Mechanical Design Software

When leaving GeoHECRAS and commuting home, the network license often bugs out and I have to force restart the software once I'm back on the internet. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

GeoHECRAS enhances speed and efficiency in hydraulic modeling, aids in developing CAD files for FEMA CLOMRs easily, and organizes input parameters. It allows me to easily incorporate various file types to ensure accuracy in my models. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Not found any negatives thus far and I have really tried to break it by opening all CAD versions I have going back 20 years on some multi level buildings. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Cost of the software was a huge factor as I can get the package for a once off budgetary amount and not have to keep paying forever. It allows me to service my clients with a professional item. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The bloatware aspect of it. AutoDesk never takes anything out of AutoCAD, just adds new stuff on top of existing. It definitely slows down load time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As the default 2D drafting program, the DWG format is largely convertible for import into other programs. As a more limited in scope and capability program than BIM programs likes like Revit, the basic elements of the program can be taught with relative ease. In one case, I taught the secretary at a local contractor's office to do AutoCAD for the backyard decks that were his specialty. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I dislike Designcenter NX because it is hard to learn at first, needs a strong computer, and is expensive Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Designcenter NX solves the problem of using many different tools for design, testing, and manufacturing by putting everything in one software. This helps me save time and work faster because I don’t need to switch between programs. It also reduces mistakes since any change updates everywhere. Overall, it makes my work easier, more organized, and more efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

At times, performance can slow down when working with very large assemblies or highly detailed imported models. We also feel the UI and command discovery for less frequent tools could be more intuitive, especially for newer users. Further improvements in AI-assisted automation and faster handling of dense assembly selections would make the overall experience even better. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Solid Edge features a user-friendly interface paired with robust modeling tools like Synchronous Technology. This modeling approach enables rapid creation and effortless modification of 3D models. Additionally, Solid Edge offers powerful capabilities such as Sheet Metal modeling, Frame Design, Assembly modeling, Routing, and CAM. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

-A lock or read-only mode for supplied model elements would be helpful for regulatory workflows--especially when we only want to add or isolate certain features without changing the approved hydrology that is not impacted by the updates.

-Make calculation assumptions clearer and allow options. For example, when calculating TCs the hydraulic radius is assumed. However, some cities prefer velocities for channelized flow to be assumed. In the report feature include more detailed calculations so it is easier to implement in the submitted report. Or possibly allow an option to generate a well-structured TC and CN excel sheet that includes detailed calculations.

-For CN calcs include the basin name in the attribute table for the intermediate results shapefile. This way if we need to merge all of them together in GIS they still can be categorized by the basin

-Allow for several terrain layering for tcs etc. For example if we have multiple terrains and want one terrain read for part of the tc and a different one for a seperate portion.

-The report feature is very beneficial however i think AI could be implemented to help improve the context, structure, calculations, etc. This will help the user better incorporate the hydrology model and its parameters in their overall drainage report that is to be submitted.

-Allow better control of what component is being selected. Right now, if i have the HMS model on and add a cad file or other shapefiles i cannot select them while the hms model is on.

-In HEC-RAS there is a tool that allows the user to compare geometries and points out any differences. This would be beneficial in GeoHMS

-Before running the model if there are elements with no downstream connection add a pop up before running prompting the user to confirm before running. There have been times when working with large models that i have gone through several iterations and then find out that one junction is missing a connection. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

OvOverall, GeoHECHMS significantly reduces time and increases efficiency by eliminating the need to use multiple software programs. The software's unique capabilities streamline processes, leading to substantial cost savings. One example, GeoHECHMS simplifies river routing by automatically creating and assigning 8-point cross sections to your reaches. Previously, this would require creating these sections in GIS or Civil 3D, manually assigning the points, and then inputting them into HECHMS for each reach. GeoHECHMS automates this entire process, saving both time and effort. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One challenge I have experienced with GeoSTORM is modeling stormwater treatment, particularly when trying to represent pretreatment practices. At times, it can be difficult to configure the treatment components in a way that accurately reflects how the system is designed to function in the field. Because of this, I sometimes wish there were more flexibility to manually define or customize treatment processes within the model.

For example, having the option to manually represent pretreatment elements, such as sediment forebays or other initial treatment steps, would make it easier to more accurately reflect certain stormwater management designs. While the existing tools are helpful, additional manual modeling capabilities or more flexible configuration options for treatment practices would improve the program’s ability to represent complex systems. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

GeoSTORM streamlines many of the most time-consuming aspects of stormwater modeling and SWPPP analysis. Tasks such as delineating drainage sub-basins, calculating drainage areas, determining flow paths, and computing time of concentration can take a significant amount of time when performed manually in CAD or spreadsheets. GeoSTORM automates much of this process, which improves efficiency and reduces the potential for manual calculation errors.

By integrating these calculations directly into the modeling workflow, the software allows me to focus more on evaluating stormwater management strategies and ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements, rather than spending excessive time on manual setup and calculations. This ultimately speeds up project development and helps produce more consistent and transparent hydrologic analyses. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The only issues I have ran into so far are crashes and the autosave function failing. At times, it will freeze up randomly even if there was no input into the program. Additionally, the autosave feature is not the greatest, as it doesn't always reconnect to the host server. I actually lost a small amount of work from yesterday due to this. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Altium allows me and my company to streamline our development process and integrate multiple different designs and boards in one program. Previously, we were using KiCad which didn't allow for multiboard design. Now, we are able to work with ease. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There isn’t really anything I dislike about Onshape, except for one issue: it relies entirely on an internet connection. If your connection is slow or unstable, the software’s performance also suffers, which can be quite frustrating. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Onshape mainly solves the problems of software installation, file management, and collaboration in CAD design. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

ActCAD has a steep learning curve for advanced features, limited add-ons, and documentation that could be more comprehensive, with potential performance issues on older systems. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

ActCAD solves problems of affordability, compatibility, and usability, providing a cost-effective, user-friendly platform with comprehensive tools that enhance productivity and streamline workflows for designers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is little bit laggy with Acad DWG having large number for solids and hatches, material rendering is not upto mark Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

it solves all basic need of a mechanical+ architeural engineer need to conceptulaise the design and prepare a well document for engineering purposes, its trinity feature enables it to perform a powerfull role to collaborate all around Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One thing I don’t like about artificial intelligence is that it is not always perfectly accurate and sometimes gives information that needs to be double-checked. It also cannot fully understand human emotions or personal situations like a real person can. Because of that, conversations can sometimes feel less natural, and you still need human judgment when using AI tools. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

MicroStation helps solve problems related to technical drawing, design accuracy, and project coordination. It allows us to create precise engineering drawings and manage complex infrastructure projects more efficiently. By using MicroStation, we reduce errors, improve collaboration between team members, and save time during the design and documentation process. This ultimately increases productivity and ensures higher quality project results. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The documentation of plans, the workflow of sending views to layout is something that takes time to make changes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

SketchUp solves the 3D representation for me quickly, I like its ease of use and the extensive 3dwarehouse library, which saves me time. I can make quick changes and generate realistic settings in my projects. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Honestly it is a little bit difficult and takes a longer time when trying to download and install. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

SOLIDWORKS helps me show the working principle of machinery clearly to clients and ensures safety with simulations. It designs 3D and 2D drawings simultaneously, saving time by easily converting 3D models to 2D drawings. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find the library in Autodesk Fusion lacking. Also, working with large assemblies can be challenging. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Autodesk Fusion has an easy user interface and integrates modeling, sketching, CAM, and generative design, so I don't need separate CAD and CAM software. It also works on any computer and OS, which is super convenient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One thing I didn’t like initially about Coohom was that the interface felt a bit overwhelming. Since the layout is different from some other design tools, it took me time to understand where certain settings and controls were located. In the beginning, this slowed down my workflow. I also felt that some features are not very intuitive at first. You sometimes have to try a few times or watch tutorials to fully understand how a specific tool works. For someone using it for the first time, that adjustment period can be slightly frustrating. Once I got used to it, things became easier, but the initial learning phase could definitely be smoother Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As an interior designer with around two years of experience, one of the biggest challenges I face is presenting ideas clearly to clients. Many clients find it difficult to imagine a space just by looking at 2D drawings or explanations. Coohom helps solve that problem by allowing me to create proper 3D designs and realistic renders that make the concept much easier to understand. It saves me time compared to doing everything manually. I can quickly build layouts, experiment with furniture placement, and adjust materials to show different options. This makes client discussions smoother because they can visually see the changes instead of just imagining them. The designs are quite accurate to a good extent, which helps in planning and giving better quotations. Another thing that has benefited me is that Coohom works well on both laptop and mobile. Sometimes I need to quickly show a design or check a project while I’m not in the office, and it runs smoothly. That flexibility really helps in dayto day work. One feature I genuinely find very useful is the refer and earn program. It’s actually a good initiative because as designers we often connect with other designers, contractors, or students. Being able to recommend a tool that I’m already using and getting some benefit from it is a nice advantage. It feels practical, not just a marketing gimmick. For me, Coohom solves the problem of visualization, client communication, and presentation quality. It helps me create better-looking interior concepts and explain them confidently. While no software is perfect, it has definitely made my design process more efficient and professional. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

None that i can recall. Easy training and interface is very friendly with different responsive features allowing easy navigation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Professional roads and drainage drawing and design creation and to analys stormwater and easy management of multiple projects document is perfect. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

In Sketch mode, the snap lines can be a bit buggy at times, and they don’t always let me place a point exactly where I want. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I used to use a CAD program called TinkerCAD. It was pretty fun and easy to work with, but the engine just didn’t let me create the kind of detailed models I wanted. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I dislike that you are not able to just purchase it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I do not have any problems. The program allows me to design freely. It helps allow me to figure out what is needed for various projects with our multiple companies. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

When I work on large assemblies, Inventor crashes suddenly, and sometimes there's no mouse movement showing. The model feature in drawings for exploded views is not working well. These issues may be resolved by upgrading the software. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Inventor to create complex 3D parametric models and drawings, resolve issues in existing designs, and easily convert AutoCAD 2D drawings to 3D. Its versatility and interchangeability save me time and enhance productivity. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.