Tuskr Reviews & Product Details

I appreciate how Tuskr's intuitive interface makes test planning and organization straightforward. The platform excels at centralizing my test case management, providing me with clear visibility into test execution progress, and generating comprehensive reports that help me quickly identify trends and quality issues. I especially value its ability to seamlessly handle both my manual and automated testing workflows, combined with excellent search and filtering capabilities that significantly reduce my administrative overhead. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I found the learning curve steeper than expected when configuring automated test workflows, particularly for users less familiar with automation frameworks. I also experienced occasional delays when generating reports for large test datasets, and I wish the platform offered more granular permission controls for team collaboration. Additionally, the mobile app's functionality is limited compared to the web version, which can be restrictive when I need to check test status on the go. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like about Tuskr how straight and easy it is to use for managing test cases. The interface is neat and clean, and it doesn’t take much to find what you need. Creating the test cases, organizing them, and running it feels smooth and doesn’t gets complicated. The dashboards and reports are also helpful because they give a clear picture and vision of testing progress without needing extra or external tools. Overall it makes the testing process much easier to handle. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Tuskr works goot, but there are a few things that could get better. Some parts of the interface feel a bit complicated, and certain actions take more steps than they should. The search can be slow at times, especially when you’re with a large number of test cases. I also feel the integrations could be a little more flexible and easy. None of these are deal-breakers, but they are small areas where the tool could improve. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I appreciate how easy it is to navigate Tuskr. Creating and organizing test cases is simple, and the interface remains unobtrusive throughout the process. The dashboards are particularly useful, allowing me to quickly identify completed tasks and those that still require attention. Overall, Tuskr streamlines the entire testing process and makes it much smoother. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

At times, the test case hierarchy can seem somewhat inflexible, especially when I'm working with larger groups of tests. I also find that some of the more advanced options require a bit of time to understand. These aren't major issues, but they do tend to slow me down occasionally. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about Tuskr is how it brings structure and clarity to our entire QA process. As an IT Admin, I regularly use it to manage internal testing for application updates and infrastructure changes. The interface is clean and easy to work with setting up test cases, assigning them to team members and tracking their execution is very straightforward.

The Jira integration is one of the biggest advantages. It keeps our testing and development teams in perfect sync by automatically updating bug statuses and linking test cases to issues. This reduces a lot of manual follow-ups and confusion during release cycles. I also appreciate how Tuskr allows me to monitor real time progress and generate quick reports for management or post deployment reviews. Overall, it has made our QA workflow faster, more transparent and better organized. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing significant so far. It's reliable,fast and the customer support team is quick to assist whenever we have questions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Tuskr mainly to keep my tasks organized and my work on track. It helps me break down bigger goals into smaller, manageable tasks, set priorities, and make sure nothing important is missed. I like how simple and easy Tuskr is to use. It doesn't feel complicated or cluttered, so I can quickly add tasks, check my progress, and move on with my work. It helps me stay focused without wasting time figuring out the tool itself. The features I value most are the task lists and progress tracking; being able to clearly see what needs to be done and what’s completed keeps me motivated and focused. Updating tasks is easy, fitting naturally into my routine. The initial setup was very easy for our team, and the interface was intuitive, which allowed us to get started almost immediately. Overall, it keeps my planning simple and helps me stay consistent with my daily work. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One thing that could be improved is adding a bit more flexibility in customization, like more options for organizing or viewing tasks in different ways. Sometimes it would also be helpful to have deeper insights or reminders built in. More customization in how tasks are organized would really help, like being able to switch between different views or group tasks based on priority or deadlines more easily. Deeper insights such as simple productivity summaries or patterns over time would also be useful, so I can understand how I’m working and adjust my habits. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really appreciate how Tushkr lets me quickly jot down testing notes for things like upload glitches, script errors, fitness track checks, render times, thumbnail previews, playlist orders, or SEO tag loads, and then organizes them into tidy cases. I can group these by series or phase, add extra details quickly, prioritize risks with labels, and easily rerun the cases with minimal changes the next time. The main view presents clear stats on passes, fails, waits, patterns, coverage levels, and quick trends right up front, which helps me address weak spots before they disrupt my production day or lead to last-minute fixes. My partner can join in effortlessly as well they test their sections, attach pictures, logs, quick notes, or even short clips directly, and everything is compiled into a single, organized record without the hassle of searching through endless messages or files. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find the brief pause when loading older test batches during busy periods to be inconvenient, and making custom adjustments often requires several attempts since there aren’t any helpful hints. Additionally, tailoring reports to fit my specific needs sometimes involves extra steps. The free usage limits are quickly reached when I do consistent video testing, and the mobile version lacks a few desktop features that I rely on frequently. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really appreciate how Tushkr captures my quick testing notes on playback errors, export issues, fitness clip timings, or tag validations, and organizes them into straightforward, adaptable cases. I can sort these by project phase, flag urgent ones, add steps with ease, and reuse them for ongoing series without having to redo everything each time. The main dashboard instantly shows me charts highlighting what's working, what's broken, what's pending, and what's improving, which helps me address problems before they affect my entire editing workflow. Involving my co-creator is effortless they can review, add images or details, and everything updates in one place, avoiding the confusion and delays of endless group chat threads. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I’m not a fan of the slight slowdown that happens when I try to access full past test sets during peak times, and it can be a bit tricky to figure out some of the unique options without immediate onboard guidance. Also, the basic plan tends to run out quickly for me, especially when I’m working extensively with long-form content tests. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really appreciate how Tushkr captures my spontaneous testing notes whether they're about render failures, caption glitches, fitness metrics, or upload speeds and transforms them into organized cases. I can easily tag these cases, group them by video series, prioritize the high risk ones, and rerun tests smoothly without having to rebuild everything from scratch each time. The overview dashboard immediately presents me with color coded pass/fail bars, trend arrows, the count of open issues, and quick filters, which helps me tackle problems before they escalate into major reshoot headaches. Bringing my partner into the process is simple as well; they can complete their test runs, attach proof photos or error logs, and everything syncs live into a shared timeline, eliminating those time-consuming message threads that usually waste hours. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find the brief delay that appears when loading stacked test histories during a deadline rush to be frustrating. Additionally, setting up more specialized custom configurations often requires a few test clicks without the benefit of immediate help tips, which can slow things down. The starter limits also become noticeable rather quickly, especially when I'm running continuous content testing marathons. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really appreciate how Tushkr captures my quick testing ideas for video export bugs, script timing problems, fitness validations, thumbnail loading, playlist synchronization, and even comment flow checks, transforming them into organized cases. I can easily launch these cases, sort them by episode, refine them quickly with tags, and rerun them across multiple cycles with minimal retyping or hassle. The dashboard provides instant visibility into progress rings, failure points, pending queues, trends, and coverage gaps, allowing me to address issues before they disrupt edits or delay posts. Onboarding my partner is straightforward they can run tests, add screenshots or logs directly, and everything merges seamlessly into the history without chat confusion or version conflicts. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find the brief lag when scrolling through old run lists near deadlines to be frustrating, and the need to experiment with custom fields without any guidance can be confusing. Additionally, the limitations of the starter plan become apparent quickly, especially when conducting series testing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like Tuskr because it's simple and organized. Its clean interface makes it easy to structure and find and update test cases and suites quickly. I also find the search and suite organization really effective because it's quick to find the right test case and keeps everything structured as our coverage grows. The search feature helps us instantly find the right test case without digging through folders or old spreadsheets, saving a lot of time during regression and release crunch. The clean test case editor is very valuable too; it makes creating and updating steps fast and the consistent formatting helps keep our documentation clear across the team. The initial setup was very easy, creating projects and organizing suites was straightforward, and we could start test case management right away without much onboarding. Overall, Tuskr keeps test cases and suites well organized and saves a lot of time compared to spreadsheets. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think the main improvement needed for Tuskr is better notifications and change tracking. Having easier visibility into what was updated and by whom would be really helpful, especially when dealing with larger suites. It would be beneficial to have a per test case changelog and the ability to follow suites with filtered updates or digest notifications. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.