What do you like best about Perk (formerly TravelPerk)?
What I like most about Perk is the modern and intuitive user interface. The platform makes business travel booking significantly easier, as flights, hotels, train journeys, and other travel services can be managed centrally in one place. The user guidance is clear and allows even new users to quickly find their way around.
Particularly valuable are the integrations with tools from the HR, finance, and expense management sectors. This allows travel bookings to be seamlessly integrated into existing company processes, reducing manual administrative effort.
In terms of performance, the platform works quickly and reliably. Search results are displayed promptly, and bookings can be completed within minutes, noticeably increasing efficiency in everyday work.
The pricing and ROI are also convincing. By centrally controlling travel, automating processes, and adhering to travel policies, companies can save time and better control travel costs. For many teams, the added value significantly exceeds the investment costs.
The onboarding and support are also worth mentioning positively. The introduction is straightforward, and the support team responds quickly and competently to inquiries. This usually allows problems to be solved without major delays.
Another plus point is the AI-supported functions and intelligent automations that simplify booking processes, suggest suitable travel options, and support compliance with internal guidelines. This contributes to an overall more pleasant and efficient user experience.
Overall rating: Perk combines excellent UX, strong integration possibilities, reliable performance, clear business value, and helpful intelligent functions into a comprehensive solution for modern business travel management. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What do you dislike about Perk (formerly TravelPerk)?
Perk is overall a strong solution for business travel management, yet there are some areas with room for improvement.
The pricing can be relatively high for smaller companies or teams with low travel volumes. Additional fees for certain premium features or flexible booking options can increase the overall costs.
While many standard integrations are available, specific company processes or individual system landscapes cannot always be mapped without additional implementation effort.
The user interface (UI/UX) is generally intuitive but can quickly become confusing with more complex travel requirements or exceptions. Some functions are not always found where users would expect them.
In terms of performance, it occasionally happens that search results do not display all available travel options or that certain airline and hotel rates appear cheaper outside the platform.
Onboarding usually runs smoothly, yet administrators need some time to optimally set up travel policies, approval workflows, and integrations.
Support generally responds reliably, but processing times can be longer than desired for more complex inquiries or escalations.
In the area of AI and intelligent functions, there is still room for development. The existing automations are helpful but could provide more proactive recommendations, for example, in cost savings, travel policies, or alternative routes.
In summary, the advantages clearly outweigh the disadvantages, but there is still potential for improvement, particularly in pricing structure, customizability, and the maturity of some intelligent functions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.