What do users say about Loopio?

Loopio AI continues to be a gamechanger in bid management and bid writing. We have seen massive improvements in the AI and have been really impressed with the content it is producing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are still document formats/styles that cannot easily be loaded into Loopio, i.e. complex Excel spreadsheets with multiple columns, Word documents with tables etc. It would also be good to link external AI engines like ChatGPT with Loopio AI to reduce rekeying. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Loopio is evolving to improve constantly. There are always updates to the system to further push automation and the quality of work produced from the system through the use of AI and connections to other business systems. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I would like to see Loopio make further improvements to encompass more of the whole RFP process. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Since using Loopio more extensively, I've found the collaboration features to be particularly valuable. Assigning sections to subject matter experts, tracking progress, and maintaining a centralized response library make it much easier to manage large RFPs. The outlook and teams' integration also helps connect opportunities with proposal work, reducing context switching. Overall, it has become a dependable platform for organizing complex RFP responses across teams. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The AI capabilities have improved but still require significant review before responses are client-ready, especially for technical or highly customized questions. Library management continues to be a challenge because outdated and duplicate content accumulates over time, making answer selection less reliable. Search relevance could also be improved so the best responses surface more consistently. Better automation for content governance and library cleanup would make the platform even more effective. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Highly recommended to streamline the bidding process, simplify complicated tendering requirements and collate previous responses to ensure continuous improvement. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

User type allocation can be complicated and the cost of additional users could be more transparent to allow for effective budget planning. Read-only library users would be helpful as standard. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about Loopio is its user-friendly interface. It's intuitive, straightforward, and easy to navigate. I also like its collaborative capabilities - from projects, to suggesting the library feature. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are a few areas where Loopio could improve. The editor doesn’t include keyboard shortcuts for formatting, which makes content updates less efficient than they could be. The Duplicate Entries feature could also be more intuitive, with clearer options for choosing which entry to keep. During Project uploads, document mapping could be more flexible when identifying questions, sections, and subsections. In addition, the Library Backup export to Word would be much more useful with stronger formatting and document-structure options, since the current output often requires substantial cleanup afterward. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like the ease of use that Loopio offers. The automated answers are extremely helpful because they save time and prevent me from having to manually find different answers to complete a response. I also appreciate the various aspects of the library, which help keep our different products organized. With categories, sub-categories, and tagging, it becomes easy to distinguish what information is for what product. When using automated responses for an RFP, I can narrow down categories and tags to ensure we are only pulling from relevant resources and information. The library provides one central place to organize our responses and makes it easy to review and maintain. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think Loopio could improve its importing and exporting capabilities, especially with PDFs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Still the best User Interface out of all the tools that I've used. Clean and simple navigation, powerful tools, and it's easy to train people. Their new features around AI have reduced the time to our first draft by about 70-80% and most of the answers are solid. The new Proposal Summary feature makes tracking deliverables more streamlined and user friendly. Their "Project Import" tool is the best on the market, helping proposal managers get their projects in front of their teams both accurate and very fast. All around, Loopio takes the pain out of responding to Tenders, RFPs, Security Questionnaires, and puts proposal managers in the driver seat better than anything else on the market. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Having attended a recent roadmap webinar, the only thing that they can improve they're already working on: Agentic AI that can be trained to help craft responses. The tool continues to remain fantastic, keeping focus on core functionality while expanding workflow functionality. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The system is highly intuitive and intelligently designed to streamline everyday processes. By automating routine tasks and presenting information in a clear, user-friendly way, it enables employees, managers and administrators to complete activities more efficiently, reducing manual effort and improving the overall user experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The only enhancement I'd like to see is the AI search function available outside of projects. Other than that, I'm very happy with the platform. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like the Document Library functionality and the fact that you can see prior responses. This helps us look at how we previously responded to various inquiries and maintain consistency in responses to vendor security and privacy assessments that we receive regularly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

My sentiments remain the same. I don't like the proposal-building functionality. It could be more intuitive and have more AI functionality. Additionally, it would be nice if Loopio were a plug-in with Google Drive. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Loopio has been responsive in taking and incorporating feedback regarding their generative AI features, specifically around the configurability of Get Answers so that users can limit the use of genAI vs stored answers for higher-risk responses such as for security risk assessments. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It would be interesting to see a Loopio MCP on the product roadmap. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.