Automated Testing Software

Peak-time queues on popular iPhones. Real devices can line up, cold starts aren’t simulator-fast. iOS signing quirks. Resigning IPAs for real devices occasionally trips on entitlements, fixable, but it eats time during setup. Tunnel fragility on long runs. Corporate proxies sometimes need custom flags, and very long sessions can drop if the network hiccups. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Device coverage without a device lab. We went from ~8 to ~40 meaningful Android/iOS combos per release. “Works on my emulator” bugs dropped ~30% over two quarters. Faster, trustable CI signal. Parallel App Automate runs cut the PR feedback loop from ~1 hour to ~15 minutes, and every failure ships with video + logs, so triage is measured in minutes, not meetings. Reproducible edge cases. Last week we caught a deep-link crash on Android 14 only when the device language was Arabic and the network was throttled, App Live made that a two-minute repro instead of a day of guessing. Lower ops overhead. No buying/patching phones, no USB hubs, no lab maintenance. The team spends time on scenarios instead of infrastructure. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find the network calls erroring out while trying to stream data to be a problematic issue, even though it hasn't impacted functionality significantly. Additionally, I'm not satisfied with LaunchDarkly's observability feature—its lack of robustness and insight, coupled with the high cost, doesn't meet my expectations. The integration of Observability and Session Replay feels overly coupled, and I don't appreciate its interference with the console. Finally, the pricing model is complicated, especially the context counting method, which makes it difficult to forecast costs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use LaunchDarkly for feature flagging, making our process more configurable with a helpful UI and easing complex flag evaluations, improving workflow by easily searching contexts for toggling flags for specific users or projects. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find GitHub can feel overwhelming for beginners, especially when dealing with multiple branches and pull requests. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use GitHub for code hosting and management, enhancing collaboration with features like pull requests and code reviews, and benefiting from its strong integration ecosystem. It supports my portfolio, showcasing my skill with visible contributions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes postman becomes slow, especially when i have multiple collections loaded. it occasionally needs to be restarted because, after being idle for long time, certain requests don't execute properly and get stuck in a continuous loading state. the ui can also feel slightly complex for new users, and sharing collections with teammates can be a bit confusing for someone using it for the first time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

postman solves the problem of efficiently testing and managing multiple apis. when i test an api once, i can save then request along with its payload. this make retesting much easier because i can reuse the same payload, modify it slightly if needed, and quickly send then request again. Postman also supports pre-request and post-request scripts, which is very useful. for example i can automatically save tokens to my environment and reuse them across multiple requests without manually copying and pasting each time. another major benefit is environment management. i can create separate environments like local, dev, staging or production and simply switch the environment from the dropdown. postman automatically picks the correct variables for then entire collections, which save a lot of time and prevents mistakes. since some apis developed by me and some by teammates, using the same shared collection helps everyone stay aligned. if i need to test an api created by someone else, i can easily find it, run it and reuse the saved request. postman also syncs between the desktop app and the web version. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There might be a bit of a learning curve if you are not familiar with CI/CD for mobile, but there is plenty of documentation and support available. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Bitrise takes all of the headaches that you would have with building out and maintaining your own build server and workflows and creates a great experience that is constantly kept up-to-date by their development teams. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think the environments in Apidog could be simplified. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Apidog to design, document, and test APIs efficiently, enjoying better UI, faster response times, and enhanced features. It helps me organize endpoints, manage environments, and run requests swiftly compared to other HTTP clients. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Since GitLab offers so many features, it can feel a bit overwhelming when you’re just starting out. Also, I’ve noticed that performance can slow down a little when working with larger repositories, but it’s not a big issue once you get used to the workfloww Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As an Android developer, GitLab helps me keep everything organized in one workflow — code reviews, issue tracking, and CI/CD builds for different app flavors. It makes collaboration with backend and QA teams much smoother, and automated pipelines save a lot of time during testing and releases. Overall, it’s helped us ship updates faster and with fewer headaches. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The User Interface, while functional, feels slightly dated compared to some modern SaaS platforms. It's nota a deal breaker, but a refresh would improve user experience Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It helping us reduce the number of issues that reach customers. Previously, manual testing missed edge cases in checkout, which led to abandoned carts. With ACCELQ, we have automated end to end flows that catch these errors earlier. It also supports testing across both our online and mobile app, giving us confidence before every release. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Tuskr works goot, but there are a few things that could get better. Some parts of the interface feel a bit complicated, and certain actions take more steps than they should. The search can be slow at times, especially when you’re with a large number of test cases. I also feel the integrations could be a little more flexible and easy. None of these are deal-breakers, but they are small areas where the tool could improve. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Tuskr helps me to manage test cases in a much more easy way. Earlier, keeping track of test steps, results, and changes across was messy, but with Tuskr everything stays well structured and easy to use. It saves my time during test execution because you don’t have to jump between different tools every time. The reports also make it simple to understand overall test coverage and understand the issues early. Overall, it brings clarity to the whole testing process and makes coordination with my team smoother Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Based on my experience with UiPath Agentic Automation, the most notable drawback is the high cost of licenses, which makes it difficult to justify for smaller projects. I have also faced a steep learning curve, as effective use of the platform demands advanced technical expertise. Setting up complex scenarios or handling edge cases has proven to be especially challenging. Additionally, I have observed that the platform uses a significant amount of computing resources, often resulting in slow performance on standard computers. There are also some limitations when it comes to process compatibility and version control. The main challenges I have encountered include the complexity of development, the difficulty of integrating unstructured business data, and the shortage of highly skilled professionals required to operate the system. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

UiPath Agentic Automation is helping me solve critical problems in repetitive business processes that rely on legacy applications without modern APIs. The platform allows me to automate tasks that previously consumed hours of manual work interacting with legacy systems, SAP, old databases, and desktop applications that can't be easily replaced. This benefits me by eliminating human error caused by fatigue in data capture and transfer processes between disconnected systems, significantly reducing operating costs by freeing up staff for strategic activities, and accelerating response times in processes such as request management and customer onboarding. Integration with Computer Vision allows me to automate even legacy interfaces without available technical documentation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I didn't face any issues using TestFirst, but it doesn't have Mac support and some of our applications require to be tested on MacOS, so it's a limitation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We use Jira-integrated TestFirst and link all our testing tasks with respective test cases. That helped to identify the areas lacking coverage because of the well-organized structure in TestFirst. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As with anything Metadata api based in Salesforce the system has to work around the complexities of the SalesForce object architecture. The data dictionary does take us a long way to getting past this however. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It gives us exact visibility into our customers Salesforce Orgs and helps us find the inflection points for our implementations. One example is an implementation that was hung up for 3 days on a problem, within 15 minutes of connecting sonar we worked past it. Its a lifesaver as is Brad and Kevin from their team. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are only a few areas that could be improved. For more advanced React Native or monorepo setups, I would prefer more granular control over caching strategies, especially for node_modules, Pods, and Gradle caches. Sometimes the UI can feel slightly slow when switching between build history or pipeline views. Also, adding deeper analytics around build performance (average build time, cache hit rates, failed step metrics, etc.) would be helpful for optimizing pipelines. However, none of these are blockers for daily use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Appcircle solves several pain points that React Native teams face when managing both iOS and Android builds. It eliminates the complexity of dealing with native build environments, provisioning profiles, certificates, local machine inconsistencies, and custom scripts. Instead of maintaining separate CI setups for Android and iOS, everything runs in a unified cloud environment. Automatic signing, environment variable management, and pipeline steps significantly reduce manual errors and speed up our release process. This saves our team a lot of time, especially when preparing builds for QA, staging, and production. As a result, our delivery workflow is faster, more reliable, and requires much less maintenance. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think the Qase dashboard needs improvements. The information displayed on it is not clear or is often incomplete. This forces me to use queries to view certain information that should be more accessible. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Qase to centralize and organize test cases, which simplifies our documentation and daily processes of manual and automated testing, making the entire process more practical and efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The only real downside I've experienced is that they are not part of our core team, therefore they do not get insights into the most common pain points our customers are experiencing. They are receptive to this information when we share it with them, but as a third party there is always one more hop in the communication chain. This is just part of the business model though, not a particular deficit of their company. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

QA Wolf is solving low test coverage and a lack of resources to adequately test our application manually. Before using QA Wolf, we had very poor regression test coverage, and now it is much higher. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Credits are specific to each project and must be moved to another project to be used there. The process for transferring credits wasn’t very clear. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

This tool is excellent for observing real user interactions, identifying pain points, and collecting feedback throughout development. It helps us determine how to improve usability, helps us validate design choices, and ensures the product works well for users. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The only thing I would like to see improved is deeper documentation for some advanced features. A few integrations required help from support to understand fully. A richer library of tutorials and implementation examples would help new users adopt faster. Also, reporting dashboards could be more customizable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Qodex.ai is helping us reduce time spent on manual testing and increase coverage on API and performance testing. Its automated workflows identify vulnerabilities early in the cycle, which helps us ship more stable releases. We now detect issues in staging instead of finding them after deployment.

It has streamlined our testing process across multiple projects and teams, improved collaboration, and reduced our dependency on external tools. The platform’s AI suggestions also help prioritize critical issues, which shortens the overall testing timeline. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The only drawback of Salesforce Platform is its complexity at scale.

As you start adding more customisations, integrations, and workflows, the system can feel heavy and sometimes requires specialised expertise to manage. Licensing and add-on costs can also become high for growing teams. That said, these challenges are manageable with proper governance and do not outweigh the overall value the platform provides. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Salesforce Platform helps us centralize customer data, automate key business processes, and improve cross-team visibility.

It solves the challenge of scattered information by giving us a single, unified view of every customer interaction. Automated workflows and approvals have reduced manual effort, improved response times, and increased overall efficiency. With better reporting and real-time dashboards, decision-making has become faster and more data-driven. Overall, it has helped streamline operations, enhance customer experience, and support our growth with a scalable foundation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I'd like to be able to check page <titles> and maybe other key non-display attributes. Have now learned that my grumble about wanting to run the same set of tests against the same system but in different environments, is covered by BugBug 'profiles', so looks like I simply need to learn more to get even more out of BugBug 🙂 Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Validate site pages to allow post code changes to detect breakages and issues Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The price is a bit high, but it's the price to pay for peace of mind. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Manage the versions of my project with Git and automate deployments easily, without DevOps expertise, thanks to a git command. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.