G2 reviewers report that Asana excels in user satisfaction, boasting a significantly higher overall score compared to SAP PPM. Users appreciate its intuitive interface and the ability to customize workflows, making it a favorite for teams looking for flexibility in project management.
According to verified reviews, Asana's ease of use is a standout feature, with many users highlighting how simple it is to navigate and manage multiple projects. One user noted, "I really like Asana's interface because it's simple and easy to use," which contrasts with SAP PPM, where some users find the interface less intuitive.
Users say that Asana's implementation process is quick and straightforward, with many praising the onboarding experience. In contrast, SAP PPM, while well-structured, may require more time to fully grasp its extensive features, which can be overwhelming for new users.
Reviewers mention that Asana's extensive feature set, including task prioritization and customizable to-do lists, allows teams to stay organized effectively. Users have noted, "So many options to customize based on our project needs," which highlights Asana's adaptability compared to SAP PPM's more rigid structure.
According to recent feedback, both platforms offer solid support, but Asana edges out with a slightly higher quality rating. Users appreciate the responsive support team, while SAP PPM users have noted that while the support is good, it may not be as readily accessible.
G2 reviewers highlight that while SAP PPM is favored in enterprise settings for its robust reporting capabilities, Asana's strength lies in its appeal to small businesses. Users have remarked on SAP PPM's "easy and fast for reporting," but Asana's user-friendly design makes it a better fit for teams that prioritize simplicity and collaboration.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.