
That we have an actionable portal in which to sandbox potential threats. In most cases, it does a good job determining if a reported email is either a threat, spam or clean. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
PhishER is lacking in key areas including features, reporting, and support. It does not offer the robust capabilities found elsewhere in the KnowBe4 ecosystem, particularly when compared to KSAT. The interface feels unpolished, and the platform frequently struggles to process requests, often running slowly and encountering errors more often than is acceptable for a security product.
Automation capabilities are minimal. Beyond basic keyword-based tagging, there is very little available to meaningfully streamline workflows or reduce manual effort. Reporting is another major weakness—built-in reports provide limited actionable insight and pale in comparison to the comprehensive reporting available in KSAT.
My experience with PhishER support has been particularly disappointing. Issues are routinely minimized or described as “expected behavior,” even when the platform becomes difficult or impossible to use. It is apparent that frontline support agents lack sufficient training and escalation support from senior staff and the development team.
If you are considering PhishER because you have been impressed with KnowBe4’s KSAT product, be aware that the same level of polish, investment, and maturity has not been applied here. Based on my experience, PhishER does not currently meet the expectations one would reasonably have for a product in this space. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The reviewer uploaded a screenshot or submitted the review in-app verifying them as current user.
Validated through LinkedIn
Organic review. This review was written entirely without invitation or incentive from G2, a seller, or an affiliate.






