Red Hat Enterprise Linux Reviews & Product Details

1. Much more secure than windows operating system.

2. Performance is best as compare to any other operating system even if we allocate minimum required resources like cpu ram etc

3. Used in almost every organisation to host most of the mission critical applications as rhel providers performance, security and free to use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

1. GUI interface is not that user friendly as compare to windows.

2. Creating repository removes the packages dependency and installing packages without subscription is difficult.

3. If audit happens removing vulnerabilities and updating packages without subscription is so much difficult.

4. Making changes in the /etc configuration files and restarting any service as per need when selinux is in enforcing state is difficult.

5. Allowing ports and services when firewall is in on state is difficult. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Red Hat Enterprise Linux for its stable and secure environments, which are vital for automation and CI/CD workflows. I really like how robust the system is, especially during updates and long-running workloads. Built-in tools like SELinux, yum/dnf, and systemd make management smooth, and it integrates well with automation tools like Ansible. SELinux provides strong security by controlling access and enforcing policies. Yum/dnf makes package management seamless and keeps systems up to date. Systemd simplifies service management and the system boot process. Together, all these make Red Hat Enterprise Linux secure, reliable, and easy to maintain. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes the subscription cost could be higher for smaller teams, and occasional updates or patches can introduce compatibility issues. The learning curve for some advanced features like SELinux can also be steep for new users. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find Red Hat Enterprise Linux very useful because of its support, long-term support, and stability, which are some of the biggest advantages of using this environment. The support measures like forums, and regular bug fixes help me stay updated with the security standards. I also appreciate its enterprise-grade security, which is often used in high-level industries, and this exposure helps me become familiar with the system. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think the price limits could be improved. Even though it is updated, the newer standards are adopted very slowly and there should be an update every few years to adopt new standards. Also, installing drivers is a multi-step command line process which requires enabling the EPL deposit, installing the tools, and other things. It would be better if it were more of a one-click process because the additional drivers in the UI are secondary here. The partitioning aspect during setup was difficult; the manual tool is complex, which can be challenging for beginners due to the required planning and navigation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Stability & Reliability: RHEL is extremely stable and reliable, making it ideal for production workloads.

Enterprise Support: Red Hat’s enterprise-grade support and regular security patches give confidence in critical environments.

Security & Compliance: Built-in security features like SELinux, FIPS compliance, and regular CVE patches keep systems safe. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Cost Factor: Subscription and support costs Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I truly value the stability and reliability that RHEL offers for enterprise workloads. Its security features, such as SELinux, regular patching, and long-term support, make me feel confident when managing critical applications. RHEL also integrates smoothly with cloud platforms, virtualization, and container technologies like OpenShift. The documentation is thorough, and Red Hat's support team is always quick to respond whenever I encounter any issues. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The subscription cost is on the higher side compared to other Linux distributions, which can be a barrier for smaller businesses or personal projects. Also, the learning curve can be steep for beginners. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

RHEL provides consistent performance, predictable updates, and long-term support, which makes it ideal for production workloads. The built-in SELinux policies, lifecycle management, and seamless integration with tools like Ansible make system administration much easier and far more secure. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I dislike about Red Hat Enterprise Linux is that some features and repositories require a subscription to access, which can increase costs for smaller teams. Additionally, certain advanced configurations can be complex for beginners, especially when dealing with SELinux or dependency issues. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's a staple in the IT world and just like offering Microsoft licensing to your clients, you have to offer RHEL as well. The support you get for Linux is crucial in the enterprise space. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Honestly there is nothing I dislike about Red Hat and they are much easier to deal with from a partner perspective than Microsoft. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

ability to write and run scripts, schedule automatic scripts (cron) and run command line unix commands Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

slight variation with user management and changes/settings Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I appreciate the scalability of Red Hat Enterprise Linux across our environment, which allows us a global reach. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find some elements of complexity and skills gap a bit challenging. It would be helpful if there was free training available for everyone. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We use RHEL for it's Enterprise-Grade stability, security and Long Term Support (10+ years). Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Dislikes for RHEL often center on it's cost, steeper learning curve for desktop/newusers, reliance on specific repos (EPEL), slower desktop performance and community friction. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.