Applied
Applied is the essential platform for unbiased hiring. We often make decisions without realising that our unconscious biases play a role. This can even happen when we have good intentions, so naturally, it will creep into our hiring decisions. Applied offers a solution to reduce this bias when hiring to improve traditional methods. We're trying to create a fairer world, one hire at a time! Our platform has been designed to help our customers find the best talent for their open positions. We do this by leveraging skills-based assessments, which focus on each candidate's skills and abilities that will help them be successful in a role. When using Applied to hire, you can expect up to a fourfold increase in the ethnic diversity of candidates and three times as many suitable candidates. You'll receive analytics at every step of the process so you can feel confident that you're making the best hiring decisions possible. When organisations transform the way they hire, they not only discover the very best candidates, they help usher in a world where everyone feels a sense of inclusion, equity, and belonging. Hire with purpose, supported by science.
Average Rating: 4.5/5.0
Total Reviews: 21
How Do G2 Users Rate Applied?
- Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 8.8/10 (Category avg: 9.1/10)
- Performance: 8.7/10 (Category avg: 8.9/10)
- Workflow Building: 7.7/10 (Category avg: 8.4/10)
- Dashboards: 8.3/10 (Category avg: 8.6/10)
Who Is the Company Behind Applied?
- Seller: Be Applied Ltd.
- Year Founded: 2015
- HQ Location: London, England
-
Twitter: @beapplied
7,016 Twitter followers -
LinkedIn® Page: www.linkedin.com
20 employees on LinkedIn®
Who Uses This Product?
- Top Industries: Non-Profit Organization Management
- Company Size: 57% Small, 38% Medium
What Are Recent G2 Reviews of Applied?
"User friendly and fascinating"
Rating: 4.5/5.0 stars
— Verified User in Non-Profit Organization Management
Rating: 4.5/5.0 stars
— Rachel H.
What Are G2 Users Discussing About Applied?
- What is Applied used for? - 1 comment
