Compare Loopio and Responsive, formerly RFPIO 
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Loopio excels in ease of use, with users highlighting its fast and intuitive interface. One user mentioned, "I like that Loopio is fast and easy to use, making things simple for our team," which allows teams to manage multiple submissions efficiently.
- Users say that Responsive, formerly RFPIO, offers a smooth setup experience, with many praising its straightforward initial configuration. A reviewer noted, "The initial setup was easy, which made the whole experience better," indicating that new users can quickly get up to speed.
- Reviewers mention that Loopio provides exceptional customer support, with users appreciating the proactive assistance from their customer success managers. One user stated, "I like the customer service and support, as well as the library features," which contributes to a positive overall experience.
- According to verified reviews, Responsive shines in communication and updates, with users noting that the tool frequently shares information about new releases and best practices. This consistent communication helps users feel informed and supported in their use of the software.
- G2 reviewers report that both products have strong collaboration features, but Loopio stands out with its efficient workflow management for RFPs. Users appreciate how it streamlines the process of mapping questions and assigning owners, making RFP management smoother.
- Users say that while both tools have AI capabilities, Responsive's features are particularly noted for their intuitiveness. A user remarked, "I like the AI features where I can ask questions," which helps reduce workload and allows for a focus on more critical tasks.
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (53.4% of reviews)
Mid-Market (48.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Loopio
Star Rating
(811)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (53.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about LoopioResponsive, formerly RFPIO
Star Rating
(1,282)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (48.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Responsive, formerly RFPIOPricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Loopio
No pricing availableResponsive, formerly RFPIO
No pricing availableFree Trial
Loopio
No trial information availableResponsive, formerly RFPIO
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.9
682
8.9
1,054
Ease of Use
9.1
685
8.7
1,070
Ease of Setup
8.8
496
8.6
636
Ease of Admin
9.1
455
8.7
543
Quality of Support
9.4
642
9.1
925
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.6
448
9.3
527
Product Direction (% positive)
9.3
652
9.0
1,023
Features by Category
Document Creation
8.2
325
|
Verified
8.4
467
|
Verified
8.0
314
|
Verified
8.0
455
|
Verified
7.4
279
|
Verified
7.8
419
|
Verified
8.0
273
|
Verified
8.1
399
|
Verified
8.0
261
|
Verified
8.0
362
|
Verified
8.3
286
|
Verified
8.1
397
|
Verified
Workflow
8.4
301
|
Verified
8.2
419
|
Verified
8.8
320
|
Verified
8.8
458
|
Verified
8.6
315
|
Verified
8.5
436
|
Verified
Analytics
Feature Not Available
8.2
366
|
Verified
Feature Not Available
8.3
399
|
Verified
8.0
274
|
Verified
8.4
452
|
Verified
Administration and Platform
9.1
338
|
Verified
8.8
491
|
Verified
8.7
334
|
Verified
8.4
479
|
Verified
7.5
173
|
Verified
7.7
317
|
Verified
Feature Not Available
7.3
235
|
Verified
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
7.6
168
7.6
250
|
Verified
Generative AI
7.3
93
7.5
140
RFP Generation
8.1
359
7.5
508
8.6
351
8.3
499
8.2
330
8.0
489
9.2
417
8.9
616
RFP Distribution
Feature Not Available
8.1
506
Feature Not Available
7.6
483
Feature Not Available
7.8
487
Submissions
9.1
408
8.8
592
9.2
416
8.8
621
8.9
401
8.6
569
7.9
281
7.8
396
RFP Response
8.8
367
8.5
515
9.1
389
8.8
577
9.0
380
8.7
551
8.2
297
7.8
410
8.1
304
8.1
408
8.0
302
7.9
402
Agentic AI - RFP
6.4
53
7.0
67
6.6
53
6.8
64
6.4
52
6.7
66
Data Sources
Not enough data
8.1
113
Not enough data
7.8
117
Not enough data
8.4
119
Generation
Not enough data
8.0
118
Not enough data
8.2
116
Not enough data
8.0
111
Delivery
Not enough data
8.4
111
Not enough data
8.0
104
Not enough data
7.8
92
Generative AI
Not enough data
7.6
74
Not enough data
7.6
72
Not enough data
6.5
51
Not enough data
6.2
50
Agentic AI - Document Generation
Not enough data
5.3
6
Functionality
Feature Not Available
7.4
112
Feature Not Available
7.5
109
Feature Not Available
7.7
124
9.0
163
8.5
143
Risk assessment
Feature Not Available
7.1
106
Feature Not Available
6.6
103
Feature Not Available
7.7
115
6.6
47
6.7
20
Generative AI - Vendor Security and Privacy Assessment
7.1
47
7.2
23
7.3
51
7.8
24
Supplier Marketplace
Not enough data
8.5
8
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Contract Management
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Data Collection
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Project Management
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.3
7
Agentic AI - Strategic Sourcing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Salesforce AppExchange Apps
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Loopio and Responsive, formerly RFPIO are categorized as RFP, Proposal, Salesforce AppExchange Apps, and Vendor Security and Privacy Assessment
Unique Categories
Loopio has no unique categories
Responsive, formerly RFPIO is categorized as Strategic Sourcing and Document Generation
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Loopio
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Responsive, formerly RFPIO
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
28.8%
Information Technology and Services
13.7%
Financial Services
7.9%
Hospital & Health Care
4.4%
Marketing and Advertising
3.4%
Other
41.8%
Computer Software
24.0%
Information Technology and Services
20.0%
Financial Services
7.1%
Insurance
5.0%
Hospital & Health Care
4.6%
Other
39.3%
Discussions
How do we versino control changes to content?
3 Comments
BK
Version Control:
1) If you are releasing multiple versions of software you can version control on your answer through creating a tag for that version....Read more
What is the best way to use the "Library"?
2 Comments
SM
Hi Gokul,
Great question! We currently have a workflow that allows you to thoughtfully update your Library, as you respond to an RFP. This allows you to...Read more
What is Loopio used for?
1 Comment
IR
It helps teams manage and respond to RFPs, RFIs, DDQs, and security questionnaires in one system.
It uses a central content library so companies can reuse...Read more
What is RFPIO used for?
1 Comment
JP
RFPIO is used for RFP/RFx/RFI response management tool. This tool helps to upload the request from prospect/customer as a doc and configurable to assign...Read more
What is RFP360, an RFPIO company used for?
1 Comment
JP
RFP360 is a software platform designed to streamline the Request for Proposal (RFP) process. It is developed by RFPIO, which is a company specializing in...Read more
Are any plans of including AI/machine learning capabilities?
1 Comment
SO
Great question and thanks for asking. RFPIO's product as a whole is based upon machine learning, which helps suggest content for answers based on questions...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
Your software and services insights are valuable.
Your peers come to G2 to get an inside look at and other business solutions. Adding perspective on will help others pick the right solution based on real user experience.
