--- title: OpenText Application Quality Management Reviews meta_title: 'OpenText Application Quality Management Reviews 2026: Details, Pricing, & Features | G2' meta_description: Filter 133 reviews by the users' company size, role or industry to find out how OpenText Application Quality Management works for a business like yours. aggregate_rating: rating_value: 4.0 review_count: 133 scale: '5' date_modified: '2026-06-30' parent_category: name: Development url: https://www.g2.com/categories/development --- # OpenText Application Quality Management Reviews **Vendor:** OpenText **Category:** [Software Testing Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/software-testing) **Average Rating:** 4.0/5.0 **Total Reviews:** 133 ## About OpenText Application Quality Management Micro Focus is now part of OpenText! OpenText™ Application Lifecycle Management (ALM)/Quality Center empowers you to achieve high efficiency in testing and manage quality with a requirements-driven, risk-based approach, align people with processes, mitigate application complexities, automate manual tasks, and establish end-to-end traceability. Gaining a complete view across all releases and projects grants you insights that help informed decisions. Multiple deployment options, open integrations with common tools, and strong data control make ALM/Quality Center ideal for ensuring compliance and adapting to changes. OpenText™ ALM/Quality Center serves as the single pane of glass to govern software quality and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes. Designed for complex multi-application environments, organizations can achieve high efficiency in their testing and measure quality with a requirements-driven and risk-based testing approach. Advanced reporting provides a complete view across all releases to gain new insights and make informed decisions. With numerous deployment options, open integrations with common tools and strong data controls, ALM/Quality Center is a perfect choice for enterprises that need to enforce standards, ensure compliance and adapt to changing tools. ## OpenText Application Quality Management Pros & Cons **What users like:** - Users commend the **excellent customer support** of OpenText Application Quality Management, enhancing their overall experience. (3 reviews) - Users find the **ease of use** in OpenText Application Quality Management enhances their testing and tracking processes effectively. (3 reviews) - Users value the **ease of use and feature abundance** in OpenText Application Quality Management, enhancing their testing processes. (3 reviews) - Users appreciate the **ease of implementation** of OpenText Application Quality Management, streamlining their testing processes efficiently. (3 reviews) - Users appreciate the **easy implementation** of OpenText Application Quality Management, streamlining their process for product upgrades. (2 reviews) - Project Management (2 reviews) - Requirements Management (2 reviews) - Time-saving (2 reviews) - Tracking (2 reviews) - Tracking Ease (2 reviews) **What users dislike:** - Users find the **difficult setup** for integrating third-party tools to be quite challenging and time-consuming. (1 reviews) - Users find the **pricing to be a significant drawback** , especially for small businesses looking for cost-effective solutions. (1 reviews) - Users note that the **expensive subscriptions** make it less accessible for small companies despite its quality as a test management tool. (1 reviews) - Users find that **integration issues** with third-party tools can complicate the use of OpenText Application Quality Management. (1 reviews) - Users find the **lack of clarity in the interface** and scheduling options to hinder their experience with the product. (1 reviews) - Pricing Issues (1 reviews) - User Interface Issues (1 reviews) ## OpenText Application Quality Management Reviews ### 1. QC Review **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** krishnendu k. | Sr Software Engineer, Information Technology and Services, Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 29, 2015 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** It's easy to maintain project. Easy to assign people. Result update by manually and automated way and report page is too good. Its centralize project management too. I love this tool very much. I would like to recommended this tool strongly. **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** If you provide a light weight video link for a general problem. it would be good. I don't know how to export report to a PPT. Like some general information link should be there along with video. **Recommendations to others considering OpenText Application Quality Management:** Yes **What problems is OpenText Application Quality Management solving and how is that benefiting you?** I was a QA engineer and a tech Lead. My team works for a enterprise management software and storage product validation. we use it our manually result and we have a separate setup for automation after that we export result to QC ### 2. ALM Leads the way, but is it getting left behind? **Rating:** 3.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Dusty J. | Principal Consultant, Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 22, 2015 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** I've primarily used HP ALM as a test planning and test execution tool. I've used it at multiple companies as a quality industry-standard tool. HP ALM provides for easy requirement traceability in the Requirements module (though that relationship is easily broken). It has robust reporting capabilities--far beyond what I found necessary for the scope of my work. It's fairly easy to parameterize a test case, in order to perform data-driven testing. It was easy to look at a list of test cases/configurations and see which ones had been executed. I've always liked the defect tracking in ALM. It's easy to create a bug while executing a test and tie it directly to the step being executed, or to create a general bug and list out the steps to reproduce. **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** I wish you could dock/undock the screen when creating test cases. The text on the screen is entirely too small to read it as you enter the text, or as you try to execute a test case, and there's no way to increase the font size or change the font. There's no way to change the default font size/type. Once I parameterized a test case, I found it difficult to work with the test case configurations. I couldn't create a new suite of test case configurations as a new test run/test build without creating copies of EVERY test case configuration when often times I only wanted a subset, meaning I had to delete the configs I didn't need/want. Once I have multiple configs built, I want to be able to manage them as individual tests. It was easy to filter a list of test configs to find out which ones I owned, but without creating a report, I couldn't view all the test cases I owned across multiple test suites. With a large team, working on a large project, there needs to be better visibility of the test cases/configurations not completed, and who owns them, or a way for testers to find all the test cases they own to make sure everything is completed or to find test cases that can be run, when some tests may be blocked by an issue. I wish you could create default text to be generated within the bug window when creating a bug so that standard information was entered and collected. When every tester follows the same format, and provides the same basic information (Summary, Environment, OS/Browser, Module/Feature/Function, Description with Steps to Reproduce, and Expected vs. Actual Results), it makes it easier for developers to reproduce an issue. The requirements traceability is fragile, and easily broken. In a waterfall environment, we used standard requirement documents, which we uploaded/attached to the requirements we manually entered into ALM. I saw several instances where someone updated a requirement or added the exact same requirement, without updating the traceability to an existing test case. Now you had duplicate requirements, but test cases that still pointed to the old requirement, or didn't point to any requirements. **Recommendations to others considering OpenText Application Quality Management:** I would consider the other options available, such as JIRA or Rally, and how robust your defect tracking/reporting must be for the pace of your development. If you need robust reporting capabilities and defect tracking, ALM is unmatched, but if you need a light-weight, flexible solution, there's probably a better option. **What problems is OpenText Application Quality Management solving and how is that benefiting you?** We used ALM for a big team, working on a big project. Upper management used ALM's robust reporting capabilities to see everything going on with the project. With those reports being so data-driven, it was important that everyone enter the correct data or make the correct selections, in order to produce the correct result and give management an accurate picture of the project. The benefit for management was the ability to manage a large team, working on a large project, with multiple components, all at the same time. ### 3. Review for HP ALM_Shivakumar **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Shivakumar G. | Cerner Applications Analyst, Information Technology and Services, Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** December 17, 2015 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** Managing the test scripts and Defect management. **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** Should give some more options about how we can use this tool to interact with other testing applications **Recommendations to others considering OpenText Application Quality Management:** Keep up the good work! **What problems is OpenText Application Quality Management solving and how is that benefiting you?** I used this tool for the various client facing testing projects. Its been very good experience. ### 4. Straight forward and easy to use. **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** December 17, 2015 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** Can create and track both test cases and related results. **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** The performance of the software can be an issue sometimes **Recommendations to others considering OpenText Application Quality Management:** In terms of trends within the technology space, DATA IS KING. Therefore, invest in yourself by learning SQL. **What problems is OpenText Application Quality Management solving and how is that benefiting you?** test applications, benefits are in tracking functional test cases, results, and defects. ### 5. User friendly compared to RQM **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** December 17, 2015 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** I like that it is user friendly, easy to use and has a very nice layout. I can also say that it has more features compared to IBM's RQM in organizing test cases and test scripts. **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** What I don't like is it crashes sometimes and we were not able to connect MS Excel to HP ALM to do automatic import of test cases. **What problems is OpenText Application Quality Management solving and how is that benefiting you?** We were able to solve the problem to track our test execution day by day by having a standard report generated in HP ALM. ### 6. Global Concept Owner for Test Management Tools **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Machinery | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** December 16, 2015 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** Getting requirements, tests and defects alltogether linked with each other to get understanding when my product is ready, how it's tested and what defects are still to be fixed. **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** Sharing assets (Requirements, test cases and defects) over projects is troublesome. Required browser is limited to IE. **Recommendations to others considering OpenText Application Quality Management:** Use all features from Requirements and testing to defect tracking and reporting. **What problems is OpenText Application Quality Management solving and how is that benefiting you?** Getting requirements, tests and defects alltogether linked with each other to get understanding when my product is ready, how it's tested and what defects are still to be fixed. ### 7. Excellent and relaible **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Femi E. | Programme Test Lead, Hospital & Health Care, Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** December 17, 2015 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** Sprint Management, Defect Management along with the dashboard. Integration with automation tool **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** Its not web based, hence external client will still require access to internal network **Recommendations to others considering OpenText Application Quality Management:** This tool make Testing and reporting quite easy and clear to all stakeholders. **What problems is OpenText Application Quality Management solving and how is that benefiting you?** Management Report has been made easy with this tool ### 8. HP QC review **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 18, 2015 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** The option to manage all the tests in one tool (requirements , tests plan , running the tests and manage defects). The tool gives a good picture about the state tests and available to other then QA team. **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** 1. Requirements : It is give option for failed or success only. so if you have 10 requirements and only 1 failed then all the requirement mark as failed. it will better if HP will display it as %. It will show the real requirements status. 2. You can't have an option to change fonts or / and change the fonts size (for test plan , test lab and defects). this is basic feature that actually missing. **Recommendations to others considering OpenText Application Quality Management:** The QC is not cheap tool but in the end of the day your ROI will be fast. you will not spent your time to understand if your product quality are good and you include all the requirements and will not spent time to generate report to your managers (they can do it easily!) **What problems is OpenText Application Quality Management solving and how is that benefiting you?** In order to manage the QA in any company , you must central toll. the best tool that existing is HP -QC . It is save time and money and give you the option to know on line what is the real Quality of your products or projects. ### 9. Test Automation repositroy **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Shyam K. | Sr QA Analyst / Automation Lead, Financial Services, Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** December 10, 2015 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** it's user friendly and support integration with other HP tools **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** there is no schedule run mechanism entire Test Lab folder **Recommendations to others considering OpenText Application Quality Management:** Yes **What problems is OpenText Application Quality Management solving and how is that benefiting you?** We are maintaining the entire automation test runs and results and scripts in one place under ALM ### 10. Awesome Test tracking tool **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** January 05, 2016 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** Entire tool, love the way tool is integrated with requirements, testcases and defects. also the way it can be used with QTP code **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** disconnect between Test plan and test lab. whenever you upload a testcase it should be moved to test lab immediately **What problems is OpenText Application Quality Management solving and how is that benefiting you?** 1) easy to track requirements vs testcases 2) easy tracking of defects between testcases and requirements ### 11. Real handy and secure and robust tool **Rating:** 3.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Financial Services | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** December 10, 2015 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** the snapshot feature in test run that attaches screenshots to the test cases, and the link feature that link test case to the requirement and the bridge to QTP **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** Cannot work outside network,slow at times and the limit on memory for attachments **Recommendations to others considering OpenText Application Quality Management:** more user friendly ,like using outside workplace network **What problems is OpenText Application Quality Management solving and how is that benefiting you?** testing page features and tracking defects. in different phases of testing ### 12. I use it to execute test cases on developed code. **Rating:** 3.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Blake C. | Application Developer, Financial Services, Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** November 13, 2015 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** Everything is organized well. There is a lot of functionality **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** The UI feels a little bland, but it's not a huge deal. **What problems is OpenText Application Quality Management solving and how is that benefiting you?** With ALM, I test software and fixed submitted code defects. ### 13. quality centre **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 29, 2015 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** It covers full SDLC, manages requirements and testing and gives a full view of the world regardless of method. One of my favourite features is the ability to capture evidence within test execution. You can then associate screen evidence at step level. The tool also nicely integrates with other HP tools such as QTP which is now known as UFT from version 12. There are also many third party plugins available for integration. **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** Sadly the price and user cost is high, however based on company size you can factor this in **Recommendations to others considering OpenText Application Quality Management:** I have been in the software testing industry for nearly 20 years. I have used many tools and find that QC always comes out as the favourite. It ticks all the boxes for all of the SDLC and covers end to end testing nicely. One of my favourite features is the ability to capture evidence with in the execution run time so you can associate screens with steps. This helps for many ISO standards. The tools also integrate nicely into other HP and third party applications. **What problems is OpenText Application Quality Management solving and how is that benefiting you?** This would cover full SDLC eg requirements and planning and release and test and execution and incident management and reporting ### 14. Liked the flexibility of Quality Center **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 29, 2015 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** I liked the way you can organize your test cases and test scripts. It allows for reuse and can speed up the testing process and ability to provide status to management. **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** I do not like that you cannot have multiple test scripts tied to one test case. Or that you can reuse the same test case. You have to copy the test case to reuse it. I want to create the test case once and execute it multiple times for each release. **Recommendations to others considering OpenText Application Quality Management:** Have a plan in place as to how you want to test before you select a tool. Do not pick a tool then figure out how you want to standardize your testing. Allow the tool to work for you and if your process doesn't fit in the tool review your process so the tool can help your process. **What problems is OpenText Application Quality Management solving and how is that benefiting you?** We are solving the problem of not having a standard way of reporting testing status. We have been able to get teams reporting on the same reports and in the same standard way. ### 15. Not too sure **Rating:** 1.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Michael S. | Agile Architect, Computer Software, Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 27, 2015 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** It has a large foothold in the market which is a pro and con. The support of the product is backed by a very large company. **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** Took years to get away from IE 8 when even Microsoft ran for the hills. It is super expensive and it was tied at the hip with Internet Explorer which is pretty bad. Then it was tied to QTP which was based on vbscript. I heard some people took that in college. **Recommendations to others considering OpenText Application Quality Management:** if you hate IE you might not like quality center. **What problems is OpenText Application Quality Management solving and how is that benefiting you?** Visibility of testing and potential quality concerns. ### 16. Nice tools for Program functional and technical testing **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Meng-Hsun Y. | Senior Financial Business Specialist, Pharmaceuticals, Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 18, 2015 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** The function of tracking the program defect and user friendly interface. Workflow function to route the completed test result to next level reviewer. **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** It is not easy to continue the test after the test is stopped accidentally. **What problems is OpenText Application Quality Management solving and how is that benefiting you?** Find out the program defect issues and have the solution to fix the defect in the proper ways. ### 17. Great quality software **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 26, 2015 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** The management of defects - fast, easy and effective. **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** The limitations of statistics available - for example when displaying overview of test results. **Recommendations to others considering OpenText Application Quality Management:** Select this tool if you want an easy, simple and straight forward way to monitor your test execution plan. Furthermore, it can be used to store test repository for future use. Defect management is also easy to follow with features such as linking defects to test scripts and exporting useful statistics. However the options are limited and there is room for improvement. **What problems is OpenText Application Quality Management solving and how is that benefiting you?** The problems had to do with the prioritisation of the tests and the identification of critical tests that had to be run. The benefits were that it was easy to monitor the test execution and make estimates of project delivery. ### 18. Quailty Center is a great tool for Application Life Cycle Management **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Al A. | ALM Administrator, Information Technology and Services, Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 27, 2015 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** Great ability to customize Projects and entities within the Project **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** Limits on Project size. There is not a lot of issue with this product. It is just a great tool that serves the purpose. **Recommendations to others considering OpenText Application Quality Management:** Keep Projects small in size **What problems is OpenText Application Quality Management solving and how is that benefiting you?** Great Dashboard Reporting, Defect management, Requirements Management. ### 19. Quality Center tool facilitated test management **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 20, 2015 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** Release Management and Dashboard - Release management has been designed for smoother tracebility between the Test Set, Test Plan and Requirements. Different types of Metrics and Reports can be generated in Dashboard by using SQL queries. **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** Third party add-in Ex:Configuring crystal reports – It is very difficult to configure third party add-ins **Recommendations to others considering OpenText Application Quality Management:** Administering complex configurations on single instance and at the same time providing the flexibility for unique configurations, without impacting the standard workflow is always challenging. This approach can be achieved by using Quality Center **What problems is OpenText Application Quality Management solving and how is that benefiting you?** Workflow standardisation and reuse - various projects which are aligned by development, maintenance, support groups and each team has specific need. By implementing the standard logic using VB Script, we designed the Standard Workflow which was very helpful. ### 20. Worked wuth HP ALM/QC as QA tester and QA Team Lead for 7 years **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Telecommunications | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** December 01, 2015 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** Bug tracking possibilities and graphs for analysis. **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** Easy and intuitive functionality aligned to software QA needs. **What problems is OpenText Application Quality Management solving and how is that benefiting you?** Very clear bug tracking and software life cycle management. ### 21. Quality Center is excellent tool for software Tester **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Shabbir J. | Network QA Tester, Telecommunications, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 25, 2015 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** It's one tool for all your testing needs. You can write, execute test cases and log defects all in one tool **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** nothing i can recall off. I believe everything is perfect. **Recommendations to others considering OpenText Application Quality Management:** Best tool to use in the market **What problems is OpenText Application Quality Management solving and how is that benefiting you?** I have used personally QC tool..write, execute and defect tracking tool in one..makes life easier than have a defect tracking tool separate. There is lots in QC, like graphs, tracking, etc... ### 22. Quality Center Review **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 27, 2015 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** The Test Configuration option is the one I like most. It helps in reducing the time during script creation and also pater on when more similar scrips needs to be added. we can just update the Test Configuration. **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** its inability to do Parameters for each step is a drawback. Also, we are not able to upload Call in Scripts into scripts. We need to map it after the script is been uploaded into ALM from Excel. **Recommendations to others considering OpenText Application Quality Management:** Pretty good tool. Single repository for all needed. **What problems is OpenText Application Quality Management solving and how is that benefiting you?** Here we are using AC/ALM for uploading Test Cases and mapping them to Requirements, running the test cases and raising defects. ### 23. Defect management & QA by HP QC **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Krunal R. | Technical Compliance - Project manager, Consumer Electronics, Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 18, 2014 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** It's the best tool for Quality Assurance - testing, defect tracking and management. **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** There are still many bugs that needs to be improved and taken care of by HP management. - Running scripts can some time take forever - The application requires many ad-ons and installations each time you load HP QC - The server crash issue while loading the application - The application freezes **Recommendations to others considering OpenText Application Quality Management:** It's a nice tool for anyone who would like to manage their IT or business needs for defects tracking and issue resolution. **What problems is OpenText Application Quality Management solving and how is that benefiting you?** It provides a feature for RTM (Requirement Traceability Matrix) - we wanted to have a good coverage around the test defects before we finally go live. - Hierarchy structure is well organized - Test plan and test lab module are displayed in the tree (hierarchy) structure and easily accessible - Good view for end user and tester to operate while using this product - Very nice export feature for the data that you would like to have it on your desktop, files or server - easily integrated with various reporting options available like excel, word, etc. - You can set your mailbox information in HP Quality center and by having it configured in the tool, you can receive an auto email notification each time you want to see a defect being logged, actioned by any user or tester or if it's being resolved - You can set priorities for the defects that are being tracked and logged - based on the business criticality, you can deem it as Low, Medium or High (Critical) - 3, 2 and 1 rankings - Reporting features are available in various format and can be easily customized if needed ### 24. HPQC 10.0 **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Daniel P. M. | Testing Manager, Banking, Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 27, 2015 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** Complete integration with HP QTP and BPT process **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** The administrative privileges needed to work with HPQC (at least for the first access). **What problems is OpenText Application Quality Management solving and how is that benefiting you?** To manage and plan test scenarios, defect flow and sometimes automation ### 25. HP QC is a great tool/test director **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 18, 2015 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** HP QC is a nice tool for both manual and automation testers. I like all the modules especially Test Lab and Defects etc. **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** Everything about Quality center is good. **Recommendations to others considering OpenText Application Quality Management:** Yes **What problems is OpenText Application Quality Management solving and how is that benefiting you?** Great tool ### 26. Worked on HP ALM for almsot 4 years **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Higher Education | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 29, 2015 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** The best feature of HP ALM i have felt is that its very organized and its ease of use. This would the best quality management tool i have seen **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** Disliking factors are the cost , support level **Recommendations to others considering OpenText Application Quality Management:** Recommended **What problems is OpenText Application Quality Management solving and how is that benefiting you?** Benefits of ALM is I believe its the best quality management tool avavilable ### 27. Works to the best of its ability **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 26, 2015 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** The ability to track and graph testing data **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** Not being able to export/import test cases made in Excel. **Recommendations to others considering OpenText Application Quality Management:** Make use of the tracking features for test cases ran. Its very helpful **What problems is OpenText Application Quality Management solving and how is that benefiting you?** Regression and functionality testing for company app. Benefits of seeing what my peers are working on. ### 28. Review Quality Center **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Computer Software | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 31, 2015 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** The test management and test lifecycle is well maintained **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** The license fee is too high and it needs to have free plugins for open source tools like JIRA **Recommendations to others considering OpenText Application Quality Management:** Its simple to use and maintain **What problems is OpenText Application Quality Management solving and how is that benefiting you?** Defect management and test execution Benefits: Complete Traceability and repository ### 29. Its excellent to work with large enterprise. **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 18, 2015 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** Reporting & Mapping . Reports exported from dashboard and end to end mapping. **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** Performance(takes time in loading) and support from HP. **Recommendations to others considering OpenText Application Quality Management:** Satisfactory support is not provided by HP & they will always recommend to upgrade current version of QC which is not possible several times. **What problems is OpenText Application Quality Management solving and how is that benefiting you?** Requirement coverage is done well. ### 30. Excellent experiance with QC **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 26, 2015 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** Test Plan & Test Lab sections are capable to plan and perform smooth testing. Good Audit trial feature. **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** eSignature should give facility to approve or reject test cases in bulk. **Recommendations to others considering OpenText Application Quality Management:** Need better connectivity with other softwares **What problems is OpenText Application Quality Management solving and how is that benefiting you?** Software validation and compliance. QC benefited alot. ### 31. HP ALM Review **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 31, 2015 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** The interface. The ability to generate reports. **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** It is bit slow. Takes time to load intially **Recommendations to others considering OpenText Application Quality Management:** Its a good software will solve your business needs. **What problems is OpenText Application Quality Management solving and how is that benefiting you?** Defect Life cycle ### 32. Quality Center is a great tool **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 26, 2015 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** Tracking defects feature with different status. **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** filters need some more user friendly view. **What problems is OpenText Application Quality Management solving and how is that benefiting you?** tracking defects between different teams ### 33. First Problem: HP and Quality Do Not Belong in the Same Sentence **Rating:** 1.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Michael S. | Agency Manager, Insurance, Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** June 11, 2013 **What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?** I appreciate that since the acquisition of Mercury Interactive Co., the HP Software Division has improved since most of its products came from that acquisition. This product is an alright option for IT quality assurance of various software applications. **What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?** When dealing with products that are targeted towards IT minded persons a company should review the quality assurance of its own product before releasing it. As with many HP products there are many bugs to be weeded out and even when the system functions properly it is inadequate. **Recommendations to others considering OpenText Application Quality Management:** A large part of quality assurance is reporting. Review JIRA for there query functions. ## OpenText Application Quality Management Discussions - [How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/how-compatible-is-this-software-in-integrating-it-with-non-micro-focus-applications) - 2 comments, 1 upvote - [View OpenText Application Quality Management pricing details and edition comparison](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-application-quality-management/reviews?page=3&qs=pros-and-cons§ion=pricing&secure%5Bexpires_at%5D=2026-07-02+13%3A31%3A13+-0500&secure%5Bsession_id%5D=9b1fb8cb-e22e-4444-86fe-e0d4a7f85a83&secure%5Btoken%5D=965c09222dac51e0b6ef0d94f8c3de9446a871ad3feb3692675ee78756212cc6&format=llm_user) ## OpenText Application Quality Management Features **Functionality** - Test Repository - Integration - Test Diversity **Bug Reporting** - User Reports & Feedback - Tester Reports & Feedback - Team Reports & Comments **Functionality ** - Test Feedback - Test History - Customization - Test Variety **Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software** - Test Management - Traceability - Requirements Management **Agentic AI - Software Testing** - Autonomous Task Execution - Natural Language Interaction - Proactive Assistance **Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace** - Autonomous Task Execution - Multi-step Planning - Cross-system Integration **Management** - Reporting - Version Control - Scaling **Bug Monitoring** - Analytics - Bug History - Data Retention **Automation** - Organization - Reliability - Thoroughness **Organization - ALM Software** - Reporting - Collaboration - Project Planning **Agentic AI - Automation Testing** - Autonomous Task Execution - Natural Language Interaction - Proactive Assistance **Agentic AI - Bug Tracking** - Adaptive Learning - Natural Language Interaction - Proactive Assistance ## Top OpenText Application Quality Management Alternatives - [TestRail](https://www.g2.com/products/testrail/reviews) - 4.4/5.0 (592 reviews) - [Tricentis qTest](https://www.g2.com/products/tricentis-qtest/reviews) - 4.3/5.0 (103 reviews) - [Zephyr Enterprise](https://www.g2.com/products/zephyr-enterprise/reviews) - 4.1/5.0 (77 reviews)