Rapid Testing Software

One area that could be improved is the occasional issue where certain devices fail to boot correctly or become unresponsive. Additionally, network or hardware-level problems can be difficult to replicate, and in these situations, physical devices sometimes reveal bugs that are not detected on BrowserStack devices. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Testing applications often requires access to multiple devices, which can be costly and inconvenient. Broswestack provides a wide range of devices, making it unnecessary to purchase them individually. This not only lowers the expense of acquiring devices for testing but also ensures that the necessary devices are always available when needed. Also the simultaneous devices where we can add multiple devices at once saves time by a lot. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I would like Mobile testing in the free plan. We are not able to make updates on mobile and desktop separately in a free plan while setting split URL testing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find VWO Testing simplifies setting up A/B tests, aiding our team in launching pages effectively while offering reliable visitor tracking, ensuring increased visitor validation before going live. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

In outsystems the thing i dont like was to refresh a dependencies in Outsystems O11 version .but the good news is this issue is also resolved in in outsystems ODC version. so i have have nothing in my hand to dislike it . Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Before using a outsystem i was a Dot-Net developer so the main problem in that is to write a code with its syntax and logic take a lot of time and efforts but , while the outsystems came in market with this low code features then it had changes everything in outsystems you can easily write a code without any care of the syntax you only focus a logic part then you can easily achieve your project by this rapid development . I think this is really benefiting me. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The only drawback of Salesforce Platform is its complexity at scale.

As you start adding more customisations, integrations, and workflows, the system can feel heavy and sometimes requires specialised expertise to manage. Licensing and add-on costs can also become high for growing teams. That said, these challenges are manageable with proper governance and do not outweigh the overall value the platform provides. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Salesforce Platform helps us centralize customer data, automate key business processes, and improve cross-team visibility.

It solves the challenge of scattered information by giving us a single, unified view of every customer interaction. Automated workflows and approvals have reduced manual effort, improved response times, and increased overall efficiency. With better reporting and real-time dashboards, decision-making has become faster and more data-driven. Overall, it has helped streamline operations, enhance customer experience, and support our growth with a scalable foundation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Despite the strengths postman can feel heavy and sluggish when handling large collections,multiple work spaces or extensive automated tests.Several users report performance slowdowns, syncing issues across devices and the need to restart the app of the long idle periods. For newcomers, the interface may initially feel overwhelming due to number of features and options available

Additionally, some advanced and useful functionality are locked behind paid plans,which can be limiting for small teams or individual users. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Postman solves the problem of testing and managing APIs easily without needing extra code or multiple tools. It let's me quickly send requests,check respons and handle authentication and organise APIs in one place. This benefits me by saving time in find issues early and allowing me to work independently and efficiently Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

More complex than lightweight tools (but worth it if you care about depth) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Statsig is solving a very real gap for me as a SaaS founder — the difference between surface-level analytics and actual product intelligence. Most tools show me what users do on the screen, but Statsig shows me why they behave that way and how it impacts retention and long-term usage.

As a full stack developer, I appreciate that I can tie feature adoption directly to real outcomes instead of guessing based on click heatmaps or UI behavior alone. It gives me confidence when shipping features because I can validate impact with data, not gut feeling.

For wedo.software and the SaaS products we build, Statsig turns analytics into actionable product direction, not just dashboards — and that’s a big difference. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Based on my experience with UiPath Agentic Automation, the most notable drawback is the high cost of licenses, which makes it difficult to justify for smaller projects. I have also faced a steep learning curve, as effective use of the platform demands advanced technical expertise. Setting up complex scenarios or handling edge cases has proven to be especially challenging. Additionally, I have observed that the platform uses a significant amount of computing resources, often resulting in slow performance on standard computers. There are also some limitations when it comes to process compatibility and version control. The main challenges I have encountered include the complexity of development, the difficulty of integrating unstructured business data, and the shortage of highly skilled professionals required to operate the system. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

UiPath Agentic Automation is helping me solve critical problems in repetitive business processes that rely on legacy applications without modern APIs. The platform allows me to automate tasks that previously consumed hours of manual work interacting with legacy systems, SAP, old databases, and desktop applications that can't be easily replaced. This benefits me by eliminating human error caused by fatigue in data capture and transfer processes between disconnected systems, significantly reducing operating costs by freeing up staff for strategic activities, and accelerating response times in processes such as request management and customer onboarding. Integration with Computer Vision allows me to automate even legacy interfaces without available technical documentation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think the environments in Apidog could be simplified. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Apidog to design, document, and test APIs efficiently, enjoying better UI, faster response times, and enhanced features. It helps me organize endpoints, manage environments, and run requests swiftly compared to other HTTP clients. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The User Interface, while functional, feels slightly dated compared to some modern SaaS platforms. It's nota a deal breaker, but a refresh would improve user experience Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It helping us reduce the number of issues that reach customers. Previously, manual testing missed edge cases in checkout, which led to abandoned carts. With ACCELQ, we have automated end to end flows that catch these errors earlier. It also supports testing across both our online and mobile app, giving us confidence before every release. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While AB Tasty is easy to use, it requires experience and sometimes new users experience a longer learning curve. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We use AB Tasting for personalization and also for feature management and it works well. It helps us understand important features and how users interact with them before rolling them out. The emotion AI also comes very handy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Tuskr works goot, but there are a few things that could get better. Some parts of the interface feel a bit complicated, and certain actions take more steps than they should. The search can be slow at times, especially when you’re with a large number of test cases. I also feel the integrations could be a little more flexible and easy. None of these are deal-breakers, but they are small areas where the tool could improve. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Tuskr helps me to manage test cases in a much more easy way. Earlier, keeping track of test steps, results, and changes across was messy, but with Tuskr everything stays well structured and easy to use. It saves my time during test execution because you don’t have to jump between different tools every time. The reports also make it simple to understand overall test coverage and understand the issues early. Overall, it brings clarity to the whole testing process and makes coordination with my team smoother Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The UI, although user-friendly, can sometimes feel slightly slow when switching between sections or loading campaign data. Performance improvements would make the experience even better. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It helps simplify email marketing and automation by giving a single platform to run campaigns and sequences efficiently. Instead of manually sending emails or managing multiple tools, I can setup automated sequences that run on their own and keep engagement consistent. It has helped save time, reduce manual effort and maintain better follow-ups through structured email workflows. Overall, it makes managing email campaigns more organized and predictable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I didn't face any issues using TestFirst, but it doesn't have Mac support and some of our applications require to be tested on MacOS, so it's a limitation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We use Jira-integrated TestFirst and link all our testing tasks with respective test cases. That helped to identify the areas lacking coverage because of the well-organized structure in TestFirst. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As with anything Metadata api based in Salesforce the system has to work around the complexities of the SalesForce object architecture. The data dictionary does take us a long way to getting past this however. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It gives us exact visibility into our customers Salesforce Orgs and helps us find the inflection points for our implementations. One example is an implementation that was hung up for 3 days on a problem, within 15 minutes of connecting sonar we worked past it. Its a lifesaver as is Brad and Kevin from their team. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While ServiceNow App Engine is very helpful, some areas could be improved. At times, the low-code features feel limited when more complex logic or customization is needed, and switching to advanced scripting becomes necessary. Debugging and troubleshooting can also be challenging, especially when issues occur across multiple flows or integrations. In addition, performance can also slow down for large or complex applications, and better documentation or clearer error messages would make development and issue resolution easier. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use ServiceNow App Engine to create custom applications easily, automate work, and reduce manual effort. It streamlines processes, improves organization, speeds up tasks, and integrates seamlessly with other ServiceNow modules, making workflow management more efficient and less error-prone. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The only real downside I've experienced is that they are not part of our core team, therefore they do not get insights into the most common pain points our customers are experiencing. They are receptive to this information when we share it with them, but as a third party there is always one more hop in the communication chain. This is just part of the business model though, not a particular deficit of their company. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

QA Wolf is solving low test coverage and a lack of resources to adequately test our application manually. Before using QA Wolf, we had very poor regression test coverage, and now it is much higher. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think the Qase dashboard needs improvements. The information displayed on it is not clear or is often incomplete. This forces me to use queries to view certain information that should be more accessible. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Qase to centralize and organize test cases, which simplifies our documentation and daily processes of manual and automated testing, making the entire process more practical and efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Credits are specific to each project and must be moved to another project to be used there. The process for transferring credits wasn’t very clear. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

This tool is excellent for observing real user interactions, identifying pain points, and collecting feedback throughout development. It helps us determine how to improve usability, helps us validate design choices, and ensures the product works well for users. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The only thing I would like to see improved is deeper documentation for some advanced features. A few integrations required help from support to understand fully. A richer library of tutorials and implementation examples would help new users adopt faster. Also, reporting dashboards could be more customizable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Qodex.ai is helping us reduce time spent on manual testing and increase coverage on API and performance testing. Its automated workflows identify vulnerabilities early in the cycle, which helps us ship more stable releases. We now detect issues in staging instead of finding them after deployment.

It has streamlined our testing process across multiple projects and teams, improved collaboration, and reduced our dependency on external tools. The platform’s AI suggestions also help prioritize critical issues, which shortens the overall testing timeline. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I'd like to be able to check page <titles> and maybe other key non-display attributes. Have now learned that my grumble about wanting to run the same set of tests against the same system but in different environments, is covered by BugBug 'profiles', so looks like I simply need to learn more to get even more out of BugBug 🙂 Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Validate site pages to allow post code changes to detect breakages and issues Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.