Automated Testing Software

From a pricing perspective, this solution can feel expensive for smaller teams or organisations with limited testing budgets, especially when higher parallel execution capacity is needed. That said, when I weigh the device coverage, the infrastructure savings, and the testing capabilities it offers, the overall value still outweighs the cost challenges for our use case. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

BrowserStack addresses one of the biggest challenges for our organisation: testing across a wide range of real Android and iOS devices without having to maintain a physical device lab. With App Live, we can instantly access different devices and OS versions in just a few clicks, saving a significant amount of time and effort during test execution.

Another major advantage is being able to run both web and mobile automation suites on BrowserStack’s cloud infrastructure. We use Automation Pro and App Automate as part of our CI/CD pipeline, integrated with CircleCI. Whenever a new build is deployed to the staging environment, automated tests are triggered automatically. This allows us to perform thorough QA validation before every release, catch issues early, and reduce the number of bugs that reach production.

BrowserStack also provides detailed test reports, screenshots, videos, and error logs, which makes troubleshooting much easier. When defects are reported by the QA team, these insights help us pinpoint the root cause faster and collaborate effectively with developers to resolve issues.

The cloud-based platform has improved our overall productivity by removing the need for device setup, ongoing maintenance, and manual app installation. Integration with Firebase is especially helpful because it lets us access and install the required application builds directly, making the testing process more efficient.

A feature that adds significant value for us is the ability to test across multiple devices simultaneously. Comparing application behaviour side by side on Android and iOS devices helps us validate platform-specific functionality, spot inconsistencies quickly, and deliver a better user experience across all supported devices.

Overall, BrowserStack has helped us accelerate testing cycles, improve release quality, reduce infrastructure overhead, and increase confidence in every deployment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While GitHub is an exceptional platform, there are a few areas that could be improved. Some advanced features — especially around enterprise‑level automation and security — are locked behind higher‑tier plans, which limits flexibility for smaller teams. The interface can also feel slow or cluttered when navigating large repositories with many branches, issues, or pull requests. Additionally, GitHub Actions sometimes requires deep YAML knowledge, making complex workflows harder to maintain.

One major concern for me is customer support responsiveness. When I encounter a serious issue and open a support ticket, it often takes months before I receive any meaningful reply. This delay makes it difficult to resolve critical problems in a timely manner. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

GitHub solves several critical challenges in modern software development. It provides a reliable and structured way to manage version control, ensuring that every change is tracked, documented, and reversible. This eliminates confusion around code updates and makes collaboration far more efficient. The Pull Request workflow helps maintain code quality by enabling clear reviews, discussions, and approvals before merging.

GitHub also centralizes project management through Issues, Discussions, and integrated CI/CD pipelines with Actions, allowing me to automate builds, tests, and deployments without relying on external tools. This reduces operational overhead and keeps the entire development lifecycle in one place. Overall, GitHub gives me a more organized, secure, and productive environment for building and maintaining software. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One limitation I've experienced with Postman is that managing large API collections and environments can become difficult as projects grow. When working with multiple AI services and backend APIs, collections can get cluttered, making navigation and maintenance more time-consuming. In addition, collaboration features like advanced governance, reporting, and workspace management are more useful in the paid plans, which can be limiting for smaller teams. Overall, these are minor drawbacks, and they don't outweigh the value Postman provides for API development and testing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Postman solves the challenge of validating and debugging APIs before they are integrated into our applications. In our AI-powered insurance document processing project, I use it to test APIs for document uploads, policy data extraction, authentication, and backend integrations. It allows me to quickly verify request and response data, identify issues early, and ensure APIs work correctly before deployment. This has reduced debugging time, improved API reliability, and accelerated the delivery of AI features, resulting in a more stable and efficient development process. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Managing a growing number of feature flags over time requires discipline to clean up ones that are no longer needed, otherwise the codebase accumulates unnecessary complexity. Pricing scales with usage and seats, which can get expensive as the number of flags and monthly active users grows. The initial setup for integrating flags cleanly into existing code took some restructuring, especially for parts of the codebase that weren't originally built with feature flagging in mind. Some of the more advanced targeting and experimentation features have a learning curve before getting full value out of them. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

LaunchDarkly has let us test new features on a small subset of real users before a full rollout, catching issues early without risking a broken experience for everyone on the platform. This has made deploying changes to core functionality, like trip flow updates, much safer, since we can instantly disable a feature if something goes wrong instead of needing an emergency rollback and redeploy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We would all like for it to be able to be faster, but it is getting better, and vastly better than traditional tools. I would like to be able to more easily accommodate refreshing sandboxes in the pipeline (or hot-swapping). No real dislikes, just feature requests, I guess! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's allowing our team to be able to work across the globe, on projects that may or may not overlap in terms of metadata components that we touch, while not hindering our ability to deploy changes. We overall much more efficient not only in the standard build -> deploy, but we're not fixing things accidentally overwritten when someone else updated the same layout, etc.

It's also integrating with Jira so that we can capture actual changes made in tickets, that we can then use to auto-generate actually useful release notes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I have loved each and every small thing od Tuskr but a bit more modern ui will surely impact a lot Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

it was difficult to keep track of test cases, test results, and testing progress in one place. We had to manage a lot of information manually, which could be time-consuming.

Tuskr helps us organize test cases, run tests, and track results more easily. It gives us a clear view of testing progress and reduces the need for spreadsheets and manual tracking. This saves time and makes our testing workflow more organized. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While GitLab provides a comprehensive DevOps platform, navigating its vast feature set across complex nested projects and CI/CD configurations can occasionally feel cluttered. Additionally, managing heavy pipeline runner overhead or debugging intricate continuous integration configurations locally prior to pushing changes can still present a steep learning curve for development teams. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is the most accessible tool for code review and maintenance. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

GitLab eliminates the friction of managing fragmented toolchains by consolidating version control, CI/CD automation, issue tracking, and security scanning into a single unified DevOps platform. This centralizes code maintenance and versioning, allowing teams to seamlessly collaborate, rollback or switch between release versions instantly, and automate pipeline workflows to deliver secure software faster with significantly reduced operational overhead. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I didn't face any issues using TestFirst, but it doesn't have Mac support and some of our applications require to be tested on MacOS, so it's a limitation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We use Jira-integrated TestFirst and link all our testing tasks with respective test cases. That helped to identify the areas lacking coverage because of the well-organized structure in TestFirst. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The thing I dislike about Redgate Flyway is that every time I manually need to migrate changes. It should have AI integrated into it that automatically migrates all changes whenever there is any. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Redgate is saving a lot of time for my organisation developers and testers providing easy usage and quick response time for migration. Also the error messages it shows whenever there is any migration error are very descriptive and easy to understand for a new joiner as well. It is overall benefitting me by adding up business value and safe migration of changes keeping all developers and testers at same level of code. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While UiPath Agentic Automation is powerful, there is still a learning curve when moving from traditional RPA to agent-based automation. Designing and troubleshooting agent workflows requires a different mindset, and debugging can sometimes be challenging due to the dynamic nature of AI responses. The licensing cost may also be on the higher side for smaller teams. That said, most of these challenges are manageable with proper training and experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

UiPath Agentic Automation is helping us address business processes that require contextual understanding and dynamic decision-making, which were challenging to automate using traditional RPA. We are using it in document processing and workflow orchestration scenarios, where AI agents analyze information, make decisions, and trigger the appropriate actions. As a result, we have reduced manual intervention, improved processing speed, and achieved better operational efficiency while expanding automation coverage across complex business processes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While the product documentation is solid, I’ve noticed that community-driven resources such as blogs, tutorials, YouTube videos, and real-world implementation examples are still somewhat limited compared to more established automation platforms. Expanding the community ecosystem and encouraging more shared examples would make it even easier for new users to learn the platform and adopt it with confidence. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It helped me get through the onboarding process very quickly, even though I had no prior experience with the platform. It also feels maintenance-free and required less time to implement. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The audit export is a little basic. For goverment work I sometimes need a specific format, and I end up cleaning it up before it goes to the compliance team. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Using Kualitee, I easily track test management and bug fixes. It connects requirements, tests, and bugs, speeding up audits. Centralizing our compliance testing reduces errors, and logging bugs directly from failed test cases saves time by eliminating manual data entry. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Except some small issues, there's not much to complain about. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We used to handle store submissions manually, which was time consuming and error prone. Appcircle automated that entire flow; build, sign, and publish and cutting down our release cycle significantly. The Re-sign Binary feature has also been a huge time saver, allowing us to redistribute the same build with different signing identities without rebuilding from scratch. The publish module in particular removed the need for anyone on the team to have direct access to developer portal credentials, which also improved our security posture. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Credits are specific to each project and must be moved to another project to be used there. The process for transferring credits wasn’t very clear. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

This tool is excellent for observing real user interactions, identifying pain points, and collecting feedback throughout development. It helps us determine how to improve usability, helps us validate design choices, and ensures the product works well for users. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As with anything Metadata api based in Salesforce the system has to work around the complexities of the SalesForce object architecture. The data dictionary does take us a long way to getting past this however. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It gives us exact visibility into our customers Salesforce Orgs and helps us find the inflection points for our implementations. One example is an implementation that was hung up for 3 days on a problem, within 15 minutes of connecting sonar we worked past it. Its a lifesaver as is Brad and Kevin from their team. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

For advanced testing scenarios, the platform could benefit from deeper customization and more granular control over test configurations. Improved documentation around complex use cases and clearer visibility into test execution logic would make it more powerful for engineering-heavy teams. Expanding integrations and reporting flexibility would further enhance its value. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Qodex.ai addresses the challenge of manual, time-intensive software testing by introducing AI-assisted automation. It helps reduce testing overhead, improves consistency, and accelerates release cycles. For me, this means faster validation of features, quicker feedback during development, and the ability to focus more on core engineering tasks rather than repetitive test execution. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I have not found any issues as I have only engaged with QA Wolf for a couple of months. I am sure I would be better in answering this after our new platform has to go through QA Wolf. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Solves the regular testing that is needed when we do new features or changes to our features. Our applications are new and we have a small team. Having QA Wolf fills the gap for small teams. We struggle with regular testing as we do not have a dedicated QA group. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

So far, I haven’t found anything to dislike, as it is a great improvement over our team's old processes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Test case repository management is better overall. The integration with Jira and MCP speeds up test case creation and helps me create new cases more quickly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing sort of such to dislike in keploy! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Personally I have dealt with the problem of first finding the actual production flows in the application , and then writing tests for it , needed manual intervention, keploy helps me to reduce the time on testing while automatically finding the flows, and helping the robust release for the application at each deployment! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like it alot Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I can automate tasks with different workflows instead of manual setup, maintaining my applications through up-to-date images. It ensures pipelines work smoothly and new changes don't break the master branch. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.