Mailosaur Reviews & Product Details

What stands out to me is the effectiveness and simplicity. We have experimented with various tools for handling emails in test automation, particularly for OTPs and 2FA, and Mailosaur has consistently been the easiest to use—it just works. I also appreciate the generous trial program, which makes it straightforward to create a functional proof of concept. This, in turn, is easy to present to the team and management for final approval. I also like the python library that has helpful methods for extracting the codes and links without manually parsing the email structure. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I honestly can't think of any drawbacks. If I had to mention something, it would just be a lighthearted observation: my colleagues often joke about the product's name. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Mailosaur is highly effective for email and SMS automation testing. It simplifies the process of capturing, inspecting, and validating messages in test environments. The API integration is straightforward, and the dashboard provides clear visibility into test communications. This makes it easy to automate end-to-end scenarios and ensure reliable message delivery and content verification. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Mailosaur can be expensive for larger teams or projects with high message volume. The message retention period is limited, which may require frequent cleanup or data export. Some advanced features may require additional configuration or are only available on higher-tier plans. Integration with certain frameworks could be improved for more seamless automation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like the simplicity of the design applied in Mailosaur. Work-wise, I love Mailosaur as it allows me to create multiple inboxes with different domains, but manage them all under one access and one view. Another thing I like about Mailosaur is its capability to integrate with familiar test automation tools like Cypress and Playwright. This allows tests which require email integration to be much easier. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Experience-wise, I don't have any issue with using Mailosaur. However, since I am using one provided by my employer, I am unsure of the cost. All I can say it must be a good product and service as my employer continues to renew the services year to year. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Mailosaur makes it incredibly easy to capture and inspect emails/SMS messages sent from staging or automated tests. No manual inbox juggling—everything is centralized and API-driven. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Many users feel Mailosaur’s pricing becomes expensive as testing volume increases, especially for small teams or startups. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is very easy to use and everything quite intuitive. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Their pricing strategy, I don't need 500 test emails per day for my business yet, but 50 is not enough. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is easy to set up and works well. Provides APIs to easily use it in your end to end tests. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Don't really know. Haven't tried any competing products. I guess it could be cheaper or more seats be available in each tier. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Mailosaur is helping me to provide phone no. to test sms alerts, order, login codes, Signup otp, Booking confirmation and more and mail authenticator helps generate one time passcodes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The UI is really smooth and learning curve is minimum for this software. Even a beginner can get hold of there easy to use process and adapt very quickly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's very easy to start using it, but if you can insert code and have sone technical skills it can get very deep and bring good insights.

Very cheap to start, even to just see how mails are received in different inboxes can be much more expensive in other solutions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

SMS testing is not as cheap and easy to start as emails. It just does what it does, you can't build or improve your mails here, it's just for testing and getting insights. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

My experince with mailosaur is not so good, our use case is we sent marketing emails to our subscribers but before active our campaign we need to test all link and attachments. In this case i think mailosaur is not usefull because why should we pay when all these features are available in free tools. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Not helpfull all tese features are available in free tools Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

After hand-rolling a Python script and trying various email providers and APIs, Malosaur was a breath of fresh air.

It had a simple interface and was easy to implement, first in Postman and then in Cypress, as our automation suite matured and grew.

It runs in our CI/CD pipeline, confirming new user credentials are delivered.

In particular, the additional information they return about emails as separate JSON objects saved us a bunch of time and effort parsing the message body. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Having it be so useful to our processes that I pay for it out of pocket and our accounting team can't seem to figure out how to make it reimbursable? Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.