Link copied to clipboard # PandaDoc vs Responsive, formerly RFPIO Comparison - What are their main differences? Share [ Export ](/compare/pandadoc/responsive-formerly-rfpio/export.csv) PandaDocResponsive, formerly RFPIO[+ Add Product](#) Pricing **PandaDoc** Free Trial **$19.00** 1 Seat cost Per Month ยท Essentials **Responsive, formerly RFPIO** No pricing available **Pricing Insights** from reviews Time to Implement **PandaDoc** 1 monthFaster Based on 892 responses **Responsive, formerly RFPIO** 2 months Based on 41 responses Return on Investment **PandaDoc** 8 months3 months sooner Based on 811 responses **Responsive, formerly RFPIO** 11 months Based on 35 responses Perceived Cost **PandaDoc** $$$$$ **Responsive, formerly RFPIO** $$$$$ Average Discount **PandaDoc** 10% **Responsive, formerly RFPIO** 11%1% more **Pros & Cons** from reviews **PandaDoc** [ Ease of Use (665) ](https://www.g2.com/products/pandadoc/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1640374&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Document Management (333) ](https://www.g2.com/products/pandadoc/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1643902&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Signature Issues (107) ](https://www.g2.com/products/pandadoc/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1642674&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Missing Features (105) ](https://www.g2.com/products/pandadoc/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1643969&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews) **Responsive, formerly RFPIO** [ Ease of Use (150) ](https://www.g2.com/products/responsive-formerly-rfpio/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1782473&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Features (117) ](https://www.g2.com/products/responsive-formerly-rfpio/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1783575&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Learning Curve (34) ](https://www.g2.com/products/responsive-formerly-rfpio/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1778186&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Not Intuitive (33) ](https://www.g2.com/products/responsive-formerly-rfpio/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1780371&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews) Integrations **PandaDoc** [ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_24587f96a3fcccbd1a27958aacca893c/actionstep.png "Product Avatar Image") Actionstep ](https://www.g2.com/products/actionstep/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_d06214a78a4c42bbd28cfa5c5d8b7b38/acuity-scheduling.png "Product Avatar Image") Acuity Scheduling ](https://www.g2.com/products/acuity-scheduling/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_e89d21750715f4646ed61c011b2917dc/adobe-acrobat.png "Product Avatar Image") Adobe Acrobat ](https://www.g2.com/products/adobe-acrobat/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_d6baa37f3fd778d1adc429bf82873583/agiloft-agiloft-contract-management-suite%282%29.png "Product Avatar Image") Agiloft Contract Management... ](https://www.g2.com/products/agiloft-agiloft-contract-management-suite/reviews)[ View all ](https://www.g2.com/products/pandadoc/integrations) **Responsive, formerly RFPIO** [ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_cbdded440dd46c7dcb4debe3e10b5048/microsoft-sharepoint.png "Product Avatar Image") Microsoft SharePoint ](https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-sharepoint/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_89403f91f420a370f25b6800af702d70/microsoft-word.png "Product Avatar Image") Microsoft Word ](https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-word/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_685fcffbb1d262ce4dbe736eb3c92266/okta%282%29.png "Product Avatar Image") Okta ](https://www.g2.com/products/okta/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_3535f71b2a0f16cb37247f249d1d534c/salesforce-agentforce.jpeg "Product Avatar Image") Salesforce Agentforce ](https://www.g2.com/products/salesforce-agentforce/reviews)[ View all ](https://www.g2.com/products/responsive-formerly-rfpio/integrations) Screenshots **PandaDoc** ![PandaDoc screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/112069/templates_2x-min.png) **Responsive, formerly RFPIO** ![Responsive, formerly RFPIO screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/1450083/Product-Banner-1.png) **Ratings** from reviews Meets Requirements **PandaDoc** 9.2 9.22,875 **Responsive, formerly RFPIO** 8.8 8.81,080 Ease of Use **PandaDoc** 9.2 9.22,913 **Responsive, formerly RFPIO** 8.7 8.71,098 Ease of Setup **PandaDoc** 9.1 9.11,931 **Responsive, formerly RFPIO** 8.6 8.6662 Ease of Admin **PandaDoc** 9.1 9.11,450 **Responsive, formerly RFPIO** 8.7 8.7546 Quality of Support **PandaDoc** 9.0 9.02,342 **Responsive, formerly RFPIO** 9.1 9.1950 Has the product been a good partner in doing business? **PandaDoc** 9.2 9.21,423 **Responsive, formerly RFPIO** 9.3 9.3530 Product Direction (% positive) **PandaDoc** 9.1 9.12,628 **Responsive, formerly RFPIO** 9.0 9.01,046 **Features** ratings from reviews Document Generation 8.4 839 7.6 141 Proposal 8.5 1,259 8.1 563 E-Signature 8.3 2,068 Not enough data Salesforce AppExchange Apps 8.3 10 Not enough data CPQ 8.7 410 Not enough data Online Form Builder 8.9 174 Not enough data AI Proposal Generator Tools Not enough data 9.7 6 E-Notary 9.3 47 Not enough data Vendor Security and Privacy Assessment Not enough data 7.4 156 Contract Management 9.0 1,293 Not enough data RFP Not enough data 8.0 719 Strategic Sourcing Not enough data 8.6 8 User Insights **Reviewers' Company Size** Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 70.0% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 26.4% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 3.6% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 70.0% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 26.4% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 3.6% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 12.6% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 48.3% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 39.1% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 12.6% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 48.3% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 39.1% **Reviewers' Industry** [![PandaDoc](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/97320b34486db82a48d7af098a34228d/pandadoc.svg "PandaDoc")](https://www.g2.com/products/pandadoc/reviews) PandaDoc Computer Software 9.7% Marketing and Advertising 9.3% Information Technology and Services 8.3% Construction 4.6% Financial Services 4.0% Other 64.1% [![Responsive, formerly RFPIO](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/799e832a5413ade138b86c0c7447b06b/responsive-formerly-rfpio.svg "Responsive, formerly RFPIO")](https://www.g2.com/products/responsive-formerly-rfpio/reviews) Responsive, formerly RFPIO Computer Software 24.2% Information Technology and Services 19.9% Financial Services 7.0% Insurance 5.1% Hospital & Health Care 4.5% Other 39.3% Alternatives **PandaDoc Alternatives** ![Proposify](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/c9c4f4613d98269846967bdb81d04f85/proposify.svg "Proposify") [ Proposify ](/products/proposify/reviews) ![Qwilr](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/d006c87add0987c5a3a22be14a81bd79/qwilr.svg "Qwilr") [ Qwilr ](/products/qwilr/reviews) ![GetAccept](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/e6889f440c0cb205dbd1ef1d76a18c56/getaccept.svg "GetAccept") [ GetAccept ](/products/getaccept/reviews) ![Adobe Acrobat Sign](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/478678941e2cab8a8bf8f98586f19726/adobe-acrobat-sign.svg "Adobe Acrobat Sign") [ Adobe Acrobat Sign ](/products/adobe-acrobat-sign/reviews) **Responsive, formerly RFPIO Alternatives** ![Loopio](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1487565815/loopio.svg "Loopio") [ Loopio ](/products/loopio/reviews) ![QorusDocs](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/839c5bf1530bdde5dcb8776aa246c715/qorusdocs.svg "QorusDocs") [ QorusDocs ](/products/qorusdocs/reviews) ![Proposify](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/c9c4f4613d98269846967bdb81d04f85/proposify.svg "Proposify") [ Proposify ](/products/proposify/reviews) ![Qwilr](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/d006c87add0987c5a3a22be14a81bd79/qwilr.svg "Qwilr") [ Qwilr ](/products/qwilr/reviews) ## PandaDoc vs Responsive, formerly RFPIO FAQs Generated using AI Last updated: August 14, 2026 ### What is the difference between PandaDoc vs Responsive, formerly RFPIO? PandaDoc stands out for its higher G2 rating, stronger ease of setup, and a focus on ease of use, while Responsive, formerly RFPIO, is recognized for its robust support and team collaboration features. | [PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/products/pandadoc/reviews) | [Responsive, formerly RFPIO](https://www.g2.com/products/responsive-formerly-rfpio/reviews) | | --- | --- | | 4.7/5 (3,700 reviews) | 4.5/5 (1,311 reviews) | | Small-Business | Mid-Market | | 9.1 | 8.6 | | 9.0 | 9.1 | | Ease of Use (718 all-time mentions) | Team Collaboration (143 all-time mentions) | ### How do the pricing models of PandaDoc and Responsive, formerly RFPIO compare? PandaDoc is rated as the stronger value by reviewers, with a higher satisfaction score on price and cost-related dimensions. - **PandaDoc:** Reviewers consistently highlight PandaDoc as cost-effective and affordable, with several noting its value compared to competitors. - **Responsive, formerly RFPIO:** Reviewers mention that Responsive is a significant investment and note its price point as slightly higher than average, though they also cite its advanced features as justification. - **Switching reasons:** Recent reviewers have switched to PandaDoc for its lower cost and better cost-to-value ratio compared to other digital signature services. ### What are the best alternatives to PandaDoc and Responsive, formerly RFPIO? The top 3 alternatives to PandaDoc and Responsive, formerly RFPIO are Loopio, Proposify, and Qwilr. | Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | [PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/products/pandadoc/reviews) | 4.7/5 (3,700 reviews) | Small-Business | Reviewers describe PandaDoc as cost-effective and affordable. | Ease of Use (718 all-time mentions) | | [Responsive, formerly RFPIO](https://www.g2.com/products/responsive-formerly-rfpio/reviews) | 4.5/5 (1,311 reviews) | Mid-Market | Reviewers note Responsive is a significant investment but cite advanced features as justification. | Team Collaboration (143 all-time mentions) | | [Loopio](https://www.g2.com/products/loopio/reviews) | 4.6/5 (813 reviews) | Mid-Market | โ€” | Content Library and RFP Management | | [Proposify](https://www.g2.com/products/proposify/reviews) | 4.6/5 (1,143 reviews) | Small-Business | โ€” | Proposal Creation and Customization | | [Qwilr](https://www.g2.com/products/qwilr/reviews) | 4.6/5 (917 reviews) | Small-Business | โ€” | Document Design and Presentation | ### Which Proposal features should I prioritize when comparing PandaDoc and Responsive, formerly RFPIO? Buyers should prioritize ease of use, document management, automation, team collaboration, and integration capabilities when comparing PandaDoc and Responsive, formerly RFPIO. - **Ease of Use:** PandaDoc (9.2 score, 718 all-time mentions); Responsive, formerly RFPIO (8.7 score, 340 all-time mentions). - **Document Management:** PandaDoc (353 all-time mentions); Responsive, formerly RFPIO (87 all-time mentions). - **Automation:** Responsive, formerly RFPIO offers automation-document generation, with 85 all-time mentions for automation and 82 for artificial intelligence. - **Team Collaboration:** Responsive, formerly RFPIO (143 all-time mentions); PandaDoc does not have a comparable volume of collaboration mentions. - **Integrations:** Both products are frequently cited for integrations, with PandaDoc reviewers mentioning Salesforce and Pipedrive, and Responsive, formerly RFPIO reviewers highlighting Slack and Salesforce. ### What are the pros and cons of PandaDoc vs Responsive, formerly RFPIO? PandaDoc's headline strength is ease of use, while Responsive, formerly RFPIO excels in team collaboration and automation. - **PandaDoc strengths:** Ease of use (718 all-time mentions), document management (353), simple interface (337), e-signatures (304), tracking features (150). - **PandaDoc trade-offs:** Editing difficulties (98), limited customization (85), and document management limitations (83). - **Responsive, formerly RFPIO strengths:** Team collaboration (143), automation (85), content management (123), AI technology (72), and efficiency (186). - **Responsive, formerly RFPIO trade-offs:** Learning curve (71), not always intuitive (60), and requires ongoing content library maintenance. ### Is PandaDoc or Responsive, formerly RFPIO better for small businesses? PandaDoc is the better fit for small businesses, supported by its largest segment and strong small-business reviewer sentiment. - **PandaDoc:** Small-Business is the largest reviewer segment, with reviewers consistently praising its affordability, ease of use, and quick setup for small teams. - **Responsive, formerly RFPIO:** Mid-Market is the largest reviewer segment, with reviewers noting its advanced features and collaboration tools, but also mentioning a steeper learning curve and higher investment, making it less tailored for small businesses. ### Which Proposal platform has better integrations? PandaDoc and Responsive, formerly RFPIO are at parity for integrations, with each product favored for different integration partners in recent reviews. - **PandaDoc:** Reviewers frequently mention integrations with Salesforce and Pipedrive, with 45 all-time mentions for Pipedrive. - **Responsive, formerly RFPIO:** Reviewers highlight Slack integration, with 19 all-time mentions, and also cite Salesforce integration as a key feature. ### How do PandaDoc and Responsive, formerly RFPIO compare on customer support? PandaDoc and Responsive, formerly RFPIO are at parity on Quality of Support, with scores of 9.0 and 9.1 respectively. - **PandaDoc:** Reviewers consistently describe support as responsive, helpful, and quick to resolve issues, with several citing positive onboarding and training experiences. - **Responsive, formerly RFPIO:** Reviewers highlight the support team's responsiveness, proactive feedback incorporation, and regular check-ins, with 101 all-time mentions for customer support. ### Which is easier to implement, PandaDoc or Responsive, formerly RFPIO? PandaDoc is rated higher for Ease of Setup, with a 9.1 score compared to Responsive, formerly RFPIO's 8.6. - **PandaDoc:** Reviewers describe setup as quick, easy, and straightforward, often mentioning that onboarding required minimal effort and was ready to use immediately. - **Responsive, formerly RFPIO:** Reviewers note that setup can be smooth with good onboarding support, but some mention a more complex implementation process and a steeper learning curve, especially for larger teams or advanced features. ### Which product has better Contracts? PandaDoc is favored for Contracts, with higher ease-of-use scores and more frequent reviewer mentions of contract management and e-signature capabilities. - **PandaDoc:** Contracts are a core focus, with 304 all-time mentions for e-signatures, 353 for document management, and a 9.2 Meets Requirements score. - **Responsive, formerly RFPIO:** Contracts are supported through content management and automation features, with 87 all-time mentions for document management and an 8.8 Meets Requirements score.