Link copied to clipboard # Fluent by Apryse vs PandaDoc Comparison - What are their main differences? Share [ Export ](/compare/fluent-by-apryse/pandadoc/export.csv) Fluent by AprysePandaDoc[+ Add Product](#) Pricing **Fluent by Apryse** Free Trial No pricing available **PandaDoc** Free Trial **$19.00** 1 Seat cost Per Month ยท Essentials **Pricing Insights** from reviews Time to Implement **Fluent by Apryse** 3 months Based on 6 responses **PandaDoc** 1 monthFaster Based on 886 responses Return on Investment **Fluent by Apryse** 12 months Based on 5 responses **PandaDoc** 8 months4 months sooner Based on 805 responses Perceived Cost **Fluent by Apryse** $$$$$ **PandaDoc** $$$$$ Average Discount **Fluent by Apryse** Not enough reviews yet **PandaDoc** 9% **Pros & Cons** from reviews **Fluent by Apryse** [ Automations (1) ](https://www.g2.com/products/fluent-by-apryse/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=2044195&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Easy Integrations (1) ](https://www.g2.com/products/fluent-by-apryse/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1338970&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews) **PandaDoc** [ Ease of Use (665) ](https://www.g2.com/products/pandadoc/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1640374&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Document Management (333) ](https://www.g2.com/products/pandadoc/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1643902&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Signature Issues (107) ](https://www.g2.com/products/pandadoc/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1642674&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Missing Features (105) ](https://www.g2.com/products/pandadoc/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1643969&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews) Integrations **Fluent by Apryse** Not enough data **PandaDoc** [ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_24587f96a3fcccbd1a27958aacca893c/actionstep.png "Product Avatar Image") Actionstep ](https://www.g2.com/products/actionstep/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_d06214a78a4c42bbd28cfa5c5d8b7b38/acuity-scheduling.png "Product Avatar Image") Acuity Scheduling ](https://www.g2.com/products/acuity-scheduling/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_e89d21750715f4646ed61c011b2917dc/adobe-acrobat.png "Product Avatar Image") Adobe Acrobat ](https://www.g2.com/products/adobe-acrobat/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_d6baa37f3fd778d1adc429bf82873583/agiloft-agiloft-contract-management-suite%282%29.png "Product Avatar Image") Agiloft Contract Management... ](https://www.g2.com/products/agiloft-agiloft-contract-management-suite/reviews)[ View all ](https://www.g2.com/products/pandadoc/integrations) Screenshots **Fluent by Apryse** ![Fluent by Apryse screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/1315993/MS-Products-templates.png) **PandaDoc** ![PandaDoc screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/112069/templates_2x-min.png) **Ratings** from reviews Meets Requirements **Fluent by Apryse** 9.0 9.071 **PandaDoc** 9.2 9.22,857 Ease of Use **Fluent by Apryse** 8.4 8.471 **PandaDoc** 9.2 9.22,893 Ease of Setup **Fluent by Apryse** 8.3 8.343 **PandaDoc** 9.1 9.11,912 Ease of Admin **Fluent by Apryse** 8.9 8.940 **PandaDoc** 9.1 9.11,441 Quality of Support **Fluent by Apryse** 9.0 9.071 **PandaDoc** 9.0 9.02,328 Has the product been a good partner in doing business? **Fluent by Apryse** 9.1 9.142 **PandaDoc** 9.2 9.21,415 Product Direction (% positive) **Fluent by Apryse** 8.8 8.870 **PandaDoc** 9.1 9.12,615 **Features** ratings from reviews Document Generation 7.1 10 8.4 838 E-Signature Not enough data 8.5 2,062 Salesforce AppExchange Apps Not enough data 8.3 10 CPQ Not enough data 8.7 409 Online Form Builder Not enough data 8.9 174 Document Creation 7.8 6 Not enough data Proposal Not enough data 8.6 1,255 E-Notary Not enough data 9.3 47 Contract Management Not enough data 9.0 1,279 User Insights **Reviewers' Company Size** Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 33.8% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 50.6% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 15.6% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 33.8% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 50.6% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 15.6% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 70.1% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 26.3% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 3.6% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 70.1% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 26.3% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 3.6% **Reviewers' Industry** [![Fluent by Apryse](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/6a52e316499c81fb5b887f75a23df4b3/windward-core-document-generation-components.svg "Fluent by Apryse")](https://www.g2.com/products/fluent-by-apryse/reviews) Fluent by Apryse Computer Software 18.2% Financial Services 13.0% Information Technology and Services 11.7% Insurance 7.8% Automotive 6.5% Other 42.9% [![PandaDoc](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/97320b34486db82a48d7af098a34228d/pandadoc.svg "PandaDoc")](https://www.g2.com/products/pandadoc/reviews) PandaDoc Computer Software 9.7% Marketing and Advertising 9.3% Information Technology and Services 8.4% Construction 4.7% Financial Services 4.0% Other 64.0% FAQs ## Fluent by Apryse vs PandaDoc FAQs Generated using AI Last updated: August 16, 2026 ### What is the difference between PandaDoc vs Fluent by Apryse? PandaDoc stands out for its higher G2 rating, stronger small-business presence, and top-cited ease of use, while Fluent by Apryse is favored for flexibility and integration with Microsoft Office. | [PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/products/pandadoc/reviews) | [Fluent by Apryse](https://www.g2.com/products/fluent-by-apryse/reviews) | | --- | --- | | 4.7/5 (3,703 reviews) | 4.4/5 (83 reviews) | | Small-Business | Mid-Market | | 9.1 | 8.3 | | 9.1 | 9.0 | | Ease of Use (718 all-time mentions) | Flexibility and Microsoft Office integration (recent reviews) | ### How do the pricing models of PandaDoc and Fluent by Apryse compare? PandaDoc is rated as the stronger value on price and cost satisfaction, with reviewers consistently citing affordability and value for money. - **PandaDoc:** In recent reviews, many cite PandaDoc as cost-effective and offering a strong cost-to-value ratio, with several reviewers highlighting its affordability compared to competitors. - **Fluent by Apryse:** Recent reviews mention that prices are too expensive and note dissatisfaction with cost, especially for smaller organizations. - **Switching reasons:** Reviewers mention switching to PandaDoc from higher-cost digital signature services due to its lower price and better value. ### What are the best alternatives to PandaDoc and Fluent by Apryse? The top three alternatives to PandaDoc and Fluent by Apryse are Conga Composer, Proposify, and Qwilr. | Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | [PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/products/pandadoc/reviews) | 4.7/5 (3,703 reviews) | Small-Business | Cost-effective, strong value | Ease of Use (718 all-time mentions) | | [Fluent by Apryse](https://www.g2.com/products/fluent-by-apryse/reviews) | 4.4/5 (83 reviews) | Mid-Market | Mixed, some cite high cost | Flexibility, Microsoft Office integration | | [Conga Composer](https://www.g2.com/products/conga-composer/reviews) | 4.4/5 (918 reviews) | Mid-Market | โ€” | Document automation and Salesforce integration | | [Proposify](https://www.g2.com/products/proposify/reviews) | 4.6/5 (1,143 reviews) | Small-Business | โ€” | Proposal creation and tracking | | [Qwilr](https://www.g2.com/products/qwilr/reviews) | 4.6/5 (917 reviews) | Small-Business | โ€” | Interactive proposals and design flexibility | ### Which Proposal features should I prioritize when comparing PandaDoc and Fluent by Apryse? Buyers comparing PandaDoc and Fluent by Apryse should prioritize ease of use, document management, integrations, contract features, and template customization. - **Ease of Use:** PandaDoc scores 9.2 (718 all-time mentions for ease of use); Fluent by Apryse scores 8.4. - **Document Management:** PandaDoc has 353 all-time mentions; Fluent by Apryse is cited for flexibility and Microsoft Office integration in recent reviews. - **Integrations:** PandaDoc is frequently cited for integrations, including Pipedrive (45 all-time mentions); Fluent by Apryse is noted for Microsoft Office integration in recent reviews. - **Contracts:** Contracts are the most frequently mentioned feature across both products, with PandaDoc receiving extensive positive feedback on contract workflows and templates. - **Template Customization:** Fluent by Apryse is highlighted for template flexibility and dynamic document generation; PandaDoc is praised for standardized templates and ease of editing. ### What are the pros and cons of PandaDoc vs Fluent by Apryse? PandaDoc's headline strength is ease of use, while Fluent by Apryse is most often praised for its flexibility and Microsoft Office integration. - **PandaDoc strengths:** Ease of use (718 all-time mentions), document management (353), simple interface (337), e-signatures (304), tracking features (150), and integrations. - **PandaDoc trade-offs:** Editing difficulties (98 all-time mentions), limited customization (85), and some complaints about document management and access issues. - **Fluent by Apryse strengths:** Flexibility, Microsoft Office integration, dynamic template generation, and ease of integration with business workflows (recent reviews). - **Fluent by Apryse trade-offs:** Reviewers note a steep learning curve, upgrade challenges, and dissatisfaction with pricing and technical support in recent reviews. ### Is PandaDoc or Fluent by Apryse better for small businesses? PandaDoc is the better fit for small businesses, with a larger small-business segment and consistently positive sentiment from small-business reviewers. - **PandaDoc:** Largest segment is Small-Business; reviewers highlight ease of use, affordability, and quick setup as key benefits for small teams. - **Fluent by Apryse:** Largest segment is Mid-Market; small-business sentiment is less prominent, and recent reviews cite higher cost as a barrier for smaller organizations. ### Which Proposal platform has better integrations? PandaDoc is favored for integrations, with more frequent and diverse integration mentions in reviews. - **PandaDoc:** Integrations with Pipedrive are cited in 45 all-time reviews, and recent reviews highlight smooth integration with Salesforce and ATS platforms. - **Fluent by Apryse:** Recent reviews mention Microsoft Office integration and easy integration with business workflows, but with fewer specific third-party integration mentions. ### How do PandaDoc and Fluent by Apryse compare on customer support? PandaDoc and Fluent by Apryse are rated nearly equally on Quality of Support, with scores of 9.1 and 9.0 respectively, indicating parity. - **PandaDoc:** Reviewers frequently describe responsive and helpful support, with many citing positive experiences during onboarding and issue resolution. - **Fluent by Apryse:** Support experiences are mixed; some reviewers praise responsiveness and helpfulness, while others report slow or insufficient support and unresolved requests. ### Which is easier to implement, PandaDoc or Fluent by Apryse? PandaDoc leads on Ease of Setup with a 0.8-point advantage (9.1 vs 8.3), making it easier to implement than Fluent by Apryse. - **PandaDoc:** Reviewers consistently describe setup as quick and straightforward, with many able to get started immediately or with minimal guidance. - **Fluent by Apryse:** Reviewers note a steeper learning curve and more complex setup, with some citing challenges during upgrades and template configuration. ### Which product has better Contracts? PandaDoc is the stronger choice for Contracts, with higher reviewer scores and more frequent positive mentions for contract workflows and templates. - **PandaDoc:** Contracts are a core feature with extensive positive feedback in recent reviews, supported by a Meets Requirements score of 9.2 and 353 all-time mentions for document management. - **Fluent by Apryse:** Contracts are supported with a Meets Requirements score of 9.0, and reviewers highlight dynamic template generation and Microsoft Office integration for contract creation. Alternatives **Fluent by Apryse Alternatives** ![Conga Composer](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/d8671da67dce1a9bd9534611de2a8553/conga-composer.svg "Conga Composer") [ Conga Composer ](/products/conga-composer/reviews) ![Nitro PDF](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/0effc2c8707addc0bc87be537d895c74/nitro-pdf.svg "Nitro PDF") [ Nitro PDF ](/products/nitro-pdf/reviews) ![Foxit PDF Editor](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1704327af4e4eb2d2174535f45143cf5/foxit-pdf-editor.svg "Foxit PDF Editor") [ Foxit PDF Editor ](/products/foxit-pdf-editor/reviews) ![Wondershare PDFelement](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/4b2b015b79fe294e95e3a05c4b7ffe26/wondershare-wondershare-pdfelement.svg "Wondershare PDFelement") [ Wondershare PDFelement ](/products/wondershare-wondershare-pdfelement/reviews) **PandaDoc Alternatives** ![Proposify](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/c9c4f4613d98269846967bdb81d04f85/proposify.svg "Proposify") [ Proposify ](/products/proposify/reviews) ![Qwilr](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/d006c87add0987c5a3a22be14a81bd79/qwilr.svg "Qwilr") [ Qwilr ](/products/qwilr/reviews) ![GetAccept](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/e6889f440c0cb205dbd1ef1d76a18c56/getaccept.svg "GetAccept") [ GetAccept ](/products/getaccept/reviews) ![Adobe Acrobat Sign](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/478678941e2cab8a8bf8f98586f19726/adobe-acrobat-sign.svg "Adobe Acrobat Sign") [ Adobe Acrobat Sign ](/products/adobe-acrobat-sign/reviews)