Policy Management Software

One thing I find challenging about Microsoft Power Automate is that debugging flows can sometimes be confusing, especially when something doesn’t work as expected. Error messages are not always very clear, so it can take time to figure out what went wrong, particularly in more complex workflows.

Another downside is that while the interface is generally user-friendly, it can become a bit overwhelming when building larger or more advanced flows. Managing multiple conditions, loops, and actions isn’t always as intuitive as it could be.

There are also some limitations with certain connectors and features unless you move to higher-tier plans, which can make it restrictive depending on your needs. In addition, performance can occasionally be inconsistent, with some flows taking longer to trigger or complete than expected.

Overall, while it’s a powerful tool, there’s definitely a learning curve when you start going beyond the basics, and improving clarity around errors and flow management would make a big difference. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Before using Microsoft Power Automate, a lot of our work involved manual, repetitive tasks like sorting emails, moving files, and sending routine notifications. These processes were time-consuming and also increased the chances of human error, especially when things got busy.

With Power Automate, we’ve been able to streamline many of these workflows. For example, tasks like automatically saving attachments, updating lists, or notifying team members now happen without any manual input. This has significantly reduced the time spent on administrative work and allowed us to focus more on higher-value tasks.

It’s also improved consistency, since processes now follow the same logic every time instead of depending on someone to remember each step. In terms of impact, we’ve saved several hours each week, reduced mistakes, and improved overall response times, especially when it comes to handling incoming requests or important updates. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Integration depth: While Slack and Gmail connections are solid, some advanced features (like formatting Slack messages with richer layouts or handling Gmail threading intelligently) feel limited. Learning curve for complex flows: Simple automations are easy, but when workflows involve multiple conditional branches, the interface can get a bit overwhelming. A more guided setup or visual cues would help. Notification management: Slack alerts are great, but without fine‑tuned controls, they can become noisy. More granular options for filtering or batching notifications would reduce clutter. Error handling transparency: If a workflow fails (say, due to a Gmail API hiccup), the error messages aren’t always clear. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Jotform Workflows to streamline communication between Slack and Gmail, saving time and reducing errors. It automates notifications and emails, eliminating manual follow-ups and repetitive tasks. The drag-and-drop builder is intuitive, allowing easy customization, and it integrates seamlessly with tools I use daily. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

LaserFiche is helpful when we deal with large volumes of documents, from the approvals and documents sharing

LaserFiche bas costs issues, where it demands high maintenance costs and requires some IT infrastructure Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

LaserFiche has resolved the problem of large volumes of physical documents, which are prone to being stolen or destroyed, and this involves digitization and centralized storage

We use LaserFiche to automate the approval process, and this eliminates delays and ensures that our admin has manageable tasks

The security of our documents is maintained through the help of this app, and timely audit is done to see users that have accessed the documents

The process of distributing documents is made easier and faster, and this includes sharing to people in different locations

LaserFiche is suitable for all companies, and this involves those with large amounts of documents. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

At the moment, I find no inconvenience; the resolution of the issues is swift and efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I have the opportunity to work with AuraQuantic and I must say it is an exceptional experience. This company stands out in the development of BPM (Business Process Management) processes that truly transform the way organizations operate. From the first contact, the AuraQuantic team demonstrated a deep knowledge and commitment to continuous improvement. Additionally, the customer support is outstanding. They are always willing to help and offer customized solutions that fit our specific needs. The training and resources they provide are of high quality, which facilitates the implementation and use of their software. In summary, I recommend AuraQuantic to any company looking to improve its processes and increase its efficiency. Their innovative approach and dedication to the customer really make a difference. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The platform has a learning curve, particularly for users without a technical background when building more advanced workflows.

Providing more ready-made templates (for common processes like expense, leave, approval flows) would significantly speed up adoption. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Before Emakin, many of our processes were either manual or scattered across different systems.

Now, we manage a wide range of operations such as:

Demand and ticket processes

Expense and travel management

Document approval workflows

HR and training-related operations

in a centralized and structured way.

This has helped us:

Reduce manual workload

Increase process visibility

Improve tracking and reporting

Accelerate response times

Overall, it has significantly improved operational efficiency and coordination between teams. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There’s a learning curve when it comes to customizing dashboards and process maps, but once our team got familiar with it, we realized how powerful and flexible the system truly is. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Interfacing helped us address process inconsistencies and lack of documentation that came with our company’s rapid growth. It centralizes all of our operational data, creating one reliable source of truth for management and compliance teams. With automated workflows and clear accountability, we’ve significantly reduced operational risks and improved project delivery timelines. It’s also made onboarding new employees much easier since all procedures are clearly defined and accessible. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

With Bizagi, I sometimes find myself adjusting my process to fit the tool, rather than having the tool adapt to the way I work. Even so, it still allows me to desgin processes in a professional way, and those processes can then be automated. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It brings clarity to cross team processes. Instead of guessing how things work, everyone can see the exact workflow and responsibilities, which makes managing processes and projects much easier. It saves time and helps me maximize my service by keeping everything clear and aligned. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The truth is that nothing, however, it "frustrates" me that it doesn't take the weight of what it really is and who it competes against: There is a need to enhance awareness, as many times the platform, its features, and capacity itself "fights" shoulder to shoulder with renowned SaaS like Salesforce, SAP, ServiceNow, and others. What I feel as a company offering CoTalker's services is that by not being on their radar, they simply opt for another solution, which always (and from my own experience) ends up being more costly, longer to implement, and with a high percentage or degree of dissatisfaction. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Solve problems of business process automation, operation, flow development, information centralization, knowledge repository, internal and external management platform, in other cases of communication, user support, and ticket management, among others.

We could list the benefits on several pages and still run out of time, however, if I had to summarize the greatest benefit in just one, it is the adaptability of the platform to any requirement. It often happens that in a briefing meeting, opportunity, or problem, there is never a time when we don't use CoTalker (regardless of the core of the problem) as a basis for the solutions we want to deliver to that challenge, and that, coming from us, who are deeply embedded in the market, you will never find in another platform. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes the refresh speed is low or going in buffering mode and some cases of missed notifications. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Its implementation and configuration is quick and fast. We are getting MIS data very easily. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There is nothing major to dislike, but sometimes advanced workflow customization feels a bit limited. The first time setup also takes some time to understand properly. Apart from that, it works smoothly and does what it promises. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Cflow is solving the problem of scattered approvals and untracked internal requests. Earlier many things were happening on emails and chats which caused delays and confusion. With Cflow, everything is structured and easy to track. It helped us improve coordination between teams, reduced follow ups, and made sure tasks are completed on time. This is really helpful for managing SEO and content related work where timelines matter a lot. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Without completing the recommended training, it's deployment process can feel fairly complex and hard to navigate, and it isn’t always clear what the next step should be. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

TimeXtender is a robust platform designed to integrate with multiple database systems, including Microsoft SQL Server and other related technologies. Because it supports such a wide range of integrations, the implementation process can sometimes feel complex, particularly in environments that depend on diverse data sources.

The platform also offers strong security measures, including encryption of sensitive information both within the system and while data is in transit. This helps ensure that critical business data remains protected throughout processing and transfer.

In addition, its automation capabilities can significantly reduce manual intervention in routine tasks. By streamlining data integration, management, and governance processes, TimeXtender can improve operational efficiency and make day-to-day workload management easier. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main limitation for our organisation is no two step approval and publish workflow. In previous software we were able to send a draft for approval, once approved it would be sent for publishing. This workflow does not exist currently in Flowingly as it can only be sent for approval and publish at the same time. We have had to create a separate approval process that is not as streamlined.

In a process map, the arrow path is set automatically, which can lead to arrow lines crossing and makes the flow harder to follow. Also, you can’t add an additional recording to an existing SOP, which limits how you can update or expand it later. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Flowingly is our newly adopted process mapping software, it has been a benefit of our organisation as it is a user friendly interface saving on training effort and making uptake easier. We are still in the implementation phase and initial comments from staff have been very positive. Process Documentation has never been easier or more accessible to create. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Although its design is functional, the interface has a classic style that could be modernized to visually match other tools in the market. On the other hand, being a growing platform, the online community is still small; this makes it a greater challenge to find solutions in forums or external tutorials for very specific errors compared to older software. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Solve the problem of having to manually move data between applications that do not communicate with each other (for example, from a PDF to an Excel). It does not get tired of processing invoices and does not make mistakes with numbering. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

According to some of my team members, setting up or configuring Comidor software can be challenging at first, which may necessitate additional training or support to ensure proper configuration. However, despite these initial small difficulties, we are extremely satisfied with the platform's rich features and high quality. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Prior to implementing Comidor, our material ordering process lacked efficiency. We relied on manual processes that were both time-consuming and prone to errors. Moreover, our inventory levels and order status were difficult to track, resulting in a lack of visibility. With no centralised system to track orders, we struggled to monitor inventory levels, making it challenging to identify delays or shortages. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes the system has glitches, and it can be hard to figure out what’s going wrong or what’s possible to do when something breaks. The flowforma design part can also be confusing at times, especially when I’m trying to set things up the way I want. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Flowforma helps our program run more smoothly by streamlining our processes and keeping information and records in one place. It also offers some built-in functions that save time once the flows are up and running. Overall, it helps staff stay more organized and be more effective with time management. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Customizing workflows is time-consuming, and some advanced reporting needs extra configuration and third-party tools. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use LogicGate Risk Cloud to manage risks, compliance, and audits in one place. It removes manual, spreadsheet-based GRC work with automated workflows and reduces delays in audits, saving time. I like building and customizing workflows without coding and seeing everything in a single dashboard. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One area where Abstra could improve is in its integration options. While it supports a good range of data sources, there are a few niche tools we use that aren’t directly supported, which sometimes requires workarounds. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Abstra simplified custom software development and streamlined our workflows through automation. This reduced manual tasks, improved efficiency, and saved us time. It also enabled better data management by integrating various sources, ultimately cutting costs and allowing us to focus on core strategies. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While you're able to create custom steps, it does take a while and can be cumbersome. Especially when it feels like some Steps should already be included in the basic functions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

FlowWright is an affordable, easy-to-use software that easily integrates into your company. It really works and can help with your day-to-day tasks! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We've been able to stay on track and stay focused on a project to ensure on-time completion and efficencies. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I found the initial setup and administration of user rights difficult, and figuring out the ideal content structure and level of detail took some trial and error. Buttons for navigation and menu layout are not consistently implemented across the various pages, which can cause some confusion in the beginning. Furthermore, the tool for creating process maps lacks basic snap-to-grid functionality in certain situations (compared to Microsoft Visio, for instance), which makes it harder to ensure a consistent, uniform layout across the process maps made by multiple persons. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Visualizing, linking and carrying out processes, which helps simplify work. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are many limitations when it comes to customizations that you can do in Navvia. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I am using it for my rapid process design workshops to redesign our ITSM processes Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.