Tuskr Reviews & Product Details

I use Tuskr for running software tests and checking bugs. I appreciate that the test runs are clean and you can run full suites or partial sets without losing track of progress. I like that there is no clutter and no over-engineering; everything is easy to find. One of the most useful features for me is the ability to attach screenshots or files directly within each test step. This makes everything clearer for developers, eliminating the need to hunt for files and speeding up debugging. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Reporting could be more powerful, Integrations are limited, Learning curve for new or complex testers. Performance with large databases can slow down Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I appreciate how Tuskr's intuitive interface makes test planning and organization straightforward. The platform excels at centralizing my test case management, providing me with clear visibility into test execution progress, and generating comprehensive reports that help me quickly identify trends and quality issues. I especially value its ability to seamlessly handle both my manual and automated testing workflows, combined with excellent search and filtering capabilities that significantly reduce my administrative overhead. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I found the learning curve steeper than expected when configuring automated test workflows, particularly for users less familiar with automation frameworks. I also experienced occasional delays when generating reports for large test datasets, and I wish the platform offered more granular permission controls for team collaboration. Additionally, the mobile app's functionality is limited compared to the web version, which can be restrictive when I need to check test status on the go. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really appreciate Tuskr's clean structure for managing test cases and execution cycles without making things complicated. The platform keeps everything centralized, from writing detailed test steps to organizing them into suites and running execution cycles, which streamlines day-to-day QA activities. The interface is straightforward, making it easy to navigate between projects, releases, and reports without unnecessary complexity. I also like the integration capability, especially with ClickUp, which helps maintain traceability between failed test cases and development tasks. The dashboard and heatmap views provide quick visibility into execution status and failure distribution across modules, making the testing process more organized and easier to monitor throughout the release cycle. The centralized view of test execution progress across projects and release cycles is very helpful, as it displays key metrics and makes monitoring testing activity easier. The ClickUp integration ensures traceability between test execution results and issue resolution without duplicating information across platforms, improving visibility, traceability, and coordination within the testing process. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One area that could be improved in Tuskr is the level of advanced dashboard customization. The existing dashboard and heatmap provide useful visibility, but the ability to create more tailored reports with customizable filters, widgets, or export formats would make it more adaptable for different stakeholder needs. Teams that require highly specific reporting formats may need additional flexibility. Another aspect that could be enhanced is bulk editing and large-scale test case management when handling very extensive regression libraries. As the number of test cases grows, performing structural updates or reorganizing multiple suites at once can require extra manual steps. Improving automation around bulk actions and offering more configurable workflow settings would further streamline operations for larger QA environments. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really like how clean and straightforward the UI of Tuskr is. It doesn’t feel overloaded like some other test management tools, which makes it easier to use. The ability to clone regression suites and organize test cases module-wise saves us time every sprint. The reporting is simple but good enough for client updates without needing extra formatting. The bulk edit and import feature works surprisingly well, especially when migrating test cases from older sheets. I also like that permissions can be controlled easily, which is helpful because we work with client-side stakeholders. Tuskr isn’t overly complex, which honestly makes adoption smoother for new team members. The initial setup was fairly smooth, and the platform integrates well into our sprint-based QA workflow without adding unnecessary complexity. Overall, it’s simple, reliable, and fits really well into our workflow. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes while cloning large regression suites, formatting or test step alignment slightly shifts, so we have to manually recheck it. The reporting is decent but a bit limited if you need very customized dashboards. Also, filtering options can feel a little basic when managing bigger projects. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like about Tuskr how straight and easy it is to use for managing test cases. The interface is neat and clean, and it doesn’t take much to find what you need. Creating the test cases, organizing them, and running it feels smooth and doesn’t gets complicated. The dashboards and reports are also helpful because they give a clear picture and vision of testing progress without needing extra or external tools. Overall it makes the testing process much easier to handle. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Tuskr works goot, but there are a few things that could get better. Some parts of the interface feel a bit complicated, and certain actions take more steps than they should. The search can be slow at times, especially when you’re with a large number of test cases. I also feel the integrations could be a little more flexible and easy. None of these are deal-breakers, but they are small areas where the tool could improve. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like Tuskr because it is simple and clean to use, making it easy for our team to create, organize, and track test cases without extra complexity. Its simplicity helps everyone on the team understand and use it without much training, and it keeps test cases, plans, and results clearly organized. This reduces back-and-forth communication and keeps everyone aligned. The tool feels lightweight and clutter-free, doing exactly what we need for manual testing and team collaboration without unnecessary features. Having everything in one place makes collaboration smoother and helps us stay focused on testing instead of managing the tool itself. The initial setup was also very easy, allowing us to start quickly without much configuration or training. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One thing that could be improved in Tuskr is more advanced reporting and customization options. While it works well for basic manual testing, teams with growing or more complex needs might miss deeper analytics or automation integrations. A few more collaboration features, like better notifications or comments on test execution, would also help improve team communication. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I appreciate how easy it is to navigate Tuskr. Creating and organizing test cases is simple, and the interface remains unobtrusive throughout the process. The dashboards are particularly useful, allowing me to quickly identify completed tasks and those that still require attention. Overall, Tuskr streamlines the entire testing process and makes it much smoother. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

At times, the test case hierarchy can seem somewhat inflexible, especially when I'm working with larger groups of tests. I also find that some of the more advanced options require a bit of time to understand. These aren't major issues, but they do tend to slow me down occasionally. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like Tuskr for its simplicity and ease of use, especially for managing test cases and QA documentation. The UI is very clean and easy to understand, making everything stay well organized in one place. It saves time compared to using spreadsheets, making the workflow for QA teams much smoother and reducing unnecessary complexity. It's practical for day-to-day testing work. The initial setup was very easy and straightforward, and we were able to get started quickly without much effort. I also appreciate how smoothly Tuskr integrates with other tools like Jira, fitting well into our existing workflow and complementing the tools we use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find Tuskr could benefit from adding more advanced features for reporting and customization. For the basic test case management, it's great, but the advanced reporting isn't as simple or valuable as it could be. I'd love more customizable reports and dashboards so the team can tailor them based on specific testing needs. Being able to customize would really help with tracking test progress and providing clear updates to stakeholders. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Tuskr to manage and organize my test cases, which helps keep everything in one place and reduces confusion. I like its simplicity and organized interface, which makes my mind clear and lets me know what to focus on or what is done. It saves me time by organizing everything in such a way that it helps me manage multiple things. For instance, if a test case fails because of a login button, I can link that test case to the login button. The initial setup was also easy and simple. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some features can be more simple to understand for new users, like some advanced features are required to be more simple and understandable. Integration with GitHub, GitLab, and Microsoft Teams can be very useful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that Tuskr keeps everything simple and organized, making the UI clean and easy to use for everyone, even new team members. I really appreciate having all test cases, test plans, and execution results centralized, reducing back-and-forth and mistakes. I also like the collaboration aspect because testers and developers can easily check updates, see pass/fail status, and understand the current testing progress without repeated inquiries. It’s great for saving time and maintaining a structured testing process, which is perfect for manual testing teams like ours. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes it feels a bit limited if you want more advanced features like deep automation integration or very detailed reporting and analytics. For teams that need complex workflows, it may not feel as flexible as bigger tools. Also, I feel the dashboard and reporting section could be stronger — like more customizable filters, better summary views, and more detailed insights on execution progress. A few more integrations with common tools would also make it smoother for teams that use multiple platforms. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.