Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare PAZO and YOOBIC 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
UpKeep
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Axero
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
goHappy
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (53.3% of reviews)
Enterprise (45.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 1 Users Per Month
No pricing available
PAZO
Star Rating
(64)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (53.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 1 Users Per Month
Browse all 3 pricing plansYOOBIC
Star Rating
(163)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (45.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about YOOBICSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that YOOBIC excels in "Quality of Support" with a score of 9.4, while PAZO follows closely with 9.2. Reviewers mention that YOOBIC's support team is responsive and helpful, making it easier for users to resolve issues quickly.
- Reviewers mention that YOOBIC has a strong performance in "Content Storage and Management" with a score of 9.3, compared to PAZO's 8.4. Users say that YOOBIC's content management features allow for efficient organization and retrieval of documents, which is crucial for their operations.
- Users on G2 highlight that PAZO shines in "Logistic Activities" and "Order Management," both scoring 8.7, while YOOBIC struggles with lower scores of 5.7. Reviewers mention that PAZO's tools streamline logistics and order processes, making it a better fit for retail environments.
- G2 users report that YOOBIC's "Task Management" features are rated highly at 9.4, while PAZO also scores well at 9.0. Users say that YOOBIC's task tracking and planning capabilities help teams stay organized and efficient, which is essential for daily operations.
- Reviewers mention that PAZO's "Training & eLearning" features, particularly in "Content Delivery and Tracking," score 8.5, while YOOBIC's score is slightly lower at 8.5. Users report that PAZO's training modules are user-friendly and effective in delivering content to employees.
- Users say that YOOBIC's "Performance" metrics are rated at 9.0, while PAZO's performance is slightly lower at 8.4. Reviewers mention that YOOBIC provides robust analytics and reporting tools that help businesses track their performance effectively.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
YOOBIC
No pricing availableFree Trial
PAZO
Free Trial is available
YOOBIC
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
53
9.1
131
Ease of Use
9.1
53
8.9
137
Ease of Setup
8.7
40
8.9
124
Ease of Admin
8.8
39
8.5
91
Quality of Support
9.2
53
9.5
127
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
39
9.3
86
Product Direction (% positive)
9.8
47
9.5
127
Features by Category
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Content Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Productivity Tools
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Basics
Not enough data
9.0
26
Not enough data
9.1
25
Content
Not enough data
8.1
17
Not enough data
8.2
23
Not enough data
8.5
28
Performance
Not enough data
8.6
23
Not enough data
7.8
25
Not enough data
7.8
17
Training & eLearning
Not enough data
8.8
28
Not enough data
8.5
26
Not enough data
8.7
28
Not enough data
8.7
25
Not enough data
9.3
25
Not enough data
8.3
22
Planning
Not enough data
8.7
35
Not enough data
8.9
37
Not enough data
8.4
34
Execution
Not enough data
8.8
42
Not enough data
8.3
36
Not enough data
8.6
38
Performance
Not enough data
8.5
35
Not enough data
8.5
35
Not enough data
8.7
40
Training & eLearning
Not enough data
8.8
28
Not enough data
8.5
26
Not enough data
8.9
16
Not enough data
8.7
28
Not enough data
8.7
25
Not enough data
9.3
25
Not enough data
8.3
22
Generative AI
Not enough data
7.4
7
Not enough data
7.1
7
Not enough data
7.2
6
Information Distribution
Not enough data
9.0
54
Not enough data
7.8
46
Not enough data
8.8
55
Not enough data
8.2
52
Not enough data
8.7
42
Employee Engagement
Not enough data
8.6
48
Not enough data
8.8
50
Not enough data
8.8
51
Not enough data
8.4
46
Not enough data
8.9
50
Not enough data
9.2
20
Not enough data
8.7
20
Not enough data
8.1
20
User Experience & Accessibility - Employee Communications
Not enough data
8.4
20
Not enough data
9.2
20
Not enough data
9.1
20
Not enough data
9.1
20
Content Distribution - Employee Communications
Not enough data
9.4
19
Not enough data
7.6
19
Not enough data
7.5
19
Additional Features - Employee Communications
Not enough data
8.2
18
Not enough data
7.8
18
Not enough data
7.7
18
Agentic AI - Employee Communications
Not enough data
9.2
8
Not enough data
9.2
8
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administrative Tasks - Frontline Worker Communication Platforms
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
8.3
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
6.7
9
Not enough data
8.7
9
Communication Features - Frontline Worker Communication Platforms
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
9.1
9
Not enough data
8.1
9
Operations - Frontline Worker Communication Platforms
Not enough data
6.1
9
Not enough data
7.3
10
Not enough data
9.4
9
Not enough data
8.7
9
Agentic AI - Frontline Worker Communication Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
In-store tasks - Retail Task Management Software
8.7
5
8.4
23
8.7
5
8.5
23
Not enough data
8.3
22
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
8.4
23
8.7
5
9.2
23
Task management - Retail Task Management Software
9.0
5
9.4
23
9.0
5
9.4
23
9.0
5
9.3
23
Analytics and reporting - Retail Task Management Software
9.0
5
9.1
23
Not enough data
8.2
23
Not enough data
8.5
23
Agentic AI - Employee Intranet
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Facility Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Facility Management Platform Features
8.7
18
Not enough data
8.9
15
Not enough data
8.5
13
Not enough data
8.5
14
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
15
Not enough data
8.7
14
Not enough data
8.5
17
Not enough data
8.6
14
Not enough data
7.8
17
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
PAZO and YOOBIC are categorized as Retail Task Management and Retail Execution
Unique Categories
PAZO is categorized as Facility Management
YOOBIC is categorized as Frontline Worker Communication Platforms, Employee Communications, Microlearning Platforms, Learning Experience Platforms (LXP), and Employee Intranet
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
PAZO
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
YOOBIC
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Retail
28.3%
Facilities Services
16.7%
Commercial Real Estate
6.7%
Apparel & Fashion
6.7%
Consumer Services
5.0%
Other
36.7%
Retail
54.3%
Apparel & Fashion
13.0%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
5.6%
Restaurants
4.3%
Automotive
3.1%
Other
19.8%
Discussions
What is PAZO used for?
1 Comment
Official Response from PAZO
Pazo is how best-in-class retailers bring brand strategies to life in stores. A unified platform for operational excellence, Pazo brings together frontline...Read more
PAZO has no more discussions with answers
YOOBIC has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
