helping address key industry challenges such as data silos and communication delays. By bringing office and field teams together on one platform, it aims to improve productivity and support more predictable outcomes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I am not satisfied with the design of the field tool in Build, as I find it lacking in user friendliness. From my perspective, there is a lot of potential for improvement, particularly in making the tool easier to use. It is clear that ACC was originally intended for engineers, and now there is an attempt to adapt it for construction or installation workers with the field tool in Build. However, the current design and layout still fall short of what is needed. I strongly believe that working closely with a user experience (UX) group could help make the field tool more intuitive and accessible for those who will actually be using it on the job. Here you can learn a lot from other softwares like Dalux, that has a much more intuitive user interface. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It addresses fragmented processes and documentation by offering a single platform where all documentation can be managed together. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Onboarding Requires Commitment

To unlock Methvin’s full value, teams need time to configure workflows and train users this isn’t an instant plug and play tool.

Interface Can Feel Dense for New Users

Consultants and executives may initially find the depth of detail overwhelming without tailored dashboards. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What impressed me most is Methvin’s first principles estimating methodology, which shifts conversations away from guesswork and legacy spreadsheets toward defensible, auditable cost models. This is especially valuable when organizations need to justify bids to stakeholders, clients, or internal governance teams. The platform doesn’t just speed up estimating it improves the quality of decision making across the project lifecycle. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Even though this is true of any system you want to use consistently and accurately, I still dislike the amount of work on the back end involved. It takes forever, but it's definitely worth it.

Handoff is not always as attentive to details as I would like it to be. It does miss details or miscalculate quantities when reviewing drawings. However, this perfectly exemplifies the need for human diligence and review regardless of how brilliant and automated technology becomes.

The biggest flaw with handoff is the inability to edit some aspects of the templates. I wish I could format things differently. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Handoff has been a great resource for proposal organization and refinement. It also allows me to optimize my time since I can create rules, utilize the pricing catalogs, and spit out templates in a matter of minutes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I wish they would expand the design modules to work more like a website CMS, maybe the ability to use HTML//CSS to really amp up the design and layout. Also the integration with HubSpot is not the best, it does not do what I wanted it to do. BUT I still love the platform, and they are always adding new features, so I will not be changing anytime soon! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Simple but beautiful proposals that do not take all day to make! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The only thing I’m not a huge fan of is the default email reminders, and the fact that I can’t personalize them. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Anchor is solving the problem of messy, time-consuming billing and payment collection by making the entire process simple and streamlined — for both me and my clients. It keeps everything organized in one place, makes it easy for clients to view and pay, and reduces back-and-forth or confusion. For me, that means I’m spending less time chasing payments or managing invoicing details and more time focusing on my actual client work. It’s helped me run my business more efficiently, feel more confident in my process, and it creates a smoother, more professional experience for the clients I serve. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

For very complex or highly customized projects, the initial setup of templates and pricing logic can take some time. However, even this setup process is still faster and simpler than in most alternative tools we’ve tried. We would also appreciate more built-in analytics to track proposal performance. That said, once everything is configured, daily use is smooth and efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Before Apropo, proposals were created manually in documents and spreadsheets, which was slow and error-prone. Now we can generate consistent, detailed offers much faster, even for complex projects with multiple modules or phases. It also helps standardize pricing across the organization and makes collaboration between sales, delivery, and management much easier. We can respond to clients quickly, maintain a professional image, and avoid pricing mistakes. Overall, it shortens the sales cycle and frees up time for actual client work. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Several aspects of the platform feel outdated and could use some refreshing. I also find the template body somewhat difficult to work with; it would be much more convenient if it were easier to adjust. Additionally, I wish I could edit a quote directly instead of having to generate a completely new version each time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

This software integrates smoothly with our existing tools, making the process of creating budgets much more efficient and saving us valuable time. Its streamlined design has noticeably improved our workflow, and we found it easy to implement alongside our current methods. Additionally, it allows us to present our work with a polished and professional appearance. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

At times, configuring certain settings can be complex. However, whenever you encounter an issue or need clarification, the support team is responsive and provides clear, effective assistance. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Price2Spy to automatically link our pricing to competitors, match their prices, and strategically position ourselves below them—while ensuring we never drop below our cost price. It allows us to stay consistently competitive in the market and offers the option for full automation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing that I can think of! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Iris to quickly respond to security questionnaires. It helps fill out these questionnaires efficiently by making it easy to import and auto-annotate sections. I like the auto analyze AI tool and exporting features which streamline this process. I also enjoy using the Chrome extension for one-off questions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are situations where some prices do not show up, but this is because competitors websites get updated and changed constantly. However once pointed out, the app will fix this soon. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

already explained Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Advanced analytics and management-level reporting are still maturing. While the core response workflow is strong, leadership dashboards around usage trends, efficiency metrics, and content performance could be more robust. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Inventive solves the real problems enterprise RFP teams face: response accuracy, context control, and consistency across large content sets. The quality of responses is meaningfully better than other tools we evaluated, and the conflict detection helps prevent inconsistencies before content goes out. Despite the complexity it handles, the product is very easy to use proposal managers and SMEs were productive almost immediately, with minimal training. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There's very little that I find limiting. if i had to point out one thing, it would be that some of the reporting features could be more advanced, especially for deeper analysis across multiple contract types. However, this is minor compared to the overall value the platform provides. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Before fynk, managing contracts and approvals across Andy.do was a fragmented process email chains, spreadsheets, and manual follow up were slowing everything down. fynk centralize all our agreements, providers clarity on statuses and automates reminders so nothing slips through the cracks.

The biggest benefit is time saved and risk reduced. With fynk, out legal and finance workflows are smoother, approvals happen faster, and we have a clear audit trail which gives me peace of mind as CEO. its and essential tool that helps us operate efficiently without adding admirative overhead. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Interface feels really old compared to some other apps. I am old school, so It doesn't bother me at all, mostly my employees Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

With this service quoting becomes consistent, it removes a lot of mistakes that we did manually before. Now I don't check 3 places to confirm pricing, and the quote history stays in place. Really it turned our check out process into a fast and easy thing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Responsive licenses work on a named user basis. Anyone who logs in to review answers, comment, edit, or approve content requires a paid seat. There is no free reviewer only access. This often increases license count for teams with legal, security, or executive reviewers who participate occasionally in RFP reviews. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Responsive solves the problem of scattered content and slow RFP execution. Before using Responsive, answers lived across documents and folders, which made reuse difficult and increased risk of inconsistency. Responsive centralizes approved content in a single library, which improves accuracy and reuse across bids.

Responsive also helps manage complex RFPs under tight timelines. Automated question matching and prepopulation reduce manual work and speed up response creation. Project workflows support clear ownership, task assignment, and progress tracking, which improves coordination across contributors. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.