G2 takes pride in showing unbiased reviews on user satisfaction in our ratings and reports. We do not allow paid placements in any of our ratings, rankings, or reports. Learn about our scoring methodologies.
A weekly snapshot of rising stars, new launches, and what everyone's buzzing about.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users find the no-code approach of Autify highly accessible, simplifying the process of test automation for everyone.
Users value the no-code approach of Autify, enjoying its accessibility for all user skill levels.
Users appreciate the no-code approach of Autify, making test automation accessible for everyone with its visual editor.
Users find Autify to be expensive, which may hinder its accessibility for smaller teams or projects.
Users find the limited integrations of Autify restrict their workflow flexibility and collaboration with essential tools.
Users find the limited integrations with tools restrict their workflow and collaboration options in Autify.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users value the ease of use of Mailosaur, finding it simple and efficient for email testing in automation.
Users value the API Integration of Mailosaur, enabling seamless setup and centralized management of test emails and SMS.
Users value the easy API integration of Mailosaur, simplifying email and SMS capture during testing processes.
Users feel Mailosaur is expensive as costs rise with testing volume, particularly affecting small teams and startups.
Users find Mailosaur's pricing issues increasingly problematic as testing volume rises, particularly affecting small teams and startups.
Users find Mailosaur's cost increases significantly with testing volume, making it challenging for small businesses.
This description is provided by the seller.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users appreciate Loadium's excellent customer support, ensuring assistance is always available during performance testing.
Users find Loadium's ease of use impressive, with an intuitive UI and excellent support enhancing their experience.
Users value Loadium for its excellent support and observability, making performance testing more efficient and user-friendly.
This description is provided by the seller.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users laud the effortless codeless automation in TestGrid, streamlining their transition from manual to automated testing.
Users find the seamless codeless automation of TestGrid to expedite testing processes and enhance efficiency significantly.
Users find TestGrid a cost-effective solution for automated testing, significantly reducing time and expenses.
Users are frustrated by the limited access restrictions of TestGrid, as it's currently only available to enterprise users.
Users are frustrated by the limited access to AI-powered test automation, which is exclusive to enterprise users.
Users believe that poor UI requires improvements, despite being satisfied with TestGrid's overall performance and support.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users value the automation capabilities of Testuff, enhancing the speed and reliability of their testing process.
Users value the quick and helpful customer support from Testuff, enhancing their overall testing experience significantly.
Users appreciate the clear and straightforward reporting of Testuff, which enhances the overall testing process efficiency.
This description is provided by the seller.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users appreciate the wide device variety supported by OpenText Functional Testing Lab, enhancing their testing experience.
Users appreciate the user-friendly interface of OpenText Functional Testing Lab, enabling quick contributions from less experienced users.
Users appreciate the wide app support and user-friendly interface, enabling quick contributions and real device testing.
Users note the limited community, as OpenText Functional Testing Lab is primarily accessible to larger enterprises.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users highlight the exceptional customer support from Original Software, enhancing their overall experience and confidence in the system.
Users find the ease of use of Original Software instrumental for quick onboarding and efficient testing processes.
Users highlight the intuitive interface and effective support from the customer success manager, enhancing testing and training experiences.
Users experience integration issues with Original Software, particularly with MS Teams and certain CI/CD tools.
Users note a challenging learning curve initially, but support and documentation ease the transition.
Users find the user difficulty challenging due to surname-based test assignments and unclear screen names.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users enjoy the seamless automation capabilities of Appvance IQ, enhancing testing efficiency and integration ease.
Users find Appvance IQ's ease of use exceptional, enabling quick testing and seamless integration with minimal coding.
Users value the complete automation of E2E testing in Appvance IQ, enhancing security and efficiency in testing.
Users report numerous bug issues in Appvance IQ, highlighting the need for more security patches and a simpler interface.
Users find the poor UI of Appvance IQ challenging, especially for those who are not tech-savvy.
Users express concerns about pricing issues, feeling the costs may not align with the value provided.
This description is provided by the seller.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users find Hotjar's user-friendly interface intuitive and easy to navigate, enhancing accessibility for all team members.
Users value Hotjar's intuitive interface and comprehensive features, enhancing insights into user behavior and improving UX.
Users value the comprehensive heatmaps of Hotjar for clear insights into user interactions and behavior.
Users face recording issues with slow loads, restrictive limits, and missed interactions on dynamic pages affecting visibility.
Users find difficult filtering of recordings overwhelming, especially on high-traffic sites, impacting their review process.
Users find Hotjar to be quite expensive, especially as usage increases and for mid-sized businesses.
This description is provided by the seller.
This description is provided by the seller.