Qase Reviews & Product Details

I really like how smoothly Qase integrates with Playwright and how visual and organized everything is. The ability to see all my test cases, their status, and execution results in one place without jumping between tools is fantastic. The direct link of Playwright tests using automation IDs saves a lot of time, and the dashboards give a clear picture of test coverage and failures. It makes managing both manual and automated tests effortless, and I actually enjoy checking the reports after a CI run because it’s satisfying to see everything neatly tracked. Also, the initial setup of Qase was surprisingly straightforward with clear documentation, and everything just started flowing automatically once configured. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Honestly, Qase works really well overall, but there are a few areas that could be smoother. Sometimes setting up the automation ID links with Playwright takes a bit more manual effort than I’d like, especially when dealing with a large number of tests. Also, the reporting dashboards are great, but I wish they had a bit more flexibility to customize views or filter by specific tags and environments. Nothing major, but these small tweaks would make it feel even more seamless for a busy Playwright workflow. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really like the simplicity and straightforward features of Qase, which make it easy to use for day-to-day testing without having to spend too much time figuring things out. This helps me concentrate more on the actual testing work. The Aiden AI for generating test cases is also growing on me, especially as it creates test cases that already follow my format, saving both time and effort. Qase is great for automation testing too; I'm amazed at how it automatically creates test runs, making the process smoother and more efficient, particularly for repeated tests. Overall, it makes both manual and automation testing more manageable. The initial setup of Qase was easy and the tool is very user-friendly, which really supports my workflow and grows with use over time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes Qase can feel a bit laggy, especially when navigating between pages or loading test cases. There are moments when actions take longer than expected, which can slow down the testing flow, particularly during busy testing sessions. Improving the performance and responsiveness would make the overall experience smoother and help maintain focus while working. In terms of performance, Qase can sometimes feel slow when loading test cases, switching between sections, or working with larger test suites. This becomes more noticeable when multiple testers are using the project at the same time. Improving page load times, reducing delays when clicking actions, and making the UI more responsive would really help improve the overall experience. It would also be great if background processes, like syncing or saving changes, were faster or less noticeable so they don't interrupt the workflow. Overall, better performance optimization would make Qase feel smoother and more efficient during daily testing activities. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love the convenience offered by Qase, as the entire usability of the platform is simple and greatly facilitates our work in including test cases. Everything is intuitive, with clear descriptions and pre-configured options for the fields, such as the selection between manual or automated tests and the specification of unstable tests, which greatly simplifies our daily routine. The structure for including test cases is very well organized, allowing us to keep all documentation centralized and well-managed, a crucial aspect for any QA team. Moreover, the transition to using Qase was quite smooth and uncomplicated, contributing to a good adaptation for the entire team. This combination of simplicity, functionality, and ease of use is what makes Qase a truly valuable software for our work. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think the Qase dashboard needs improvements. The information displayed on it is not clear or is often incomplete. This forces me to use queries to view certain information that should be more accessible. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The interaction of cypress to directly create tests within the platform so you dont have to write tests that you already have present. Also the ability to link cypress tests to tests already written. We are using the platform as a test library to determine the Automation coverage of our platform. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Did have some issues with getting cypress up and running even using the likes of both Grok and ChatGPT for assistance, the support team were able to resolve my problems due to a configuration I was missing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

First think I like about Qase is powerful impact of AI where you can have innovations for manual as well as automated testing.

Very user friendly interfaces which qase provide to its users.

Advantages to use qase is to make your work more faster than other testing softwares and it's also easy to use with so many available features like efficient data, accurate reports. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Very effective software packed with AI so nothing to dislike Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Qase provides a clean and intuitive interface that makes test management straightforward and collaborative. Creating, organizing, and executing test cases is smooth, and the integration with CI/CD pipelines and popular tools (like Jira, GitHub, and Slack) adds real value to QA workflows. Reporting and analytics are also strong ,it’s easy to get a clear view of test coverage and progress across projects. Overall, it reduces manual effort and improves visibility for both testers and developers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While Qase is powerful, there are a few areas where it could improve. The performance can slow down when handling very large test suites, and the learning curve for some advanced features may feel steep for new users. Customization options for reporting and dashboards could be more flexible, and offline accessibility is limited. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We recently adopted it and its features have surprised us quite a bit. The usability is exceptionally high-quality and the way data is displayed is incredibly clear. It's a very powerful tool for test management, and it also allows integrations with other applications. I'm currently using RobotFramework and will soon be using Jira. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

At the moment, I haven't yet identified anything I dislike about the tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

On September 8, 2025, I encountered a login issue: every time I tried to sign in, the website redirected me back to the main login page without any error message. This made it impossible to access my account, and I wasn’t sure whether the problem was related to my Google account, my Qase account, or something else. I contacted Qase support, and here are my thoughts:

Extremely fast response time — I received assistance almost immediately.

The support team was polite and guided me through the process step by step.

The instructions were clear, included direct links, and even a helpful screenshot.

After following the recommendations, everything worked smoothly without further issues.

Overall impression:

A very positive support experience: quick response, clear instructions, and friendly communication. The problem was fully resolved in just a few minutes. Thank you for the excellent support! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There was a slight misunderstanding at the beginning: I thought I needed to change my Google account password. Perhaps the wording of the answer could be made a little clearer for users who are not familiar with the difference between a Google password and a Qase password. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I’m really enjoying using Qase so far. We used a different test management tool before, and I like Qase much more. The UI is intuitive, simple, and visually appealing. Features like Test Plans, Test Cases, Repositories, and Shared Steps make it easy to keep all my tests organized. Project settings are highly customizable, which is a big plus. Integrating Qase with our CI/CD was straightforward and worked almost immediately after we were granted access. I use it almost daily to monitor the health of my test suites, and it’s made the whole process much simpler. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don’t have any major dislikes about Qase. The UI is visually appealing, though some areas could benefit from a more modern update. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.