What I value most about Ubuntu is its stability, developer-friendliness and reliable software packages management (apt, Snap). Using this OS as my daily driver makes my work productive and comfortable due to the native Linux terminal, Docker utility and comprehensive documentation. The stability and security of the LTS versions also contribute to a positive experience and simplify work. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

In my view, Ubuntu’s main drawback is its heavy reliance on Snap packages, which can result in slower application performance and increased disk usage. Also, while Ubuntu generally offers strong hardware support, certain proprietary applications or specific peripheral devices may still need extra configuration to work properly. Lastly, some professional tools, such as Adobe Creative Suite, along with other Windows-only programs, are not supported natively. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about Ubuntu is the strong balance it strikes between ease of use and real power. It works well right out of the box for both beginners and experienced users, offers excellent hardware compatibility, and is backed by a huge community with very solid documentation.

The regular Long Term Support (LTS) releases give me confidence in its stability, and the Software Center along with apt package management makes installing and keeping software up to date very straightforward. I also appreciate how smoothly it runs across a wide range of hardware, from older machines to modern workstations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some hardware—especially newer Wi‑Fi cards, printers, or GPUs—may still require manual driver installation or additional configuration. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As a personal user in Colombia, what I value most about Ubuntu is its flexibility for programming and development tasks. I mainly use the terminal with APT to install development tools (Python, Node.js, Docker) quickly and without complications.

The GNOME interface is intuitive and allows me to work comfortably both in Spanish and by configuring the system to my liking. The automatic security updates give me peace of mind, and the support from the Spanish-speaking community in forums is excellent when I have questions.

Additionally, being open-source, I can fully customize it without worrying about licenses. I use it in dual-boot with Windows 11, and Ubuntu is my main system when I need to program or experiment with new technologies. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Since I am not an expert programmer, the learning curve can sometimes be a bit frustrating. What I like least is that, for specific tasks or when an unexpected error occurs, I can't solve it just with the graphical interface; I have to resort to searching for tutorials on forums, YouTube, or technical documentation on the internet.

Although the help community is excellent, I would like the system to facilitate these processes more "by default" without forcing the user to research so much on the web or to use commands in the terminal for simple things. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love that Ubuntu is free, lightweight, and developer-friendly. The terminal is a big plus for managing projects and installing tools efficiently. Ubuntu works really well with technologies like Node.js, Git, and Docker, providing a reliable environment for backend development and running applications in containers. This helps keep my workflow organized, making it easier to build, test, and manage projects without spending money on an operating system. The initial setup was straightforward, and starting with basic development tools didn't take much time, which added to a smooth experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes setting up certain drivers or fixing compatibility issues can be frustrating, especially for beginners. Some apps also work better on Windows, so it would be nice to have broader software compatibility and easier troubleshooting. Ubuntu could improve by providing clearer error messages and simple step-by-step solutions for common problems. Better automatic driver detection, easier software installation, and a built-in tool to identify and fix system issues would make it much more beginner-friendly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Ubuntu has been a dependable operating system for my daily work. It's stable, responsive, and easy to customize based on my workflow. I also appreciate how well it works with the development tools I use, making it simple to set up projects and keep everything running smoothly. Since it's open source, it delivers excellent value without sacrificing reliability or performance. Whenever I've needed help, the documentation and community have made it easy to find solutions. Overall, it has been a solid platform for both development and everyday productivity. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some hardware drivers and third-party software can require extra setup compared to other operating systems. While most issues can be resolved, the initial configuration may take a little time, especially when working with newer hardware or specialized applications. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The best thing about Ubuntu is that it gives much control and raw usage to the hardware. which makes the features like customizations, tooling and setup, development use cases, and fixing. I use it regularly with my remote system.

Ubuntu works well with modern and modest hardware with ease, making it a very adaptive choice for a machine. The ecosystem and integrations are great. compatibility with tools like Git, DevTools, Docker, and CLI tools.

The biggest benefit for me has been how easy it makes go through the happenings underground in any system. like working with networks, processes, permissions, filesystems, and all those root kernel-level nuances. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Pointing to the dislikes for this great open-source OS would be nonsense; still, sometimes it feels like the UX could be better compared to other options available. Also, being very close to the system might not be a great fit for all types of users, and they might feel a bit trickled and find it hard to learn regularly.

Sometimes I have noticed that with some updates I have to troubleshoot something to reconfigure my environment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find Ubuntu to be a very useful operating system for developers and students as it provides a reliable alternative to Windows or Mac OS. I love that it's free and open source, making it accessible without needing to purchase an expensive license. Ubuntu's user-friendly interface is great for newcomers to Linux because it's really easy to learn with a clean and simple desktop environment. I appreciate that common tasks like installing applications, managing files, connecting to Wi-Fi, and changing system settings are straightforward. Ubuntu is particularly strong for software development with excellent support for programming languages, development tools, Git, Docker, databases, and many other technologies. The command line tools enable quick task execution, which is a big plus. I also appreciate the regular security updates that keep the system protected. The initial setup was very easy and straightforward, which was great, especially as the system guided me through most of the steps. Overall, I had a positive experience with Ubuntu, finding it flexible and useful for both deployment and development. It's particularly recommended to students and developers who need a free and flexible operating system. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

If you're completely new to Linux, you might need some time to understand terminal commands, the file system, and the software installation process. But these difficulties become easier once you get used to the environment. The transition to Ubuntu from another system also took some time, but it's manageable once you get acquainted. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I appreciate Ubuntu’s massive community ecosystem paired with its LTS release cadence. Whenever I hit strange issues with our sensor‑processing workloads, I can almost always find existing forum threads covering similar bugs. Deb package compatibility is solid, and most open‑source tools we rely on have pre‑built Ubuntu versions ready to install. Security patches roll out predictably for LTS builds, so I don’t need to spend excessive time hardening each individual server. For our small infrastructure team, this reduces guesswork and keeps our data pipelines operating steadily day in and day out. Additionally, deploying Ubuntu on our cloud instances was quick and straightforward; cloud templates were readily available so we could spin‑up new data processing servers in minutes. Once those initial templates were finalized, rolling out additional Ubuntu hosts became very fast for our environmental data workloads. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One persistent pain point I run into is proprietary hardware driver support on Ubuntu desktop. Some of our specialized lab monitoring peripherals struggle to get properly recognized, requiring manual third-party driver installs that break after system updates. Certain newer kernel versions also occasionally introduce minor regressions for our cloud virtual instances. Snaps can feel intrusive too; some pre-installed snap applications auto-update in the background and eat unexpected disk resources. While server-focused workflows remain very reliable, desktop-side polish for niche industry hardware still leaves room for meaningful improvements. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really like Ubuntu's flexibility, stability, and strong support for software development. The terminal and package management system make it easy to install development tools, manage dependencies, and automate tasks. I particularly appreciate the straightforward integration with Git, Python, Docker, compilers, and other development tools, which makes setting up and maintaining projects convenient. The ability to customize the environment to suit different development needs is another major advantage. I also value the large open-source community and extensive documentation, which make troubleshooting and learning new tools much easier. Overall, Ubuntu provides a clean and powerful environment that gives me good control over my development workflow. The additional tools like APT package manager, GNOME desktop environment, Terminal, Snap, and built-in system utilities further enhance its use for both everyday development and advanced technical experimentation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One area Ubuntu could improve is hardware compatibility and ease of configuration, especially for users who are new to Linux. Some peripherals, proprietary drivers, or specialized applications can require additional setup compared with Windows or macOS. Software availability can also occasionally be a limitation when a specific commercial application does not have a native Linux version. I’d also like the software-center and package-management experience to feel more consistent, particularly when choosing between APT, Snap, and other installation methods. Overall, Ubuntu is very capable for development, but better hardware support, application availability, and a more streamlined software-management experience would make it more accessible for everyday users. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As a cybersecurity professional, what I like best about Ubuntu is its seamless compatibility with essential security tools like Nmap, Wireshark, Metasploit, and Burp Suite. The terminal is powerful and efficient for running scripts, network scanning, and vulnerability assessments. Ubuntu's built-in security features like AppArmor and UFW firewall provide a solid security baseline. Its stability, frequent security patches from Canonical, and strong open-source community make it the most reliable OS for penetration testing, ethical hacking, and cyber defense work. It's my primary OS for all security lab environments. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As a cybersecurity professional, one downside of Ubuntu is that some proprietary security tools and software do not have native Linux support, requiring workarounds or Wine to run them. The initial learning curve can be steep for beginners transitioning from Windows, especially when configuring security environments manually via terminal. Hardware compatibility issues occasionally arise with certain network adapters and wireless cards, which are critical for tasks like packet sniffing and monitor mode in wireless security testing. Additionally, Ubuntu's default repositories sometimes have outdated versions of security tools, requiring manual updates or third-party PPAs to get the latest versions needed for professional cybersecurity work. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.