When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found them equally easy to use. However, Epicor Prophet 21 is easier to set up, and do business with, while IFS Cloud is easier to administer.
Epicor Prophet 21 and IFS Cloud both meet the requirements of our reviewers at a comparable rate.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Epicor Prophet 21 is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of IFS Cloud over Epicor Prophet 21.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Epicor Prophet 21
No pricing available
IFS Cloud
No pricing available
Free Trial
Epicor Prophet 21
No trial information available
IFS Cloud
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.2
86
8.2
223
Ease of Use
7.6
157
7.6
224
Ease of Setup
6.8
118
6.6
157
Ease of Admin
7.2
55
7.4
151
Quality of Support
7.0
79
6.4
217
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Why do the expected, required and promise dates differ between order, production and purchasing screens?
1 Comment
AP
Generally, these dates are driven by lead time information from the inventory supplier information. Often, the expected and required dates are the same. The...Read more
Why does the expected, required and promise dates differ between order, production and purchasing screens?
1 Comment
E
Hello Taylor, Thanks so much for your query.
Production orders have a required date, which is different from an order date as a production order is...Read more
Epicor Prophet 21 has no more discussions with answers
It’s IFS’s Field Service Module. This is a module developed by IFS to support field agents wherein they can key in requirements/service reports from remote...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.