The Panaya Platform Reviews & Product Details

The best thing about Panaya is how quickly it can analyze the impact of changes and streamline testing. It helps reduce risk, saves time, and gives clear visibility into what needs to be fixed and tested before deployment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The platform can feel a bit complex for first-time users, and it takes some time to fully understand certain reports and configuration options. If usability were improved and a few key workflows were simplified, it would make the overall user experience smoother and more intuitive. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about Panaya is its user-friendly interface and centralized test management. It makes it easy to track test execution, manage defects, monitor progress, and collaborate with business and technical teams, improving overall testing efficiency and visibility. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The reporting and dashboard customization options could be more flexible. Additionally, navigating between test scripts and defects can sometimes be time-consuming, and the platform's performance could be improved when handling large volumes of test data. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really appreciated the user-friendliness of the platform, especially in the testing part, where the status of test progress can be monitored at a glance (this is helped by the business intelligence, supported by AI, offered by the platform).

The platform’s performance is good. I didn’t have the opportunity to explore the integration capabilities of panaya. The platform worked well, so there was no need for support. Pricing was managed by the company, and I had no visibility into it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I didn’t fully enjoy about Panaya were some aspects of the defect management features. Linking a defect to a test step isn’t very straightforward, because you need to type the exact test name in order to create the link. This makes the process quite long, and many times it’s not possible to remember by heart the exact names of the steps.

Also, attachments in the defect evidence should support more than just image formats. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence is able to create a draft SFT test script, understanding the sequence of steps inside the transaction. The screen capturing of evidence reduces a lot of additional workload for test executions. It's pretty easy to create the test script library. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's missing context or prerequisites needed to run tests. The AI features fail to consider customization validations that aren't mentioned in writeouts or manuals. The test creation should not just read documents but ask test-related questions that delve into authorizations or roles needed, custom validations relevant for business, workflows active in transactions, and data-relevant prerequisites. Multiple screen shifting should be allowed for tests involving processes running across multiple systems. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We use Panaya for test tracking. The best feature for us is that Panaya captures the screen automatically, so we don’t have to take screenshots ourselves. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

When we have thousands of test steps, the bulk update tool should offer more columns to update; otherwise, we end up having to do those updates manually. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find The Panaya Platform really simplifies UAT and makes it easy to upload and modify test cases, which is super helpful. I love the user interface, and it shares real-time updates of defects detected by testers directly to developers. Plus, the setup process was perfectly easy, and all of this makes The Panaya Platform an excellent tool for my needs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The dashboard of the test cycle could be improved by displaying the tasks pending for each user, showing which developer is responsible for each defect, and providing live status updates. Also, having the drill links directly to the failed tasks and defects detected would be helpful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

1. Defect creation and tracking them for resolution.

2. Test case creation and tracking them for resolution.

3. Detailed Dashboard stating Module wise / Month wise progress on Defects and Test Cases

4. Export and upload functions which saves manual efforts

It’s easy to use and tailor according to project needs. Adding multiple attachments is also easy during test case creation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

So far, I haven’t noticed any issues with the product. It meets my expectations and works as I hoped. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence is the way it simplifies UAT and reduces testing effort through impact-based analysis. Instead of manually identifying what needs testing after every change, Panaya intelligently highlights affected business processes, which helps teams focus on high-risk areas and avoid unnecessary regression testing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some advanced features and impact analysis outputs may take time for new users to fully understand. While the platform is powerful, there can be a learning curve for business users during the initial adoption phase, and certain dashboards or reporting views could be more customizable and intuitive. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Smart Testing is easy to implement. No software needs to be installed locally; the test users can use the application directly and perform the specified test cases as in their daily work. Additional documentation is not required, and in case of errors, consultants and developers can precisely trace what happened during the test. The AI also automatically generates a textual description, allowing for searches by terminology. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Despite all the advantages, the new recorder – purely related to the SAPGUI – has the disadvantage that automatic scripting is no longer supported when playing tests. However, if you have installed the corresponding frontend and backend components, you can still use the old recorder in special cases. Otherwise, the new recorder is clearly the better choice and our customer preference. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Its interface is simple, but not that complete. There’s no message login page, and what I recently noticed is that in the integrated ITP it logs in automatically instead of having to click the submit button. I really like this feature. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There is no double-click feature. I have to open the record first and then update it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.