Compare Observe.AI and evaluagent 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (65.0% of reviews)
Mid-Market (65.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Starting at £20.00 1 Per user Per Month
Observe.AI
Star Rating
(233)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (65.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Observe.AIevaluagent
Star Rating
(437)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (65.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at £20.00 1 Per user Per Month
Free Trial is available
Learn more about evaluagentSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that evaluagent excels in user experience, with many praising its minimalistic design and ease of navigation. Users find it particularly helpful for tracking feedback and performance, making it a streamlined choice for quality assurance tasks.
- According to verified reviews, Observe.AI stands out for its AI-enhanced conversation analysis, which users describe as resourceful and effective. Reviewers highlight its ability to capture customer insights and sentiments, making it a powerful tool for understanding customer interactions.
- Users say that evaluagent offers a quick and intuitive setup process, with many noting how easy it is to create contacts for evaluation. This feature is particularly beneficial for teams looking to implement quality assurance processes without extensive training.
- Reviewers mention that while Observe.AI provides detailed call analysis and high accuracy in sentiment detection, some users feel it may not be as user-friendly as evaluagent. The complexity of its features can be a barrier for teams that prefer a more straightforward interface.
- G2 reviewers highlight that evaluagent has a strong presence in the mid-market segment, with a significant number of recent reviews indicating a high level of user satisfaction. This suggests that evaluagent is a reliable choice for businesses in this space looking for effective quality assurance solutions.
- According to recent feedback, while both products have similar scores in quality assurance, users appreciate that Observe.AI focuses on high-value insights from calls, which can be crucial for businesses aiming to enhance customer engagement and satisfaction through detailed analytics.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Observe.AI
No pricing availableevaluagent
Auto-QA and Improvement
Starting at £20.00
1 Per user Per Month
- Call transcription
- Auto work assignment
- Auto, manual, blended QA scorecards
Free Trial
Observe.AI
No trial information availableevaluagent
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
180
9.1
372
Ease of Use
9.2
180
9.0
381
Ease of Setup
9.0
103
9.2
271
Ease of Admin
9.2
92
9.1
100
Quality of Support
9.2
176
9.1
328
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
94
9.4
101
Product Direction (% positive)
9.7
172
9.3
374
Features by Category
Call Analytics
9.5
44
Feature Not Available
8.9
45
8.7
39
9.1
45
9.0
43
9.0
40
Feature Not Available
Artificial Intelligence - Conversation Intelligence
9.3
40
8.9
44
8.7
43
8.6
42
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
8.9
17
8.9
28
Agentic AI - Conversation Intelligence
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
7.0
5
Quality Assurance
9.2
144
9.2
340
9.0
140
8.9
314
8.8
135
8.9
335
Engagement
9.1
145
9.0
325
9.1
138
8.7
332
8.8
134
8.4
288
Performance
9.0
126
8.5
294
9.3
134
8.9
292
Generative AI
8.8
28
7.4
202
8.8
28
7.6
200
Responses
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation - AI Agents
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Autonomy - AI Agents
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
8.7
21
8.6
19
Testing - Contact Center AI Observability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analytics - Contact Center AI Observability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Infrastructure - Contact Center AI Observability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Customer Query Resolution - AI Customer Support Agents
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Customer Interaction Automation - AI Customer Support Agents
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Autonomy
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Agents
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Observe.AI and evaluagent are categorized as Conversation Intelligence, Contact Center Quality Assurance, and Speech Analytics
Unique Categories
Observe.AI is categorized as AI Customer Support Agents, AI Agents For Business Operations, and Contact Center AI Observability
evaluagent has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Observe.AI
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
evaluagent
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Outsourcing/Offshoring
13.4%
Consumer Services
12.9%
Hospital & Health Care
7.4%
Telecommunications
6.9%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
6.5%
Other
53.0%
Financial Services
22.0%
Consumer Services
20.1%
Insurance
8.5%
Gambling & Casinos
3.6%
Computer Games
3.3%
Other
42.4%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is the best way to use this tool to have more accurate and quality results in a short matter of time ?
2 Comments
AT
The best way to use this tool to have more accurate and quality results in a short matter of time is having a job like mine as quality assurance analyst. Read more
Can I use this tool in promoting quality work to other people in our community?
2 Comments
BI
Yes definitely!! it would make your evaluations more accurate!!Read more
Is there any other way to retrieve of find the date of the call back?
1 Comment
Official Response from Observe.AI
Thanks for your question, Beberly. You can use your metadata to search for calls with the same phone number, same customer, or other parameters that are...Read more
What is EvaluAgent used for?
2 Comments
Official Response from evaluagent
Evaluagent is the only platform that delivers and connects out of the box, customizable, and AI-driven interaction intelligence to auto-QA and automated...Read more
evaluagent has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
Your software and services insights are valuable.
Your peers come to G2 to get an inside look at and other business solutions. Adding perspective on will help others pick the right solution based on real user experience.
