Deck Building Software

I don't like that the measurement tool only allows one measurement. It would be awesome if you could have multiple measurements coming off of one measurement in the same view. Just having that single view option is a bummer. One other area would be the Procore integration. Right now, to my knowledge, it only connects to Procore documents. It would be really nice if we were able to plug it directly into the Procore drawings rather than the documents. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Revizto to streamline all of our MEP trade models into one space and keep clash detection, model organization, and issue tracking organized. It's a clean workspace for our projects. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

AutoCad can feel overwhelming to beginners cause of its wide range of tools and commands, especially when you are working on complex 2d or 3d shapes or large files. Even though the interfae is professional but sometimes it feels a bit outdated compared to newer design softwares. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Beofre using AutoCad, creating and modifying technical drawings used to take much more time and increased the chances of errors. With AutoCad now i can design complex shapes with much more precision. I can make quick changes and organize drawings efficiently. It saves significant time during design and documentation work. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Not found any negatives thus far and I have really tried to break it by opening all CAD versions I have going back 20 years on some multi level buildings. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Cost of the software was a huge factor as I can get the package for a once off budgetary amount and not have to keep paying forever. It allows me to service my clients with a professional item. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I wish there was a better library of included hatch patterns and materials. I find that material rendering is something I have to spend much more time than I'd like to enable accurate rendering outputs. Certain materials are difficult to rotate, particularly if they are a part of a component, rather than 'painted' into the model. The material and hatch library just feel very limited, which requires trying to custom generate or find other materials to bring in which can get messy. Creating your own templates and knowing how to customize certain features to create useful outputs/data within a model can get very complicated if you're not quite savvy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that building a 3D model in Revit enables me to generate relevant views that are live-updated with model changes, avoiding manual updates required by 2D CAD systems. This helps clarify design intent for clients and contractors. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes it can be unstable with product add-ons going into major simulations, guess this could be expected but further development for that would be great as we use that a lot. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Able to design fast, creating digital twins and model creations that improve the business much faster. Working together with Teamcenter share for cloud sharing also makes it easier. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The major factor is the 'bug splat". Despite its versions and performance have upgraded tremendously over the years, SketchUp is still prone to crashes when models become overly heavy with un-purged components.. Also, complex geometry cannot be easily created without third-party plugins. For a tool that started as free/affordable option, the recurring pro subscription pricing may feel steep for solo practitioners. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It creates a perfect bridge between 2D sketch and ideation and the final resulting 3D render. It can be seamlessly integrated into AutoCAD's workflow, AI's workflow and also as external exports for a cloud based softwares like Coohom. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don't think there is anything useless. Of course, like all the best software, there are always some improvements that could be made. Specifically, I would like to be able to manage free tables with cells that perform calculations or, at the very least, integrate OLE objects (like an Excel table or a Word text). Finally, the management of images could be improved by allowing cropping. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Edificius allows for a truly impressive time saving, both for its use in itself and for the interchangeability of work with energy and structural software, not to mention with the computation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Haven't found any issues so far Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Onshape solves my dependency on high-end hardware, letting me work from any device with a browser. Its parametric nature helps me reuse models for new projects, and I can handle complex assemblies without performance hiccups, even while traveling. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes saving the documents or finding them can be difficult. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use SmartDraw to create spaces for event setups, making them user-efficient and easy to organize for different groups. It saves me time with its ease of use, quick access to items, and efficient document editing and sharing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Rebuild errors. I think SOLIDWORKS should integrate a system that can detect rebuild errors and help resolve the issue. Sometimes, while I’m applying commands, it shows rebuild errors, and after that I’m not able to find where the errors are coming from. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

SOLIDWORKS helps reduce the cost of prototyping. With this software, I can create almost any part, choose materials using the Appearances section, and then run different types of analysis with SOLIDWORKS Simulation.

As a third-year mechanical engineering student, I regularly model parts and assemblies, which has really helped me improve my skills. Right now I’m working on a project where I design parts in SOLIDWORKS, convert them to an .stl file, and then print them on a 3D printer. Overall, it makes my work much easier. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One thing I dislike about Autodesk Fusion is that it is highly dependent on an internet connection for sign-in and cloud features, which can be inconvenient when working with limited or unstable connectivity. Sometimes the software also feels resource-heavy, especially on mid-range systems, causing slowdowns during complex assemblies or simulations.

Another drawback is that some advanced features are locked behind paid plans, which can be limiting for students or individual users who want to explore deeper CAM or simulation capabilities. Occasional updates also change the interface slightly, which takes some time to adjust to.

And the last and most important drawback is its platform fees! Like paying 1 lakh + per year in India ,is I think can be difficult for some designers and engineers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Autodesk Fusion solves the problem of having to use multiple separate tools for design, testing, and manufacturing by bringing everything into one integrated platform.

From an electronics perspective, it helps in designing accurate enclosures, brackets, and mechanical parts for electronic projects such as sensor housings, control boxes, and PCB enclosures. Being able to visualize dimensions in 3D ensures that electronic components fit properly, reducing physical rework and material waste. This has helped me move from concept to a ready-to-fabricate design much faster. For general use, Fusion streamlines the entire design workflow by allowing quick modifications through parametric modeling and validating designs using basic simulation before manufacturing. This saves time, improves design accuracy, and boosts confidence before prototyping. Overall, it has made my project development process more efficient, organized, and reliable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is little bit laggy with Acad DWG having large number for solids and hatches, material rendering is not upto mark Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

it solves all basic need of a mechanical+ architeural engineer need to conceptulaise the design and prepare a well document for engineering purposes, its trinity feature enables it to perform a powerfull role to collaborate all around Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One thing I don’t like about artificial intelligence is that it is not always perfectly accurate and sometimes gives information that needs to be double-checked. It also cannot fully understand human emotions or personal situations like a real person can. Because of that, conversations can sometimes feel less natural, and you still need human judgment when using AI tools. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

MicroStation helps solve problems related to technical drawing, design accuracy, and project coordination. It allows us to create precise engineering drawings and manage complex infrastructure projects more efficiently. By using MicroStation, we reduce errors, improve collaboration between team members, and save time during the design and documentation process. This ultimately increases productivity and ensures higher quality project results. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One thing I didn’t like initially about Coohom was that the interface felt a bit overwhelming. Since the layout is different from some other design tools, it took me time to understand where certain settings and controls were located. In the beginning, this slowed down my workflow. I also felt that some features are not very intuitive at first. You sometimes have to try a few times or watch tutorials to fully understand how a specific tool works. For someone using it for the first time, that adjustment period can be slightly frustrating. Once I got used to it, things became easier, but the initial learning phase could definitely be smoother Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As an interior designer with around two years of experience, one of the biggest challenges I face is presenting ideas clearly to clients. Many clients find it difficult to imagine a space just by looking at 2D drawings or explanations. Coohom helps solve that problem by allowing me to create proper 3D designs and realistic renders that make the concept much easier to understand. It saves me time compared to doing everything manually. I can quickly build layouts, experiment with furniture placement, and adjust materials to show different options. This makes client discussions smoother because they can visually see the changes instead of just imagining them. The designs are quite accurate to a good extent, which helps in planning and giving better quotations. Another thing that has benefited me is that Coohom works well on both laptop and mobile. Sometimes I need to quickly show a design or check a project while I’m not in the office, and it runs smoothly. That flexibility really helps in dayto day work. One feature I genuinely find very useful is the refer and earn program. It’s actually a good initiative because as designers we often connect with other designers, contractors, or students. Being able to recommend a tool that I’m already using and getting some benefit from it is a nice advantage. It feels practical, not just a marketing gimmick. For me, Coohom solves the problem of visualization, client communication, and presentation quality. It helps me create better-looking interior concepts and explain them confidently. While no software is perfect, it has definitely made my design process more efficient and professional. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

That it doesn't have so many 2D functions for creating sketches and that it allows creating lines that join on different reference planes. I would also like to be able to stretch an object and have it stay fixed to simulate movement, and that it allows recording videos or animations of that movement. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that 3D models can be created very quickly, textures can be added, and they are rendered in just a few steps. In general, the process is simple and agile. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Possibly, this is also due to my limited personal use of Catenda, as I primarily know the platform from the perspective of accompanied customer projects, but Catenda does not replace a classic document management system for formal SIA or authority processes and must be supplemented in such cases. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

In construction projects, many decisions are made, but they are often not centrally recorded or later cannot be traced because they have disappeared deep in the inbox in old emails. A typical example is the choice of a product during the planning phase, such as a door. In the execution phase, the question then arises as to why exactly this product was chosen. The decision itself has been made, but the reasoning, context, or impacts are no longer transparently documented. Catenda helps to centrally record the decisions so that they remain comprehensible to all project participants and do not need to be discussed again in later project phases. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I dislike about DraftSight is that some advanced features and customizations feel less polished compared to more established CAD platforms. Certain tools can be slower or less intuitive than expected, and occasional compatibility quirks appear when working with very complex DWG files. While none of these issues are deal‑breakers, they can interrupt the workflow at times. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

DraftSight helps me streamline all my 2D drafting work by providing a reliable and efficient environment for creating and editing DWG files. It solves the problem of maintaining compatibility with partners who use different CAD platforms, ensuring smooth collaboration. Its clean interface and stable performance reduce time spent on repetitive tasks, which improves productivity and keeps projects moving efficiently. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Navisworks is purely a review/coordination tool, so you can’t directly fix clashes in the model; you have to switch back to Revit, AutoCAD, or your authoring software to make changes and then reload. For fast‑paced projects, this constant round‑tripping can slow down coordination and feel inefficient Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Navisworks mainly solves two big project‑level problems: federated model chaos and late‑discovered clashes/schedule risks, and it benefits you by turning those into early, visual, and sharable coordination outputs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

When I work on large assemblies, Inventor crashes suddenly, and sometimes there's no mouse movement showing. The model feature in drawings for exploded views is not working well. These issues may be resolved by upgrading the software. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Inventor to create complex 3D parametric models and drawings, resolve issues in existing designs, and easily convert AutoCAD 2D drawings to 3D. Its versatility and interchangeability save me time and enhance productivity. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are some improvements that can be made to CMBuilder:

- Fair warning to anyone with poor internet or hardware, it may not function as well (CMBuilder is online so internet is required with good speed, the more you add the more pressure it applies to your PC, so make sure you have a good work laptop).

- Most features people would like are currently being worked on, (eg. multiple people working on one project, animation, visual change, etc.) these features are complicated to create, so please give them some time.

- The higher the tier for subscription, the more you will get out of the program. One of the most vital features (requesting resources in a quick turnover time) is locked to the highest subscription, which might be difficult for some people/companies to pay for as it can be a bit pricey if you want this subscription plus more project space. Keep this in mind and try to get as many people involved in the company so the higher subscription has better value for your company! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

CMBuilder is making meetings easier and helps people communicate better with each other thanks to seeing things in 3D. Visually, people understand 3D easier than a markup to every type of person on the job. We have been able to problem solve issues with some of the markups we could have missed in real life along with discuss important ideas we hadn't thought of thanks to being able to see the environment in a new way. Clients enjoy the visual aid in presentations and discussions as well. Things can be changed on the fly and CMBuilder makes it easy to develop these aspects of the job. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.