Automated Testing Software

At times, session start time can be slightly slow, especially during peak hours. Occasionally, device availability is limited for certain OS and browser combinations, which can delay testing. Debugging through recorded sessions is helpful, but deeper performance diagnostics could be more detailed. Pricing can also feel on the higher side as the team scales and parallel testing needs increase. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

BrowserStack eliminates the need to maintain an in-house device lab for cross-browser and cross-device testing. It allows us to instantly test our application across multiple browsers, operating systems, and real mobile devices without setup overhead. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While the feature set is massive, the UI is starting to feel quite bloated and cluttered, making it difficult for new team members to find specific repository settings. I also find the notification system frustratingly noisy; even with custom filters, important mentions often get buried under automated bot alerts. Additionally, debugging GitHub Actions can be a tedious 'commit-and-push' cycle because there’s no native, robust way to test complex workflows locally. Lastly, the pricing jump from the 'Team' to 'Enterprise' tier feels steep for mid-sized startups that need advanced security features like SAML SSO Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

First and mageing the codebase and tracking project versions, and collaborating with the large teams as well. GitHub solves the chaos of collaborative coding and version management. It eliminates the risk of overwriting teammate code through structured Pull Requests and provides a 'time machine' for our codebase via a detailed commit history. Additionally, it streamlines our DevOps workflow, allowing us to automate testing and deployments so we can focus on building features rather than managing server files Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One thing I don't like is that sometimes it feels heavy when too many tabs or collections are open. It can slow down a bit. Also, a few features are hidden behind menus, so it takes time to find them when I'm in a hurry. Syncing across devices works, but occasionally I feel it takes time to update. The desktop app also needs to be updated frequently, which interrupts my work for a minute or two. These are small things, but I notice them in my daily use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Postman mainly solves the problem of testing APIs without writing code again and again. Before using it, I used to print logs, write small scripts, refresh servers, and repeat the same steps just to check on requests. It was tiring and slow. Postman removes all that extra work. I can test, debug, and understand responses quickly. It saves a lot of time during development because I can see directly what is wrong and fix it right away. It also helps me keep everything organized. Instead of having small code snippets everywhere, all my API call states are saved in one place, so I can reuse them anytime. When I need to share something with someone, I just send the collection link. It makes teamwork easier and avoids confusion. It also helps me avoid guessing. when an API is not working. I can see the exact error clearly instead of searching through logs or reopening the server again and again. Another thing is that it keeps my workflow smooth. I can switch between different environments easily. like dev, staging, or production. without typing everything again. It saves a small bit of time that really adds up. It also makes learning new APIs easier. when I want to check how some new service works. I can try out requests quickly and understand the response without setting up the whole project. Sharing testing steps with teammates becomes simple too. Instead of explaining things in long messages, I can share a collection, and they can run the same request on their side. It avoids miscommunication. It helps me catch mistakes early. if I send a wrong payload or forget a header. I can see the issue right away instead of debugging for hours. That takes a lot of frustration away. It also keeps everything neat. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I'm not sure if it's a browser issue (I use Firefox), but sometimes pages load but the components themselves take some time to get rendered. I've also encountered a few hiccups with the search feature when I'm searching for specific flags; I have to be case-sensitive sometimes when I search for flags. Maybe it would be better if it was a bit more relaxed. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Managing a huge number of feature flags through a clean UI for different environments (dev, testing, prod, ...etc.) save me a lot of time. I can even track and monitor evaluations for flags over time which helped me in debugging some production issues with ease. An incident that might take me a few hours to find its root cause now only takes 15-30 minutes through tracking flag evaluations on Launch Darkly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing as such.

One standout feature is how smoothly Bitrise integrates with Git providers and other third-party tools. The workflow configuration feels flexible while still staying simple, so we can customize build steps without adding unnecessary complexity. The build logs are detailed and easy to follow when debugging, which helps cut down troubleshooting time significantly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Performance has been reliable, with consistent build times and minimal downtime. The UI makes it easy to monitor builds, manage environment variables, and track deployment history. Overall, Bitrise has helped streamline our release process and improved our team’s productivity.

Highly recommended for any team looking for a robust and developer-friendly CI/CD solution for mobile apps. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Excel doesn’t drive it

You can’t just drop a spreadsheet with error codes or reference data and have Apidog magically consume it — you have to translate it into API schemas or docs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Instead of bouncing between Swagger for docs, Postman for testing, and random markdown files for specs, Apidog puts it all in one place.

Docs stay tied to the actual API definition and examples, so what you read is what you actually get.

Schema-driven assertions and reusable test cases make it harder to accidentally ship broken responses. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

In my personal opinion, the interface of GitLab can be improved further. In comparison to other version control systems, the color scheme of GitLab can be more balanced and refined. Moreover, many important settings of GitLab are hidden deep inside the menu system, making it difficult for users to access them, especially for those who are using GitLab less frequently. Accessing important settings from more prominent locations would greatly improve the user experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

GitLab fixes the issue of code change management, collaboration, and project stability all in one place. GitLab offers me a stable version control system that ensures my code is always safe and easily trackable, so I can easily see what happened when a bug or crash happens and easily revert or repair it. GitLab also makes collaboration easy by allowing team members to review, comment, and work on code right from the platform, without having to go through any hassle of setting up or transferring files. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Reporting could be more powerful, Integrations are limited, Learning curve for new or complex testers. Performance with large databases can slow down Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Tuskr to run software tests and check bugs effectively. It maintains test progress, is clutter-free, and attaching evidence directly to steps clarifies tasks, speeding up debugging. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The best part is the ability to quickly design, test, and deploy automations at scale. Orchestrator provides centralized management and monitoring, which makes handling bots across multiple environments very smooth. It saves a lot of manual effort, reduces human error, and gives our team more time to focus on high-value work. The community support and documentation are also excellent, which helps accelerate adoption. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

UiPath is helping us eliminate repetitive, manual tasks that used to take up a lot of time—things like data entry, reporting, and cross-system updates. By automating these processes, we’ve been able to reduce errors, improve accuracy, and speed up turnaround times. This not only boosts productivity but also frees up our team to focus on more strategic and creative work, which adds greater value to the business overall. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I didn't face any issues using TestFirst, but it doesn't have Mac support and some of our applications require to be tested on MacOS, so it's a limitation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We use Jira-integrated TestFirst and link all our testing tasks with respective test cases. That helped to identify the areas lacking coverage because of the well-organized structure in TestFirst. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As with anything Metadata api based in Salesforce the system has to work around the complexities of the SalesForce object architecture. The data dictionary does take us a long way to getting past this however. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It gives us exact visibility into our customers Salesforce Orgs and helps us find the inflection points for our implementations. One example is an implementation that was hung up for 3 days on a problem, within 15 minutes of connecting sonar we worked past it. Its a lifesaver as is Brad and Kevin from their team. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main downside is the current behavior of the AI assistant (Aiden). Deleting a step always removes the pause automatically, and the AI often regenerates previously deleted steps, ignoring manual changes. There is no way to lock steps, preserve deletions, or manage steps in bulk, which makes iterative refinement unpredictable and frustrating. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Qase helps centralize test cases and testing workflows in one place. It makes test case organization clearer, improves visibility across testing activities, and simplifies collaboration between QA and development. Integrations with automation tools and CI pipelines also help keep manual and automated testing aligned and reduce maintenance overhead. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Credits are specific to each project and must be moved to another project to be used there. The process for transferring credits wasn’t very clear. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

This tool is excellent for observing real user interactions, identifying pain points, and collecting feedback throughout development. It helps us determine how to improve usability, helps us validate design choices, and ensures the product works well for users. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The least helpful thing about QA Wolf is sometimes the incorrect association of flows with bug reports. This does create scenarios where bugs are considered "open" when the root bug was resolved. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

QA Wolf is automating our client-side testing. Since implementing them, we catch regressions, both broad and niche, way faster. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think Appcircle could benefit from expanding some advanced documentation and in-app guidance for more complex configurations. Having more detailed examples or best practice quotes for advanced use cases could make onboarding and optimization even smoother. Step-by-step examples for advanced CI/CD scenarios, such as complex workflow configurations or multi-environment setups, would be very helpful. Short video tutorials or real-world samples could also make advanced features even more accessible. Continuous in-app tips for advanced settings could further enhance the user experience, especially for new team members. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Appcircle as our mobile CI/CD platform. It centralizes and automates build, testing, and distribution, streamlining release cycles and reducing manual workload. The flexibility in customization and responsive support significantly improve our development workflow and productivity. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

For advanced testing scenarios, the platform could benefit from deeper customization and more granular control over test configurations. Improved documentation around complex use cases and clearer visibility into test execution logic would make it more powerful for engineering-heavy teams. Expanding integrations and reporting flexibility would further enhance its value. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Qodex.ai addresses the challenge of manual, time-intensive software testing by introducing AI-assisted automation. It helps reduce testing overhead, improves consistency, and accelerates release cycles. For me, this means faster validation of features, quicker feedback during development, and the ability to focus more on core engineering tasks rather than repetitive test execution. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There is a bit of a learning curve at the beginning, especially around understanding how ACCELQ structures test logic and flows. Some advanced configurations could also benefit from clearer documentation or more in app guidance once you are past onboarding, it is smooth, but initial setup can feel slightly overwhelming for first time users. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

ACCELQ helps us reduce dependency on heavy scripting and fragmented testing tools. Before using it, our testing process was slower and more siloed between QA and development.

With ACCELQ, We've improved collaboration accross teams, shortened regresion cycles, and increased test coverage without increasing headcount. The DevOPs integration ensures tests run consistently as part of our delivery pipeline, which has helped us catch issues earlier and release with more confidence. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The only thing which i dislike in salesforce is that its cache issue and its changement reflection in UI Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Salesforce helps many companies solve business problems.

They use Salesforce to build strong relationships with customers.

It helps them provide better services and improve customer experience.

It also allows them to track everything properly, like sales, leads, and customer interactions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Honestly, there isn’t anything I dislike about Keploy so far.

What stands out to me is the clarity of vision, the developer-first approach, and the strong focus on solving real problems in testing. The culture feels supportive and growth-oriented, which makes it a great place to learn, contribute, and build meaningful impact. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Keploy is solving the problem of slow, manual, and often neglected testing in modern development workflows. Writing unit and API tests takes time, and many teams either delay it or struggle to maintain good coverage. Keploy simplifies this by automatically generating tests and helping teams achieve high code coverage with minimal effort.

For me, this is beneficial because I get to work on a product that directly improves developer productivity. It helps me understand real-world developer pain points, learn more about testing practices, and contribute to a tool that creates tangible impact for engineering teams. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We have experienced issues with rollbacks due to accents in the names of objects; when attempting to reprocess the deployment, these are not recognized correctly. This has caused us inconveniences, as the rollback process must be carried out in a very short time due to the incidents generated by the deployment. Additionally, the experience with support has been complicated, especially regarding response times for this type of situation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Boost the reliability in delivering changes to their final destination, which has resulted in a positive experience during audits. The reduction in deployment time and the automated process for delivering business-requested changes generate enthusiasm and add additional value to the agility process that the organization requires. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.