Opentext functional Testing for Developers Reviews & Product Details

A significant strength of UFT Developer is its vast language support. Using the tool, programmers may create automated tests in a variety of well-known programming languages, including Java, C#, JavaScript, and more. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The learning curve for UFT Developer is particularly severe for people who are unfamiliar with Micro Focus products or test automation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Ability to use languages other than VB script such as Java Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is expensive compared to other relevant tools Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Ease of development and use , supporting cross broswer, helping in test maintenance, Analysis of test results. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Micro Focus UFT Developer is not open source when there are multiple options like selenium. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As we were setting up our internal Test Automation Team to handle SAP upgrades and migration, we were looking for reliable, stable and suitable Test Automation Tool. Microfocus (then HP) came as top based on the features in ALM (Test management interface) and UFT (for development of test scripts)

What I liked while using Microifcus ALM and UFT is it was very developer-friendly and could handle the library in the script and had strong integration with SAP.

The output of the script as results were also clear. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Automation Scripts that were created in UFT relied on specific Data and there was not much support for automating data supply. Further, it required long hours of installation due to lot many pre-requisites. However, still we were able to use UFT in a much more useful manner. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Better way to organize the product testing Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Not compatible with API automation testing to utilize full extent Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Timely Update was provided though there was some ambiguity Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some functionalities were not working at the time of delivery Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Can be used to automate web as well as SAP. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The result mode is a bit not clear to understand it can be enhanced and can be made more informative. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It has a very nicely organized structure of handling artifacts that are used in test automation such as Repository, Functional Libraries, and test cases. It uses VB Script which is quite easy to understand and learn. Since it has its own IDE, it becomes very easy to manage all things in one place. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Two things I don't like are

1. It uses VBScript. VBScript does not have good rich features as a programming language.

2. The Community or support for UFT is very minimal nowadays. For other test automation, You can find so much help online but for UFT it is very little. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

UFT has all the features which will make a QA develop and run their tests easily and on different paltforms Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are no features to be disliked. I like every aspect of it Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The following features of UFT help me a lot in my testing:

1. Record and Play feature

2. Ability to create the Objects beforehand

3. Capture of Dynamic elements Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There is nothing I can think of. It is very good tools for QA's Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.