Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Best Requirements Management Software for Small Business

Adam Crivello
AC
Researched and written by Adam Crivello

Products classified in the overall Requirements Management category are similar in many regards and help companies of all sizes solve their business problems. However, small business features, pricing, setup, and installation differ from businesses of other sizes, which is why we match buyers to the right Small Business Requirements Management to fit their needs. Compare product ratings based on reviews from enterprise users or connect with one of G2's buying advisors to find the right solutions within the Small Business Requirements Management category.

In addition to qualifying for inclusion in the Requirements Management Software category, to qualify for inclusion in the Small Business Requirements Management Software category, a product must have at least 10 reviews left by a reviewer from a small business.

Show More
Show Less

G2 takes pride in showing unbiased reviews on user satisfaction in our ratings and reports. We do not allow paid placements in any of our ratings, rankings, or reports. Learn about our scoring methodologies.

Coming Soon
Get Trending Requirements Management Products in Your Inbox

A weekly snapshot of rising stars, new launches, and what everyone's buzzing about.

Sample Trending Products Newsletter
1 filter applied
Clear All

7 Listings in Small Business Requirements Management Available

(184)4.3 out of 5
Optimized for quick response
6th Easiest To Use in Requirements Management software
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Jama Connect® is a comprehensive requirements management solution designed to facilitate the entire product, software, and systems development lifecycle, from initial idea generation through to launch

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Medical Devices
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 49% Mid-Market
    • 34% Enterprise
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Jama Connect for Requirements Management features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.4
    Stakeholder Communication
    Average: 8.5
    8.8
    Requirements Listing
    Average: 8.8
    8.3
    Internal Communication Enablement
    Average: 8.8
    8.3
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.6
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Company Website
    Year Founded
    2007
    HQ Location
    Portland, OR
    Twitter
    @jamasoftware
    3,963 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    304 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Jama Connect® is a comprehensive requirements management solution designed to facilitate the entire product, software, and systems development lifecycle, from initial idea generation through to launch

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Medical Devices
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 49% Mid-Market
  • 34% Enterprise
Jama Connect for Requirements Management features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.4
Stakeholder Communication
Average: 8.5
8.8
Requirements Listing
Average: 8.8
8.3
Internal Communication Enablement
Average: 8.8
8.3
Ease of Use
Average: 8.6
Seller Details
Company Website
Year Founded
2007
HQ Location
Portland, OR
Twitter
@jamasoftware
3,963 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
304 employees on LinkedIn®
(97)4.2 out of 5
Optimized for quick response
9th Easiest To Use in Requirements Management software
View top Consulting Services for Polarion
Save to My Lists
Entry Level Price:Starting at $42.00
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Polarion is a comprehensive software lifecycle management solution designed to assist organizations in maintaining project transparency and enhancing collaboration throughout the development process.

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Automotive
    • Airlines/Aviation
    Market Segment
    • 48% Enterprise
    • 30% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Polarion Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Ease of Use
    10
    Customizability
    9
    Customization
    7
    Traceability
    7
    Flexibility
    6
    Cons
    Complexity
    5
    Learning Curve
    4
    Not Intuitive
    4
    Process Inefficiency
    3
    Slow Performance
    3
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Polarion features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    7.9
    Stakeholder Communication
    Average: 8.5
    8.8
    Requirements Listing
    Average: 8.8
    8.1
    Internal Communication Enablement
    Average: 8.8
    8.0
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.6
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Company Website
    Year Founded
    1980
    HQ Location
    Plano, Texas
    Twitter
    @siemenssoftware
    36,817 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    17,653 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Polarion is a comprehensive software lifecycle management solution designed to assist organizations in maintaining project transparency and enhancing collaboration throughout the development process.

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Automotive
  • Airlines/Aviation
Market Segment
  • 48% Enterprise
  • 30% Mid-Market
Polarion Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Ease of Use
10
Customizability
9
Customization
7
Traceability
7
Flexibility
6
Cons
Complexity
5
Learning Curve
4
Not Intuitive
4
Process Inefficiency
3
Slow Performance
3
Polarion features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
7.9
Stakeholder Communication
Average: 8.5
8.8
Requirements Listing
Average: 8.8
8.1
Internal Communication Enablement
Average: 8.8
8.0
Ease of Use
Average: 8.6
Seller Details
Company Website
Year Founded
1980
HQ Location
Plano, Texas
Twitter
@siemenssoftware
36,817 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
17,653 employees on LinkedIn®

This is how G2 Deals can help you:

  • Easily shop for curated – and trusted – software
  • Own your own software buying journey
  • Discover exclusive deals on software
(35)4.9 out of 5
1st Easiest To Use in Requirements Management software
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Modern Requirements has been called Microsoft's go-to partner for requirements management since 2015. We bring all of the essential features a requirements management tool needs to have for your team

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    • Computer Software
    Market Segment
    • 31% Mid-Market
    • 31% Small-Business
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Modern Requirements4DevOps features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.9
    Stakeholder Communication
    Average: 8.5
    9.9
    Requirements Listing
    Average: 8.8
    9.8
    Internal Communication Enablement
    Average: 8.8
    9.9
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.6
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Year Founded
    1999
    HQ Location
    Toronto, CA
    Twitter
    @mdnrequirements
    404 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    56 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Modern Requirements has been called Microsoft's go-to partner for requirements management since 2015. We bring all of the essential features a requirements management tool needs to have for your team

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
  • Computer Software
Market Segment
  • 31% Mid-Market
  • 31% Small-Business
Modern Requirements4DevOps features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.9
Stakeholder Communication
Average: 8.5
9.9
Requirements Listing
Average: 8.8
9.8
Internal Communication Enablement
Average: 8.8
9.9
Ease of Use
Average: 8.6
Seller Details
Year Founded
1999
HQ Location
Toronto, CA
Twitter
@mdnrequirements
404 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
56 employees on LinkedIn®
Entry Level Price:0.00 USD
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next is a scalable management solution for the communication, collaboration and verification of your requirements. It enables you to capture, trace, analy

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    • Automotive
    Market Segment
    • 62% Enterprise
    • 31% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Data Management
    1
    Documentation
    1
    Flexibility
    1
    Cons
    Authentication Issues
    1
    Expensive
    1
    Limited Features
    1
    Missing Features
    1
    Process Inefficiency
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.6
    Stakeholder Communication
    Average: 8.5
    8.9
    Requirements Listing
    Average: 8.8
    8.7
    Internal Communication Enablement
    Average: 8.8
    7.4
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.6
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    IBM
    Year Founded
    1911
    HQ Location
    Armonk, NY
    Twitter
    @IBM
    710,904 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    322,159 employees on LinkedIn®
    Ownership
    SWX:IBM
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next is a scalable management solution for the communication, collaboration and verification of your requirements. It enables you to capture, trace, analy

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
  • Automotive
Market Segment
  • 62% Enterprise
  • 31% Mid-Market
IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Data Management
1
Documentation
1
Flexibility
1
Cons
Authentication Issues
1
Expensive
1
Limited Features
1
Missing Features
1
Process Inefficiency
1
IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.6
Stakeholder Communication
Average: 8.5
8.9
Requirements Listing
Average: 8.8
8.7
Internal Communication Enablement
Average: 8.8
7.4
Ease of Use
Average: 8.6
Seller Details
Seller
IBM
Year Founded
1911
HQ Location
Armonk, NY
Twitter
@IBM
710,904 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
322,159 employees on LinkedIn®
Ownership
SWX:IBM
(133)4.0 out of 5
10th Easiest To Use in Requirements Management software
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Micro Focus is now part of OpenText! OpenText™ Application Lifecycle Management (ALM)/Quality Center empowers you to achieve high efficiency in testing and manage quality with a requirements-driven,

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    • Computer Software
    Market Segment
    • 71% Enterprise
    • 21% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • OpenText Application Quality Management Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Customer Support
    3
    Ease of Use
    3
    Features
    3
    Implementation Ease
    3
    Easy Implementation
    2
    Cons
    Difficult Setup
    1
    Expensive
    1
    Expensive Subscriptions
    1
    Integration Issues
    1
    Lack of Clarity
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • OpenText Application Quality Management features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.6
    Stakeholder Communication
    Average: 8.5
    8.8
    Requirements Listing
    Average: 8.8
    9.6
    Internal Communication Enablement
    Average: 8.8
    7.9
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.6
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    OpenText
    Year Founded
    1991
    HQ Location
    Waterloo, ON
    Twitter
    @OpenText
    21,649 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    23,021 employees on LinkedIn®
    Ownership
    NASDAQ:OTEX
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Micro Focus is now part of OpenText! OpenText™ Application Lifecycle Management (ALM)/Quality Center empowers you to achieve high efficiency in testing and manage quality with a requirements-driven,

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
  • Computer Software
Market Segment
  • 71% Enterprise
  • 21% Mid-Market
OpenText Application Quality Management Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Customer Support
3
Ease of Use
3
Features
3
Implementation Ease
3
Easy Implementation
2
Cons
Difficult Setup
1
Expensive
1
Expensive Subscriptions
1
Integration Issues
1
Lack of Clarity
1
OpenText Application Quality Management features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.6
Stakeholder Communication
Average: 8.5
8.8
Requirements Listing
Average: 8.8
9.6
Internal Communication Enablement
Average: 8.8
7.9
Ease of Use
Average: 8.6
Seller Details
Seller
OpenText
Year Founded
1991
HQ Location
Waterloo, ON
Twitter
@OpenText
21,649 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
23,021 employees on LinkedIn®
Ownership
NASDAQ:OTEX
(102)4.1 out of 5
11th Easiest To Use in Requirements Management software
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Perforce ALM (formerly Helix ALM) offers a robust, unified requirements, issue, and test management platform that provides best-in-class traceability and brings order, clarity, and consistency to your

    Users
    • Software Engineer
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 41% Mid-Market
    • 35% Enterprise
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Perforce ALM Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Automation
    2
    Comprehensive Features
    2
    Easy Integrations
    2
    Features
    2
    Flexibility
    2
    Cons
    Difficult Customization
    1
    Difficult Setup
    1
    Expensive
    1
    Integration Issues
    1
    Lack of Chat Functionality
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Perforce ALM features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.3
    Stakeholder Communication
    Average: 8.5
    9.3
    Requirements Listing
    Average: 8.8
    8.6
    Internal Communication Enablement
    Average: 8.8
    7.8
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.6
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    Perforce
    Year Founded
    1995
    HQ Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Twitter
    @perforce
    5,101 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    1,684 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Perforce ALM (formerly Helix ALM) offers a robust, unified requirements, issue, and test management platform that provides best-in-class traceability and brings order, clarity, and consistency to your

Users
  • Software Engineer
Industries
  • Computer Software
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 41% Mid-Market
  • 35% Enterprise
Perforce ALM Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Automation
2
Comprehensive Features
2
Easy Integrations
2
Features
2
Flexibility
2
Cons
Difficult Customization
1
Difficult Setup
1
Expensive
1
Integration Issues
1
Lack of Chat Functionality
1
Perforce ALM features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.3
Stakeholder Communication
Average: 8.5
9.3
Requirements Listing
Average: 8.8
8.6
Internal Communication Enablement
Average: 8.8
7.8
Ease of Use
Average: 8.6
Seller Details
Seller
Perforce
Year Founded
1995
HQ Location
Minneapolis, MN
Twitter
@perforce
5,101 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
1,684 employees on LinkedIn®
(141)4.3 out of 5
13th Easiest To Use in Requirements Management software
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    What is Codebeamer? Codebeamer is a complete Application Lifecycle Management solution to simplify complex product and software engineering at scale. The open platform extends ALM functionalities wit

    Users
    • Systems Engineer
    Industries
    • Automotive
    • Medical Devices
    Market Segment
    • 51% Mid-Market
    • 27% Enterprise
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • codebeamer Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Cloud Services
    1
    Customizability
    1
    Customization Options
    1
    Features
    1
    Integrations
    1
    Cons
    Complex Configuration
    1
    Complexity
    1
    Difficult Learning
    1
    Expertise Requirement
    1
    Learning Curve
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • codebeamer features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    7.8
    Stakeholder Communication
    Average: 8.5
    8.2
    Requirements Listing
    Average: 8.8
    8.5
    Internal Communication Enablement
    Average: 8.8
    8.0
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.6
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    PTC
    Year Founded
    1985
    HQ Location
    Boston, Massachusetts
    Twitter
    @PTC
    37,817 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    7,734 employees on LinkedIn®
    Ownership
    NASDAQ: PTC
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

What is Codebeamer? Codebeamer is a complete Application Lifecycle Management solution to simplify complex product and software engineering at scale. The open platform extends ALM functionalities wit

Users
  • Systems Engineer
Industries
  • Automotive
  • Medical Devices
Market Segment
  • 51% Mid-Market
  • 27% Enterprise
codebeamer Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Cloud Services
1
Customizability
1
Customization Options
1
Features
1
Integrations
1
Cons
Complex Configuration
1
Complexity
1
Difficult Learning
1
Expertise Requirement
1
Learning Curve
1
codebeamer features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
7.8
Stakeholder Communication
Average: 8.5
8.2
Requirements Listing
Average: 8.8
8.5
Internal Communication Enablement
Average: 8.8
8.0
Ease of Use
Average: 8.6
Seller Details
Seller
PTC
Year Founded
1985
HQ Location
Boston, Massachusetts
Twitter
@PTC
37,817 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
7,734 employees on LinkedIn®
Ownership
NASDAQ: PTC