Website Monitoring Software

Devices that are offline are shown as unhealthy on the dashboard which I would prefer to not be included in the statistics. It does let me customise other health information though which is good.

I wish I could run patching/scripts on a scheduled basis if its missed, I think this is an upcoming feature.. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

OS and Software patching and showing at a glance which devices this has failed on, and most importantly for us being able to automate scripts on devices which helps us keep other aspects of the workstations up to date.

I also now have it monitoring my online servers as an uptime monitor to see if they are offline so I can find out before my users tell me.

It is also providing us with backups and I can quickly access them via NinjaOne to download a file a user has mistakenly deleted. There is also an option to do a full image restore which we have been able to do when transferring a broken workstation into a virtual machine which is something we would not have been able to easily do before NinjaOne.

We also use it for MDM to ensure that company owned iPhones are being updated and we can remote wipe them and change passcodes if users forget them. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I dislike about LogRocket is that it can sometimes be heavy and noisy, especially in complex apps:

Session replays can be slow to load or laggy at times

High data volume makes it harder to find the exact session you need without very specific filters

It can capture a lot of noise, so meaningful signals (the real bug trigger) aren’t always obvious

There’s some setup/maintenance overhead to get masking, sampling, and performance tuned correctly

Cost can scale up quickly as session volume grows

It’s powerful, but it needs careful configuration to avoid performance impact and to keep the signal-to-noise ratio high. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

LogRocket addresses the problem of limited visibility into real user issues in production. Rather than relying only on logs, screenshots, or vague bug reports, it provides a full replay of what the user actually experienced.

For me, this is valuable because it makes hard-to-reproduce bugs much easier to understand. It shows the exact user actions that led to the issue, and it brings frontend errors, network failures, and UI state together in one place. It also reduces the back-and-forth with product or support teams to clarify reproduction steps, which speeds up root cause analysis and helps validate fixes more quickly.

Overall, it helps me move faster from bug report to root cause to fix, especially for flaky, environment-specific, or user-behavior-driven issues. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

New Relic can feel complex for newcomers. The platform is powerful, but understanding all its dashboards, APM details, and configuration options takes significant time.

Many reviewers note that onboarding requires a noticeable investment, especially for teams new to observability tools. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Lack of visibility into the customer journey

Problem:

E‑commerce teams often struggle to understand exactly where users encounter friction—slow product pages, checkout failures, or payment gateway delays.

How New Relic solves it:

New Relic provides end‑to‑end visibility of critical journeys like checkout and fulfillment, showing which technical issues directly impact revenue Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The built-in videos were a bit fast and I had to rewatch them a few times. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

From not knowing their product at all, to being able to get value out of the logs and build a dashboard in about 8 hours of work is mind blowing. Their product is lean and mean... No fluff. Just straight to getting value out of my logs. This product is incredible. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The app management tool is great, but it would be even better with more transparency during the install process. A progress bar and ETA for each app would help us manage our time better. Also, since many updates require a restart, having the ability to automatically schedule a reboot for right after the install finishes would be a huge lifesaver for our workflow. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Managing hardware and app issues is much faster now that everything is under one roof. We can check disk space, memory, and IP info at a glance, which saves a ton of time. The remote desktop integrations (AnyDesk/Splashtop) are rock solid, and being able to store login info for dedicated machines makes supporting our power users a breeze. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes the website will just not load, and I have to wait quite a few times. Also, Metric Explorer sometimes crashes if it has a tad bit more data to share. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Coralogix for monitoring logs, alerting, and tracing, enhancing developer work and on-call team efficiency. It also optimizes costs with the TCO optimizer and integrates seamlessly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

In our current context,

As our infrastructure or application footprint grows, storage costs increase proportionally and can become a major expense. If we need to retain data for extended periods, expect those costs to rise even further (so storage necessity is the key).

Just like other platforms, Datadog also offers numerous integrations with third-party platforms like Slack, Microsoft Teams, and Jira. We leveraged on all these channels initially that lead to increased costs, as each integration added complexity and resource usage along with increase complexity implementing them. We had to strip someof them to manage cost and purpose of applications at different environment levels.

There are so many options for same purpose but without proper guidance or complete understanding of that usecase, we may en dup implement more than what is required. So purpose is key here. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

1. Datadog is helping us providing the complete picture of problem with some initial details and by giving us a single platform to monitor 50+ microservices across 40+ AWS accounts, so nothing slips through the cracks. we have some first hand information based on automation or test suits logs, we know where to check, leading to less turn around time.

2. It tackles incident management/response challenges with real-time alerts, on-call integration, and automated triage, identifying similar patterns, notes around the service and resolution documents helping us fix issues before they impact customers at large extend. Its integration to different platforms we manage (almost all) is really a value add.

3. Built-in health checks and test suites keep our systems in shape, while integrations with AWS, PagerDuty, Slack, and more make the whole workflow smooth and connected. Datadog eliminates tool silos and creates a smooth workflow for monitoring and incident resolution.

4. From service-level segregation to rich dashboards, Datadog turns most of our log data into simple insights for engineers and execs alike. Different dashboards at low level and higher level made our life easy from monitoring to presenting the data to higher-ups. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There’s nothing to dislike. It’s the number 1 observability tool to use, implement, and monitor applications. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

In Dynatrace, we can set up alerts based on anomalies as well as static thresholds. It can notify you before your application goes down, or when any issue occurs, helping you keep things secure. We can also set service-level boundaries for SLA, SLO, and SLI. In addition, we can create multiple dashboards for the DevOps team to keep an eye on the application’s performance. Overall, it helps you secure your application and address problems before it goes down. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The UI and dashboard experience could be more polished and intuitive. A bit more consistency in layout and interactions would improve usability. Additionally, AI-driven observability features (such as automated root-cause analysis or smarter anomaly detection) could be further strengthened to add more proactive insights. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

CubeAPM helps us quickly identify performance bottlenecks, slow transactions, and runtime issues across our applications. Earlier, it was harder to pinpoint the exact service or method causing latency, which increased troubleshooting time. With CubeAPM’s APM and runtime metrics, we now get clear visibility into request flows and system behavior, allowing us to detect and resolve issues much faster.

This has reduced downtime, improved overall application stability, and helped the engineering team move from reactive firefighting to more proactive performance monitoring. Additionally, the move away from Datadog has helped us keep observability costs more predictable while maintaining the visibility we need. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I have nothing negative to say about the operational performance of Pandora FMS's features, I believe it is software that offers a top quality digital security system. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

By using the digital features and resources of Pandora FMS, I have managed to free my networks and virtual systems from all kinds of viruses and security risks, now I can protect my data and carry out my online activities without any problems. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It can take a significant amount of time and effort to train new users on its advanced functionality and full set of features. In my opinion, it’s also noticeably pricier than other APM tools I’ve worked with. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

My experience with IBM Instana in our organization has been largely positive. Before deploying it, we struggled to identify performance issues quickly. Since implementing it, it has helped us resolve incidents faster and has also given us real-time monitoring capabilities, which makes it easier to spot and address problems as they arise. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I dislike about Paessler PRTG is that it can become expensive as the number of sensors increases, especially for large-scale environments. The licensing model based on sensor count may limit scalability. Additionally, the initial configuration for complex infrastructures can feel overwhelming, and advanced customization options sometimes require deeper technical knowledge. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

PRTG addresses the challenge of limited network visibility and slow issue detection. It helps me by delivering real-time alerts, cutting down on downtime, and strengthening overall system reliability.

Stepping back, monitoring isn’t only about spotting problems after they appear; it’s about catching them early and preventing real business impact. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Not a dislike but a feature I would like to see is ExtraHop move towards prevention. Currently, the product is good at identifying and detecting suspicious or malicious activity. Prevention can be achieved through integration with tools but it would be nice to have these native to ExtraHop. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Whenever we perform penetration tests, ExtraHop is always the first tool to detect the activity. Often times, the penetration testers will start their campaigns performing reconnaissance and trying to remain stealthy. Because they are not attempting to exploit vulnerabilities at this stage and may be using legitimate system tools, these actions would usually go unnoticed. By inspecting all network traffic, ExtraHop is quick to determine unusual activity on the network host even if it is not a managed device. The network traffic can be inspected by SOC teams and actions can be taken to contain the suspicious device. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don’t have any major complaints, but one aspect that could use improvement is the internal documentation and the number of manual steps involved in workflows. If there were more structure and clearer guidance in these areas, I believe productivity could be enhanced even more. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Last9 is solving the problem of unreliable, difficult-to-understand systems in modern distributed architectures. As applications grow more complex, it becomes harder to maintain uptime, identify the root cause of failures, and ensure that services meet reliability goals. Last9 addresses this by providing structured SLO (Service Level Objective) management, real-time observability, and automated insights into system performance.

For me, this has been extremely beneficial because it helps me:

Detect issues early before they become customer-impacting incidents.

Reduce time spent on debugging, since Last9 surfaces the exact services or dependencies causing reliability risks.

Track reliability in a measurable way through SLOs instead of relying on subjective judgments.

Focus my efforts on what truly matters, thanks to clear error budgets and actionable alerts.

Deliver more stable releases, ensuring better user experience and fewer production escalations.

Overall, Last9 helps turn reliability from a reactive activity into a proactive, data-driven process — which boosts my efficiency and confidence in managing high-scale systems. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

So far, I haven't found any drawbacks. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It guarantees me a completely stable network. Previously, I had many wifi problems; when working with a large volume of data for my job, my NAS server did not function as smoothly and reliably as it does now. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The biggest challenge is lack of name recognition as we leverage ENA as part of the services that we provide to our client base. From targeted marketing or more highly visible partnerships, the Entuity name needs more recognition in the IT Network world. They were purchased by Park Place a few years ago which has helped in some areas but not in the area of name recognition in the monitoring space.

One other area of concern, which is likely true with many vendors, but something we didn't used to see with the Entuity folks is they tend to defer instead of just coming out and saying 'no' to some questions. If we are asking for them to support something new that doesn't make sense to them we would appreciate a more open and honest answer. I recently met with their executive team and got those answers that their engineers will no longer provide. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Do a trial and work with the sales engineers. As a hosting company we have a very large and complex network and produces situations that they could not handle. The sales engineers immediately took those to development and in roughly one week we had a custom hot-fix that addressed all of our concerns. And to our delight, all of those changes were included in the GA product release to the public. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The biggest has been tool consolidation. When we are supporting a client that is having a performance problem, the ability to go to a single console to see all the network views that we care about (instead of half a dozen different products) goes a long way to reduce the time to resolution. Then on top of that are all the event management rules we can leverage to control unwanted noise and out of the box integration to our preferred enterprise management tool, BMC TrueSight.

Another major gap that we have used Entuity to fill is to have regular backups of network equipment configurations across many brands. There are still some gaps but it is narrowing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I cannot complain about AppSignal, possibly the problem is with us that we still need to add more integrations, for example with error reporting. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Performance monitoring and log analysys Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is worth noting that the tool is still in heavy development. While the team is clearly trying their best and moving quickly, not all convenience features are present yet compared to older, more bloated competitors. However, the stability and speed of the core features more than make up for the current gaps in the "nice-to-have" category. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

For an engineering team without a dedicated DevOps department, Dash0 removes the operational burden of 'tool-chaining' by providing a unified, OTel-native environment that automatically correlates logs and traces, allowing us to maintain full visibility into our services without needing a specialist to manage complex infrastructure or proprietary agents. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We did not experience any issues with Atatus we could dislike. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We use Atatus when investigating and troubleshooting issues with our LIVE instance of our web platform.

It provides nice drill down into problems on multiple levels in one place. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Reporting isn't good. Alerting setup is a bit complex. I had to dig through the documentation to get the email notification to work properly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

A few months ago a sudden spike in one of our core network switches. Observium flagged the interface as saturated, and I tracked it back to a misconfigured backup job. Without Observium, I probably wouldn't have caught it until users started complaining. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.