Users report that IFS excels in its Chart of Accounts feature, receiving a score of 9.8, while mHelpDesk's score of 8.3 indicates it may not offer the same level of customization and flexibility in this area.
Reviewers mention that mHelpDesk shines in Payments Scheduling with a score of 8.9, compared to IFS's score of 8.1, suggesting that mHelpDesk provides a more user-friendly experience for managing payment timelines.
G2 users highlight that IFS's Quality of Support is rated at 6.4, which is notably lower than mHelpDesk's 8.2, indicating that users may find mHelpDesk's customer service more responsive and helpful.
Users on G2 report that IFS has a more complex Ease of Setup with a score of 6.6, while mHelpDesk's score of 7.6 suggests a smoother onboarding process, making it potentially more accessible for small businesses.
Reviewers say that mHelpDesk's Ease of Use is rated at 8.3, which is higher than IFS's 7.6, indicating that mHelpDesk may be more intuitive for everyday users, especially those with less technical expertise.
Users report that IFS's Product Direction score of 8.2 reflects a strong commitment to future development, while mHelpDesk's score of 7.0 suggests it may not be as focused on evolving its features to meet user needs.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
IFS Cloud
No pricing available
mHelpDesk
No pricing available
Free Trial
IFS Cloud
No trial information available
mHelpDesk
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.1
220
8.2
113
Ease of Use
7.6
221
8.3
115
Ease of Setup
6.6
153
7.6
45
Ease of Admin
7.4
151
8.0
45
Quality of Support
6.4
214
8.2
114
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
It’s IFS’s Field Service Module. This is a module developed by IFS to support field agents wherein they can key in requirements/service reports from remote...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.