Best Container Engine Software

Adam Crivello
AC
Researched and written by Adam Crivello

Container engines, often referred to as operating-system-level virtualization, are operating systems in which the kernel allows the existence of multiple isolated instances. Each instance is referred to as a container, virtualization engine, or jail. Developers use these to create secure, virtual hosting environments with isolated resources. Developers can also separate applications, programs, or segments of code for increased security. These tools reduce overhead for companies and simplify migration processes. Containers can also be used to store applications in a securely hosted environment to increase space, efficiency, and organization. Software solutions such as container management software, container orchestration software, container networking software, container monitoring software, and service discovery software combine to create a microservice ecosystem.

To qualify for inclusion in the Container Engines category, a product must:

Virtualize operating systems in a resource-isolated environment
Add a level of abstraction to contained applications
Allow administrators experience a virtual dedicated server
Allow administrators to determine policies and interpolation

Best Container Engine Software At A Glance

Best for Small Businesses:
Best for Mid-Market:
Best for Enterprise:
Highest User Satisfaction:
Show LessShow More
Best for Enterprise:
Highest User Satisfaction:

G2 takes pride in showing unbiased reviews on user satisfaction in our ratings and reports. We do not allow paid placements in any of our ratings, rankings, or reports. Learn about our scoring methodologies.

No filters applied
22 Listings in Container Engine Available
(803)4.5 out of 5
2nd Easiest To Use in Container Engine software
View top Consulting Services for Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Open source platform for mission-critical computing

    Users
    • Software Engineer
    • System Engineer
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    • Computer Software
    Market Segment
    • 48% Enterprise
    • 29% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Security
    80
    Ease of Use
    73
    Stability
    67
    Customer Support
    64
    RHEL Compatibility
    56
    Cons
    High Cost
    66
    Expensive
    36
    Lack of Support
    29
    Usage Difficulty
    23
    Difficult Learning Curve
    19
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.8
    Quality of Support
    Average: 8.2
    8.9
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    8.4
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.5
    8.5
    Ease of Admin
    Average: 8.6
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    Red Hat
    Company Website
    Year Founded
    1993
    HQ Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Twitter
    @RedHat
    292,228 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    19,863 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Open source platform for mission-critical computing

Users
  • Software Engineer
  • System Engineer
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
  • Computer Software
Market Segment
  • 48% Enterprise
  • 29% Mid-Market
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Security
80
Ease of Use
73
Stability
67
Customer Support
64
RHEL Compatibility
56
Cons
High Cost
66
Expensive
36
Lack of Support
29
Usage Difficulty
23
Difficult Learning Curve
19
Red Hat Enterprise Linux features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.8
Quality of Support
Average: 8.2
8.9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
8.4
Ease of Use
Average: 8.5
8.5
Ease of Admin
Average: 8.6
Seller Details
Seller
Red Hat
Company Website
Year Founded
1993
HQ Location
Raleigh, NC
Twitter
@RedHat
292,228 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
19,863 employees on LinkedIn®
(239)4.6 out of 5
1st Easiest To Use in Container Engine software
View top Consulting Services for Docker
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Docker Hub is the world’s largest repository of container images with an array of content sources including container community developers, open source projects and independent software vendors (ISV)

    Users
    • Software Engineer
    • Senior Software Engineer
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    • Computer Software
    Market Segment
    • 40% Small-Business
    • 31% Mid-Market
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Docker features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.4
    Quality of Support
    Average: 8.2
    9.1
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    8.7
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.5
    8.9
    Ease of Admin
    Average: 8.6
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Year Founded
    2013
    HQ Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Twitter
    @docker
    521,457 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    941 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Docker Hub is the world’s largest repository of container images with an array of content sources including container community developers, open source projects and independent software vendors (ISV)

Users
  • Software Engineer
  • Senior Software Engineer
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
  • Computer Software
Market Segment
  • 40% Small-Business
  • 31% Mid-Market
Docker features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.4
Quality of Support
Average: 8.2
9.1
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
8.7
Ease of Use
Average: 8.5
8.9
Ease of Admin
Average: 8.6
Seller Details
Year Founded
2013
HQ Location
San Francisco, CA
Twitter
@docker
521,457 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
941 employees on LinkedIn®

This is how G2 Deals can help you:

  • Easily shop for curated – and trusted – software
  • Own your own software buying journey
  • Discover exclusive deals on software
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Users
    No information available
    Industries
    No information available
    Market Segment
    • 40% Enterprise
    • 40% Mid-Market
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Red Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.8
    Quality of Support
    Average: 8.2
    8.6
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    8.5
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.5
    8.3
    Ease of Admin
    Average: 8.6
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    Red Hat
    Year Founded
    1993
    HQ Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Twitter
    @RedHat
    292,228 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    19,863 employees on LinkedIn®
Users
No information available
Industries
No information available
Market Segment
  • 40% Enterprise
  • 40% Mid-Market
Red Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.8
Quality of Support
Average: 8.2
8.6
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
8.5
Ease of Use
Average: 8.5
8.3
Ease of Admin
Average: 8.6
Seller Details
Seller
Red Hat
Year Founded
1993
HQ Location
Raleigh, NC
Twitter
@RedHat
292,228 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
19,863 employees on LinkedIn®
(67)4.1 out of 5
4th Easiest To Use in Container Engine software
View top Consulting Services for Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Compute
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Compute options range from VMs to GPUs to bare metal servers, and includes options for dense I/O workloads, high performance computing (HPC), and AMD EPYC processors.

    Users
    • Software Engineer
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    • Computer Software
    Market Segment
    • 48% Enterprise
    • 28% Mid-Market
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Compute features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.1
    Quality of Support
    Average: 8.2
    8.0
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    8.7
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.5
    8.1
    Ease of Admin
    Average: 8.6
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    Oracle
    Year Founded
    1977
    HQ Location
    Austin, TX
    Twitter
    @Oracle
    821,543 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    199,405 employees on LinkedIn®
    Ownership
    NYSE:ORCL
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Compute options range from VMs to GPUs to bare metal servers, and includes options for dense I/O workloads, high performance computing (HPC), and AMD EPYC processors.

Users
  • Software Engineer
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
  • Computer Software
Market Segment
  • 48% Enterprise
  • 28% Mid-Market
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Compute features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.1
Quality of Support
Average: 8.2
8.0
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
8.7
Ease of Use
Average: 8.5
8.1
Ease of Admin
Average: 8.6
Seller Details
Seller
Oracle
Year Founded
1977
HQ Location
Austin, TX
Twitter
@Oracle
821,543 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
199,405 employees on LinkedIn®
Ownership
NYSE:ORCL
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    WebSphere Hybrid Edition is the comprehensive collection of WebSphere application runtimes and modernization tools that enable you to modernize enterprise Java applications and create new cloud-native

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Banking
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 65% Enterprise
    • 27% Mid-Market
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition (Application Server & Liberty) features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.4
    Quality of Support
    Average: 8.2
    8.6
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    7.9
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.5
    8.0
    Ease of Admin
    Average: 8.6
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    IBM
    Year Founded
    1911
    HQ Location
    Armonk, NY
    Twitter
    @IBM
    714,459 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    317,108 employees on LinkedIn®
    Ownership
    SWX:IBM
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

WebSphere Hybrid Edition is the comprehensive collection of WebSphere application runtimes and modernization tools that enable you to modernize enterprise Java applications and create new cloud-native

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Banking
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 65% Enterprise
  • 27% Mid-Market
IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition (Application Server & Liberty) features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.4
Quality of Support
Average: 8.2
8.6
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
7.9
Ease of Use
Average: 8.5
8.0
Ease of Admin
Average: 8.6
Seller Details
Seller
IBM
Year Founded
1911
HQ Location
Armonk, NY
Twitter
@IBM
714,459 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
317,108 employees on LinkedIn®
Ownership
SWX:IBM
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    MicroK8s is pure upstream Kubernetes, not a subset. We keep it small with sensible choices that just work. That makes a quick install, with easy upgrades and great security — and leaves your options

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    Market Segment
    • 59% Small-Business
    • 24% Mid-Market
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Canonical MicroK8s features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.3
    Quality of Support
    Average: 8.2
    7.8
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    9.5
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.5
    7.9
    Ease of Admin
    Average: 8.6
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Year Founded
    2004
    HQ Location
    London
    Twitter
    @Canonical
    103,329 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    1,627 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

MicroK8s is pure upstream Kubernetes, not a subset. We keep it small with sensible choices that just work. That makes a quick install, with easy upgrades and great security — and leaves your options

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Computer Software
Market Segment
  • 59% Small-Business
  • 24% Mid-Market
Canonical MicroK8s features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.3
Quality of Support
Average: 8.2
7.8
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
9.5
Ease of Use
Average: 8.5
7.9
Ease of Admin
Average: 8.6
Seller Details
Year Founded
2004
HQ Location
London
Twitter
@Canonical
103,329 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
1,627 employees on LinkedIn®
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Sandboxie uses isolation technology to separate programs from your underlying operating system preventing unwanted changes from happening to your personal data, programs and applications that rest saf

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    No information available
    Market Segment
    • 43% Mid-Market
    • 43% Small-Business
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Sandboxie features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.6
    Quality of Support
    Average: 8.2
    8.3
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    9.4
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.5
    8.9
    Ease of Admin
    Average: 8.6
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    Sandboxie
    Year Founded
    2014
    HQ Location
    Boston, MA
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    25 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Sandboxie uses isolation technology to separate programs from your underlying operating system preventing unwanted changes from happening to your personal data, programs and applications that rest saf

Users
No information available
Industries
No information available
Market Segment
  • 43% Mid-Market
  • 43% Small-Business
Sandboxie features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.6
Quality of Support
Average: 8.2
8.3
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
9.4
Ease of Use
Average: 8.5
8.9
Ease of Admin
Average: 8.6
Seller Details
Seller
Sandboxie
Year Founded
2014
HQ Location
Boston, MA
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
25 employees on LinkedIn®
(54)4.4 out of 5
3rd Easiest To Use in Container Engine software
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Virtuozzo, a leading hyperconverged cloud platform for service providers, ISVs, and enterprises, enables production-ready OpenStack Infrastructure-as-a-Service, multi-cloud Platform-as-a-Service, Kube

    Users
    • DevOps Engineer
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    • Computer & Network Security
    Market Segment
    • 63% Small-Business
    • 26% Mid-Market
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Virtuozzo features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.2
    Quality of Support
    Average: 8.2
    8.7
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    8.8
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.5
    8.8
    Ease of Admin
    Average: 8.6
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    Virtuozzo
    Year Founded
    2015
    HQ Location
    Schaffhausen
    Twitter
    @virtuozzoinc
    3,672 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    261 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Virtuozzo, a leading hyperconverged cloud platform for service providers, ISVs, and enterprises, enables production-ready OpenStack Infrastructure-as-a-Service, multi-cloud Platform-as-a-Service, Kube

Users
  • DevOps Engineer
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
  • Computer & Network Security
Market Segment
  • 63% Small-Business
  • 26% Mid-Market
Virtuozzo features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.2
Quality of Support
Average: 8.2
8.7
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
8.8
Ease of Use
Average: 8.5
8.8
Ease of Admin
Average: 8.6
Seller Details
Seller
Virtuozzo
Year Founded
2015
HQ Location
Schaffhausen
Twitter
@virtuozzoinc
3,672 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
261 employees on LinkedIn®
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    resinOS is an operating system tailored for containers and designed for the unique realities of the embedded world. resinOS supports almost 20 distinct device types, has a robust networking and provis

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    No information available
    Market Segment
    • 60% Small-Business
    • 40% Mid-Market
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • resinOS features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.8
    Quality of Support
    Average: 8.2
    9.4
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    8.3
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.5
    8.3
    Ease of Admin
    Average: 8.6
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    balena
    Year Founded
    2013
    HQ Location
    London, GB
    Twitter
    @balena_io
    6,238 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    73 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

resinOS is an operating system tailored for containers and designed for the unique realities of the embedded world. resinOS supports almost 20 distinct device types, has a robust networking and provis

Users
No information available
Industries
No information available
Market Segment
  • 60% Small-Business
  • 40% Mid-Market
resinOS features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.8
Quality of Support
Average: 8.2
9.4
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
8.3
Ease of Use
Average: 8.5
8.3
Ease of Admin
Average: 8.6
Seller Details
Seller
balena
Year Founded
2013
HQ Location
London, GB
Twitter
@balena_io
6,238 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
73 employees on LinkedIn®
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Canonical LXC by Linuxcontainers.org is a set of tools, templates, library and language bindings. It's pretty low level, very flexible and covers just about every containment feature supported by the

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 71% Small-Business
    • 21% Mid-Market
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Canonical LXC features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    7.8
    Quality of Support
    Average: 8.2
    9.0
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    8.2
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.5
    9.3
    Ease of Admin
    Average: 8.6
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Year Founded
    2004
    HQ Location
    London
    Twitter
    @Canonical
    103,329 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    1,627 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Canonical LXC by Linuxcontainers.org is a set of tools, templates, library and language bindings. It's pretty low level, very flexible and covers just about every containment feature supported by the

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 71% Small-Business
  • 21% Mid-Market
Canonical LXC features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
7.8
Quality of Support
Average: 8.2
9.0
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
8.2
Ease of Use
Average: 8.5
9.3
Ease of Admin
Average: 8.6
Seller Details
Year Founded
2004
HQ Location
London
Twitter
@Canonical
103,329 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
1,627 employees on LinkedIn®
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    runc is a CLI tool for spawning and running containers according to the OCI specification.

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    No information available
    Market Segment
    • 64% Small-Business
    • 18% Enterprise
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • runc features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    7.3
    Quality of Support
    Average: 8.2
    6.7
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    8.7
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.5
    9.2
    Ease of Admin
    Average: 8.6
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Year Founded
    1993
    HQ Location
    Saint Louis, Missouri
    Twitter
    @ObjectComputing
    3,806 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    392 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

runc is a CLI tool for spawning and running containers according to the OCI specification.

Users
No information available
Industries
No information available
Market Segment
  • 64% Small-Business
  • 18% Enterprise
runc features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
7.3
Quality of Support
Average: 8.2
6.7
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
8.7
Ease of Use
Average: 8.5
9.2
Ease of Admin
Average: 8.6
Seller Details
Year Founded
1993
HQ Location
Saint Louis, Missouri
Twitter
@ObjectComputing
3,806 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
392 employees on LinkedIn®
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    KubeSphere is a distributed operating system for cloud-native application management, using Kubernetes as its kernel. It provides a plug-and-play architecture, allowing third-party applications to be

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    No information available
    Market Segment
    • 33% Enterprise
    • 33% Mid-Market
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • KubeSphere Container Platform features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.1
    Quality of Support
    Average: 8.2
    8.3
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    9.1
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.5
    10.0
    Ease of Admin
    Average: 8.6
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    HQ Location
    Hong Kong, CN
    Twitter
    @KubeSphere
    2,036 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    9 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

KubeSphere is a distributed operating system for cloud-native application management, using Kubernetes as its kernel. It provides a plug-and-play architecture, allowing third-party applications to be

Users
No information available
Industries
No information available
Market Segment
  • 33% Enterprise
  • 33% Mid-Market
KubeSphere Container Platform features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.1
Quality of Support
Average: 8.2
8.3
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
9.1
Ease of Use
Average: 8.5
10.0
Ease of Admin
Average: 8.6
Seller Details
HQ Location
Hong Kong, CN
Twitter
@KubeSphere
2,036 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
9 employees on LinkedIn®
(16)4.2 out of 5
5th Easiest To Use in Container Engine software
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Apache Mesos is a cluster manager that distributes resources across applications and databases.

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Internet
    Market Segment
    • 38% Enterprise
    • 38% Mid-Market
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Apache Mesos features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    7.8
    Quality of Support
    Average: 8.2
    7.8
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    7.4
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.5
    6.7
    Ease of Admin
    Average: 8.6
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Year Founded
    1999
    HQ Location
    Wakefield, MA
    Twitter
    @TheASF
    66,785 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    2,291 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Apache Mesos is a cluster manager that distributes resources across applications and databases.

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Internet
Market Segment
  • 38% Enterprise
  • 38% Mid-Market
Apache Mesos features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
7.8
Quality of Support
Average: 8.2
7.8
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
7.4
Ease of Use
Average: 8.5
6.7
Ease of Admin
Average: 8.6
Seller Details
Year Founded
1999
HQ Location
Wakefield, MA
Twitter
@TheASF
66,785 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
2,291 employees on LinkedIn®
By OCI
(27)4.3 out of 5
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    The Open Container Initiative (OCI) is comprised of a diverse set of members that are committed to creating an open industry standard around a container image format and runtime backed by a certificat

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 52% Enterprise
    • 30% Mid-Market
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • OCI features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.2
    Quality of Support
    Average: 8.2
    8.5
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    8.0
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.5
    8.7
    Ease of Admin
    Average: 8.6
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    OCI
    Year Founded
    2018
    HQ Location
    San Francisco, US
    Twitter
    @OCI_ORG
    5,195 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    5 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

The Open Container Initiative (OCI) is comprised of a diverse set of members that are committed to creating an open industry standard around a container image format and runtime backed by a certificat

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Computer Software
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 52% Enterprise
  • 30% Mid-Market
OCI features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.2
Quality of Support
Average: 8.2
8.5
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
8.0
Ease of Use
Average: 8.5
8.7
Ease of Admin
Average: 8.6
Seller Details
Seller
OCI
Year Founded
2018
HQ Location
San Francisco, US
Twitter
@OCI_ORG
5,195 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
5 employees on LinkedIn®
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Canonical LXD is a next generation system container manager.It offers a user experience similar to virtual machines but using Linux containers instead.It's image based with pre-made images available f

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    No information available
    Market Segment
    • 53% Small-Business
    • 27% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Canonical LXD Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Features
    4
    Container Management
    3
    Simple
    2
    Easy Management
    1
    Management Control
    1
    Cons
    Improvement Needed
    2
    Complexity
    1
    Difficult Learning
    1
    Lack of Automation
    1
    Resource Limitations
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Canonical LXD features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.0
    Quality of Support
    Average: 8.2
    9.3
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    8.0
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.5
    8.3
    Ease of Admin
    Average: 8.6
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Year Founded
    2004
    HQ Location
    London
    Twitter
    @Canonical
    103,329 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    1,627 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Canonical LXD is a next generation system container manager.It offers a user experience similar to virtual machines but using Linux containers instead.It's image based with pre-made images available f

Users
No information available
Industries
No information available
Market Segment
  • 53% Small-Business
  • 27% Mid-Market
Canonical LXD Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Features
4
Container Management
3
Simple
2
Easy Management
1
Management Control
1
Cons
Improvement Needed
2
Complexity
1
Difficult Learning
1
Lack of Automation
1
Resource Limitations
1
Canonical LXD features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.0
Quality of Support
Average: 8.2
9.3
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
8.0
Ease of Use
Average: 8.5
8.3
Ease of Admin
Average: 8.6
Seller Details
Year Founded
2004
HQ Location
London
Twitter
@Canonical
103,329 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
1,627 employees on LinkedIn®

Learn More About Container Engine Software

What is Container Engine Software?

Container engine software provides the infrastructure to run, manage, and execute container instances. Containers are executable software units that run on the cloud, desktop, or traditional IT systems. The container engine supports running multiple, isolated, container instances on the same OS kernel.

The container engine is responsible for many tasks in containers. This includes container creation by taking container images. Container images are built-in units that house applications, metadata, and dependencies required for a container runtime.  Most container engines use the open container initiatives (OCI) container image formats.

The software prepares the isolated environment for containers – known as provisioning – and allocates requirements for the container execution. To ensure smooth execution in isolated environments, it monitors container runtimes and enhances security, allowing set security policies and configurations as required.  

Many open-source providers offer container engine software. A command line interface (CLI) can also manage container engines, whereby instructions are given to container runtimes in the command line.

What are the Common Features of Container Engine Software?

Container engine software comes with a lot of functionalities. While every vendor might not provide all the features, here are the most common features in container engine software.

Isolation and resource management: The container engine creates new containers and isolates old ones from the operating systems. It then allocates necessary resources such as memory, CPU, and network so the container runs efficiently. 

Container creation: It creates a new container by setting up resources and pulling in a container image, a built-in unit that stores all dependencies and libraries required for the execution of containers.

Container execution: The container engine software produces the necessary container runtime environment to execute containers. It also monitors the container during execution and manages its lifecycle.

Security: Container engine solutions ensure the safety of the container by restricting access privileges and isolating containers from each other.

Integration: The container can integrate and verify compatibility with other container software.

What are the Benefits of Container Engine Software?

Container engines are an essential part of the ecosystem of container tools. They are crucial to the smooth and efficient functioning of containers. Here we list the most important benefits:

Easy deployment: Containerization engine software facilitates well-ordered-enables deployment of containers and guarantees automation across different environments.

Efficient resource utilization and automation: Container engines ensure optimal resource usage, as it makes it possible for multiple containers to run in a single operating system through isolation for execution.

Security: The container engine isolates containers for execution into namespaces and assigns restrictions on container access to provide holistic protection.

Who Uses Container Engine Software?

Companies involved in software development and deployment use the containerization engine system. 

Developers: Developers use this software to bundle cloud-native applications and execute them in the desired environment.

DevOps teams: DevOps teams utilize container engines in the continuous development/continuous deployment automation practices.

System administrators: Container engines manage the lifecycle of containers, in turn helping system administrators handle their production environments.

What are the Alternatives to Container Engine Software?

Container engine software can be replaced by this type of software, either partially or completely:

Virtual machines (VM): They provide isolations between cloud-native applications. Each VM runs its own operating system instance.

Operating system virtualization: This provides a way to isolate apps, but might be limited to some OSs. 

Software Related to Container Engine Software

Container engine software is used along with other container technology software, including:

Container orchestration tools: Container orchestration tools assist in the deployment and management of container lifecycles. They also boost security by keeping containers separate from each other.

Container management software: Container management software provides support for virtualization, resource allocation, and management of container workloads. These platforms scale containerization processes by organizing container workloads and related resources, and troubleshooting when allocation issues arise.

Container security tools: Container security software is used to protect containerized applications, related resources, container networks, nodes, and the infrastructure.

Challenges with Container Engine Software

Software solutions can come with their own set of challenges. The container engine has to work with the entire container ecosystem; if not,  security and performance issues may develop.

Security: If not correctly configured, security risks occur because containerized applications share the same kernel. Safety problems in one container's workload can affect the others. Regular updates and the right configuration are important for mitigating these risks.

Monitoring: Because they have to function properly in different environments, at the right performance levels, keeping an eye on metrics for all the running containers is arduous.

Storage: The container engine needs to connect with persistent storage and data centers to stow docs and information that are accessible without latency when containerized applications are running.

Which Companies Should Buy Container Engine Software?

Companies that are in development that use container technology should invest in container engine software.

Software development companies: Companies that use DevOps principles should buy container engine software. It lends a hand to their continuous integration/continuous deployment practices.

Cloud platform providers: By including the capabilities to run containerized apps, cloud platform providers can cater to clients who use containers in their IT landscape.

How to Buy Container Engine Software

Requirements Gathering (RFI/RFP) for Container Engine Software

The software’s ability to integrate with development lifecycle workflows, cloud infrastructure, other container software, and APIs must be considered.

Companies should take advantage if a container engine software vendor offers a free trial to evaluate the product before investing. Depending on the scope of the deployment, it might be helpful to produce an RFI, a one-page list with a few bullet points describing what a business needs from the software. 

Compare Container Engine Software Products

Create a long list

Buyers need to identify features and use cases that they need from their container engine tools, which will start them off with a large pool of software providers. Next comes evaluating the pros and cons of each product. Plenty of open-source projects provide free setups. CRI-O is an example of a community-driven container engine.

Create a short list

Short lists cross-reference the results of initial vendor evaluations with other buyer reviews on third-party review sites such as G2.com, which guide the buyer on their path to purchase. From a list of three to five products, buyers compare pricing and features to determine the best fit.

Conduct demos

Companies should try out all of the products on their shortlist. During vendor demonstrations, buyers should ask specific questions about the functionalities and use cases they care about the most. For example, they might ask the vendor to show how the container engine software tool enforces access control.

Selection of Container Engine Software

Choose a selection team

Involving the most relevant personnel is crucial during the software selection process. The team should include relevant company stakeholders who can scrutinize the software to check whether it will meet the organization’s requirements. The individuals responsible for the day-to-day use of container registry software must be a part of the selection team. 

Negotiation

The cost of the software varies based on the features offered, the number of instances, and the number of users. Buyers looking to trim costs should negotiate the specific functions that matter to them to get the best price. More often than not, the price and specifications on the vendor’s pricing page are flexible. It’s crucial to negotiate about the fees for implementation and support, as well. 

Final decision

Before deciding to purchase the software, testing it for a short period is advisable. Everyday users are the best people to perform this assessment. They can use and analyze the software product's capabilities and offer valuable feedback. In most cases, software service providers offer tutorials and a short-term product trial. If the selection team is satisfied with what the software does, the buyers can proceed with the purchase or contracting process.