# Which Epicor Channel Partners have a strong track record on Kinetic migrations from legacy systems?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I've been researching which <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/epicor-channel-partners">Epicor Channel Partners</a> have a strong track record specifically on Kinetic migrations from legacy systems, since moving off an older system carries different risks than a fresh implementation with no process history to account for.</p><ol>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/cre8tive-technology-and-design/reviews"><strong>Cre8tive Technology and Design</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Direct experience guiding a manufacturer from no prior ERP system onto Epicor Kinetic suggests real comfort handling the specific challenge of building process discipline from scratch during a migration, not just moving data.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/six-s-partners/reviews"><strong>Six S Partners</strong></a><strong>:</strong> A high volume of completed implementations using Epicor's own methodology suggests a fairly standardized, repeatable approach to migrations rather than one built fresh for each client.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/quartz-group-inc/reviews"><strong>Quartz Group, Inc.</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Being specifically praised for expertise during a version upgrade suggests the same depth of product knowledge would likely carry over to a legacy migration scenario, even though the direct review evidence is for an upgrade rather than a full migration.</li>
</ol><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For manufacturers who have migrated a legacy system to Epicor Kinetic: did the harder part turn out to be the data migration itself, or rebuilding the internal processes around the new system afterward?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 8 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;Having gone through the Epicor Channel Partners category on G2, the signal operations directors seem to trust most is domain match, whether the partner&#39;s consultants have actually run your mode of manufacturing, discrete versus process versus mixed-mode, rather than the partner tier.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;The escalation delays the post raises with Cre8tive reads as structural to the reseller model more than a one-off, since anything routing back to Epicor sits outside the partner&#39;s direct control, so it&#39;s worth pinning response terms in the contract. From the reviews, the Quartz vertical-fit point is a useful pattern here: a partner strong in aerospace isn&#39;t automatically strong in your plant, and fit is consultant-level more than firm-level. For the directors who evaluated this, was the deciding signal watching how a partner scoped a live workflow during the sales cycle, or something that proved they had run your kind of plant before?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 5 days ago
- Author title: Marketing





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4