QuoteWerks is a turn-key quoting and proposal solution with over 80,000 Users in 101 countries. What sets QuoteWerks apart is its 55+ integrations with CRM, Accounting, Distributors, FedEx/UPS, Leasing, Sales Tax, Microsoft Word, Dell, Cisco, HP, CDW, NewEgg, Provantage, and more. QuoteWerks is used by companies in almost every industry and by companies of all sizes
Salesforce CPQ automates quoting, contracting, and the ordering processes. The solution improves sales productivity and helps you close more deals without ever leaving Salesforce. Fully native on the Salesforce platform, Salesforce CPQ delivers next-generation CPQ which is 5-10x easier to implement than legacy CPQ applications.
PandaDoc is an app that lets you build, track, and sign your docs all in one place. Automate your workflow, discover what sells with built-in analytics, and get legally binding signatures in minutes.
Conga Composer makes it easy for Salesforce.com users to create sophisticated documents and reports using their data in Salesforce CRM with just a few clicks.
Oracle CPQ Cloud (Configure, Price, and Quote) helps you sell faster, easier, and with greater accuracy—from anywhere.
Proposify proposal software helps growing teams remove document bottlenecks, and get visibility into the most important stage of your sales cycle: the close.
Proposal software for consistent, rapid proposal creation. Manage your reps pipelines and track what your clients viewed with proposal analytics.
Vendavo is a cloud-based mobile sales solution that integrates with leading CRM and ERP systems.
Easy to set up and easy to use, DealHub award-winning Sales Engagement and CPQ platform lets you share relevant content, quickly produce error-free quotes, track buyer engagement and automate sales workflows and approvals. DealHub is fully native within Salesforce and Microsoft Dynamics CRM.
According to G2, ConnectWise CPQ holds an average rating of 4.0/5 from 142 reviews, while QuoteWerks leads with a 4.4/5 average rating across 196 reviews. QuoteWerks outperforms ConnectWise CPQ across all rated dimensions, with a 0.6-point advantage in Meeting Requirements (8.8 vs 8.2), a 0.5-point lead in Usability (8.3 vs 7.8), a 0.9-point higher Ease of Setup (8.0 vs 7.1), a 0.7-point better Ease of Admin (8.3 vs 7.6), a 1.0-point superior Support rating (8.6 vs 7.6), and a 0.7-point edge in Ease of Doing Business With (9.1 vs 8.4). User feedback highlights that ConnectWise CPQ is highly customizable and integrates well with ConnectWise PSA, offering reliable quoting linked to client service activities. However, it has a steep learning curve, limited template formatting options, and requires paid professional services for advanced customization. Conversely, QuoteWerks is praised for its ease of use, efficiency, and professional, customizable templates. It integrates seamlessly with multiple CRMs and accounting systems, supports engagement tracking and eCommerce features, and significantly reduces quote creation time. While QuoteWerks' interface is sometimes described as dated and initial setup can be complex, users emphasize its time-saving capabilities and workflow automation. Overall, QuoteWerks provides a more user-friendly, efficient, and integrative quoting solution with stronger support and business ease, whereas ConnectWise CPQ offers deep customization primarily within the ConnectWise ecosystem but with a steeper learning curve and fewer advanced features.
The best alternatives to ConnectWise CPQ include QuoteWerks (4.4/5 stars, 196 reviews), Agentforce Revenue Management (4.2/5 stars, 1502 reviews), PandaDoc (4.7/5 stars, 3492 reviews), Conga Advantage CPQ (4.2/5 stars, 235 reviews), Conga Composer (4.4/5 stars, 905 reviews), Oracle CPQ (4.0/5 stars, 271 reviews), Proposify (4.6/5 stars, 1135 reviews), ClientPoint (4.5/5 stars, 198 reviews), Vendavo (4.3/5 stars, 68 reviews), and DealHub.io (4.7/5 stars, 848 reviews). These alternatives have higher average ratings and larger review counts, indicating strong user satisfaction and market presence.
Alternatives to ConnectWise CPQ offer native engagement tracking and eCommerce capabilities, which ConnectWise CPQ lacks.
Reviewers recommend QuoteWerks for its ease of use, extensive integrations (115+ CRM, PSA, and accounting solutions), and efficient quoting process with real-time distributor pricing. Agentforce Revenue Management is favored for its comprehensive revenue lifecycle management, AI-powered automation, and seamless Salesforce integration. PandaDoc is praised for its simplicity, document management, e-signatures, and robust CRM integrations. Conga Advantage CPQ is recommended for its flexible quote-to-cash process and strong Salesforce compatibility. DealHub.io is highlighted for its unified revenue platform, guided selling, and ease of use. These tools are noted for better administration, support, usability, and setup ease compared to ConnectWise CPQ, making them preferred choices among reviewers.
Users choose QuoteWerks over ConnectWise CPQ primarily for its superior ease of use and efficiency, as reflected in 15 mentions of its intuitive interface and 10 mentions of efficiency improvements. QuoteWerks accelerates quote creation from hours to minutes, supported by professional, customizable templates praised in 9 reviews. Its robust integrations with CRMs like Salesforce, QuickBooks, and Sage streamline workflows and reduce manual data entry, noted in 8 reviews, enhancing sales and financial processes. QuoteWerks also offers engagement tracking and eCommerce features absent in ConnectWise CPQ, providing greater visibility and sales channel flexibility. Despite a somewhat dated interface and a complex initial setup, users value its centralized product and pricing databases, bundle management, and automation capabilities that reduce errors and improve accuracy. These advantages contribute to QuoteWerks' higher dimension scores in Ease of Setup (8.0 vs 7.1) and Support (8.6 vs 7.6), making it a preferred choice for organizations seeking a comprehensive, efficient, and integrative quoting solution with strong business usability (9.1 vs 8.4).