# Top 10 Quotient Alternatives & Competitors **Average Rating:** 4.7/5 **Total Number of Reviews:** 22 Looking for alternatives or competitors to Quotient? Proposal Software is a widely used technology, and many people are seeking user friendly, powerful software solutions with api / integrations, proposal effectiveness reporting, and ai text generation. Other important factors to consider when researching alternatives to Quotient include features. The best overall Quotient alternative is PandaDoc. Other similar apps like Quotient are Proposify, Qwilr, Responsive, formerly RFPIO, and GetAccept. Quotient alternatives can be found in [Proposal Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/proposal) but may also be in [RFP Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/rfp) or [E-Signature Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/e-signature). ## Best Paid & Free Alternatives to Quotient - [PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/products/pandadoc/reviews) - [Proposify](https://www.g2.com/products/proposify/reviews) - [Qwilr](https://www.g2.com/products/qwilr/reviews) - [Responsive, formerly RFPIO](https://www.g2.com/products/responsive-formerly-rfpio/reviews) - [GetAccept](https://www.g2.com/products/getaccept/reviews) - [Loopio](https://www.g2.com/products/loopio/reviews) - [Conga Composer](https://www.g2.com/products/conga-composer/reviews) - [DocSend](https://www.g2.com/products/dropbox-docsend/reviews) - [Oneflow](https://www.g2.com/products/oneflow/reviews) - [Jotform Sign](https://www.g2.com/products/jotform-sign/reviews) ## Top 10 Alternatives to Quotient Recently Reviewed By G2 Community Browse options below. Based on reviewer data, you can see how Quotient stacks up to the competition, check reviews from current & previous users in industries like Information Technology and Services, Automotive, and Building Materials, and find the best product for your business. ### 1. [PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/products/pandadoc/reviews) By PandaDoc **Average Rating:** 4.7/5 **Total Reviews:** 3,703 PandaDoc is an app that lets you build, track, and sign your docs all in one place. Automate your workflow, discover what sells with built-in analytics, and get legally binding signatures in minutes. Reviewers say compared to Quotient, PandaDoc is: - Better at meeting requirements Categories in common with Quotient: [Proposal](https://www.g2.com/categories/proposal) **Compare:** [Quotient vs PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/compare/pandadoc-vs-quotient) **Compare PandaDoc with other alternatives:** - [PandaDoc vs Proposify](https://www.g2.com/compare/pandadoc-vs-proposify) - [PandaDoc vs Qwilr](https://www.g2.com/compare/pandadoc-vs-qwilr) - [PandaDoc vs Responsive, formerly RFPIO](https://www.g2.com/compare/pandadoc-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) - [PandaDoc vs GetAccept](https://www.g2.com/compare/getaccept-vs-pandadoc) - [PandaDoc vs Loopio](https://www.g2.com/compare/loopio-vs-pandadoc) - [PandaDoc vs Conga Composer](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-pandadoc) - [PandaDoc vs DocSend](https://www.g2.com/compare/dropbox-docsend-vs-pandadoc) - [PandaDoc vs Oneflow](https://www.g2.com/compare/oneflow-vs-pandadoc) - [PandaDoc vs Jotform Sign](https://www.g2.com/compare/jotform-sign-vs-pandadoc) ### 2. [Proposify](https://www.g2.com/products/proposify/reviews) By Proposify **Average Rating:** 4.6/5 **Total Reviews:** 1,143 Proposify proposal software helps growing teams remove document bottlenecks, and get visibility into the most important stage of your sales cycle: the close. Reviewers say compared to Quotient, Proposify is: - Better at meeting requirements Categories in common with Quotient: [Proposal](https://www.g2.com/categories/proposal) **Compare:** [Quotient vs Proposify](https://www.g2.com/compare/proposify-vs-quotient) **Compare Proposify with other alternatives:** - [Proposify vs PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/compare/pandadoc-vs-proposify) - [Proposify vs Qwilr](https://www.g2.com/compare/proposify-vs-qwilr) - [Proposify vs Responsive, formerly RFPIO](https://www.g2.com/compare/proposify-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) - [Proposify vs GetAccept](https://www.g2.com/compare/getaccept-vs-proposify) - [Proposify vs Loopio](https://www.g2.com/compare/loopio-vs-proposify) - [Proposify vs Conga Composer](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-proposify) - [Proposify vs DocSend](https://www.g2.com/compare/dropbox-docsend-vs-proposify) - [Proposify vs Oneflow](https://www.g2.com/compare/oneflow-vs-proposify) - [Proposify vs Jotform Sign](https://www.g2.com/compare/jotform-sign-vs-proposify) ### 3. [Qwilr](https://www.g2.com/products/qwilr/reviews) By Qwilr **Average Rating:** 4.6/5 **Total Reviews:** 917 Save time and win more work by replacing your sales documents with interactive & mobile-friendly webpages that plug into your systems and are as easy to build and reuse as they are beautiful. Reviewers say compared to Quotient, Qwilr is: - More expensive Categories in common with Quotient: [Proposal](https://www.g2.com/categories/proposal) **Compare:** [Quotient vs Qwilr](https://www.g2.com/compare/quotient-vs-qwilr) **Compare Qwilr with other alternatives:** - [Qwilr vs PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/compare/pandadoc-vs-qwilr) - [Qwilr vs Proposify](https://www.g2.com/compare/proposify-vs-qwilr) - [Qwilr vs Responsive, formerly RFPIO](https://www.g2.com/compare/qwilr-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) - [Qwilr vs GetAccept](https://www.g2.com/compare/getaccept-vs-qwilr) - [Qwilr vs Loopio](https://www.g2.com/compare/loopio-vs-qwilr) - [Qwilr vs Conga Composer](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-qwilr) - [Qwilr vs DocSend](https://www.g2.com/compare/dropbox-docsend-vs-qwilr) - [Qwilr vs Oneflow](https://www.g2.com/compare/oneflow-vs-qwilr) - [Qwilr vs Jotform Sign](https://www.g2.com/compare/jotform-sign-vs-qwilr) ### 4. [Responsive, formerly RFPIO](https://www.g2.com/products/responsive-formerly-rfpio/reviews) By Responsive **Average Rating:** 4.5/5 **Total Reviews:** 1,311 Responsive is a cloud-based RFP software that eliminates the friction often associated with responding to Requests for Proposal (RFPs), through a no-nonsense set-up, simple and intuitive user interface, and robust integrations with Salesforce and Slack. Reviewers say compared to Quotient, Responsive, formerly RFPIO is: - More expensive Categories in common with Quotient: [Proposal](https://www.g2.com/categories/proposal) **Compare:** [Quotient vs Responsive, formerly RFPIO](https://www.g2.com/compare/quotient-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) **Compare Responsive, formerly RFPIO with other alternatives:** - [Responsive, formerly RFPIO vs PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/compare/pandadoc-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) - [Responsive, formerly RFPIO vs Proposify](https://www.g2.com/compare/proposify-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) - [Responsive, formerly RFPIO vs Qwilr](https://www.g2.com/compare/qwilr-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) - [Responsive, formerly RFPIO vs GetAccept](https://www.g2.com/compare/getaccept-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) - [Responsive, formerly RFPIO vs Loopio](https://www.g2.com/compare/loopio-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) - [Responsive, formerly RFPIO vs Conga Composer](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) - [Responsive, formerly RFPIO vs DocSend](https://www.g2.com/compare/dropbox-docsend-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) - [Responsive, formerly RFPIO vs Oneflow](https://www.g2.com/compare/oneflow-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) - [Responsive, formerly RFPIO vs Jotform Sign](https://www.g2.com/compare/jotform-sign-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) ### 5. [GetAccept](https://www.g2.com/products/getaccept/reviews) By GetAccept Inc. **Average Rating:** 4.6/5 **Total Reviews:** 1,267 GetAccept is an all-in-one solution for e-signature, contract management, proposal creation, sales collateral management, document tracking and prospecting. Used by sales, HR, customer success and development teams; personal video messaging, live chat and analytics are popular features. Reviewers say compared to Quotient, GetAccept is: - More expensive Categories in common with Quotient: [Proposal](https://www.g2.com/categories/proposal) **Compare:** [Quotient vs GetAccept](https://www.g2.com/compare/getaccept-vs-quotient) **Compare GetAccept with other alternatives:** - [GetAccept vs PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/compare/getaccept-vs-pandadoc) - [GetAccept vs Proposify](https://www.g2.com/compare/getaccept-vs-proposify) - [GetAccept vs Qwilr](https://www.g2.com/compare/getaccept-vs-qwilr) - [GetAccept vs Responsive, formerly RFPIO](https://www.g2.com/compare/getaccept-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) - [GetAccept vs Loopio](https://www.g2.com/compare/getaccept-vs-loopio) - [GetAccept vs Conga Composer](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-getaccept) - [GetAccept vs DocSend](https://www.g2.com/compare/dropbox-docsend-vs-getaccept) - [GetAccept vs Oneflow](https://www.g2.com/compare/getaccept-vs-oneflow) - [GetAccept vs Jotform Sign](https://www.g2.com/compare/getaccept-vs-jotform-sign) ### 6. [Loopio](https://www.g2.com/products/loopio/reviews) By Loopio Inc. **Average Rating:** 4.6/5 **Total Reviews:** 813 Loopio’s response management platform helps companies streamline their response process for RFPs, DDQs, Security Questionnaires, and more. Currently serving over 1,700 companies globally at world-leading organizations, Loopio enables sales and proposal teams to respond faster, improve response accuracy, and win more business. Reviewers say compared to Quotient, Loopio is: - Better at support - Better at meeting requirements - More expensive Categories in common with Quotient: [Proposal](https://www.g2.com/categories/proposal) **Compare:** [Quotient vs Loopio](https://www.g2.com/compare/loopio-vs-quotient) **Compare Loopio with other alternatives:** - [Loopio vs PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/compare/loopio-vs-pandadoc) - [Loopio vs Proposify](https://www.g2.com/compare/loopio-vs-proposify) - [Loopio vs Qwilr](https://www.g2.com/compare/loopio-vs-qwilr) - [Loopio vs Responsive, formerly RFPIO](https://www.g2.com/compare/loopio-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) - [Loopio vs GetAccept](https://www.g2.com/compare/getaccept-vs-loopio) - [Loopio vs Conga Composer](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-loopio) - [Loopio vs DocSend](https://www.g2.com/compare/dropbox-docsend-vs-loopio) - [Loopio vs Oneflow](https://www.g2.com/compare/loopio-vs-oneflow) - [Loopio vs Jotform Sign](https://www.g2.com/compare/jotform-sign-vs-loopio) ### 7. [Conga Composer](https://www.g2.com/products/conga-composer/reviews) By Conga **Average Rating:** 4.4/5 **Total Reviews:** 918 Conga Composer makes it easy for Salesforce.com users to create sophisticated documents and reports using their data in Salesforce CRM with just a few clicks. Reviewers say compared to Quotient, Conga Composer is: - More expensive - Better at meeting requirements Categories in common with Quotient: [Proposal](https://www.g2.com/categories/proposal) **Compare:** [Quotient vs Conga Composer](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-quotient) **Compare Conga Composer with other alternatives:** - [Conga Composer vs PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-pandadoc) - [Conga Composer vs Proposify](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-proposify) - [Conga Composer vs Qwilr](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-qwilr) - [Conga Composer vs Responsive, formerly RFPIO](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) - [Conga Composer vs GetAccept](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-getaccept) - [Conga Composer vs Loopio](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-loopio) - [Conga Composer vs DocSend](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-dropbox-docsend) - [Conga Composer vs Oneflow](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-oneflow) - [Conga Composer vs Jotform Sign](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-jotform-sign) ### 8. [DocSend](https://www.g2.com/products/dropbox-docsend/reviews) By Dropbox **Average Rating:** 4.6/5 **Total Reviews:** 590 DocSend tells salespeople how prospects engage with their sales material. Have the right conversation, with the right person, at the right time, and do business faster. Reviewers say compared to Quotient, DocSend is: - Better at meeting requirements Categories in common with Quotient: [Proposal](https://www.g2.com/categories/proposal) **Compare:** [Quotient vs DocSend](https://www.g2.com/compare/dropbox-docsend-vs-quotient) **Compare DocSend with other alternatives:** - [DocSend vs PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/compare/dropbox-docsend-vs-pandadoc) - [DocSend vs Proposify](https://www.g2.com/compare/dropbox-docsend-vs-proposify) - [DocSend vs Qwilr](https://www.g2.com/compare/dropbox-docsend-vs-qwilr) - [DocSend vs Responsive, formerly RFPIO](https://www.g2.com/compare/dropbox-docsend-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) - [DocSend vs GetAccept](https://www.g2.com/compare/dropbox-docsend-vs-getaccept) - [DocSend vs Loopio](https://www.g2.com/compare/dropbox-docsend-vs-loopio) - [DocSend vs Conga Composer](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-dropbox-docsend) - [DocSend vs Oneflow](https://www.g2.com/compare/dropbox-docsend-vs-oneflow) - [DocSend vs Jotform Sign](https://www.g2.com/compare/dropbox-docsend-vs-jotform-sign) ### 9. [Oneflow](https://www.g2.com/products/oneflow/reviews) By Oneflow **Average Rating:** 4.4/5 **Total Reviews:** 372 Oneflow makes contract handling easy and efficient for everyone involved in one powerful workspace. Reviewers say compared to Quotient, Oneflow is: - More expensive Categories in common with Quotient: [Proposal](https://www.g2.com/categories/proposal) **Compare:** [Quotient vs Oneflow](https://www.g2.com/compare/oneflow-vs-quotient) **Compare Oneflow with other alternatives:** - [Oneflow vs PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/compare/oneflow-vs-pandadoc) - [Oneflow vs Proposify](https://www.g2.com/compare/oneflow-vs-proposify) - [Oneflow vs Qwilr](https://www.g2.com/compare/oneflow-vs-qwilr) - [Oneflow vs Responsive, formerly RFPIO](https://www.g2.com/compare/oneflow-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) - [Oneflow vs GetAccept](https://www.g2.com/compare/getaccept-vs-oneflow) - [Oneflow vs Loopio](https://www.g2.com/compare/loopio-vs-oneflow) - [Oneflow vs Conga Composer](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-oneflow) - [Oneflow vs DocSend](https://www.g2.com/compare/dropbox-docsend-vs-oneflow) - [Oneflow vs Jotform Sign](https://www.g2.com/compare/jotform-sign-vs-oneflow) ### 10. [Jotform Sign](https://www.g2.com/products/jotform-sign/reviews) By Jotform **Average Rating:** 4.7/5 **Total Reviews:** 1,781 Jotform Sign is a powerful e-signature platform that combines digital signatures with built-in automation to streamline document workflows. Easily create, share, and collect legally binding e-signatures on any device — without writing a single line of code. Upload an existing PDF, choose from 800+ professionally designed templates, or build a custom document from scratch using Jotform’s intuitive drag-and-drop document builder. Designed for maximum flexibility, Jotform Sign is ideal for waivers, consent forms, lease agreements, sales contracts, onboarding documents, and any workflow that requires secure signatures. Customize every part of your document to match your brand by uploading your logo, selecting fonts and colors, and adjusting layout elements. You can also add multiple signers, define a step-by-step automated signing order, set access permissions, and personalize your email notifications. These automation tools help reduce manual tasks, prevent bottlenecks, and accelerate approval cycles. Jotform Sign works seamlessly across devices, so recipients can review and sign documents from their phone, tablet, or laptop with a smooth, user-friendly experience. Each document includes a detailed audit trail, ensuring compliance, transparency, and trustworthy record-keeping. Whether you’re handling waivers, agreements, contracts, consent forms, or internal approvals, Jotform Sign automates repetitive tasks and eliminates the slow, outdated steps of paper-based processes. All signed documents are securely stored and can be easily exported, organized, shared, or integrated with your existing workflows. By combining digital signatures with automation, Jotform Sign helps businesses reduce turnaround times, improve accuracy, and enhance the signing experience for clients, employees, and partners. Say goodbye to scanning, printing, and manual follow-ups — and manage your entire signature workflow online with a fast, modern, and reliable e-signature platform. Reviewers say compared to Quotient, Jotform Sign is: - More expensive - Better at meeting requirements Categories in common with Quotient: [Proposal](https://www.g2.com/categories/proposal) **Compare:** [Quotient vs Jotform Sign](https://www.g2.com/compare/jotform-sign-vs-quotient) **Compare Jotform Sign with other alternatives:** - [Jotform Sign vs PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/compare/jotform-sign-vs-pandadoc) - [Jotform Sign vs Proposify](https://www.g2.com/compare/jotform-sign-vs-proposify) - [Jotform Sign vs Qwilr](https://www.g2.com/compare/jotform-sign-vs-qwilr) - [Jotform Sign vs Responsive, formerly RFPIO](https://www.g2.com/compare/jotform-sign-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) - [Jotform Sign vs GetAccept](https://www.g2.com/compare/getaccept-vs-jotform-sign) - [Jotform Sign vs Loopio](https://www.g2.com/compare/jotform-sign-vs-loopio) - [Jotform Sign vs Conga Composer](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-jotform-sign) - [Jotform Sign vs DocSend](https://www.g2.com/compare/dropbox-docsend-vs-jotform-sign) - [Jotform Sign vs Oneflow](https://www.g2.com/compare/jotform-sign-vs-oneflow) --- ## Quotient Alternatives FAQs ### How does Quotient compare to PandaDoc? According to G2 data, both [Quotient](https://www.g2.com/products/quotient/reviews) and [PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/products/pandadoc/reviews) hold an equal average rating of 4.7 out of 5. However, PandaDoc has a significantly larger review base with 3,495 reviews compared to Quotient's 22, indicating broader market adoption and feedback volume. In dimension scores, PandaDoc leads Quotient by 0.4 points in Better at Meeting Requirements (9.2 vs 8.8) but trails by 0.5 points in More Usable (9.7 vs 9.2). PandaDoc also scores higher in Easier to Set Up, Easier to Admin, and Easier to Do Business With. Both products have strong support scores, with Quotient slightly ahead by 0.2 points (9.3 vs 9.1). User sentiment highlights that Quotient users appreciate its easy setup, time-saving quoting features, straightforward integrations, and professional quote templates, though they note limited template design flexibility. PandaDoc users emphasize ease of use (718 mentions), document management (353 mentions), e-signatures (304 mentions), intuitive interface (294 mentions), and extensive template capabilities (284 mentions). PandaDoc also offers a comprehensive all-in-one document workflow including creation, sending, tracking, and signing, with strong CRM integrations such as HubSpot and Salesforce. Overall, PandaDoc provides a more feature-rich, scalable solution with broader adoption and deeper integrations, while Quotient excels in usability and simplicity for quoting workflows. ### What are the best alternatives to Quotient? The best alternatives to Quotient include [PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/products/pandadoc/reviews) (4.7/5 stars, 3495 reviews), [Proposify](https://www.g2.com/products/proposify/reviews) (4.6/5 stars, 1135 reviews), and [Qwilr](https://www.g2.com/products/qwilr/reviews) (4.6/5 stars, 897 reviews). These platforms offer comprehensive proposal management with strong CRM integrations, extensive template customization, and advanced analytics. Other notable alternatives include [Responsive](https://www.g2.com/products/responsive-formerly-rfpio/reviews), [Loopio](https://www.g2.com/products/loopio/reviews), and [GetAccept](https://www.g2.com/products/getaccept/reviews), each excelling in collaboration, AI assistance, and sales workflow automation. ### What features do alternatives offer that Quotient does not? Quotient lacks advanced design and customization options such as embedding videos, rich multimedia content, and interactive pricing modules. It does not support extensive CRM integrations like HubSpot or Salesforce, nor does it provide AI-driven automation or detailed analytics on document engagement. Features like real-time collaboration, extensive template libraries, and automated workflows are also limited or absent in Quotient. ### Which Proposal tools do reviewers recommend instead of Quotient? Reviewers consistently recommend [PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/products/pandadoc/reviews) for its ease of use, robust CRM integrations (including HubSpot and Salesforce), and comprehensive document analytics. [Proposify](https://www.g2.com/products/proposify/reviews) is favored for its professional templates, real-time tracking, and seamless CRM synchronization. [Qwilr](https://www.g2.com/products/qwilr/reviews) is praised for its interactive, visually engaging proposals, strong automation features, and detailed engagement analytics. These tools are preferred over Quotient for their advanced customization, automation, and sales enablement capabilities, as reflected in thousands of positive user reviews on G2. ### Why do users choose PandaDoc over Quotient? Users choose [PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/products/pandadoc/reviews) over Quotient primarily for its comprehensive document management and e-signature capabilities, as evidenced by 304 mentions of e-signatures and 353 mentions of document management in user reviews. PandaDoc's all-in-one platform enables users to create, send, track, and sign documents seamlessly, which streamlines workflows and reduces reliance on multiple tools. Its strong integrations with major CRMs like HubSpot and Salesforce enhance automation and data synchronization, contributing to faster sales cycles and improved accuracy. PandaDoc's ease of use is highlighted in 718 mentions, reflecting its intuitive interface and user-friendly design that accommodates both technical and non-technical users. The platform's extensive template library and customization options (284 mentions) allow businesses to maintain brand consistency and accelerate document creation. Additionally, PandaDoc's real-time tracking and notification features improve follow-up efficiency and pipeline visibility. While some users note a learning curve for advanced features and occasional editing challenges, the overall value proposition, scalability, and robust feature set make PandaDoc the preferred choice for organizations seeking a versatile and integrated document workflow solution. Pricing considerations and broader adoption also influence user preference, as PandaDoc offers competitive plans with a free tier and scales well for larger teams and complex use cases. ## Explore Articles - [Which Oracle EBS resellers offer the strongest post-implementation support models and service level agreements?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-oracle-ebs-resellers-offer-the-strongest-post-implementation-support-models-and-service-level-agreements) - [User-friendly demo automation software for sales teams](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-s-the-most-user-friendly-demo-automation-software-for-sales-teams) - [How can I ensure the security of sensitive documents during M&A?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/how-can-i-ensure-the-security-of-sensitive-documents-during-m-a) - [Most reliable cloud backup software for companies](https://www.g2.com/discussions/most-reliable-cloud-backup-software-for-companies) - [What are the best talent assessment software on the market](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-is-the-best-talent-assessment-software-in-the-market) - [Which financial aid software platforms keep application processing time under three months from submission to award?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-financial-aid-software-platforms-keep-application-processing-time-under-three-months-from-submission-to-award) ## Spotlight Categories - [Online Reputation Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/online-reputation-management) - [Attribution Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/attribution) - [Identity and Access Management (IAM) Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/identity-and-access-management-iam)