Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare BiddingOwl.com and Giveffect 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ToucanTech
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Omatic Software
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Auctria
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (77.8% of reviews)
Small-Business (82.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
5%
Contact Us Per Month
BiddingOwl.com
Star Rating
(47)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (77.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
5%
Learn more about BiddingOwl.comGiveffect
Star Rating
(63)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (82.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us Per Month
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that BiddingOwl.com excels in its "Auction Listings" feature, receiving a high score of 9.4, which reviewers mention makes it easy to manage and promote auction events effectively. In contrast, Giveffect's auction capabilities are less emphasized, leading to a lower overall satisfaction in this area.
- Reviewers mention that BiddingOwl.com offers superior "Mobile Bidding" functionality, scoring 9.4, which allows bidders to participate seamlessly from their mobile devices. Users on G2 express that this feature enhances user engagement during events, while Giveffect's mobile capabilities are rated lower at 7.7, indicating room for improvement.
- G2 users highlight BiddingOwl.com's "Bid Confirmation" feature, which scores an impressive 9.4, ensuring that users receive timely notifications about their bids. In comparison, Giveffect's bid management features do not receive the same level of praise, suggesting a less robust experience for users.
- Users say that BiddingOwl.com shines in "Payment Processing," with a score of 8.9, making transactions smooth and reliable. Reviewers mention that this reliability is crucial for fundraising success, whereas Giveffect's payment processing features are perceived as less user-friendly, scoring lower at 8.3.
- Reviewers mention that BiddingOwl.com provides a more intuitive "User Dashboard," scoring 8.5, which simplifies navigation and enhances user experience. In contrast, Giveffect's dashboard is rated lower at 7.9, leading to some frustration among users who find it less straightforward.
- Users on G2 report that BiddingOwl.com’s "Donor Communications" feature scores 9.1, facilitating effective engagement with donors. This is a significant advantage over Giveffect, which, while functional, does not match the same level of satisfaction in donor communication tools, scoring lower at 8.1.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
BiddingOwl.com
Online Auction
5%
Simple, no hidden fee pricing. No subscription fee. 5% of your winning bids.
- Mobile bidding
- Paddle Raises
- Admission tickets
Giveffect
Starter
Contact Us
Per Month
Best for smaller Nonprofits
- Up to 5,000 Donor/Volunteer Records
- 5 Admin Users
- 9 Connected Systems (including CRM, Online Giving & Merchant System, Events & Fundraising Management, Volunteer Management, Marketing & Communications, and more)
Free Trial
BiddingOwl.com
Free Trial is available
Giveffect
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.6
39
8.4
44
Ease of Use
9.5
40
8.1
44
Ease of Setup
9.3
32
7.9
28
Ease of Admin
9.3
31
8.0
25
Quality of Support
9.5
38
9.0
45
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.6
31
8.8
24
Product Direction (% positive)
8.8
40
8.3
41
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
8.3
30
Not enough data
9.1
28
Not enough data
7.9
25
Not enough data
9.0
29
Fundraising
Not enough data
8.7
31
Not enough data
8.8
31
Not enough data
8.1
25
Not enough data
8.8
31
Not enough data
8.2
26
Not enough data
7.8
23
Marketing
Not enough data
7.7
27
Not enough data
7.7
19
Administration
Not enough data
8.6
23
Not enough data
8.9
27
Not enough data
8.3
28
Not enough data
7.5
25
Not enough data
8.3
28
Donor Management
Not enough data
8.1
19
Not enough data
8.3
19
Not enough data
8.2
23
Not enough data
8.2
27
Interoperability
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.5
23
Not enough data
8.3
21
Constituent Management
Not enough data
8.9
22
Not enough data
8.2
22
Not enough data
9.0
24
Marketing Automation
Not enough data
8.0
23
Not enough data
7.7
17
Not enough data
8.6
23
Not enough data
8.1
14
Workflow Automation
Not enough data
7.6
15
Not enough data
8.6
23
Not enough data
8.4
17
Reporting & Analytics
Not enough data
8.4
25
Not enough data
8.3
25
Not enough data
8.5
21
Integrations
Not enough data
8.1
20
Not enough data
8.6
24
Not enough data
7.9
20
Not enough data
7.9
12
Agentic AI - Nonprofit CRM
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Proposal Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Fund Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Impact & Outcomes
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Grant Prospecting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Compliance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integrations
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Auctioneering
9.4
9
Not enough data
9.6
9
Not enough data
9.4
9
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
9.4
9
Not enough data
9.4
9
Not enough data
User Interface
8.9
9
Not enough data
9.3
9
Not enough data
9.6
9
Not enough data
Administration
9.4
9
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
9.4
9
Not enough data
Volunteer Management
Not enough data
8.1
18
Not enough data
8.1
20
Not enough data
7.9
17
Not enough data
8.1
19
Not enough data
8.8
16
Engagement & Communication Tools
Not enough data
6.1
9
Not enough data
8.2
16
Not enough data
8.7
19
Not enough data
7.5
17
Administration
Not enough data
8.9
18
Not enough data
8.5
20
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
BiddingOwl.com and Giveffect are categorized as Auction
Unique Categories
BiddingOwl.com has no unique categories
Giveffect is categorized as Volunteer Management, Nonprofit CRM, Fundraising, Donor Management, Admission-Based Nonprofit, and Grant Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
BiddingOwl.com
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Giveffect
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Non-Profit Organization Management
24.4%
Fund-Raising
13.3%
Real Estate
8.9%
Education Management
8.9%
Civic & Social Organization
8.9%
Other
35.6%
Non-Profit Organization Management
82.0%
Fund-Raising
4.9%
Performing Arts
3.3%
Primary/Secondary Education
1.6%
Philanthropy
1.6%
Other
6.6%
Discussions
BiddingOwl.com has no discussions with answers
What is the best way to simultaneously clean up records & also adding new ones in the proper manner?
1 Comment
Official Response from Giveffect
Hi Laura! We on the Client Success Team would be more than happy to help you determine the best way to go about that based on your process and the state of...Read more
Giveffect has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
