Rapid Testing Software

At times, session start time can be slightly slow, especially during peak hours. Occasionally, device availability is limited for certain OS and browser combinations, which can delay testing. Debugging through recorded sessions is helpful, but deeper performance diagnostics could be more detailed. Pricing can also feel on the higher side as the team scales and parallel testing needs increase. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

BrowserStack eliminates the need to maintain an in-house device lab for cross-browser and cross-device testing. It allows us to instantly test our application across multiple browsers, operating systems, and real mobile devices without setup overhead. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I would like Mobile testing in the free plan. We are not able to make updates on mobile and desktop separately in a free plan while setting split URL testing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find VWO Testing simplifies setting up A/B tests, aiding our team in launching pages effectively while offering reliable visitor tracking, ensuring increased visitor validation before going live. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The UI Components are the weak link and it is really a major issue if your company has strict Brand Guidelines - you can create something functional quickly, but creating it to look “exactly” like the application you would have created using a real Web Framework is really painful and takes a lot of time. Petty One - In Expression Rules, the Input Parameter Boxes Are Tiny And You Can’t Resize Them Which Is Just Annoying Daily Inconvenience For Developers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We basically had Processes Living In Excel Spreadsheets and Email Chains and Someone’s Head And None Of It Was Tracked Or Audited Or Scalable. OutSystems Replaces That With Actual Applications That Manage The Workflow Enforce The Rules And Keep A Proper Record Of Everything Without Needing A Full Engineering Team To Build And Maintain It. The Time From “We Need This Process Fixed” To “It’s Running In Production” Is Genuinely Shorter Than Traditional Development And That Is The Core Thing It Delivers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One thing I don't like is that sometimes it feels heavy when too many tabs or collections are open. It can slow down a bit. Also, a few features are hidden behind menus, so it takes time to find them when I'm in a hurry. Syncing across devices works, but occasionally I feel it takes time to update. The desktop app also needs to be updated frequently, which interrupts my work for a minute or two. These are small things, but I notice them in my daily use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Postman mainly solves the problem of testing APIs without writing code again and again. Before using it, I used to print logs, write small scripts, refresh servers, and repeat the same steps just to check on requests. It was tiring and slow. Postman removes all that extra work. I can test, debug, and understand responses quickly. It saves a lot of time during development because I can see directly what is wrong and fix it right away. It also helps me keep everything organized. Instead of having small code snippets everywhere, all my API call states are saved in one place, so I can reuse them anytime. When I need to share something with someone, I just send the collection link. It makes teamwork easier and avoids confusion. It also helps me avoid guessing. when an API is not working. I can see the exact error clearly instead of searching through logs or reopening the server again and again. Another thing is that it keeps my workflow smooth. I can switch between different environments easily. like dev, staging, or production. without typing everything again. It saves a small bit of time that really adds up. It also makes learning new APIs easier. when I want to check how some new service works. I can try out requests quickly and understand the response without setting up the whole project. Sharing testing steps with teammates becomes simple too. Instead of explaining things in long messages, I can share a collection, and they can run the same request on their side. It avoids miscommunication. It helps me catch mistakes early. if I send a wrong payload or forget a header. I can see the issue right away instead of debugging for hours. That takes a lot of frustration away. It also keeps everything neat. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The only thing which i dislike in salesforce is that its cache issue and its changement reflection in UI Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Salesforce helps many companies solve business problems.

They use Salesforce to build strong relationships with customers.

It helps them provide better services and improve customer experience.

It also allows them to track everything properly, like sales, leads, and customer interactions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One area where Statsig could improve is identifying bot traffic more effectively.

We’ve observed some experiment exposures coming from bots and had to proactively report these cases to help improve detection. While the Statsig team was responsive, stronger built-in bot identification would help reduce noise in experiment results. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Statsig solves the problem of running reliable, production-ready experiments without excessive setup or operational overhead. In my role as a Principal Search Engineer, it allows me to quickly design, launch, and validate experiments with confidence, while ensuring exposures and metrics are behaving as expected. This significantly reduces the time and effort required to go from hypothesis to insight and enables faster, more informed product decisions in a production environment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The best part is the ability to quickly design, test, and deploy automations at scale. Orchestrator provides centralized management and monitoring, which makes handling bots across multiple environments very smooth. It saves a lot of manual effort, reduces human error, and gives our team more time to focus on high-value work. The community support and documentation are also excellent, which helps accelerate adoption. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

UiPath is helping us eliminate repetitive, manual tasks that used to take up a lot of time—things like data entry, reporting, and cross-system updates. By automating these processes, we’ve been able to reduce errors, improve accuracy, and speed up turnaround times. This not only boosts productivity but also frees up our team to focus on more strategic and creative work, which adds greater value to the business overall. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Excel doesn’t drive it

You can’t just drop a spreadsheet with error codes or reference data and have Apidog magically consume it — you have to translate it into API schemas or docs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Instead of bouncing between Swagger for docs, Postman for testing, and random markdown files for specs, Apidog puts it all in one place.

Docs stay tied to the actual API definition and examples, so what you read is what you actually get.

Schema-driven assertions and reusable test cases make it harder to accidentally ship broken responses. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Reporting could be more powerful, Integrations are limited, Learning curve for new or complex testers. Performance with large databases can slow down Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Tuskr to run software tests and check bugs effectively. It maintains test progress, is clutter-free, and attaching evidence directly to steps clarifies tasks, speeding up debugging. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

At the moment, there aren’t any straightforward native connections to Salesforce. Because of that, I haven’t been able to use the platform’s analytics capabilities, since there’s no easy way for our firm to link intakes to their corresponding statuses. With these integrations missing, I’ve had to create my own in-house calculations to track experiment probabilities and results, using a Google Sheets-GA4 integration. And our long-term play is to bring in Segment, which integrates with AB Tasty. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It’s a reliable product for running A/B and split tests. In the past, we ran into issues with other platforms, including SRM problems within the platform and challenges with GA4 audiences. Overall, it has worked well for us so far, and we also expect it to help address personalization targeting issues in the future. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The biggest challenge is the learning curve. It’s marketed as low-code, but to build anything meaningful, you still need to understand formulas, logic, and how data connections work. It’s not completely plug-and-play.

Licensing can also be confusing depending on connectors and features. Some advanced integrations require premium plans, which adds cost.

Performance can slow down when working with larger Excel files or more complex data sources. Also, troubleshooting errors isn’t always intuitive — sometimes it takes trial and error to figure out what’s wrong. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Before using Power Apps, we were manually downloading executed documents from Adobe Sign using an Excel-based tracker. This process depended heavily on human checks and was inefficient.

With Power Apps, we streamlined the tracking and reduced manual dependency. It helped centralize the process, improve visibility, and reduce the risk of missing documents.

Overall, it improved operational efficiency and reduced turnaround time for document management tasks. It also gave us better control and transparency than using spreadsheets alone. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I didn't face any issues using TestFirst, but it doesn't have Mac support and some of our applications require to be tested on MacOS, so it's a limitation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We use Jira-integrated TestFirst and link all our testing tasks with respective test cases. That helped to identify the areas lacking coverage because of the well-organized structure in TestFirst. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As with anything Metadata api based in Salesforce the system has to work around the complexities of the SalesForce object architecture. The data dictionary does take us a long way to getting past this however. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It gives us exact visibility into our customers Salesforce Orgs and helps us find the inflection points for our implementations. One example is an implementation that was hung up for 3 days on a problem, within 15 minutes of connecting sonar we worked past it. Its a lifesaver as is Brad and Kevin from their team. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main downside is the current behavior of the AI assistant (Aiden). Deleting a step always removes the pause automatically, and the AI often regenerates previously deleted steps, ignoring manual changes. There is no way to lock steps, preserve deletions, or manage steps in bulk, which makes iterative refinement unpredictable and frustrating. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Qase helps centralize test cases and testing workflows in one place. It makes test case organization clearer, improves visibility across testing activities, and simplifies collaboration between QA and development. Integrations with automation tools and CI pipelines also help keep manual and automated testing aligned and reduce maintenance overhead. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Credits are specific to each project and must be moved to another project to be used there. The process for transferring credits wasn’t very clear. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

This tool is excellent for observing real user interactions, identifying pain points, and collecting feedback throughout development. It helps us determine how to improve usability, helps us validate design choices, and ensures the product works well for users. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The least helpful thing about QA Wolf is sometimes the incorrect association of flows with bug reports. This does create scenarios where bugs are considered "open" when the root bug was resolved. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

QA Wolf is automating our client-side testing. Since implementing them, we catch regressions, both broad and niche, way faster. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

ServiceNow has quite a learning curve, onboarding especially less tech-savvy team members has been a longer process than we had anticipated. It would be great if more focus was on intuitive, minimal design as some sections are very overwhelming. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The best is to consult with a ServiceNow expert about your use cases. In our experience, they helped us personally to succeed in using the software. If we had to find everything ourselves, I estimate that we would have spent much more time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Previously, our software engineers had to develop productivity programs besides the usual software we produce. The App Engine from ServiceNow increased our performance and efficiency: everyone in the team can create apps now. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

For advanced testing scenarios, the platform could benefit from deeper customization and more granular control over test configurations. Improved documentation around complex use cases and clearer visibility into test execution logic would make it more powerful for engineering-heavy teams. Expanding integrations and reporting flexibility would further enhance its value. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Qodex.ai addresses the challenge of manual, time-intensive software testing by introducing AI-assisted automation. It helps reduce testing overhead, improves consistency, and accelerates release cycles. For me, this means faster validation of features, quicker feedback during development, and the ability to focus more on core engineering tasks rather than repetitive test execution. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There is a bit of a learning curve at the beginning, especially around understanding how ACCELQ structures test logic and flows. Some advanced configurations could also benefit from clearer documentation or more in app guidance once you are past onboarding, it is smooth, but initial setup can feel slightly overwhelming for first time users. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

ACCELQ helps us reduce dependency on heavy scripting and fragmented testing tools. Before using it, our testing process was slower and more siloed between QA and development.

With ACCELQ, We've improved collaboration accross teams, shortened regresion cycles, and increased test coverage without increasing headcount. The DevOPs integration ensures tests run consistently as part of our delivery pipeline, which has helped us catch issues earlier and release with more confidence. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

My experience with FlexiFunnels has been very disappointing. Their main focus seems to be earning money, not supporting customers.

Before payment, they conduct many webinars and show big dreams and promises. But once they receive the money, the support almost disappears. There is no proper help or resolution of issues. Instead, they keep delaying until the subscription period is close to ending, and then they ask for money again to renew.

I have discussed my concerns with around 5 to 7 different members of the FlexiFunnels team over the last 2 months. Every time, I received the same typical marketing responses like “we will help you soon” or “our team will get back to you”. Unfortunately, no real help was provided.

For the last two months, I have not received any meaningful support or solution from the team—only repeated follow-ups, webinars, and marketing talks.

Not recommended at all. Once you choose FlexiFunnels, your money is wasted because there is no proper support. I wasted my money by choosing FlexiFunnels. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I have not received any meaningful support or solution from the team—only repeated follow-ups, webinars, and marketing talks. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.