
What I like best about Basecamp is its simplicity with structure. Everything related to a project lives in one place—messages, tasks, files, schedules, and check-ins—so there’s far less switching between tools. Communication feels clearer and more intentional, especially with message boards and automatic check-ins that reduce noisy, real-time chat. It also has a low cognitive load because it’s deliberately opinionated: there aren’t endless features, just the ones most teams actually need, which makes adoption and consistency easier. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What I dislike about Basecamp is that its simplicity can feel limiting once a team’s needs grow. The task management is fairly basic, so if you need advanced workflows, dependencies, custom statuses, or detailed reporting, it can feel restrictive. There’s also no real-time chat in the way tools like Slack offer, which is intentional but can be frustrating for teams that rely on quick back-and-forth conversations. Customization is minimal overall, so you have to adapt your processes to Basecamp rather than tailoring the tool to how your team already works. Finally, for very large or complex projects, it can be harder to get a high-level view of progress across multiple projects without exporting data or using external tools. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The reviewer uploaded a screenshot or submitted the review in-app verifying them as current user.
Validated through LinkedIn
This reviewer was offered a nominal gift card as thank you for completing this review.
Invitation from G2. This reviewer was offered a nominal gift card as thank you for completing this review.




