Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

BrowserStack Reviews & Product Details

Pricing

Pricing provided by BrowserStack.

Free Trial

$0.00
1 user plan

BrowserStack Media

BrowserStack Demo - BrowserStack Automate
BrowserStack Automate
BrowserStack Demo - BrowserStack Automate
BrowserStack Automate
BrowserStack Demo - BrowserStack Automate
BrowserStack Automate
BrowserStack Demo - BrowserStack App Automate
BrowserStack Automate
BrowserStack Demo - BrowserStack App Automate
BrowserStack App Automate
BrowserStack Demo - BrowserStack App Automate
BrowserStack App Automate
Play BrowserStack Video
Play BrowserStack Video
Play BrowserStack Video
Play BrowserStack Video
Play BrowserStack Video
Product Avatar Image

Have you used BrowserStack before?

Answer a few questions to help the BrowserStack community

BrowserStack Reviews (2,476)

View 2 Video Reviews
Reviews

BrowserStack Reviews (2,476)

View 2 Video Reviews
4.5
2,476 reviews

Pros & Cons

Generated from real user reviews
View All Pros and Cons
Search reviews
Filter Reviews
Clear Results
G2 reviews are authentic and verified.
GP
Software Development Engineer in Test
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"App Automate Supercharges Testing Speed and Visibility"
What do you like best about BrowserStack?

App Automate scales my PRs, not my stress. We shard our Appium suite across ~30 devices in parallel. A smoke pack that used to take ~55 minutes now lands in ~14–16 with a clear build status and per-session artifacts. Tunnels for real backends. The secure local tunnel lets test builds hit feature-branch APIs behind VPN, great for pre-merge validation without staging deploys. Geolocation/timezone + network profiles (3G/4G/offline) are handy for edge cases.

Solid session evidence. Every run gets one canonical URL with video, device info, console/network logs, and app/device logs—perfect for tickets and vendor escalations. Framework-friendly. App Automate plays nicely with Appium + GitHub Actions, tagging builds by branch/PR keeps history tidy and makes flaky test hunts less painful.

Console logs from embedded WebViews show JS errors alongside native logs; I don’t have to hop through multiple tools to prove where the bug lives. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about BrowserStack?

Peak-time queues on popular iPhones. Real devices can line up, cold starts aren’t simulator-fast. iOS signing quirks. Resigning IPAs for real devices occasionally trips on entitlements, fixable, but it eats time during setup. Tunnel fragility on long runs. Corporate proxies sometimes need custom flags, and very long sessions can drop if the network hiccups. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

GS
SDET
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Real Devices, Fewer Surprises"
What do you like best about BrowserStack?

Automate + parallel runs save the sprint. We run ~40 parallel sessions per PR via GitHub Actions. A smoke grid that used to take ~55 minutes on our old setup now finishes in ~12–15.

Debuggable evidence, not vibes. Live console, network logs, HAR downloads, videos, and screenshots make defects reproducible. The “one link to everything” is gold for triage and for writing crisp tickets.

Local testing that “just works.” The secure tunnel lets me hit feature branches and localhost APIs behind VPN. I can flip geolocation/time-zone/network shaping to mimic real user conditions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about BrowserStack?

Occasional device queues. Real iOS devices can stack up during peak hours, cold starts are slower than simulators.

Local tunnel edge cases. Behind some corporate proxies, the tunnel needs a nudge (custom flags) and can drop on long runs.

Desktop RDP nuance. For legacy IE/old Edge testing, keyboard/input focus sometimes goes wonky when switching windows. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Joash R.
JR
QA Engineer
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Affordable Automation and Bug Capture Make Testing a Breeze"
What do you like best about BrowserStack?

The bug capture feature assists me daily by making it easier to record and share any issues I find. I also find the test management tools useful for organizing test cases and for creating automated test cases with the help of AI. The affordable automation testing has helped me improve our process, especially when it comes to regression testing.

LCA has a good user interface and its ease of usage is so helpful. Implementing it on a daily basis is possible.

Customer support is also superb since there are instances where I have to file a bug and they've follow it thru until the issue is resolved.

I've been using the bug capture daily on any scenarios.

LCA, bug capture, and test management can be access thru local installation or extension. I love how it can be easily integration to my day to day process. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about BrowserStack?

LCA is still quite new, so there aren't many tutorials available online yet. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

SS
QA Lead
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"A Must-Have Tool for QA Teams"
What do you like best about BrowserStack?

The best thing about BrowserStack is how easy it makes cross-browser and cross-device testing without the need to maintain a physical device lab. At Kudzu, we use it daily for both manual and automation testing. It’s extremely easy to use, and the interface is clean and intuitive. The integration with automation tools like Selenium and CI/CD pipelines (like Jenkins or GitHub Actions) is smooth and reliable. I also appreciate the wide range of real devices and browser combinations available, which helps us ensure high-quality releases across platforms. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about BrowserStack?

While BrowserStack is a great tool overall, there are a few areas that could be improved. Occasionally, real device sessions take a bit longer to connect, especially during peak hours. Some features, like advanced debugging tools or logs, could be more detailed — particularly when running automation tests. Also, pricing can be a bit high for smaller teams or startups, especially if you need access to multiple users or parallel sessions. But these are relatively minor issues compared to the value it provides overall. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Lea Hara C.
LC
Automation & Performance Testing Lead
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Reliable and caring platform for large-scale mobile testing"
What do you like best about BrowserStack?

What I like the most is how easy it makes testing across so many real devices and browsers. We can run tons of automated tests in parallel without having to care about setup or maintenance — it just works. The stability is great, and the integration with our CI pipelines saves a lot of time. It’s one of those tools that quietly does its job and keeps things running smoothly, which I really appreciate. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about BrowserStack?

Sometimes device sessions take a bit to start, and every once in a while the local tunnel acts up. Nothing dramatic, but when it happens you feel it. I also wish the dashboard gave a bit more flexibility when reviewing sessions. Still, overall it’s a solid and reliable service that makes testing life much easier. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

TA
Engineer
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Decent, perhaps a bit pricey"
What do you like best about BrowserStack?

BrowserStack is a fantastic platform for engineers and directors like myself who need to validate applications across a diverse range of environments. I especially appreciate how simple it is to quickly launch real devices and browsers, eliminating the need to maintain a physical device lab and resulting in significant time and cost savings. The selection of available options is impressive—you can test on various operating systems, browser versions, and mobile devices with just a few clicks. The user interface is intuitive, making it easy to get started with testing right away. I also value the fast device loading times and the reliability of the sessions, as this reduces downtime and allows me to focus more on analyzing test results. For teams that don’t have access to every possible device or OS combination, BrowserStack truly enables comprehensive cross-browser and cross-platform testing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about BrowserStack?

One limitation I’ve observed is the absence of built-in tools for simulating various network conditions or adjusting loading speeds. Although BrowserStack provides excellent access to a broad range of browsers and devices, the ability to test how a page performs on slower connections, such as 3G or unreliable Wi-Fi, would be extremely valuable. This feature would help determine if users can remain engaged and if the application stays functional when network conditions are less than ideal. Currently, it’s necessary to depend on external tools or workarounds for this type of performance testing, which leaves a noticeable gap in an otherwise comprehensive platform. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Information Technology and Services
UI
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Effortless Testing with Smooth Workflows and Real-Device Coverage"
What do you like best about BrowserStack?

The build upload -> run -> debug cycle is extremely smooth. I don’t have to think twice; it just works.

Parallel execution actually saves my day during regression sprints. Instead of waiting hours, I wrap things up much faster.

Real-device coverage is impressive. Half of the issues we catch now come from devices we’d never be able to afford or maintain in-house.

The session recordings and live logs feel like someone recorded the entire investigation trail for me, super helpful when collaborating with devs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about BrowserStack?

Sometimes older devices take too long to boot, and that slows down fast feedback.

When the dashboard gets busy, the UI feels a bit sluggish. Not a blocker, but noticeable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Information Technology and Services
UI
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Lightning-Fast Parallel Testing with Seamless CI Integration"
What do you like best about BrowserStack?

Parallelism that keeps pipelines lean. Our Appium tests fan out to ~40 real Android and iOS devices simultaneously, Pixel, Samsung, iPhone, iPad - cutting validation time from 60 min to 15 min.

Artifacts that tell the full story. Each session link bundles video, network/HAR, console, logcat/syslog, and device metadata, so debugging feels like being on the phone itself.

Stable CI integrations. With GitHub Actions and Jenkins triggers, every PR posts a pass/fail matrix to Slack and links back to the exact failing session, instant triage. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about BrowserStack?

1. App resigning quirks (push/universal-link entitlements) sometimes add setup friction.

2. Tunnel drops on long tests under corporate proxies. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Shraddha S.
SS
QA Lead
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Reliable cross-browser testing made easy"
What do you like best about BrowserStack?

BrowserStack makes it incredibly easy to test across a wide variety of browsers and devices without needing to maintain a physical device lab. The UI is intuitive, and the real-time testing is smooth and responsive. It saves a lot of time during cross-platform QA, and their support for automated testing frameworks like Selenium and Playwright is a huge plus. Integration with CI/CD pipelines is also straightforward and helps streamline testing workflows. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about BrowserStack?

Pricing can be on the higher side, especially for small teams or startups. Occasionally, real devices may take a bit longer to load, and there are rare instances of session timeouts. The speed of automated test execution can sometimes be slower compared to local environments. Additionally, limited concurrent sessions on lower-tier plans can be restrictive. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Information Technology and Services
UI
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Comprehensive Accessibility Testing with Real Screen Readers and Seamless Workflow"
What do you like best about BrowserStack?

Real screen readers on real OSes. NVDA/JAWS on Windows, VoiceOver on macOS/iOS, and TalkBack on Android let me verify semantics, focus, and reading order, not just simulate it. Keyboard-first checks that stick. I can validate Tab/Shift+Tab flow, skip links, visible focus, and modals/traps, then share a single session URL with video + console for review. System-level a11y settings. High Contrast Mode, color filters, reduced motion, text scaling/Dynamic Type, and zoom/DPR changes expose contrast and layout issues fast. Built-in tooling workflow. Live DevTools + axe-core/Lighthouse runs inside sessions, I grab the accessibility tree and ARIA hints alongside HAR/console for crisp tickets. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about BrowserStack?

Remote SR audio can stutter, making long VoiceOver/NVDA sessions tiring. Limited automation of OS a11y toggles (contrast, motion) across many sessions, manual steps add time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Pricing Options

Pricing provided by BrowserStack.

Free Trial

$0.00
1 user plan

Live - Desktop

$29.00
1 user plan/ month (billed annually)

Live - Desktop & Mobile

$39.00
1 user plan/month (billed annually)
BrowserStack Comparisons
Product Avatar Image
Qase
Compare Now
Product Avatar Image
accessiBe
Compare Now
Product Avatar Image
AWS Device Farm
Compare Now
BrowserStack Features
Test Repository
Test Feedback
Test Variety
Reporting
Test History
Automation
Organization
Reliability
Thoroughness
Test Feedback
Test History
Customization
Product Avatar Image
Product Avatar Image