Best Test Management Tools
AC
Featured Test Management Tools At A Glance
G2 takes pride in showing unbiased reviews on user satisfaction in our ratings and reports. We do not allow paid placements in any of our ratings, rankings, or reports. Learn about our scoring methodologies.
(3,160)4.4 out of 5
Entry Level Price:Free
7th Easiest To Use in Test Management software
View top Consulting Services for BrowserStack
OverviewPros and Cons
ProsEase of Use, Real Devices, Device Variety, Cross-Browser Testing, Easy Testing
ConsSlow Performance, Slow Loading, Expensive, Testing Difficulties, Slow Speed
BrowserStack features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.2
Scaling
Average: 8.7
8.6
Integration
Average: 8.6
8.9
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
8.5
Reporting
Average: 8.7
HQ Location
Dublin, DublinTwitter
@browserstack11,536 Twitter followers
OverviewPros and Cons
ProsEase of Use, Test Cases, Organization, User Interface, Intuitive
ConsLimited Customization, Poor Reporting, Integration Issues, Slow Performance, Learning Curve
Tuskr features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.8
Scaling
Average: 8.7
8.7
Integration
Average: 8.6
9.3
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
8.9
Reporting
Average: 8.7
Seller
TuskrHQ Location
Pune, IN
Sponsored
G2 Advertising
Get 2x conversion than Google Ads with G2 Advertising!
G2 Advertising places your product in premium positions on high-traffic pages and on targeted competitor pages to reach buyers at key comparison moments.
(507)4.5 out of 5
5th Easiest To Use in Test Management software
OverviewPros and Cons
ProsEase of Use, Testing Capabilities, Time-saving, Automation, User Interface
ConsTesting Difficulties, Recording Issues, Learning Curve, Slow Performance, Missing Features
Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.6
Scaling
Average: 8.7
8.3
Integration
Average: 8.6
8.7
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
8.7
Reporting
Average: 8.7
HQ Location
Hod Hasharon, CenterTwitter
@panaya4,473 Twitter followers
OverviewPros and Cons
ProsEase of Use, Test Cases, Tracking, Organization, Team Collaboration
ConsLimited Customization, Learning Curve, Insufficient Information, Filtering Issues, Slow Performance
Kualitee features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.2
Scaling
Average: 8.7
9.0
Integration
Average: 8.6
9.1
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
9.4
Reporting
Average: 8.7
HQ Location
New York, USTwitter
@Kualitee376 Twitter followers
(25)4.0 out of 5
View top Consulting Services for BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform
OverviewPros and Cons
ProsEase of Use, Helpful, Performance, Team Collaboration, Testing
ConsExpensive, Complexity, Data Limitations, Inaccuracy, Integration Issues
BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
10.0
Scaling
Average: 8.7
10.0
Integration
Average: 8.6
8.4
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
9.6
Reporting
Average: 8.7
Twitter
@perforce5,090 Twitter followers
(296)4.7 out of 5
Entry Level Price:Free
2nd Easiest To Use in Test Management software
View top Consulting Services for Qase
OverviewPros and Cons
ProsEase of Use, Customer Support, Helpful, Integrations, Test Cases
ConsLimited Customization, Testing Difficulties, Integration Issues, Missing Features, Limited Features
Qase features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.7
Scaling
Average: 8.7
8.3
Integration
Average: 8.6
9.3
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
8.7
Reporting
Average: 8.7
HQ Location
San Francisco, CaliforniaTwitter
@qase_io366 Twitter followers
OverviewPros and Cons
ProsEase of Use, Automation, Customer Support, Automation Support, Time-saving
ConsSlow Performance, Testing Difficulties, Testing Issues, Complexity, Insufficient Training
Testsigma features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.9
Scaling
Average: 8.7
8.3
Integration
Average: 8.6
8.9
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
8.8
Reporting
Average: 8.7
HQ Location
Bangalore, KarnatakaTwitter
@testsigmainc1,777 Twitter followers
OverviewPros and Cons
ProsEase of Use, Automation, Testing Automation, Time-saving, Automation Ease
ConsLearning Curve, Integration Issues, Poor Reporting, Difficult Learning Curve, Insufficient Information
ACCELQ features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.6
Scaling
Average: 8.7
9.7
Integration
Average: 8.6
9.5
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
9.5
Reporting
Average: 8.7
HQ Location
Dallas, USTwitter
@accelq1,526 Twitter followers
OverviewPros and Cons
ProsCustomer Support, Ease of Use, Features, Implementation Ease, Easy Implementation
ConsDifficult Setup, Expensive, Expensive Subscriptions, Integration Issues, Lack of Clarity
OpenText Application Quality Management features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.8
Scaling
Average: 8.7
8.2
Integration
Average: 8.6
7.9
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
8.8
Reporting
Average: 8.7
Twitter
@OpenText21,592 Twitter followers
Ownership
NASDAQ:OTEX
OverviewPros and Cons
ProsEase of Use, Integrations, Easy Integrations, Customer Support, Automation
ConsComplexity, Testing Difficulties, Editing Difficulties, Limited Features, Missing Features
testomat.io features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.3
Scaling
Average: 8.7
9.2
Integration
Average: 8.6
9.3
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
9.4
Reporting
Average: 8.7
Twitter
@testomatio1,481 Twitter followers
OverviewUser Satisfaction
UNGUESS features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.9
Scaling
Average: 8.7
8.3
Integration
Average: 8.6
9.5
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
10.0
Reporting
Average: 8.7
Seller
UNGUESSYear Founded
2015HQ Location
Milan, IT
OverviewPros and Cons
ProsIntegrations, Jira Integration, Ease of Use, Easy Integrations, Organization
ConsSlow Performance, Poor UI, Poor Reporting, Integration Issues, Setup Difficulty
Tricentis qTest features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.1
Scaling
Average: 8.7
8.1
Integration
Average: 8.6
8.4
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
8.3
Reporting
Average: 8.7
Twitter
@Tricentis12,922 Twitter followers
OverviewPros and Cons
ProsIntegrations, Ease of Use, Organization, Test Cases, Jira Integration
ConsLimited Features, Integration Issues, Automation Issues, Session Issues, Limited Customization
Testmo features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.6
Scaling
Average: 8.7
8.2
Integration
Average: 8.6
9.4
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
8.0
Reporting
Average: 8.7
Seller
TestmoHQ Location
Berlin, DETwitter
@testmoapp89 Twitter followers
OverviewPros and Cons
ProsEase of Use, Test Cases, Efficiency Improvement, Jira Integration, User Interface
ConsLimited Device Options, Difficult Learning Curve, Poor Reporting, Poor UI, Integration Issues
TestFirst features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.8
Scaling
Average: 8.7
9.8
Integration
Average: 8.6
10.0
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
9.8
Reporting
Average: 8.7
Twitter
@FirstCallQA2 Twitter followers
OverviewPros and Cons
ProsEase of Use, Automation, Time-saving, Testing Capabilities, Time-Saving
ConsSlow Performance, Insufficient Information, Learning Curve, Testing Difficulties, Difficult Learning Curve
Avo Assure features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.6
Scaling
Average: 8.7
8.3
Integration
Average: 8.6
9.0
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
9.4
Reporting
Average: 8.7
Twitter
@AvoAutomation57 Twitter followers
Similar Categories
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
