The MCP integration is the standout for me. Connecting FullEnrich to my AI assistant and my own scripts turned it from a lookup tool into something I could build a whole prospecting workflow on. I can size a sector, narrow it to the firms that fit, and find the right decision makers inside them far faster than by manual research. The company data is rich, and the people search matches contacts to the right employer, so there's very little cleaning up afterwards. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Coverage depends on how much a sector uses LinkedIn. White-collar sectors like IT, recruitment and architecture come back well, with a senior contact at 80 to 90% of firms. Frontline sectors like veterinary, dental and home care are much thinner, often under half. The headcount filter counts LinkedIn members rather than real staff, which caught me out at first because it hides large frontline employers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I run B2B prospecting daily on Hunter and Apollo, and I added FullEnrich as a third waterfall layer. It consistently pulls emails and mobile numbers the other two miss, so contactability of my lists went up, not just record count. The pay-for-results model keeps costs predictable, since I pay for a hit and not for every lookup. The 15+ source waterfall genuinely matters on harder segments. As a side effect it surfaced companies I did not have on my radar during discovery. Clean interface, fast to set up, and the integrations slot into my existing stack without friction. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The company list does not include a direct website URL column, so I cannot pull the company's website straight into the export. That slows down the workflow, because I have to look those links up separately. It is also not available as a filter, which would be useful when I want to segment by companies that have a site. Adding a website column and matching filter would remove that friction. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

FullEnrich establishes itself as a formidable enrichment tool for anyone looking to maximize the yield of their prospecting lists. Its great strength lies in its waterfall logic, which successively queries more than fifteen databases to find emails and mobile phone numbers. This operation allows for completion rates far superior to what a single provider offers, while ensuring excellent deliverability through strict cleaning of invalid data.

The interface opts for simplicity with quick and straightforward handling. Integration into a modern stack is seamless, notably thanks to a very smooth connector with Clayou chatgtp, for example, effective webhooks, and a well-designed API to automate flows to the CRM. On the billing side, the found data model proves particularly fair, especially since the carryover of unused credits and the absence of additional costs per user provide real budgetary flexibility. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

No Gemini connector to date, otherwise the solution is perfect for me Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I appreciate about FullEnrich is that I receive phone numbers of people in leadership positions that would otherwise be very difficult to access. This saves me many days of work to get the necessary contacts. Additionally, I have completely switched to FullEnrich because it provides me with 60-70% of the sought-after C-Level contacts, especially phone numbers that are otherwise hard to reach. The initial setup of FullEnrich was very easy, and I am already recommending it to friends and colleagues as I roll it out for the entire group. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes it happens that I call private phone numbers, and the contact person is then annoyed. It would be helpful if one could verify whether the phone numbers are correct or professional. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find FullEnrich valuable for data enrichment, especially with features like enriching people by their email and LinkedIn profiles to obtain emails, phone numbers, and LinkedIn profiles. This is the most valuable asset to me compared to other options. I'm also happy with the cost-effectiveness, as FullEnrich offers great service at a lower price than Klay. Additionally, the initial setup was super easy, just two buttons at max. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

FullEnrich is a new tool in the market and its current database is very small compared to other tools like Apollo and similar lead tools. It could really benefit from expanding its database over time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really like FullEnrich for its intelligent design and the ability to create lists. I also appreciate the ease of finding information such as numbers and emails, which are very easily accessible. The entire platform is very well thought out and intuitive, making it easy to understand. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I can't manage to find all the employees within companies sometimes, which can be frustrating. I imagine it depends on LinkedIn. Also, there are times when I don't succeed in finding the phone numbers of leads, which remains a main issue, even if it's not necessarily dependent on the tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The most helpful thing about using it is that it makes my work easier. I can access all the pupils for any company, including their phone numbers and emails, which has helped me reach out to them for my B2B work. It also keeps my work well filtered and makes it easier to diagnose the needs of my company. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I dont dislike about it but there may be limitation of the data some of the big companies data are missing and also the bounce rate of the emails are 2-3% though its good than other apps. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really appreciate how FullEnrich cross-references multiple sites and provides up-to-date contact info, which enhances accuracy over using separate tools. It's very easy to use. I like how it integrates with my ATS system as it makes it easy to pull contact information into a candidate's profile, speeding up the process of updating a person's details. The speed and accuracy are essential in recruiting, as they help quickly confirm information and reach out to candidates. Combining multiple tools into one, FullEnrich consolidates information from several contact enrichment platforms, which is super efficient and easy to set up, with no problems. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Really, the only thing I would improve upon is having a Chrome extension. I understand anything they do, but that would be very, very helpful. Just because LinkedIn is a core part of our business. So when we have a LinkedIn profile pulled up, it would be great if we could just use a Chrome extension to collect their contact information quickly. But I understand that's a LinkedIn problem and not a FullEnrich problem. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about FullEnrich is the depth and accuracy of its data. In my experience, the email addresses and phone numbers provided have had accuracy levels of more than 90%, which has been extremely valuable for my prospecting and outreach campaigns. The platform also saves me significant time during research, and I appreciate how easy it is to find and enrich prospect information through a simple interface. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main thing to be careful about is selecting the data points for enrichment. Make sure the Phone option is not selected unless you specifically need it, as phone number enrichment consumes 10 credits. A clearer warning about the credit cost of each enrichment option would help users avoid unintentionally spending credits Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about FullEnrich is its ability to quickly find verified professional contact information from LinkedIn profiles. It saves a significant amount of time, has a good enrichment rate, and integrates well with our outbound workflow. The accuracy of the data and the ease of use make it a valuable tool for recruitment and B2B prospecting. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main drawback is that some contact data can still be outdated or missing, especially for less active professionals. I would also like to see even broader international coverage, more transparent confidence scores for each data source, and additional native integrations with CRM and outreach platforms. Overall, the tool is very effective, but there is still room to improve data freshness and coverage. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.