What do users say about FullEnrich?

FullEnrich finds direct mobile numbers and work emails that other tools miss. We sell to small Australian healthcare practices, and their owners are hard to reach. In one run we enriched about 1,200 practice owners and got back 535 direct mobiles and 659 verified work emails. The waterfall across many providers means you only pay for results it actually finds. Searching in the web app is free, and CSV in/out made it easy to load everything into our CRM. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Honestly it's hard to fault. My only gripe is that it works so well I keep running bigger lists, so the credits go quicker than I planned. Worth deduping your list first so you don't pay for the same person twice. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I run outbound for B2B founders, and FullEnrich is the enrichment software I always start with. I upload a list, it checks several data providers one after another, and I get verified emails and mobile numbers back without paying for three separate subscriptions. Credits only get used when it actually finds something, so a weak list doesn’t eat my budget. My favorite feature is reverse email lookup: it turns Gmail and Hotmail sign-ups into real names, companies and LinkedIn profiles, which tells me exactly who is behind an inbound lead. Since they launched the MCP, I run enrichment straight from Claude with one prompt instead of exporting CSVs back and forth. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Honestly, not much. Mobile numbers use a lot more credits than emails, so on big lists I have to choose who actually needs a phone number before I run them. Large bulk runs also take a few minutes because the software checks provider after provider, so it’s not instant. That’s the trade-off for higher find rates, and I’d make it again, but if you’re used to one-click lookups it takes some getting used to. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The MCP integration is the standout for me. Connecting FullEnrich to my AI assistant and my own scripts turned it from a lookup tool into something I could build a whole prospecting workflow on. I can size a sector, narrow it to the firms that fit, and find the right decision makers inside them far faster than by manual research. The company data is rich, and the people search matches contacts to the right employer, so there's very little cleaning up afterwards. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Coverage depends on how much a sector uses LinkedIn. White-collar sectors like IT, recruitment and architecture come back well, with a senior contact at 80 to 90% of firms. Frontline sectors like veterinary, dental and home care are much thinner, often under half. The headcount filter counts LinkedIn members rather than real staff, which caught me out at first because it hides large frontline employers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really value FullEnrich for their accurate contact data quality. As a data provider, having precise personal phone numbers and emails is critical for us, and FullEnrich delivers on that front. I also find their API pretty good, which makes data integration seamless. Additionally, setting up FullEnrich was pretty easy; the API documentation was clear, and it took me less than a day to get things up and running. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don't like their policy for resellers that requires us to display their logo on our website and also that they need to be our only data provider(if we want to resell their data). It's frustrating because they themselves don't follow this standard, as they use multiple data providers but don't display any of their logos. It feels unfair to expect resellers like us to follow a policy they don't adhere to themselves. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

FullEnrich allows me to find an email or mobile number in seconds from a LinkedIn profile. As the tool queries multiple sources at once, the result rate is better than the tools I had tested before. The interface is simple, even for someone not very technical, and the credit system is transparent: you only pay for what you find. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Mobile numbers are sometimes less available than emails on certain profiles. Credits run out quickly when enriching many profiles, so it's important to target your searches well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I run B2B prospecting daily on Hunter and Apollo, and I added FullEnrich as a third waterfall layer. It consistently pulls emails and mobile numbers the other two miss, so contactability of my lists went up, not just record count. The pay-for-results model keeps costs predictable, since I pay for a hit and not for every lookup. The 15+ source waterfall genuinely matters on harder segments. As a side effect it surfaced companies I did not have on my radar during discovery. Clean interface, fast to set up, and the integrations slot into my existing stack without friction. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The company list does not include a direct website URL column, so I cannot pull the company's website straight into the export. That slows down the workflow, because I have to look those links up separately. It is also not available as a filter, which would be useful when I want to segment by companies that have a site. Adding a website column and matching filter would remove that friction. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I get better data points on prospects and leads, so my connect rates and email sends are less problematic and more accurate and on point. FullEnrich is easy to use compared to other waterfall enrichment tools, and it’s relatively affordable for a small business or a 1099 contractor like me. I find the search features useful, especially narrowing searches by technology. I also like the standard search and enrichment: I upload a CSV, and it enriches it in about three minutes. I love how fast that is. FullEnrich is more affordable and easy to use than Apollo, and setup took me two minutes—it was super easy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that FullEnrich brings different sources together in one place, so I don’t have to search across lots of platforms for B2B prospect and contact information. It helps me find prospects and relevant, validated emails and phone numbers. It’s easy to search, gives me a lot of variables to use, and makes it easy to enrich contacts I want to engage with. It’s easy to use, works smoothly, and makes building lists easy. Setup was super easy—I understood it right away and was up and going right away. I’ve already recommended it to my colleagues. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think some filters in search could be improved. The search is quite wide, and I think they’re working on that. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use FullEnrich daily for business development and lead gen, especially for getting prospects’ phone numbers and emails. I appreciate its accuracy and consistency. It’s likely the best tool on the market and certainly the best I’ve used. Other tools give me wrong information and end up costing me time. I also like the link to Claude, and I found the setup easy. Compared with Apollo, Lusha, and Kaspr, FullEnrich is head and shoulders better. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I’d like a LinkedIn plugin or extension, and FullEnrich can take a little longer. I’d also like it to be quicker for simple email requests. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

FullEnrich establishes itself as a formidable enrichment tool for anyone looking to maximize the yield of their prospecting lists. Its great strength lies in its waterfall logic, which successively queries more than fifteen databases to find emails and mobile phone numbers. This operation allows for completion rates far superior to what a single provider offers, while ensuring excellent deliverability through strict cleaning of invalid data.

The interface opts for simplicity with quick and straightforward handling. Integration into a modern stack is seamless, notably thanks to a very smooth connector with Clayou chatgtp, for example, effective webhooks, and a well-designed API to automate flows to the CRM. On the billing side, the found data model proves particularly fair, especially since the carryover of unused credits and the absence of additional costs per user provide real budgetary flexibility. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

No Gemini connector to date, otherwise the solution is perfect for me Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.