Sage Intacct Pricing Overview

Its real-time reporting and customizable dashboards make financial visibility easy and fast. The automation of key accounting processes - like accounts payable, receivable, and journal entries - saves time and reduces manual error. Could access, strong audit trails, scalability for growing businesses, and seamless integration with other systems like Salesforce and ADP. Support is generally responsive and knowledgeable, though occasionally more complex issues take time to resolve. The implementation process requires some planning and training, but with the help of onboarding resources and support, it’s manageable. Once set up, the system is intuitive with regular use. We use Sage Intacct daily for transaction entry, approvals, reporting, and financial analysis. The more we use it, the more efficient it becomes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The user interface can feel outdated and unintuitive at times, especially for new users. Navigation between modules isn't always seamless, and basic tasks can take a few extra steps compared to other platforms. The reporting tool, while powerful, has a steep learning curve. Building custom reports or adjusting templates often requires technical knowledge or admin-level access, which slows down self-service reporting. Initial implementation takes time and often requires third-party consultants. Some features that should be standard—like advanced billing or multi-entity consolidations—may come at an extra cost. Also, certain modules lack flexibility unless custom-built. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are very few user friendly aspects of Intacct, the ability to consolidate multiple financials quickly is something they do well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

1. You never know what's not going to work next. Every month Sage has a new issue when trying to produce AIA style billings.

2. They claim there is one standard cost code for all jobs, this is beyond a lie. Every single job in the system has its own set of cost codes that you have to manage. We have around 400 actual cost codes but have to manage over 800,000 thanks to how they have this set up.

3. The GL interface is extremely clunky and slow for user input. They don't allow you to copy the job or the entity down so you have to input on every transaction line. Their default setting doesn't work unless ever line item is going to the same project because every job has it's own set of cost codes.

4. Researching in Intacct is slow and difficult, if you've used Sage 100 in the past this will be a huge down grade

5. The Interactive Custom Reports are a joke. Who designs a report tool that you cannot display what information was pulled in the report? What job is this, what time period, any cost codes excluded? You'll never know once you hit print.

6. Naming conventions are not consistent; there is no consistency between the names used on the Object list and what is used in the Custom reports which makes trying to build out your own reports difficult. Which is a major issue as the system comes with no stock reports. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.